ML052430026
| ML052430026 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
| Issue date: | 10/18/2005 |
| From: | Araguas C J NRC/NRR/DRIP/RNRP |
| To: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
| Araguas C J, NRR/DRIP/RNRP,415-3637 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML052150345 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML052430026 (14) | |
Text
October 18, 2005ORGANIZATION:Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF JULY 27, 2005, MEETING WITH NEI TO DISCUSSNEI 04-01, REVISION D, "DRAFT INDUSTRY GUIDELINE FOR COMBINED LICENSE (COL) APPLICANTS UNDER 10 CFR PART 52,"AND THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW PERFORMED DURING THE EVALUATION OF A COL APPLICATIONOn July 27, 2005, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) held a public meeting withNEI at NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss NEI's,draft COL applicant guidance document and how operational programs should be addressed during the COL process. NEI and NRC discussed the electronic submission of a COLapplication, the Standard Review Plan (SRP) update, piping design acceptance criteria (DAC),probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), and the public meetings on updating SRP Section 12.5,?Radiation Protection." The meeting attendees are listed in Attachment 1 and the meetingagenda is given in Attachment 2.Several handouts were distributed during this meeting. They are listed at the end of thismemorandum with their accession numbers. All the handouts can be accessed through the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) by accession number.
ADAMS provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. If you do not have access toADAMS or if you have problems in accessing the handouts in ADAMS, call the NRC PublicDocument Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737 or e-mail pdr@nrc.gov. NEI 04-01 DISCUSSIONSBelow is a summary of the topics discussed in the meeting in the order they appeared in theagenda. Several action items were identified and are summarized at the end of this summary.
Section numbers refer to NEI 04-01 unless otherwise stated.Implementation of Operational ProgramsNEI said that the NEI 04-01 meetings had provided good discussions on the operationalprograms identified in the NEI letter dated May 14, 2001. As a result of the June meeting, NEIprovided the NRC with a proposal in an e-mail dated July 18, 2005 (Attachment 3). NEIproposed a list of 17 operational programs specifically required by NRC regulations. NEI saidthat the operational programs would be described in the final safety analysis report (FSAR), and would reflect past practice and current guidance (e.g., SRPs). NEI stated that these programs and their implementation would be clearly and sufficiently described in terms of scope and level of detail to allow the staff to make a reasonable assurance finding on program acceptability. Asa result, NEI stated that it no longer found it necessary to identify key elements of operational programs in a COL application as was proposed by the NRC in the June 2005, public meeting. With this level of detailed information in the FSAR, NEI said the regulations and the oversight process (construction and inspection program) should be a significant source of establishing reasonable assurance.NEI said it now envisions five license conditions for operational programs. NEI looked at somerecent operating licenses and some standard license conditions in developing the five license conditions. The five license conditions include the implementation schedule of the 17 operational programs, as well as specific license conditions for fire protection emergency preparedness and physical security programs. NEI said the most efficient way of preparing for the inspections would be to give the staff the implementation schedules for these programs. NEI said it had made minor changes to license conditions 2 through 5 from the June 2005public meeting. These changes were incorporated to clarify the language. The staff agreed with NEI's proposed language changes to license conditions 2 and 3, and further iterated the use of Generic Letter 86-10 as guidance for fire protection. For license condition 4, the staff asked that "address" be changed to "resolve and correct." NEI agreed to this change. The staff said that it was concerned about changes to the FSAR after issuance of the COL. NEI said that the regulations require regular updates be provided to the NRC for the designcontrol document (DCD) and the FSAR. Specifically, for operational programs described in theDCD, semiannual reports on departures from the generic DCD would be provided until fuel loadand annual updates of the plant-specific DCD would also be provided until fuel load. TheFSAR, will be updated annually between issuance of a COL and fuel load in accordance with 10CFR 50.71(e). This update includes changes to the operational programs described in the site-specific portion of the FSAR. NEI also said that for operational programs identified in the implementation schedule license condition, NRC inspectors would be informed of c hangesimplemented since the most recent plant-specific DCD/FSAR update when the inspectorsarrived on site and identified the operational program or programs to be inspected.NRC provided a list of operational programs that were included in the Westinghouse AP1000final safety evaluation report COL action item list (attachment 4). NRC said that COL actionitems are required to be addressed by the COL applicant. While NRC did not have time toevaluate this list of programs fully, some of these operational programs may need to be reviewed by the staff in a COL application. Those programs should be included in the implementation schedule license condition proposed by NEI. NRC said that the final list ofoperational programs should be determined sometime in the future, such as when the first COL application is filed to ensure that the appropriate operational programs are included in the license condition.NEI said the scope of its list is focused on programs implemented after the COL is issued andexplicitly required by regulation. NEI said it had considered a broad scope of programs but only considered those that meet the above criteria to be appropriate for a license condition. NEI said that it believes that this list of programs would be valid for any type of light water reactor design being considered. NRC acknowledged that NEI had expanded the list from thoseoriginally proposed by NEI for exclusion from inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC) in its letter dated May 14, 2001. NRC said it will consider the sc ope ofoperational programs further as it develops a response to the Commission staff requirements memorandum on SECY-04-0032, ?Programmatic Information Needed for Approval of a Combined License Application Without ITAAC."NEI also commented on whether it would be necessary to incorporate a table of operationalprograms and associated milestones in the FSAR. The staff emphasized the importance of placing these tables in the FSAR. After some discussion, NEI and NRC decided that the tableswould be incorporated into the FSAR.NRC asked NEI to provide a letter describing the screening process for required operationalprograms and a proposed list of the operational programs subject to the license conditions discussed in its handout. NEI agreed to provide a letter with this information by the end of August 2005. Training Program Implementation (eg. Timeline)NEI said that it had a draft version of the timeline but was still coordinating with INPO andtherefore did not have anything to present during the meeting. NEI said it planned to continueto coordinate with INPO and would discuss this topic at a future NEI 04-01 public meeting.Standard Review Plan (SRP) Update PrioritiesThe staff gave NEI an overview of the SRP update program as well as the program. BySeptember 2005, the staff plans to have an SRP update schedule made publicly available. By October 2005, the staff expects to have technically updated approximately thirty sections of the SRP; which will be made publicly available after they complete the SRP update procedures. Ina separate activity, the staff stated their intent to make the SRP publicly available in its entiretyby October 2005. The staff also addressed the latest concerns about the future of Review Standard (RS) 002 forreviewing an early site permit (ESP) application. Specifically, the staff is waiting for lessons learned from the current three early site permit reviews, and once this information has been gathered the update will begin. It is anticipated that the technical revisions will be m ade to thecorresponding SRP sections and RS-002 will no long contain guidance but provide pointers tothe appropriate sections of the SRP. Prior to the meeting, the staff had asked NEI to provide a list of priorities regarding the SRPupdate. NEI stated that it did not have a formal list but that it would provide the staff with thislist by the end August. NEI did provide the staff with some discussion on what it currently sees as having high priorities--Chapters 13, 17, and 19, Conduct of Operations, Quality Assurance,Severe Accidents, respectively.Piping Design Acceptance Criteria (DAC)NEI was not prepared to formally discuss its approach to piping DAC. NEI said that it would beprepared to discuss its approach at a later date. Although no formal plans were outlined, NRC and NEI did exchange information in some of the issues regarding piping DAC. The staff asked whether Westinghouse would initiate the design work for piping before a COL application and whether the design work would be submitted in conjunction with a COL application. The staff said that DAC, which includes the design portion and the as-built verification, is part of ITAAC, and that it may be possible to resolve the design portions of piping DAC before the COL is issued. NEI said it agreed with the staff's thoughts on resolving the design portions before theCOL.The staff asked about industry's intentions regarding piping DAC. NEI said that severalscenarios are being considered for how to handle this issue. One scenario discussed involved piping DAC being satisfied prior to a COL application. Another involved the applicant addressing this work at the COL stage. The staff said that industry needs to decide on how the design work will be handled. NEI said that it will work with Westinghouse and that at the nextpublic meeting NEI will have prepared a definitive approach to handling this issue.NEI also asked the staff at what point the staff wanted to get involved in piping DAC. The staffsaid it wanted to be involved during the COL application stage and after the plant is built during ITAAC. The staff said that one of its primary concerns is what happens if problems are discovered during the ITAAC stage. NEI suggested considering an engineering design verification process to look at piping at the COL stage. The staff said that engineering design verifications were used in the 1980s and might work well for verifying piping design. Both NEI
and NRC agreed to consider the topics discussed and bring this topic up in a future NEI 04-01public meeting.Electronic Submission of Combined License ApplicationsNEI provided a handout at the meeting which is Attachment 5 to this meeting summary. NEIsaid that several compatibility problems have been encountered during attempts to address therequests of multiple NRC staff within different sections. In its handout, NEI provided the staffwith what it considered the three major issues. NEI discussed the conflicting guidance on file size. ADAMS guidance limits files to 50 megabytes (MB) and suggests that numerous small files be avoided, where as the website publishers want files no larger than 5 MB. NEI said a possible solution would be for industry to provide as few files as practical and that each file be less than 50 MB in size and that only one version be submitted. NEI said that if the staffchooses to place the document on the NRC website as multiple 5 MB files, the staff shouldplace a disclaimer that the website version of the application is not the as-submitted application.The second issue that NEI identified is that ADAMS does not accept files containing objectsusing link protocols such as object linking and embedding (OLE) or dynamic data exchange (DDE). NEI said it thinks that this has created a misconception about the functionality of links in ADAMS. NEI said that links between Adobe PDF files are retained if the files are loaded directly in ADAMS and if the file names remain the same. NEI proposed that industry provide the entire application in pdf format with files named according to NRC guidance so that theycan be loaded into ADAMS retaining the links within the documents.The third issue that NEI identified is that the NRC staff has occasionally requested specific filetypes that do not meet the ADAMS formats. The staff addressed the first issue regarding the discrepancies in file size between the ADAMSversion and the website version by saying that the website version is not required but the staffthinks that it is easier to work with. The staff said it would look into NEI's suggestion of placing a disclaimer on the web for PDF files that NRC breaks into smaller "chunks" for easier Webaccess to inform readers that the website version is not the as-submitted application.The second issue, the staff addressed by saying that links within a PDF file are acceptable butlinks to separate PDF files should be deactivated (according to NRC's current electronicsubmission guidance). However, the staff also said that it would take into consideration NEI's proposal to include a "warning" (in the transmittal letter for a COL application) stating that some of the hyperlinks contained in the files may become inactive they are copied from a CD into ADAMS .On the third issue, the staff said that NRC staff should not require the submission of file formatsthat do not conform with the NRC's electronic submission guidance. The staff said that NRCmanagement is aware of and in agreement with this policy.Probabilistic Risk Assessment/Severe Accident Change ProcessNEI provided a slide package for the meeting, titled "FSAR Chapter 19 and Plant-Specific PRA"(Attachment 6 of this meeting summary). NEI said the slides contained the same information as the slides provided at the June 8-9, 2005, public meeting. NEI said it st ill supported the ideaof a phased development for FSAR Chapter 19 and the plant-specific PRA. This would include a four-phase approach with each phase representing a stage of the COL process from pre-COL to after initial fuel loading during which the FSAR Chapter 19 and the plant-specific PRA would be created and updated. NEI said that during phase 1, a summary of the status and plans for COL items and plant-specific PRA are provided in Chapter 19 of the FSAR. Chapter 19 would also include an assessment versus design PRA of plant-specific design or operational changes, or site-specific topics, which could significantly affect results and conclusions, and an assessment of impacts, and mitigation. The plant-specific PRA during this phase would be the certified design PRA which would include a description of plant-specific design or operational changes, or site-specific topics, which could significantly affect results and conclusions. It would also include an assessment of impacts, and mitigation. The staff asked NEI to clarify what kind of PRA document would be included in the submittal. NEI said the certified design PRA would be submitted and that the expectation is that any significant changes would be discussed in thesubmittal. The staff said it did not agree with this approach and that there is a large difference between a certified design and an operating plant. The staff also said it was unsure how it would determine that insights are valid. NEI responded by saying that the burden is on theapplicant to address any departures from the design certification PRA. The staff said there isn't a process to identify changes and that a multitude of small changes may have a large cumulative impact on overall plant-specific PRA. NEI said it understood the staff's concerns and that these issues would be addressed in NEI 04-01, Revision E.NEI said that during phase 2, the information provided in phase 1 for Chapter 19 would beupdated annually based on NRC requests for additional information during the COL applicationreview and the responses provided by the COL applicant. Any additional plant-specific changes and/or site-specific topics would also be addressed. The plant-specific PRA would continue to document the description of design and operational changes, and site-specific topics, whichcould significantly affect results and conclusions. Assessments of impacts and mitigation would continue to be documented throughout this phase.During phases 3 and 4, NEI said that Chapter 19 of the FSAR would continue to be updatedannually, and that phase 4 updates would be in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e). NEI said that during phase 3, Revision 0 of the plant-specific PRA would be completed and reviewedusing information that reasonably represents the as-built, as-to-be-operated plant. During phase 4 the plant-specific PRA would be maintained as appropriate. Regarding the phased development of PRA, the staff asked NEI how the process wouldaddress facts and observations gained in phase 3 from the industry peer review . NEI said that during phases 1-2 the focus is on whether the certified design PRA bounds the plant. In phases 3-4 the focus is realistic analysis. The phase 3 review would focus on whether the risk results accurately represent the plant. NEI said it was considering a peer review in phases 1-2.
The staff said a peer review in phases 1-2 would give the staff more confidence. NEI said it would evaluate whether or not to perform a peer review in phases 1-2. During the meeting, there was considerable discussion regarding when in the process a site-specific PRA (i.e., a quantified, site-specific version of the design certification PRA) would be available, and when this PRA would be submitted. There was also some discussion on whether the "margins-based" methodologies used to assess external events in the design certification should be required to be upgraded to "PRA-based" methodologies prior to COL issuance or plant startup. The PRA discussions were longer than anticipated and as a result the severe accident changeprocess discussion will be deferred until the next NEI 04-01 public meeting. Radiation ProtectionThe staff provided a brief update on the status of radiation protection. The staff said that it iswaiting for additional information from NEI on SRP Section 12.5. The staff said that a meeting to discuss the current issues regarding radiation protection had been scheduled for July 29, 2005. Clarification of NRC Written CommentsThe staff talked about where the NRC and NEI stand regarding the comment letters that theNRC has been drafting on NEI's COL guidance document. So far, the staff has given NEI fourcomment letters. The staff will send NEI one more letter. The staff and NEI decided that themost effective way of clarifying NRC's written comments would be to host a teleconference and go over each issue that NEI discovers.NEI briefly discussed its plans for the NEI 04-01 COL guidance document. NEI said it wouldlike to incorporate the staff's written comments on the document in Revision E but it will dependon whether the staff and NEI can clarify the written comments in time. NEI plans to issue Revision E as a draft document on September 30, 2005 and plans to issue the final document by the end of the year. NEI also said it is beginning work on another guidance document, NEI 06-01, "COL Implementation Guidance," and plans to issue a first draft sometime next year.Action ItemsNEI Action Items
- Send NRC a letter explaining NEI's criteria for selecting the required operational programsand listing the programs by the end of August 2005.*Submit a list of the industry's top priorities for the SRP update.
- Establish a definitive approach to piping DAC for the next public meeting.
NRC Action Items
- Office of Information Systems webpage staff to address issues regarding electronicsubmission of a COL application.*Set up a teleconference with NEI to clarify NRC's written comments on NEI 04-01./RA/Christian Araguas, Project ManagerNew Reactors Section New, Research and Test Reactors Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationAttachments:1.List of Attendees2.Agenda 3.NEI e-mail dated July 18, 2005: Industry Proposal on OperationalPrograms (ML052000149)4.NRC Handout: Selected Programs in Combined License Action Items inthe NRC AP1000 FSER (ML052100175)5.NEI Handout: Electronic Submittal Guidance - Industry Proposal(ML052100177)6.NEI Slides Handout: FSAR Chapter 19 and Plant-Specific PRA(ML052100179)Project No. 689 cc: See next pageby the end of the year. NEI also said it is beginning work on another guidance document,NEI 06-01, "COL Implementation Guidance," and plans to issue a first draft sometime next year.Action ItemsNEI Action Items*Send NRC a letter explaining NEI's criteria for selecting the required operational programsand listing the programs by the end of August 2005.*Submit a list of the industry's top priorities for the SRP update.
- Establish a definitive approach to piping DAC for the next public meeting.
NRC Action Items
- Office of Information Systems webpage staff to address issues regarding electronicsubmission of a COL application.*Set up a teleconference with NEI to clarify NRC's written comments on NEI 04-01./RA/Christian Araguas, Project ManagerNew Reactors Section New, Research and Test Reactors Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationAttachments:1.List of Attendees2.Agenda 3.NEI e-mail dated July 18, 2005: Industry Proposal on OperationalPrograms (ML052000149)4.NRC Handout: Selected Programs in Combined License Action Items inthe NRC AP1000 FSER (ML052100175)5.NEI Handout: Electronic Submittal Guidance - Industry Proposal(ML052100177)6.NEI Slides Handout: FSAR Chapter 19 and Plant-Specific PRA(ML052100179)Project No. 689 cc: See next pageADAMS ACCESSION NO. ML052150345-PackageOFFICEPM:RNRPPM:RNRPSC:RNRP NAMECAraguasJColaccinoLDudes DATE09/23/200509/26/200510/03/2005OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Distribution for July 27, 2005, Meeting Summary dated October 18, 2005Hard CopyRNRP R/FCAraguas JColaccino LDudesE-MailPUBLICJDyer (RidsNrrOd)
RBorchardt BSheron (RidsNrrAdpt)
FEltawila NRR/ADPT Secretary [RidsNrrAdpt]
NEI 04-01 Reviewers RNRP Group DMatthews BBoger CCarpenter SRichards DCoe TQuay JHannon SWeerakkody JWermiel FAkstulewicz WBateman ESullivan MMitchell TChan JCalvo RJenkins TJKim, EDO MJohnson CCasto MStutzke DRoberts STingen PSekerak DJohnson RMcIntyre TFoley SAlexander TMensah (NRR Communication Coord)
ACRS (RidsAcrsMailCenter)
OPA MEl-Zeftway JBlake RGardner CPaulkLCampbellMItzkowitz, OGC GMizuno, OGC TKenyon PQualls DNelson, OE JBongarra MChiramal PLoeser HLi GBagchi MAAshley STingen JJennings DTrimble YLi NKTrehan DBarss BMusico AKugler DThatcher RWeismanExternal e-mailbhupinder.singh@hq.doe.govtom.miller@hq.doe.gov Vanessa.Quinn@dhs.gov Kenneth.Wierman@dhs.gov James.Purvis@dhs.gov October 19, 2005Combination List:
cc:Mr. Charles BrinkmanWestinghouse Electric Co.
Washington Operations 12300 Twinbrook Pkwy., Suite 330 Rockville, MD 20852Mr. David Lochbaum, Nuclear Safety EngineerUnion of Concerned Scientists 1707 H Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006-3919Mr. Paul GunterNuclear Information & Resource Service
1424 16 th Street, NW, Suite 404Washington, DC 20036Mr. James RiccioGreenpeace 702 H Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001Mr. Adrian HeymerNuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708Mr. George Alan ZinkeProject Manager Nuclear Business Development Entergy Nuclear M-ECH-683 1340 Echelon Parkway Jackson, MS 39213Mr. Thomas P. MillerU.S. Department of Energy NE-20, Rm. A286 Headquarters-Germantown 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290Ms. Marilyn KrayVice President, Special Projects Exelon Generation 200 Exelon Way, KSA3-E Kennett Square, PA 19348Mr. Laurence ParmeManager, GT-MHR Safety &
Licensing General Atomics Company P.O. Box 85608 San Diego, CA 92186-5608Mr. Joseph D. HegnerLead Engineer - Licensing Dominion Generation Early Site Permitting Project 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Mr. Edward L. QuinnMDM Services Corporations Utility Operations Division 28202 Cabot Road, Suite 205 Laguna Nigual, CA 92677Ms. Lynn ConnorDoc-Search Associates 2211 sw 1 ST Ave - #1502Portland, OR 97201Mr. Paul LeventhalNuclear Control Institute 1000 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 410 Washington, DC 20036Ms. Patricia CampbellMorgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004Mr. W. Edward CumminsAP600 and AP1000 Projects Westinghouse Electric Company
P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0355Dr. Robert E. GambleManager, ESBWR GE Nuclear Energy 1989 Little Orchard St., M/C 365 San Jose, CA 95125-1030 October 19, 2005Dr. Jack W. RoeNuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708Mr. Stephen P. FrantzMorgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004Mr. Gary Wright, ManagerOffice of Nuclear Facility Safety Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, IL 62704Mr. Brendan HoffmanResearch Associate on Nuclear Energy Public Citizens Critical Mass Energy and Environmental Program 215 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20003Mr. Tom Clements6703 Gude Avenue Takoma Park, MD 20912Mr. Lionel BattyNuclear Business Team Graftech 12300 Snow Road Parma, Ohio 44130Mr. Ian M. GrantCanadian Nuclear Safety Commission 280 Slater Street, Station B P.O. Box 1046 Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5S9Mr. Edward F. Sproat, IIIVice President - Int'l Projects Exelon Generation 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348Mr. Glenn H. ArchinoffAECL Technologies 481 North Frederick Avenue Suite 405 Gaithersburg, MD. 20877Dr. Regis A. MatzieSenior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer Westinghouse Electric Company 2000 Day Hill RoadWindsor, CT 06095-0500Mr. Ed Wallace, General ManagerProjects PBMR Pty LTD PO Box 9396 Centurion 0046 Republic of South AfricaMr. Dobie McArthurDirector, Washington Operations General Atomics 1899 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20006Mr. Russell BellNuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708Ms. Vanessa E. Quinn, ChiefRadiological Emergency Preparedness Section Nuclear & Chemical Hazards Branch Federal Emergency Management Agency/DHS 500 C Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20472Mr. Ron Simard6170 Masters Club Drive Suwanee, GA 30024 October 19, 2005Mr. Jerald S. HolmFramatome ANP, Inc.
3315 Old Forest Road P.O. Box 10935 Lynchburg, VA 24506-0935Ms. Kathryn Sutton, Esq.Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004Ms. Anne W. CottinghamAssistant General Counsel Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006Mr. David RepkaWinston & Strawn LLP 1700 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3817Mr. Robert E. SweeneyIBEX ESI 4641 Montgomery Avenue Suite 350 Bethesda, MD. 20814Mr. Eugene S. GrecheckVice President, Nuclear Support Services Dominion Energy, Inc.
5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, VA 23060E-Mail:jerald.holm@framatome-anp.commwetterhahn@winston.com gcesare@enercon.com whorin@winston.com eddie.grant@exeloncorp.com rob.sweeney@ibexesi.com NRC Meeting with Nuclear Energy Institute To Discuss NEI's Combined LicenseApplication Guidance Document (NEI 04-01) and the Operational ProgramReview Performed During the Evaluation of a Combined License ApplicationWednesday, July 27, 20058:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.NRC Headquarters Conference Room O-1G16NameOrganizationChristian AraguasNRR/DRIP/RNRPJoseph ColaccinoNRR/DRIP/RNRPCarey FlemingConstellation Al PasswaterEPRI Talmage ClementsProgress Energy Larry Drbal Geoff QuinnBechtel Ben GeorgeSouthern Nuclear Jerry PhillabaumEnercon Joe HegnerDominion Ryuji IwasakiToshiba Al PagliaSCE&G Guy CesareEnercon Eddie GrantExelon Carl BergerEnergetics Russ BellNEI Tolani OwusuNRR/DRIP/RNRP Shiela FabiauFCW Patricia L. CampbellMorgan Lewis Adrian Heymer NEI Hulbert LiNRC/DE/EEIB Russ WellsParallax Matt ChiramalNRC/DE/EEIB George ZinkeEntergy/NuStartDaniel McLaughlinWestinghouse Yuichi HatashiWestinghouse Bob EvansEnercon Peter HastingsDuke Energy Alan LevinFramatome Steven BloomNRR/DRIP/RNRP George ThomasNRR/DSSA/SRXBJerry WilsonNRR/DRIP/RNRP Joe MihalcikConstellation Bruce MusicoNRC/NSIR/DPR/EPD Daniel BarssNRC John TsaoNRC/NRR/DE/EMCBSteve KoenickNRC/NRR/PMAS/POEBBob PallaNRC/NRR/DSSA Adel El-BassioniNRC/NRR/DSSA Donald HarrisonNRC/NRR/DSSAKeith ShawNRC/IS Mike CollinsNRC/IS Kenny NguyenNRC/ISBarry SloaneDominion Jim ChapmanScientech LLC David TeraoNRC/NRR/ADPT/DLPM/LP Kamal ManolyNRC/NRR/DE/EMEBJohn FairNRC/NRR/DE/EMEB AgendaJuly 27, 2005, Meeting with the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) to Discuss NEI'sCombined License (COL) Application Guidance and the Operational Program ReviewPerformed During the Evaluation of a Combined License Application8:30 a.m.Introductions/Opening RemarksNRC/NEI8:40 a.m.Implementation of Operational ProgramsNRC/NEI9:40 a.m.Training Program Implementation (eg. timeline)NRC/NEI 10:10 a.m. Break 10:25 a.m.SRP Update PrioritiesNRC/NEI11:00 a.m.Piping Design Acceptance CriteriaNRC/NEI 12:00 p.m.Lunch 1:00 p.m.Electronic Submission of Combined License ApplicationsNRC/NEI2:00 p.m.Probabilistic Risk Assessment /Severe Accident Change ProcessNRC/NEI3:00 p.m.Break 3:15 p.m.Radiation ProtectionNRC/NEI 3:45 p.m.Clarifications of NRC Written CommentsNEI 4:15 p.m.Future Plans for NEI 04-01 NEI 4:45 p.m.AdjournNOTE: Specific topics and associated discussion times may change without notice. Public comments will be solicited after each agenda item is completed.Contact:Joseph Colaccino, NRR 301-415-2753, jxc1@nrc.govAttachment 2