05000440/FIN-2010005-02
From kanterella
Revision as of 16:46, 8 October 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | |
| Description | The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance and associated non-cited violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, Test Control, for unacceptable preconditioning of the high-pressure core spray (HPCS) suction valves and the HPCS pump minimum flow valve prior to quarterly inservice testing (IST) of the same valves. The inspectors determined that a maintenance delay, which caused a shift in the scheduled performance of the quarterly pump and valve testing of the HPCS system, produced a schedule conflict that resulted in cycling of the HPCS pump suction valves less than 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> prior to scheduled quarterly IST of the same valves. The schedule change also caused the HPCS pump minimum flow valve to be cycled less than 26 hours3.009259e-4 days <br />0.00722 hours <br />4.298942e-5 weeks <br />9.893e-6 months <br /> prior to the eventual IST of that valve. The licensee entered the issue into their corrective action program. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because, if left uncorrected, it could lead to a more significant safety concern. The finding was of very low safety significance because it was not a design/qualification deficiency, did not represent a loss of system safety function, did not result in a loss of function of a single train for greater than its Technical Specification-allowable outage time, did not result in a loss of function of non safety-related risk-significant equipment, and was not risk-significant due to external events. This finding was associated with a cross-cutting aspect in the Work Control component of the Human Performance cross-cutting area because the licensee did not properly evaluate work week schedule changes with regard to the impact on other scheduled work. Specifically, the licensee did not reschedule work in a manner which prevented preconditioning of the HPCS suction and pump minimum flow valves. |
| Site: | Perry  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000440/2010005 Section 1R13 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2010 (2010Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.13 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | M Marshfield D Reeser B Palagi M Phalen J Cameron P Voss C Scott T Hartman P Smagacz |
| CCA | H.5, Work Management |
| INPO aspect | WP.1 |
| ' | |
Finding - Perry - IR 05000440/2010005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Perry) @ 2010Q4
Self-Identified List (Perry)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||