ML18106A964

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:24, 25 April 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Salem,Unit 2. with 981112 Ltr
ML18106A964
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 10/31/1998
From: BAKKEN A C, KNIERIEM R
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LR-N98-0541, LR-N98-541, NUDOCS 9811240169
Download: ML18106A964 (4)


Text

,-.. 1 .. -*

  • Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERA TING REPORT SALEM UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-311 Gentlemen: 12 1999 LR-N98-0541 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original Monthly Operating report for October 1998 is attached.

9811240169 981031. PDR ADOCK 05000311 R PDR /rbk Enclosures c Mr. H.J. Miller Sincerely, eneral Manager -Salem Operations Regional Administrator USNRC, Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19046 The power is in your hands. I 95-2168 REV. 6/94

  • Reporting Period: October 1998
  • DOCKET NO.: 50-311 UNIT: Salem 2 DATE: 11/15/98 COMPLETED BY: R. Knieriem TELEPHONE:

(609) 339-1782 OPERATING DATA REPORT Design Electrical Rating (MWe-Net) 1115 Maximum Dependable Capacity (MWe-Net) 1106 Month Year-to-date No. of hours reactor was critical 745 6201 No. of hours generator was on line (service 745 6088 hours0.0705 days <br />1.691 hours <br />0.0101 weeks <br />0.00232 months <br />) Unit reserve shutdown hours 0.0 0.0 Net Electrical Energy (MWH) 796576 6498002 UNIT SHUTDOWNS NO. DATE TYPE DURATION REASON METHOD OF CORRECTIVE Cumulative 87407 84152 0.0 83673587 F=FORCED (HOURS) ( 1) SHUTTING ACTION/COMMENT S=SCHEDULED (1) Reason A -Equipment Failure (Explain) B -Maintenance or Test C -Refueling D -Regulatory Restriction E -Operator Training/License Examination F -Administrative G -Operational Error (Explain) H -Other Summary: DOWN THE REACTOR (2) (2) Method 1 -Manual 2 -Manual Trip/Scram 3 -Automatic Trip/Scram 4 -Continuation 5 -Other (Explain)

Salem Unit 2 began the month of October 1998, operating at full power. Full power operation continued until October 26. On October 26, power was reduced to 60% after a fault in a 460 volt transformer caused the 22 Steam Generator Feed Pump to trip. Full power operation was restored on October 28, and continued through the end of the month.

.... *

  • DOCKET NO.: 50-311 UNIT: Salem 2 DATE: 11 /15/98 COMPLETED BY: R. B. Knieriem TELEPHONE:

(609) 339-1782

SUMMARY

OF CHANGES, TESTS, AND EXPERIMENTS FOR THE SALEM UNIT 2 GENERATING STATION MONTH: October 1998 The following items completed during October 1998 have been evaluated to determine:

1. If the probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the safety analysis report may be increased; or 2. If a possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated previously in the safety analysis report may be created; or 3. If the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any technical specification is reduced. The 1 OCFR50.59 Safety Evaluations showed that these items did not create a new safety hazard to the plant; nor did they affect the safe shutdown of the reactor. These items did not change the plant effluent releases and did not alter the existing environmental impact. The 1 OCFR50.59 Safety Evaluations determined that no unreviewed safety or environmental questions are involved.

Design Changes -Summary of Safety Evaluations There were no changes in this category implemented during October 1998. Temporary Modifications

-Summary of Safety Evaluations There were no changes in this category implemented during October 1998. Procedures

-Summary of Safety Evaluations There were no changes in this category implemented during October 1998. UFSAR Change Notices -Summary of Safety Evaluations UFSAR Change Notice S98-023, Addition Of Licensing To The Required Members Of The Station Operations Review Committee (SORC) This change added the requirement for a Licensing Department representative to the list contained in the UFSAR of disciplines that are represented on the SORG. Licensing was added to provide additional insight into regulatory requirements,

  • codes, and standards during the review of issues brought before SORG. Review of this change under 1 OCFR50.59 is required because it will result in changes to the facility as described in the SAR. This change only affects the administrative requirements for the composition of the SORG listed in the UFSAR. As such, the change will not increase the probability or consequences of an accident previously analyzed, the malfunction of equipment important to safety, nor create the possibility of an accident or malfunction of a different type. In addition, this change will not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specifications.

UFSAR Change Notice S98-037, Common Nuclear Business Unit (NBU) Radiation Protection Organization This change consolidated the Salem, Hope Creek and Technical Services Radiation Protection (RP) organizations into a single NBU organization.

The organization would be managed by a single Radiation Protection Manager (RPM) who would have responsibility for implementation of the Radiation Protection programs at both the Salem and Hope Creek stations, as well as directing the support functions previously performed by the RP Technical Services group. Review of this change under 1 OCFR50.59 is required because it will result in changes to procedures as described in the SAR. Because this change consists only of the consolidation of the Radiation Protection organization, the change will not increase the probability or consequences of and accident previously evaluated or of a malfunction of equipment important to safety. The change will not create the possibility of an accident or malfunction of a different type. In addition, the change does not affect any Technical Specifications and therefore will not reduce the margin of safety as described in the basis for any Technical Specifications.

Deficiency Reports -Summary of Safety Evaluations There were no changes in this category implemented during October 1998. Other -Summary of Safety Evaluations There were no changes in this category implemented during October 1998.