Information Notice 2006-17, Recent Operating Experience of Service Water Systems Due to External Conditions
| ML061510292 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/31/2006 |
| From: | Ho Nieh NRC/NRR/ADRA/DPR |
| To: | |
| C. Vernon Hodge, NRR/DIRS/IOEB | |
| References | |
| IN-06-017 | |
| Download: ML061510292 (6) | |
UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001July 31, 2006NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2006-17: RECENT OPERATING EXPERIENCE OFSERVICE WATER SYSTEMS DUE TO
EXTERNAL CONDITIONS
ADDRESSEES
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed
from the reactor vessel.
PURPOSE
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to informaddressees of operating experience within the past few years affecting the operability of theservice water system at several nuclear power plants. The NRC expects that recipients will
review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, toavoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not
NRC requirements;therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES
During 2004 through 2005, 15 events occurred related to blockages in service water systems. These events were primarily self-revealing. The various blocking agents included silt, sand, small rocks, grass or weeds, frazil ice, and small aquatic fauna, such as fish. All these eventswere of low safety significance but illustrate the susceptibility of the safety-significant service
water system. For instance, in September 2005, NRC inspectors identified a condition at FortCalhoun that allowed small rocks to regularly enter the raw water system, contribute to trippingof a pump and strainer motors, and interfere with traveling screen operation (NRC InspectionReport 50-285/2005-11, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML052920543). In June 2005, NRC inspectors found a portion of a servicewater accumulator outlet line at Salem to be nearly full of silt (NRC InspectionReport 50-272/2005-03, ADAMS Accession No. ML052090344). Salem - Hope Creek Nuclear Power PlantsOn December 2, 2004, crude oil was found leaking from a ship (Athos I) on the Delaware Riverupstream of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations. To mitigate the potential for oilintrusion into the cooling water systems, the licensee placed booms around the intakestructures at both stations. The booms are effective at controlling oil that is at or near the surface; however, the effectiveness of the booms was lessened because the spilled oil was"heavy" crude and was suspended at varying depths in the river. On December 3, 2004, the
licensee commenced shutdown of both Salem units due to the conditions on the river. There
were no issues associated with the shutdowns. Hope Creek was already shut down for a
refueling outage. The licensee restarted both Salem units after review of heat exchanger
performance and monitoring of the oil spill. Cooper Nuclear StationOn November 20, 2004, the service water system was clogged with sediment, resulting in anunexpected pressure drop in both loops of service water, high differential pressure alarms on
both strainers, and isolation of the nonessential service water loads. Both trains exceeded the
differential pressure operability limit of 15 psid. Backwash automatically initiated andsuccessfully cleaned the Loop A strainer, but the analogous action for Loop B did not succeed
in cleaning the strainer. Operators opened the strainer bypass valve to restore service water
flow and subsequently cleaned both strainers.On October 20, 2005, while preparing for online maintenance of the service water system,operators started a fourth service water pump and received high differential pressure alarms on
both Loops A and B. The automatic backwash did not sufficiently decrease the differentialpressure, and operators bypassed the strainer. Following these actions, the service water
system header pressures returned to normal. During the event, operators declared both loopsof service water inoperable. Both loops exceeded the strainer differential pressure structural
integrity limit of 15 psid. The high differential pressure across the strainers was the result of
debris (small rocks and sediment) introduced by the start of the fourth pump. With both loopsof service water inoperable, operators declared both emergency diesel generators inoperable. In 2005, the NRC Region IV office organized a special inspection based on the repetitive natureof this type of event (NRC Inspection Report 50-298/2005-15, ADAMS Accession No. ML061160027).Watts Bar Nuclear PlantOn November 22, 2004, while performing a manual valve exercising procedure, the licenseeidentified that a centrifugal charging pump backup cooling line from the essential raw coolingwater system was completely blocked with silt. Approximately 2.5 gallons of muddy pastepassed through the 1-inch drain valve before the valve became blocked. The line had to be
cleared mechanically. This line is significant in that this is the only high head pump with a
backup source of cooling water (NRC Inspection Report 50-390, 391/2004-05, ADAMSAccession No. ML050280344).
DISCUSSION
Cooper Nuclear StationIn both events, for a few minutes service water flow was lost to the nonessential header andgreatly reduced to the essential headers. In each case, the successful Loop A automatic
backwash precluded the need for a manual scram, which would have been required if the loss of turbine equipment cooling water had been prolonged. In each event, the Loop B filteringfunction was overwhelmed by the inrush of sediment. The Loop B automatic backwash function
failed due to the lack of downstream pressure, which provides the motive force for the
backwashing operation. The licensee believes that the contributing external factor was the lowlevel of the Missouri River, the source of the service water system. Both of these events
occurred during autumn, following the navigation season. A weir wall is installed in the river in
front of the intake structure. The low river level caused an increased portion of the water that
flows into the intake structure to go around (rather than over) the weir wall and jet into the
service water bay. This circuitous flow entrained more sand due to the high flow and deposited
it in the intake structure near the service water pump intakes in the low-flow areas.At the time of the October 2005 event, the licensee had not completed its actions to modify thesetpoint for automatic backwash of the strainer, alter the strainer intermittent backwashfrequency, modify the strainer differential pressure alarm setpoint, and implement weir-wall and
traveling-screen modifications.NRC inspectors noted that the licensee had not performed certain actions committed to in itsresponse to NRC Generic Letter (GL) 89-13, "Service Water System Problems AffectingSafety-Related Equipment," specifically to periodically monitor silt levels and to periodically
examine the intake structure basin for silt, debris, and deterioration (including corrosion), using
divers or by dewatering the intake structure bay. At the time of the event, the licensee had not
examined the intake structure bay to assess its condition. Watts Bar Nuclear PlantThe licensee generated 13 problem evaluation reports from early 2002 through late 2005 forblockages identified in raw cooling water lines. The licensee identified silt accumulation in
portions of systems providing raw cooling water for both essential and nonessential purposesand for high pressure water for fire protection. These accumulations were identified in both
stagnant and active cooling water lines, typically in system low points and in piping with lowwater velocity. In 1999 and 2002, clam accumulations resulted from missed biocide treatments.
The licensee implemented periodic ultrasonic testing and flushing to identify and minimize
blockages due to silt and clam accumulations. The initial frequency of ultrasonic testing was
every 6 months, later shortened to every 3 months. However, the licensee determined that thisprogram did not cover all susceptible lines and components.The centrifugal charging pump backup cooling line was not included in the ultrasonic testingmonitoring program. In 2000, a maintenance rule panel review left the flushing frequency for
this line at 18 months, not recognizing the consequences of silt accumulation. This conclusion
was consistent with the general site perception that silt accumulation was not a significantproblem. The blockage was found by means of an 18-month manual valve test. Most other
lines were being flushed or tested every 3 months. This issue resulted in a White finding in the
NRC's Significance Determination Process. Raw water systems draw from a section of the Tennessee River downstream of the Watts Bardam. The suspended solids count in the river water increases after periods of heavy rains
upstream. The suspended solids are transported into the affected systems where they settle atpoints with low fluid velocities. The licensee's corrective actions for the violation included increasing the frequency of ultrasonictesting, developing higher velocity flush procedures, and modifying systems to improve flushing. Lessons learned included the following observations:*Silt accumulation in smaller diameter lines may not flush as readily as in larger diameterlines.*Silt accumulates in stagnant lines off the main headers.
- Lines with a vertical drop off the main headers are more susceptible to silt accumulationthan lines with horizontal legs off the main headers.RELEVANT GENERIC COMMUNICATIONS
NRC Generic Letter 89-13, "Service Water System Problems Affecting Safety-RelatedEquipment"NRC GL 89-13 lists the following five recommendations for licensees:*Significantly reduce the incidence of flow blockage problems resulting from biofouling.*Conduct a test program to verify the heat transfer capability of all safety-related
heatexchangers cooled by service water, including initial and periodic retesting.*Ensure by a routine inspection and maintenance program for open-cycle service watersystem piping and components that corrosion, erosion, protective coating failure, silting,and biofouling cannot degrade the performance of the safety-related systems suppliedby service water.*Confirm that the service water system will perform its intended function in accordancewith the licensing basis for the plant.*Confirm that maintenance practices, operating and emergency procedures, and trainingthat involves the service water system are adequate for ensuring that safety-relatedequipment cooled by the service water system will function as int
ended and thatoperators of this equipment will perform effectively.NRC Information Notice 2004-07: "Plugging of Safety Injection Pump Lubrication Oil Coolerswith Lakeweed" NRC IN 2004-07 also discusses operating experience related to service water systemsusceptibilities due to external events.CONCLUSION
The above events involve instances in which sediment and debris has blocked flow in one ormore service water lines. A number of the events described above involved the failure to take
adequate and timely corrective actions that could have prevented the event from occurring. Often there were multiple previous occurrences that could have alerted licensees to take more
aggressive or broader corrective actions.
CONTACT
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct anyquestions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below./RA/Ho K. Nieh, Acting DirectorDivision of Policy and Rulemaking
Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts: John D. Hanna, NRC/RIVJonathan Bartley, NRC/RII402-426-9611423-365-5487 E-mail: jdh1@nrc.govE-mail: jhb1@nrc.govC. Vernon Hodge, NRR/DIRS301-415-1861 E-mail: cvh@nrc.govNote: NRC generic communications may be found on the
NRC public Web site,http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
ML061510292OFFICEIOEB:DIRSTECH EDITORRIV:DRP:RPB-E/FCSADRO:DORL:LPL4NAMECVHodgeHChang (by e-mail)JDHanna (by e-mail)BJBenneyDATE7/11/200606/14/20065/18/20067/12/2006OFFICERII:DRP:RPB6:WBROADRO:DORL:LPL2-2ADRO:DORL:LPL1-2TL:IOEB:DIRSNAMEJHBartley (by email)DVPickettSNBaileyICJungDATE 6/29/2006 7/18/20067/ 19 /20067/20/2006OFFICEPGCB:DPRLA:PGCB:DPRBC:PGCB:DPRD:DPR(A)NAMEDBeaulieuCHawes via e-mailCJacksonHNieh (JLubinski)DATE07/28/200607 /28 /200608/01/200608/01/2006