L-2007-053, Turkey Point, Units 3 & 4, 2006 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:57, 23 October 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Turkey Point, Units 3 & 4, 2006 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
ML071360135
Person / Time
Site:  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/04/2007
From: Jefferson W
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR/ADRO
References
L-2007-053
Download: ML071360135 (61)


Text

FPL MMAY .0 L-2007-053 10 CFR 50.36b U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-00001 Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 2006 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Enclosed is the 2006 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4, as required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.3.Should there be any questions or comments regarding this information, please contact James W. Connolly at (305) 246-6632.Turkey Point Nuclear Plant SM Enclosure cc: Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant JJE2S an FPL Group company 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT UNITS 3 & 4 LICENSE NOS. DPR-31, DPR-41 DOCKET NOS. 50-250, 50-251 Data Submitted by: Florida DOH Prepared by: Reviewed by:

2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT- UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary Deviations

/ Missing Data Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection Capabilities Land Use Census Key to Sample Locations Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power and Light Company's Turkey Point Site First Quarter, 2006 Second Quarter, 2006 Third Quarter, 2006 Fourth Quarter, 2006 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, 2006 PAGE 1 1 4 TABLE 1 TABLE 1A TABLE 1B TABLE 2.ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C

2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The data obtained through the Turkey Point Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples are not increasing.

These measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, is well within the limits established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. The sampling period was from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.Additionally, supplemental samples collected by the State of Florida, DOH, do not indicate adverse trends in the radiological environment.

ii 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT- UNITS 3 & 4 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Technical Specifications.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated.

This report covers surveillance activities described in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) meeting the requirements of Unit 3 and Unit 4 Technical Specifications.

II. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. Purpose The purpose of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation.

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.B. Program Description The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted pursuant to Control 5.1 of Turkey Point Unit 3 & 4 ODCM.1. Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:

a. Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 22 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.
b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-1 31, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

c. Surface water samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

1 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from three locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations coinciding with two of the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

g. Ground Water, NEI Initiative:

There were no ground water sampling locations in the REMP for 2006 Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2. Analytical Responsibility:

Radiological environmental monitoring for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH). Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel.

Samples are analyzed at the DOH Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.C. Analytical Results Table 1, Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively.

Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.D. Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors.A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census Summary.2 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT- UNITS 3 & 4 E. Interlaboratory Comparison Progqram The intercomparison program consists of participating in the DOE Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).This program provides similar testing (matrices, nuclides, and levels) as the former EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program and is referred to as the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).The samples are analyzed using the methods applicable to the REMP (gamma spectroscopy, Gross Beta, and Tritium for water).From the MAPEP handbook: Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other performance evaluation programs (PEPs), the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories.

The results for nuclides associated with the REMP are listed in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM.3 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 Ill. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A. Reportingq of Results The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by Control 1.4 of ODCM. Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM Table 5.1-2, for all samples specified by Table 5.1-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation.

These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

B. Interpretation of Results 1. Direct Radiation:

The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations.

The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the pre-operational surveillance program.Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.2. Air Particulates/Radioiodine:

The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents.

All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable 1-131. Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation.

The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements that were made during the pre-operational surveillance program.Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.3. Waterborne, Surface Water: The results of radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements.

Tritium was reported as present in 4 of the 36 surface water samples collected.

These results are consistent with the known subsurface interchange that occurs between the closed cooling canal and its surrounding waters, and the pressure gradients caused by the flow of aquifer subsurface waters in South Florida. The highest reported tritium is less than 11% of the required detection level specified by ODCM Table 5.1-3.4. Waterborne, Sediment: The results are consistent with past measurements.

Only cosmic-ray produced Be-7 and naturally occurring isotopes were identified.

4 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 5. Waterborne, Food Products: The results are consistent with past measurements; only naturally occurring radionuclides were detected.6. Broad Leaf Vegetation The results of radioactivity measurements are consistent with past measurements.

Cs-137 was detected, as in the past, in samples collected from the indicator and control locations.

The maximum concentration reported was less than 10% of the reporting level specified by ODCM Table 5.1-2. No other fission products were detected.7. Land Use Census There were no changes to the land use relative to last year's report.No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20% greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.8. Interlaboratory Comparison Program The State laboratory participated in MAPEP 15 and 16.In MAPEP 15, the results Air Filter, Water and Vegetation matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable.

The Soil matrix had one warning in response to over-estimated U-238 results.There was one not acceptable result; the lab reported an extremely low value for Cs-134 when there was none in the sample. The lab reported a false positive.In MAPEP 16, the results for all matrices were acceptable.

The warning associated with Co-57 in vegetation resulted from the lab reporting a 'zero'without a confidence interval (e.g., zero _ .00x). The W flag was issued because the grading process did not get a response that fit the expected format. The evaluation process for a blank (i.e., un-spiked) expects some small number with a large error. The State lab reported just 0.00 (zero).The results are listed in Attachment C.5 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT- UNITS 3 & 4 C. Conclusions The data obtained through the Turkey Point Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased.

Additionally, supplemental to the ODCM program, sampling of the direct exposure, inhalation, and ingestion pathways, performed by DOH, does not show adverse trends in levels of radiation and radioactive materials in unrestricted areas. The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.6 TABLE 1 Page 1 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31, 2006 (County, State)PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Exposure Rate, 8 8 d 5.4 (84/84)3.9-8.2 NW-10 10 mi., NW 7.6 (4/4)6.9 -8.2 6.2 (4/4)5.7 -6.5 Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 2 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31, 2006 (County, State)PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/m 3 Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range 131 1,260 0.024< MDA< MDA Gross Beta, 260 0.0025 0.016 (208/208)0.005 -0.029 T-72< 1 mi., WSW 0.017 (52/52)0.006 -0.029 0.016 (52/52)0.004 -0.027 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 7 Be 13408 0.0052 0.00069 0.00066 0.1862 (16/16)0.1045 -0.2326 T-72< 1 mi., WSW 0.2066 (4/4)0.1693 -0.2326 0.2014 (4/4)0.1429 -0.2585< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA 0.0273 (10/16)0.0123 -0.0382 T-58 1 mi., NW 0.0318 (2/4)0.0286 -0.0350 0.0298 (2/4)0.0265 -0.0331 Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 3 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31, 2006 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER UNITS: pCi/L Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Tritium, 36 230 Gamma Isotopic, 36 185 (4/24)125 -310 311 (24/24)198 -419< MDA T-81 6 mi., S T-81 6 mi., S 185 (4/12)125 -310 319 (12/12)248 -400<MDA 60 202 (12/12)93 -336< MDA 5 4 Mn 5 9 Fe 5 8 Co 6 0 co 6 5 Zn 9 5 Zr-Nb 1311 1340s 1 3 7 cs 1 4 0 Ba-La 4 8 4 4 8 7< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA 5 5 5 11 Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 4 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31, 2006 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: pCi/kg, DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 6 7 Be 100 140 2 1 0 Pb 2 2 6 Ra 2 3 5 u 2 3 8 U 5 8 Co 6 0 co 1 3 4 Cs 1 3 7 cS 157 (2/4)154- 159 268 (2/4)264 -272 541 (3/4)499 -570 933 (4/4)631 -1500 51 (1/4)777 (2/4)638 -916 T-81 6 mi., S T-81 6 mi., S T-81 6 mi., S T-42< 1 mi., ENE T-81 6 mi., S T-81 6 mi., S 159 (1/2)268 (2/2)264 -272 562 (2/2)550 -570 1066 (2/2)631 -1500 56 (1/2)916 (1/2)49< MDA 148 (2/2)111 -184< MDA 355 (1/2)< MDA< MDA< MDA 9 12 14 12<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 5 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31, 2006 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

UNITS: pCi/kg, WET CRUSTACEA Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f) Range Gamma Isotopic, 3 130 20 2023 (2/2)1899-2147 502 (1/2)T-81 6 mi., S T-81 6 mi., S 2023 (2/2)1899-2147 502 (1/2)1276 (1/1)319 (1/1)48(1/1)< MDA 2 2 8 Ra 54Mn 5 9 Fe 5 8 co 6 0 co 6 5 Zn 1 3 4 Cs 1 3 7 cS 9 16 9 19 17< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA< MDA 9 9 Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 6 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31, 2006 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

FISH UNITS: pCi/kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f) Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 7 Be<MDA<MDA 130 2862 (2/2)2602-3121<MDA T-81 6 mi., S 2862 (2/2)2602-3121 2488 (2/2)2325-2651 5 4 Mn 5 9 Fe 5 8 Co 6 0 Co 6 5 Zn 1340s 1370s 226 Ra 9 16 9 10 17<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA 9 9 20 Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31, 2006 (County, State)Page 7 of 8 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

UNITS: pCi/kg, WET BROAD LEAF VEGETATION Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 7 Be 71 1356 (24/24)453 -2661 4253 (24/24)2564 -6634 T-40 3 mi., W T-41 2 mi., W/NW 1428 (12/12)453-2661 4839 (12/12)2833 -6634 1259 (12/12)606-2162 3409 (12/12)2818 -4342 100 5 8 Co 6 0 Co 1311 134Cs 9 10<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA 9 8 8 52 (19/24)22 -196 1800 (2/24)1337-2264 449 (6/24)157 -785 T-40 3 mi., W T-41 2 mi., W/NW T-41 2 mi., W/NW 56(12/12)22 -196 2264 (1/12)463(3/12)327-670 28(6/12)23 -36 1881 (3/12)877 -3604 274 (3/12)206-313 2 2 6 Ra Number of Non routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 8 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31, 2006 (County, State)NOTES a. The LLD is an 'a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.LLDs in this column are at time of measurement.

The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

b. Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).c. Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.d. Results were based upon the average net response of three elements in a TLD. (Thermoluminescent Dosimeter).

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1A DEVIATIONS

/ MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Location: Dates: Deviation:

Description of Problem: Corrective Action: B) Pathway: Location: Dates: Deviation:

Description of Problem: Corrective Action: C) Pathway: Location: Dates: Deviation:

Description of Problem: Corrective Action: D) Pathway: Location: Dates: Deviation:

Description of Problem: Corrective Action: Airborne, Particulates

& Radioiodine T-64, 22 miles NNE 28 Feb to 8 Mar 2006 Failure to provide continuous monitoring Air sampler pump failure.Replaced pump, verified sampling system as operating correctly.

Airborne, Particulates

& Radioiodine T-57, 4 miles NW 7-14 Nov, 14-21 Nov, 13-19 Dec, 19-27 Dec 2006 Failure to provide continuous monitoring Sporadic power faults caused less than continuous sampler operation; sampler does auto-restart upon power restoration.

Check, reset if needed, breaker, replaced sampler pump (suspected cause), verify equipment operable and operating.

Upgrade power source to sampler system; planned completion in early 2007.Airborne, Particulates

& Radioiodine T-51, 2 miles NNW 6-13 Dec 2006 Failure to provide continuous monitoring Power failure at sampling station.Restored power; verified sampling equipment operation.

Ingestion

-seafood, crustaceans T-67,13 -18 miles North (pathway Control Location)Second half-2006 (semi-annual sampling)Failure to collect sample Insufficient sample collected; half-life versus required LLD concerns precludes compositing a 6 month sample No corrective action applicable.

2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1 B ANALYSIS WITH LLDs ABOVE ODCM TABLE 5.1-3 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1/1/2006 -12/31/2006 The values specified in ODCM Table 5.1-3, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS Distance to Nearest (a. b)7/06 Milk (c) Animal 7/06 Residence (g)7/06 Garden (d)Sector N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE L (e)0 (f)0 0 0 0 0 0 L L L L L L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L L 2.0/354 L S L SSW L SW L WSW L L L L W L WNW 3.7/302 3.7/311 NW 4.5/303 4.2/323 4.6/327 NNW L 4.4/333 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS NOTES a. All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant.b. The following format is used to denote the location: distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)For example, a residence located in the north sector at a distance of 2.0 miles bearing 354 degrees is recorded as 2.0 / 354.c. Potential milk animal locations.

d. Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.e. L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.f. 0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.g. Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:

Sector Distance Description N 1.9 / 349 24-hour Security Staff Building NNW 1.9 / 349 Security booth at park entrance 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 NEAR SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS LL.......

.... 2,." .. ... ,,"' " :", ii!}i~~i~iiii~~i~ii~i~i!}ii~i...............

!!ii.. ........ .... .:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.............:::: " " ',, , d ,'.: ," " ' ...........---. .--- -" .......................?:,,X' I S ! ':,' .. ..... .........

.. ..~~~~~~~~~

..' ,,, .........

.. " ....*........

......... ......, ..: : : :: ::: ::: ::: ::: :: ::: ::: ::: ::. .:.. ....... ........... ... I//?o? ~ ..... ? / o ?.:... ,:[,. :... ..... .y ,. ................... ... ..."'. .'? / , , .' , " '.. '...........

__. ".........i ............... ...... -., , , ..-. : :- :,. -.: .:: : :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::.. .........: :::.. .. : ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: :::.'. ."... ..N N" "V .". .'. ..N. .............NN. .........:::: ::::: ::::: :::::.....

............::: :.. .. ..~~. ... ,....,..x

,>... ........"* : : " :!::::i::i:!

". ...........

i -... : : :... : :: :/. ............

........................-......

...................................---...

2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT- UNITS 3 & 4 DISTANT REMP SAMPLING LOCATIONS M4 N22 South m ite El mm i L~omesTead 5 1 W- 45 0.4:..0 O.,. -.:: ::. : >fl PTN I\WSW-8I.ijr?.

i/+"" N7 :,%z

?% , Vt .. .:::+<: ::>:i

?):>'~~~%

!iii!~~: z~

2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 1 OF 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

QUARTERLY Location (a)Name Description N-2 Convey Point, Parking Area N-7 Black Point Marina Parking Lot N-10 Old Cutler Rd. approx. 196th Street NNW-2 East End North Canal Road NNW-10 Bailes Road & U.S. #1 NW-1 Turkey Point Entrance Road NW-5 Mowry Drive & 117th Avenue NW-1 0 Newton Road, North of Coconut Palm Drive WNW-10 Homestead Middle School W-1 On-Site, North Side of Discharge Canal W-5 Palm Drive & Tallahassee Road W-9 Card Sound Road, 0.6 mile from U.S. #1 WSW-8 Card Sound Road, 3.4 miles from U.S. #1 SW-1 On-Site near Land Utilization Offices SW-8 Card Sound Road, 5 miles from U.S. #1 SSW-5 On-Site, Southwest Corner of Cooling Canals SSW-10 Card Sound Road, west side of Toll Plaza S-5 On-Site, South East Corner of Cooling Canals S-10 Card Sound Road at Steamboat Creek SSE-1 Turtle Point SSE-1 0 Ocean Reef Control NNE-22 Natoma Substation, 2475 SW 16 Ct.aThe location name is the direction sector -approximate distance (miles) 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 2 of 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

WEEKLY Location Name Direction Sector T-51 T-57 T-58 T-52 T-72 NNW NW NW Approximate Distance (miles)2 4 1 9<1 Entrance Area to Biscayne National Park SW 107th Avenue at Mowry Canal Turkey Point Entrance Road Supplemental location used to compensate, per ODCM, for temporary loss of T-57.Just before entrance to Land Utilization's access gate.Description W WSW Control: T-64 NNE 22 Natoma Substation, 2475 SW 16 Ct.Note T-71 NNE 0.5 On site "Red Barn" picnic area.This sampling station may be used as an alternate to T-51.

2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 3 of 4 PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

MONTHLY Location Name T-42 T-81 Control: T-67 Direction Sector ENE Approximate Distance (miles)<1 6 S Description Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park N, NNE 13-18 SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name Direction Sector T-42 T-81 ENE S Approximate Distance (miles)<1 6 13-18 Description Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park Control: T-67 N, NNE 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 4 of 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name T-81 Direction Sector S N, NNE Approximate Distance (miles)6 13-18 Description Card Sound Vicinity of Turkey Point Facility Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park Control: T-67 SAMPLES COLLECTED:

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

MONTHLY Location Name Direction Sector T-40 T-41 W WNW Approximate Distance (miles)3 2 13-18 Description South of Palm Dr. on S.W. 117th Street Extension Palm Dr., West of Old Missile Site near Plant Site Boundary Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park Control: T-67 N, NNE 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE 2006 First Quarter, 2006 Second Quarter, 2006 Third Quarter, 2006 Fourth Quarter, 2006 TP QR IQ-2006 TURKEY POINT SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Sampling First Quarter, 2006 Number of Samples Sample Type Collection Frequency Locations Sampled 1. Direct Radiation 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Quarterly 22 22 Weekly Weekly 5 5 3 3 65 65 3.b. Shoreline Sediment 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 9 3 2 2 3 0 0 9 Total: 173 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection

(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.1 of 7 TP QR IQ-2006 1. DIRECT RADIATION

-TLDs -(UR/hour)Sample Deployment 07-Dec-05 Site Collection 15-Mar-06 N-2 5.9 +/- 0.3 N-7 5.1 +/- 0.2 N-10 5.5 +/- 0.3 NNW-2 5.5 +/- 0.8 NNW-10 5.9 +/- 0.3 NW-1 7.0 +/- 0.3 NW-5 5.0 +/- 0.2 NW-10 8.2 +/- 0.5 WNW-10 6.1 +/- 0.4 W-1 6.9 +/- 0.3 W-5 5.2 +/- 0.3 W-9 5.0 +/- 0.2 Sample Site WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-10 NNE-22 Deployment 07-Dec-05 Collection 15-Mar-06 4.8 +/- 0.4 4.7 +/- 0.3 7.2+/-1.1 5.3 +/-0.3 5.0 +/-0.3 5.0 +/-0.4 6.0 +/-0.3 5.1 +/-0.2 5.8 +/- 0.4 6.5 +/- 0.3 2 of 7 TP QR 1Q-2006 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-(pCi/m 3)Collection T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Date 05-Jan-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 10-Jan-06

<0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 17-Jan-06

<0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 25-Jan-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 02-Feb-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 07-Feb-06

<0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 16-Feb-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 22-Feb-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 28-Feb-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-Mar-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02(A) <0.01 14-Mar-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 21 -Mar-06 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 29-Mar-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 (A) Pump failed, replaced.

Run time est. at 137.5 out of 191.75 hrs.3 of 7 TP QR I Q-2006 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA -(pCi/M 3)Sample Sites Collection Date 05-Jan-06 10-Jan-06 17-Jan-06 25-Jan-06 02-Feb-06 07-Feb-06 16-Feb-06 22-Feb-06 28-Feb-06 08-Mar-06 14-Mar-06 21-Mar-06 29-Mar-06 Average: T51 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.003 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.001 T57 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.003 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.001 T58 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.003 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.001 T64 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.003(A)0.015 +/- 0.002 0.027 +/- 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.001 T72 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.027 +/- 0.003 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.003 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.001 (A) Pump failed, replaced.

Run time est. at 137.5 out of 191.75 hrs.2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)First Quarter, 2006 Sample Site T51 T57 Be-7 0.2142 +/- 0.0175 0.2064 +/- 0.0181 0.2191 +/- 0.0128 0.2585 +/- 0.0180 0.2326 +/- 0.0134 K-40 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37<0.0270 <0.0017 <0.0013<0.0294 <0.0016 <0.0008<0.0156 <0.0013 <0.0010<0.0278 <0.0014 <0.0011<0.0156 <0.0014 <0.0008 Pb-210<0.0629<0.0554 T58 T64 T72 0.0286 +/- 0.0042<0.0545 0.0217 +/- 0.0034 4 of 7 TP QR 1Q-2006 3.a. SURFACE WATER -(pCi/L)Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)T42 17-Jan-06

<144 211 +/-_35 <4 <4 <8 <5 <10 <7 <5 <4 <4 <6 03-Feb-06

<155 383 +/- 33 <3 <3 <7 <5 <9 <6 <5 <4 <4 <6 15-Mar-06

<154 350 +/- 24 <2 <3 <5 <3 <6 <4 <4 <3 <2 <4 T67 17-Jan-06

<144 211 +/- 28 <4 <4 <6 <4 <9 <6 <4 <5 <3 <9 03-Feb-06

<155 209 +/- 27 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <6 <6 <4 <4 <5 14-Mar-06

<154 136 +/- 25 <3 <4 <6 <3 <8 <6 <5 <4 .<4 <7 T81 17-Jan-06

<144 248 +/- 37 <4 <4 <6 <5 <7 <7 <4 <7 <4 <7 07-Feb-06 173 +/- 30 365 +/- 33 <3 <3 <7 <5 <9 <7 <5 <4 <4 <8 14-Mar-06 131 +/- 29 315 +/- 41 <3 <3 <8 <4 <8 <6 <5 <5 <4 <5 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.5 of 7 TP QR IQ-2006 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT -(DCi/ka. dry weiaht)Sample Site T42 T67 T81 Collection Date 03-Feb-06 03-Feb-06 07-Feb-06 Be-7<127<103<112 K-40<246 184 +/- 68 272 +/- 75 Co-58<15<10<11 Co-60<15<10<12 Cs-1 34<19<13<13 Cs- 137<14<13<11 Pb-210<1275<812 555 +/- 266 Ra-226 1500 +/- 180<302 819 +/- 157 Th-232<57<50<51 Others<1047<653<687 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA

-Blue Crab. (oCi/ka. wet weiaht)Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 This sample has not yet been collected.

This sample has not yet been collected.

Ra-228 4.a.2. FISH -Mixed Species -(pCi/kq, wet weight)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 This sample has not yet been collected.

T81 This sample has not yet been collected.

6 of 7 TP QR IQ-2006 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pepper -(pCi/kq, wet weight)Sample Site T40 T41 T67 Collection Date 17-Jan-06 07-Feb-06 14-Mar-06 17-Jan-06 07-Feb-06 14-Mar-06 17-Jan-06 03-Feb-06 14-Mar-06 Be-7 453 +/- 67 1304 +/- 103 631 +/- 37 859 +/- 97 780 +/- 91 1083 +/- 110 729 +/- 69 757 +/- 79 1296 +/- 37 K-40 6576 +/- 281 3149 +/- 182 3367 +/- 93 3844 +/- 247 6336 +/- 262 3969 +/- 229 3399 +/- 173 3938 +/- 201 3062 +/- 85 1-131<17<12<7<18<17<18<12<18<8 Cs-1 34<20<14<7<22<22<20<19<17<7 Cs-1 37 41 +/-7 47+/-7 22+/-4<24<18<24<12<15 23+/-4 Pb-210<2550<2256<947<2725<2477<2379<1397<1972<940 Ra-226<379<366 157 +/- 65 327 +/- 160<376 670 +/- 148<332 313 +/- 151 206 +/-59 7 of 7 TP QR 2Q-2006 TURKEY POINT SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Sampling Second Quarter, 2006 Sample Type 1. Direct Radiation 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Collection Frequency Quarterly Weekly Weekly Monthly Semiannually Locations Sampled Number of Samples 22 22 65 65 5 5 3 0 9 0 Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 2 2 3 2 2 9 Total: 174 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background and with greater than a 50% error term are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection

(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.1 of 7 TP QR 2Q-2006 1. DIRECT RADIATION

-TLDs -(JR/hour)Sample Site N-2 N-7 N-1 0 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-10 W-1 W-5 W-9 Deployment 15-Mar-06 Collection 15-June-06 5.6 +/- 0.2 4.8 +/- 0.2 5.2 +/- 0.2 4.5 +/- 0.1 5.6 +/- 0.2 6.5 +/- 0.2 4.5 +/- 0.3 7.9 +/- 0.3 6.6+/-0.3 6.6 +/- 0.2 5.7 +/- 0.3 4.9 +/- 0.3 Sample Site WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-10 NNE-22 Deployment 15-Mar-06 Collection 15-June-06 5.3 +/-0.1 5.3 +/- 0.2 6.0 +/- 0.2 5.1 +/-0.1 5.3 +/- 0.3 4.9 +/- 0.2 5.8+/-0.1 4.7 +/- 0.2 5.6 +/- 0.2 6.4 +/- 0.5 2 of 7 TP QR 2Q-2006 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-(pCi/m 3)Collection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 04-Apr-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 11-Apr-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 18-Apr-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 25-Apr-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 02-May-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 10-May-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 16-May-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 23-May-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 30-May-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 07-Jun-06

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 14-Jun-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 21 -Jun-06 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 27-Jun-06

<0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 3 of 7 TP QR 2Q-2006 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA -(pCi/m 3)Sample Site Collection Date 04-Apr-06 11 -Apr-06 18-Apr-06 25-Apr-06 02-May-06 10-May-06 16-May-06 23-May-06 30-May-06 07-Jun-06 14-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 27-Jun-06 Average: T51 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.001 T57 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.001 T58 0.020 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.029 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.001 T64 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.001 T72 0.020 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.001 2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)Second Quarter, 2006 Sample Site T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Be-7 0.1814 +/- 0.0125 0.1881 +/- 0.0128 0.1970 +/- 0.0139 0.2061 +/- 0.0127 0.2225 +/- 0.0158 K-40<0.0230 Cs-134<0.0012 Cs-1 37<0.0009 Pb-210 0.0324 +/- 0.0036 0.0279 +/- 0.0040<0.0159 <0.0014 <0.0011<0.0229 <0.0011<0.0205 <0.0011<0.0004 0.0350 +/- 0.0047<0.0011 0.0265 +/- 0.0034<0.0251 <0.0025 <0.0012<0.0591 4 of 7 TP QR 2Q-2006 3.a. SURFACE WATER -(rpCi/L)Sample Site Collection Date T42 11-Apr-06 17-May-06 13-Jun-06 T67 11 -Apr-06 16-May-06 13-Jun-06 T81 11-Apr-06 17-May-06 13-Jun-06 Zr-95 H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 (A)<148 419 +/- 36 <3 <3 <8 <4 <10 <5<144 375 +/- 35 <4 <4 <6 <5 <8 <6<145 330 +/- 35 <3 <4 <9 <4 <8 <7<148 328 +/- 33 <3 <3 <8 <4 <7 <5<144 336 +/- 30 <4 <3 <8 <4 <7 <6<145 119 +/- 20 <2 <2 <5 <3 <4 <4<146 333 +/- 30 <3 <3 <6 <5 <8 <6<144 400 +/- 35 <4 <4 <7 <4 <7 <6<145 331 +/- 31 <3 <3 <7 <4 <8 <5 Ba-140 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (B)<5 <4 <4 <8<5 <5 <4 <4<5 <4 <5 <5<4 <4 <3 <8<6 <5 <4 <6<3 <3 <2 <4<4 <4 <4 <5<5 <4 <4 <5<5 <4 <4 <6 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.5 of 7 TP QR 2Q-2006 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT -(DCi/ka. dry weiaht)Sample Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Pb-21 0 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 These samples were previously collected.

4.a.1. CRUSTACEA

-(pCi/k.q, wet weight)Sample Site T67 Collection Date 25-May-06 28-Apr-06 K-40 1276 +/- 65 1899 +/- 245 Mn-54<6 Co-58<7 Fe-59<16 Co-60<7 Zn-65<15 Cs- 134<7 Cs-137<6 Ra-226 319 +/- 48 Ra-228 48 +/- 9<31 <26 <103 <32 <47 <36<29<648<118 T81 4.a.2. FISH -(pCi/kc, wet weiaht)Sample Site T67 Collection Date 13-Apr-06 27-Apr-06 K-40 2651 +/-260 3121 +/-289 Mn-54 Co-58<26 <45 Fe-59<75 Co-60<36 Zn-65<62 Cs-1 34<31 Cs-137<30 Ra-226<490 Ra-228<135<34 <29 <99 <30 <79 T81<30<30<538<111 6 of 7 TP QR 2Q-2006 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pepper -(pCi/ka.wet weiaht)Sample Site T40 T41 T67 Collection Date 11 -Apr-06 16-May-06 13-Jun-06 11-Apr-06 16-May-06 13-Jun-06 11 -Apr-06 16-May-06 13-Jun-06 Be-7 1946 +/- 107 823 +/- 46 1443 _ 90 1447 + 106 812 +/-+83 1100 _ 83 2162 _ 97 772 +/-66 606 _ 61 K-40 4301 +/-221 3483 +/- 99 3088 +/- 180 5852 +/- 236 2833 +/- 176 4699 +/- 212 2860 +/- 177 3566 +/- 176 2818 +/- 165 1-131<17<11<16<14<23<14<16<21<13 Cs-1 34<19<8<18<16<16<15<18<16<13 Cs-1 37 65 +/-11 36+/-4 196 +/- 12 47 10 62 +/-+10 35_+/-6 29_+/-8 25 +/- 6<14 Pb-210<2073<1099<2051<2146<2281<1894<2394 3604 +/- 654<1672 Pb-212<81<38<72<74<73<61<77<73<58 Ra-226<337<159 785 +/- 125<330<314<293<339 303 +/- 113<262 7 of 7 TP QR 3Q-2006 TURKEY POINT SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Sampling Third Quarter, 2006 Sample Typ~e 1. Direct Radiation 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment 4. Ingestion 4.a.Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Collection Frequency Quarterly Weekly Weekly Monthly Semiannually Locations Sampled 22 Number of Samples 22 5 5 3 3 65 65 9 3 Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 2 2 3 0 0 9 Total: 173 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background and with greater than a 50% error term are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection

(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.I of 7 TP QR 3Q-2006 1. DIRECT RADIATION

-TLDs -(/JR/hour)

Sample Site N-2 N-7 N-1 0 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-10 W-1 W-5 W-9 Deployment 15-Jun-06 Collection 1 3-Sep-06 5.4 +/- 0.4 4.5 +/- 0.2 4.9 +/- 0.3 4.2 +/- 0.2 5.4 +/- 0.4 6.0 +/- 0.4 4.1 +/-0.2 6.9 +/- 0.4 5.7 +/- 0.3 6.0 +/- 0.4 4.9 +/- 0.4 4.2 +/- 0.2 Sample Site WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-10 NNE-22 Deployment 15-Jun-06 Collection 15-Sep-06 4.6 +/- 0.2 4.7 +/- 0.3 5.2 +/- 0.3 4.2 +/- 0.2 4.7 +/- 0.2 4.6 +/- 0.3 5.5 +/- 0.3 4.2 +/- 0.2 5.6 +/- 0.4 5.7 +/- 0.4 2 of 7 TP QR 3Q-2006 2.a. IODINE-131 Collection Date 05-Jul-06 11 -Jul-06 20-Jul-06 25-Jul-06 01-Aug-06 08-Aug-06 15-Aug-06 23-Aug-06 29-Aug-06 06-Sep-06 12-Sep-06 19-Sep-06 26-Sep-06 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-(DCi/m 3 1 T51<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02 T57<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02 T58<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02 T64<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02 T72<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.04<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02 3 of 7 TP QR 3Q-2006 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA -(pCi/m 3)Sample Site Collection Date 05-Jul-06 11-Jul-06 20-Jul-06 25-Jul-06 01 -Aug-06 08-Aug-06 15-Aug-06 23-Aug-06 29-Aug-06 06-Sep-06 12-Sep-06 19-Sep-06 26-Sep-06 Average: T51 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.014 0.011 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.006 0.011 0.017 0.017 0.013+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002* 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.002+ 0.001 T57 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.001 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.001 T58 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.001 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 T64 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 T72 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.001 2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)Third Quarter, 2006 Sample Site T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Be-7 0.1045 +/- 0.0101 0.1216 +/-_0.0132 0.1303 +/- 0.0147 0.1429 +/- 0.0165 0.1693 +/- 0.0136 K-40<0.0147 Cs-1 34<0.0013 Cs-1 37<0.0009<0.0211 <0.0012 <0.0008<0.0210 <0.0018 <0.0014<0.0277 <0.0018 <0.0009<0.0264 <0.0019 <0.0013 Pb-210 0.0166 +/- 0.0035 0.0123 +/- 0.0051<0.0473<0.0556<0.0514 4 of 7 TP QR 3Q-2006 3.a. SURFACE WATER -(DCi/L)Sample Site Collection Date T42 12-Jul-06 08-Aug-06 13-Sep-06 T67 12-Jul-06 08-Aug-06 12-Sep-06 T81 12-Jul-06 08-Aug-06 12-Sep-06 H-3<135<140<141<135<140<141 310 +/- 48 125 +/- 46<141 Zr-95 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 (A)296 +/- 23 314 +/- 22 198 +/- 29 287 +/- 28 136 +/- 22 241 +/- 26 361 +/- 17 326 +/- 23 273 +/- 25<2<2<4<4<4<3<2<2<2 Ba-140 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (B)<2<2<3<4<4<2<2<2<3<5<5<7<7<7<6<3<5<5<3<3<4<4<4<4<2<2<3<5<5<8<7<7<6<3<5<6<4<4<6<6<6<6<3<4<6<3 <3<4 <3<5 <4<5 <4<6 <4<5 <4<3 <2<4 <3<4 <4<2<2<4<3<4<3<2<2<3<4<3<6<5<5<5<2<3<5 (A) -These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B) -These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-1 40, either based on direct measurement of Ba-1 40 or based on ingrowth of La-1 40, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.5 of 7 TP QR 3Q-2006 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT -(r'Ci/kc, dry weiaht)Sample Site T42 T67 T81 Collection Date 12-Jul-06 12-Jul-06 12-Jul-06 Be-7 154 +/- 44<73 159 +/- 31 K-40<132 111 +/-34 264 +/- 44 Co-58<8<6<7 Co-60<9<6<7 Cs-1 34<10<7<8 Cs-i 37<9<7<7 Pb-210 499 +/- 231<373 570 +/- 155 Ra-226 631 +/- 125 355 +/- 117 782 +/- 89 Th-232<43 26+/-8 51 +11 U-235 49_+/-7<58 56 +/- 6 U-238 638 +/- 216<283 916 +/- 152 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA

-(DCi/ka. wet weiaht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 T67 This sample has not yet been collected.

T81 This sample has not yet been collected.

4.a.2. FISH -(pCi/kq, wet weight)Ra-228 Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 This sample has not yet been collected This sample has not yet been collected 6 of 7 TP QR 3Q-2006 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pepper -(pCi/k.q, wet weight)Sample Site T40 T41 T67 Collection Date 12-Jul-06 08-Aug-06 12-Sep-06 12-Jul-06 08-Aug-06 12-Sep-06 12-Jul-06 08-Aug-06 12-Sep-06 Be-7 1660 +/- 75 1192 +/- 76 2661 +/-109 1701 +/-51 1637 _ 114 1669 _ 101 1127 +/- 63 1161 +/-_87 1152 +/- 66 K-40 3284 +/- 126 2564 +/- 134 2978 +/- 175 6282 +/- 123 6634 +/-286 4805 +/- 227 3273 +/- 121 3363 +/- 139 3834 +/- 151 1-131<16<15<24<11<24<23<15<16<13 Cs-134<8<10<15<9<20<15<10<11<12 Cs-1 37 31 +/-_5 52 +/- 6 35 +/- 8<8 23-+/-7 88 +/- 8<8<10<8 Pb-210<652<1558<2026<499<2600<2299<571<711<624 Ra-226<194 360 +/- 109<309<162<365<313<190<237<229 7 of 7 TP QR 4Q-2006 TURKEY POINT SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 2006 Number of Samples Sample Type Collection Frequency Locations Sampled 1. Direct Radiation 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish Quarterly 22 22 Weekly Weekly 5 5 3 3 65 65 Monthly Semiannually 9 0 Semiannually Semiannually 2 2 3 1 2 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly 9 Total: 173 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background and with greater than a 50% error term are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection

(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.I of 7 TP QR 4Q-2006 1. DIRECT RADIATION

-TLDs -CuR/hour)Sample Site N-2 N-7 N-10 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-10 W-1 W-5 W-9 Deployment 13-Sep-06 Collection 06-Dec-06 5.7 +/-0.4 4.4 +/- 0.3 5.4 +/- 0.3 4.4 +/- 0.3 5.0 +/- 0.3 6.3 +/- 0.3 4.2 +/- 0.3 7.2 +/-0.4 5.8 +/- 0.4 5.9 +/- 0.4 4.6 +/- 0.4 3.9 +/- 0.2 Sample Site WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-10 NNE-22 Deployment 13-Sep-06 Collection 06-Dec-06 4.8 +/- 0.3 5.0 +/- 0.3 5.4 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 4.9 +/- 0.3 4.9 +/- 0.3 5.4 +/- 0.4 4.4 +/-0.2 5.6 +/-0.6 6.2 +/-0.3 2 of 7 TP QR 4Q-2006 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-(pCi/m 3)Collection Date 04-Oct-06 11 -Oct-06 17-Oct-06 24-Oct-06 31 -Oct-06 07-Nov-06 14-Nov-06 21 -Nov-06 28-Nov-06 06-Dec-06 13-Dec-06 19-Dec-06 27-Dec-06 T51<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01 (C)<0.02<0.01 T57<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02(A)<0.04(B)<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03(D)<0.01(E)T58 T64 T72<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.01<0.01 (A) No power; GFI receptacle was reset; estimated run time 44.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.(B) No power; GFI receptacle was reset; pump replaced; estimated run time 19 hours2.199074e-4 days <br />0.00528 hours <br />3.141534e-5 weeks <br />7.2295e-6 months <br />.(C) No power to the box; pump was still hot indicating power lost recently; experienced a normal run time of 172.417 hours0.00483 days <br />0.116 hours <br />6.894841e-4 weeks <br />1.586685e-4 months <br />; checked again on 12/15/06 at 1430 and estimated power was restored that morning at 0945.(D) No power; GFI receptacle was reset; estimated run time 19 hours2.199074e-4 days <br />0.00528 hours <br />3.141534e-5 weeks <br />7.2295e-6 months <br />.(E) No power; GFI receptacle was reset; estimated run time 158 hours0.00183 days <br />0.0439 hours <br />2.612434e-4 weeks <br />6.0119e-5 months <br />.3 of 7 TP QR 4Q-2006 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA -(DCi/m 3)Sample Sites Collection Date 04-Oct-06 11-Oct-06 17-Oct-06 24-Oct-06 31 -Oct-06 07-Nov-06 14-Nov-06 21 -Nov-06 28-Nov-06 06-Dec-06 13-Dec-06 19-Dec-06 27-Dec-06 Average: T51 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.003 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.025 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.025 +/- 0.003 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002(C)0.016 +/- 0.003 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.001 T57 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.006(A)0.019 +/- 0.002(B)0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002(D)0.008 +/- 0.002(E)0.015 +/- 0.001 T58 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.001 T64 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.004 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.001 T72 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.029 +/- 0.003 0.028 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.001 (A) No power; GFI receptacle was reset; estimated run time 44.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.(B) No power; GFI receptacle was reset; pump replaced; estimated run time 19 hours2.199074e-4 days <br />0.00528 hours <br />3.141534e-5 weeks <br />7.2295e-6 months <br />.(C) No power to the box; pump was still hot indicating power lost recently; experienced a normal run time of 172.417 hours0.00483 days <br />0.116 hours <br />6.894841e-4 weeks <br />1.586685e-4 months <br />; checked again on 12/15/06 at 1430 and estimated power was restored that morning at 0945.(D) No power; GFI receptacle was reset; estimated run time 19 hours2.199074e-4 days <br />0.00528 hours <br />3.141534e-5 weeks <br />7.2295e-6 months <br />.(E) No power; GFI receptacle was reset; estimated run time 158 hours0.00183 days <br />0.0439 hours <br />2.612434e-4 weeks <br />6.0119e-5 months <br />.2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES

-GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)Fourth Quarter, 2006 Sample Site T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Be-7 0.1807 +/- 0.0123 0.2123 +/- 0.0144 0.1971 +/- 0.0155 0.1980 +/- 0.0127 0.2018 +/- 0.0124 K-40<0.01 81 Cs-134<0.0009 Cs-137<0.0010 Pb-210 0.0247 +/- 0.0048 0.0357 +/- 0.0047<0.0242 <0.0014 <0.0013<0.0274 <0.0017 <0.0013<0.01 86 <0.0010 <0.0009<0.0171 <0.0012 <0.0007<0.0562 0.0331 +/- 0.0039 0.0382 +/- 0.0038 4 of 7 TP QR 4Q-2006 3.a. SURFACE WATER (oCi/L)Sample Site Collection Date T42 11-Oct-06 14-Nov-06 06-Dec-06 T67 11-Oct-06 14-Nov-06 05-Dec-06 T81 11-Oct-06 14-Nov-06 06-Dec-06 H-3<146<142<143<146<142<142<146<143<143 Zr-95 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 (A)214 +/- 29 <3 <3 <7 <4 <9 <6 299 +/- 31 <3 <4 <8 <4 <8 <5 254 +/- 30 <4 <4 <6 <4 <7 <7 102 +/- 29 <3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <6 93 +/-25 <4 <2 <7 <4 <9 <6 226 +/-29 <3 <3 <6 <4 <7 <6 264 +/-24 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <4 327 +/-45 <3 <3 <10 <5 <9 <9 285 +/-23 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <3 Ba-140 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (B)<5 <5 <4 <4<4 <3 <4 <7<5 <4 <4 <4<6 <4 <3 <6<5 <4 <3 <8<6 <4 <3 <3<3 <2 <2 <3<6 <6 <5 <7<3 <2 <2 <3 (A) -These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B) -These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-1 40, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.5 of 7 TP QR 4Q-2006 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT -(ICi/kg, dry weight)Sample Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 These samples were previously collected.

Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Pb-21 0 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA

-(pCi/kq, wet weight)Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Unable to obtain any blue crabs after numerous attempts.31 -Oct-06 2147 +/- 201 <25 <32 <74 <32 <55 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228<30<25 502 +/- 220 <124 4.a.2. FISH -(DCi/ka. wet weiaht)Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date 27-Oct-06 20-Oct-06 K-40 2325 +/- 182.2602 +/- 221 Mn-54 Co-58<18 <18<24 <28 Fe-59<61<66 Co-60<19<32 Zn-65<39<66 Cs-1 34<24<27 Cs-137<16<27 Ra-226<278<466 Ra-228<66<115 6 of 7 TP QR 4Q-2006 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pepper -(pCi/k.q, wet weight)Sample Site T40 T41 T67 Collection Date 11 -Oct-06 14-Nov-06 06-Dec-06 11-Oct-06 14-Nov-06 06-Dec-06 11 -Oct-06 14-Nov-06 05-Dec-06 Be-7 1703 +/- 46 1429 +/- 37 1893 +/- 47 1423 +/- 87 1385 +/- 90 1512 +/- 97 2032 +/- 41 1755 +/- 36 1563 +/- 77 K-40 3425 +/- 90 3915 +/- 87 3867 +/- 98 4346 +/- 206 5402 +/- 207 3067 _ 168 3028 _ 62 3421 +/-60 4342 _ 152 1-131<10<9<9<22<22<19<8<7<19 Cs-134<8<7<7<19<14<15<5<4<11 Cs-1 37 36+/-4 76_+/-4 29_+/-4<20 32 +/-_6 34 +/-_5 23 +/- 3 36_+/-3 32 +/-_6 Pb-210<962<861 1337 +/- 308<2180<1941 2264 +/- 722 1161 +/-152 877 +/- 154<812 Pb-212<33<28<33<79<69<70<35<31<82 Ra-226<145<125<135<270 393 +/- 152<279<109<100<247 7 of 7 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MAPEP 15, June 2006 AND MAPEP 16, December 2006 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 DOE-MAPEP 15 RESULTS Result Ref. Flag Value (Evaluation)

Acceptance Ranqe Radionuclide Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter MN54 < MDA C057 4.300 C060 2.170 ZN65 3.820 CS134 2.920 CS137 2.580 Am-241 0.100 Pu-238 0.076 None 4.096 2.180 3.423 2.934 2.531 0.093 0.067 0.481 Matrix: GrF Air Filter Bq/filter Gross Beta 0.444 Matrix: MaS Soil Bq/kg K40 MN54 C057 C060 ZN65 CS134 CS137 U238 AM241 601.47 348.23 669.5 428.93 669.83 2.11 335.37 50.10 59.02 604 346.77 656.29 447.1 657.36 None 339.69 38.85 57.08 952.01 315 166.12 153.5 228.16 95.1 None 1.3 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A N A W A A A A A A A A A 0.24-0.72 Not Applicable 2.87 -5.32 1.53-2.84 2.40 -4.45 2.05 -3.81 1.77 -3.29 0.07-0.12 0.05 -0.09 423-785 242.74 -450.80 459.4 -853.18 312.97-581.23 460.15- 854.57 237.78 -441.60 27.20 -50.50 39.96 -74.20 666.41 -1,238 220.50 -409.50 116.28-15.96 107.45 -199.55 159.71 -296.61 66.57- 123.63 Not Applicable 0.91-1.69 Matrix: MaW H3 MN54 C057 C060 ZN65 CS134 CS137 AM241 Water Bq/L 1039.3 328.47 162.17 154.50 242.77 95.36< MDA 0.99 Matrix: RdV Vegetation, Bq/sample:

MN54 5.76 C057 8.89 C060 4.10 ZN65 9.39 CS134 < MDA CS137 2.84 6.247 8.578 4.52 9.798 None 3.074 A A A A A A 4.37-8.12 6.00-11.15 3.16-5.88 6.89- 12.74 Not Applicable 2.15-4.00 N = Not Acceptable Evaluation

A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, 2006 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT -UNITS 3 & 4 DOE-MAPEP 16 RESULTS Result Ref. Flag Value (Evaluation)

Acceptance Ranae Radionuclide Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter MN54 C057 C060 ZN65 CS134 CS137 AM241 Matrix: GrF Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 2.20 2.93 1.66-0.006 3.29 2.03 0.16 0.39 Matrix: MaS Soil Bq/kg K40 622.13 MN54 625.4 C057 721.33 C060 2.698 ZN65 965.1 CS134 457.75 CS137 545.2 Matrix: MaW Water Bq/L H3 469.59 MN54 -0.05 C057 212.2 C060 48.54 N163 98.82 ZN65 190.9 SR90 17.7 CS134 113.57 CS137 202.80 Matrix: RdV Vegetation, Bq/sample:

MN54 7.77 C057 0.00 C060 5.26 ZN65 5.68 CS134 6.99 CS137 5.03 AM241 0.01 1.92 2.582 1.577 0 3.117 1.805 0.142 0.359 604 594.25 676.33 1.98 903.61 452.13 525.73 428.85 0 213.08 47.5 118.62 176.37 15.69 112.82 196.14 8.351 0 5.806 5.984 7.487 5.495 0 A A A A A A A A 1.10- 2.05 1.81 -3.36 1.10- 2.05 0 +/- 0.027 2.20 -4.09 1.26 -2.35 0.10-0.19 0.18- 0.54 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A W A A A A A N = Not 423.00 -785.00 415.98 -772.52 473.43 -879.23 None Listed 632.53 -1,175 316.49 -587.77 368.01 -683.45 300.20 -557.50 0 +/- 0.11 149.16 -277.00 33.20 -61.80 83.03- 154.21 123.46 -229.28 10.98 -20.40 78.97 -146.66 137.30 -254.98 5.85 -10.86 0 t 0.01 4.06 -7.55 4.19 -7.78 5.24 -9.73 3.85-7.14 0 +/- 0.03 Acceptable Evaluation

A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, From the MAPEP handbook: Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other PEPs, the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories.