ML113120500

Audit Plan - D.C. Cook Proposed Amendment to Convert Fire Protection Program to NFPA 805

ML113120500
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	11/08/2011
From:	Leslie Fields, Lain P NRC/NRR/DRA/AFPB, NRC/NRR/DRA/APLA
To:
Tam P
References
TAC ME6629, TAC ME6630
Download: ML113120500 (7)

Text

DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 REGULATORY AUDIT IN SUPPORT OF THE LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO IMPLEMENT TH E NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIAT I ON STANDARD 80S, "PER F ORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR F I RE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR ELECTR I C GENERAT I NG PLANTS ," AS INCORPORATED INTO TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FED ERAL REGULAT I ONS, PARAGRAPH 50.48(c) "FIRE PROTECTION" DOCKET NOS 50-315 AND 50-316 I. BACKGROUND The Dona l d C. Cook Nuclear Plant , Units 1 and 2, (D.C. Cook) has submitted a license amendment request (L AR) (Reference 1 and 2) to change its fire protection program (FPP) to one based on the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard NFPA 805, "Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants," 2001 Edition, as incorporated into Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Section 50.48(c), "Fire Protection

." The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's review of the LAR h as commenced in accordance with the Office of Nuc l ear Reactor Regula t ion's (NRR) Office Instruction LlC-1 01, "License Amendments." The NRC staff has determined that a regulatory audit of D.C. Cook should be conducted in accordance with LlC-111, "Regulatory Audits," for the staff to gain a better understanding of the licensee's calculations, proposed plant modifications, and other aspects of the LAR. A regulatory audit is a planned , license or regulation-related activity that includes the examination and evaluation of primarily non-docke ted information.

A regulatory audit is conducted with the intent to gain an understanding, to verify information, and/or to identify information that will require docket i ng to support the bas i s of the licensing or regulatory decision.

Performing a regulatory audit of licensee information is expected to assist the staff in efficiently conducting its review or gain insights on the licensee's processes or procedures. Information that the NRC staff relies upon to make the safety determination must be submi tt ed on the docket. However, there may be supporting information retained as records under 10 CFR 50.71 and/or 10 CFR 54.37 that, although not required to be submitted as part of t h e licensing action, wou l d he l p the staff better understand the licensee's submitted information.

The objectives of this regulatory audit are to:

• Gain a better understanding of the detailed ca l culations, analyses and bases underlying the NFPA 805 LAR and confirm the staff's understanding of the LAR;

• Identify further information that is necessary for the licensee to submit for the staff to reach a licensing or regulatory decision; this will result in requests for additional information (RAls); ENCLOSURE

• Verify that the licensee's planned process for self-approval of FPP changes will meet the proposed NFPA 805 license condition and quality requirements;

• Est.ablish an understanding of proposed plant modifications necessary to implement NFPA 805; and,

• Verify the processes and/or procedures that the licensee committed to as part of NFPA 805 implementation.

II. REGULATORY AUDIT BASIS The basis of this audit is the licensee's LAR (Reference 1 and 2) and the Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 9.5.1.2, "Risk-I nformed, Performance

-Based (RI/PB) Fire Protection" (Reference 3). References 4 through 8 provide additional information that will be used to support the audit. III. REGULATORY AUDIT SCOPE OR METHOD The staff will review the licensee's NFPA 805 transition as proposed in the LAR. Key to this effort is the licensee's R I/PB FPP. The staff will review the fundamental FPP elements and minimum design requirements.

A samp l e of fire protection engineering evaluations may be selected for review. I n add i tion, the staff will review, as necessary, the regulatory basis, references, licensing actions, and existing engineering equivalency evaluations, and issues which the licensee has deemed "previously approved." The scope of the review of nuclear safety performance criteria may include both at-power and non-powe r operational modes, and may require a sample of procedures and other documentation.

The compliance by fire area review will, as necessary, include multiple spurious operations, the transition of operator manual actions to recovery actions (RAs), fire protection engineering evaluations, and NFPA 805 deterministic r equirements.

The audit may also include alternatives to compliance with NFPA 805 if any are indentified. The staff may review a sample of fire risk assessments and plant change evaluations for one or more fire areas, the evaluation of the additional risk of RAs, the licensee's process for approving post-transition FPP changes, cumUlative risk and combined changes, as well as uncertainty and sensitivity analyses.

The review may also include licensee risk-informed evaluations to ensure that defense in depth and safety margins have been evaluated and a r e maintained.

The staff will also review the licensee's assessment of the technical adequacy of the PRA model used for any risk evaluations required to transition to a RI/PB FPP, including reso l ution of peer review findings and licensee se l f-assess ments. This effort may include auditing a sample of logic models and calculations in the fire PRA model as well as the Internal Events PRA model. The review will include, as necessary, the licensee's processes that have or will be implemented to maintain the quality of the PRA to support self-approval of risk-informed change eva l uation after transition is completed. The scope may also include the licensee's NFPA 805 monitoring program which is to establish and monitor acceptable levels of availability, reliability, and performance of fire protection systems and features re l ied upon for NFPA 805 compliance.

The scope will also include, as appropriate, selected plant modifications to confirm they have been appropriately characterized in the LAR. The staff may review the process for controlling compensatory measures to confirm their adequacy while they remain i n effect unt il the modifications are comp l eted. In addition, the audit will review program documentation, configuration control, and the FPP quality assurance program. The FPP design basis document will be reviewed, as well as o t her documentation of fire hazards identification and nuclear safety capab ili ty assessments.

The review will include configuratio n control of the FPP design basis document, the fire PRA methods and model , and other r elevant documentation as necessary. The staff may also review the FPP quality assurance program, and sample fire mode l s and fire model calculat ion s. Walkdowns may be performed as necessary to confirm features of the li censee's FPP and design elements. IV. INFORMATION AND OTHER MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR THE REGULATORY AUDIT The NRC audit team will require access to licensee personnel knowledgeable regarding the technical aspects of the D.C Cook LAR. At a minimum, a hardcopy and electronic copy of the following documentation should be available to the audit team:

• Ca l culational models and supporting documentation for PRA models used in support of the LAR, including peer review history and resolution of peer review significant findings;

• Calculational models and supporting documentation for fire models used in support of the LAR;

• Procedures that have been modified or developed to transition to the NFPA 805 licensing basis;

• Procedures that have been modified or developed to maintain t he NFPA 805 licensing basis after transition is comp l eted;

• Documentation of changes made to PRA models in support of change analysis;

• Documentation about PRA configuration control and procedures to support self-approval of risk-informed plant changes after transition;

• Documentation of plant modifications or ope r at i onal changes identified, screened, and considered (or planned for) during the licensee's transition to NFPA 805; and,

• Other documents, which the licensee deems as necessary to support the NRC staff's aud it , outlined under audit activities.

• Ca l culations and evaluations used to transit i on to NFPA 805 such as plant change eva l uations, engineering equivalency evaluations, and recovery act i o n eva l uations. V. TEAM ASSIGNMENTS The audit will be conducted by NRC staff from the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulat i on (NRR) and contractors; Pa c ific Northwest National Labora t ory (PNNL) and the Center for Nuclear Waste and Regu l atory Analysis (CNWRA). Division of Risk Assessment (ORA) Fire Protec t ion Branch (AFPB) and the PRA Lic ens ing Branch (AP L A) staff, and contractor personnel knowledgeable in PRA, safe shutdown and circuits analysis, and fire protection engineering, will comprise the audit t eam. NRC staff from o th er organ i zations may be assigned to the team as appropriate and others may participate as observers.

Observers at the aud it may include NRR Managers and various Regional Inspectors.

The NRC team lead for this audit will be Pau l W. Lain, NRRlDRAlAFPB, with support from Steve Short, Pacific N orthwest National Laboratory.

The tables be l ow show (1) audit milestones and schedule, and (2) planned audit team composition and their assig n ed areas for review during the aud it. Audit Milestones and Schedule Relative t o First A u dit Day Onsite (T -0) Activity Time Frame Commen t s Onsite Audit Kick-Off Meeting 11/7/11 Request Licensee provide an NFPA 805 LAR overv i ew JJresentation with important site specific information. Onsite Escorted Tour 11/8/11 Tour of risk significant power block areas. End of Day Summary Meeting 11/8-10/11 Meet with licensee to provide a summary of any significant issues and requests for additional assistance. Provide Break-out Areas 11/8-10/11 Facilitate discussion between site and staff technical areas. Onsite Audit Exit Meeting 11/11/11 Reviewers at licensee location for five days. Audit Summary (see VIII) 12/12/11 To document the audit. Regu l atory Audit Team and Assignments SRP 9.5.1.2 Audit Plan Review Areas Lead Support Sect i on 111.1.2 Modifications Team Team 111.1.3 Licensee self-approval Harry Barrett Karl Bohlander, PNNL 111.2 Fundamental FPP and Design Elements Naeem Iqbal Bob Layton , PNNL 111.3.1.2 Multiple spurious operation Harry Barrett Karl Bohlander , PNNL 111.3.2 Fire area compliance Team Team Janssens/Huczek , 111.3.2 Engineer ing evaluations, EEEEs, previous approval Iq bal/Barrett CNWRA Layton/Bohlander, PNNL 111.3.2.2 Operations guidance for fire modeling PB method Harry Barrett Karl Bohlander, PN N L 111.3.2.2 Recovery Actions Mike Snodderly Garill Coles, PNNL 111.3.3 Non-power operation Harry Barrett Karl Bohlander , PNNL 111.5.3-5.6 Risk assessments Mike Snodderly Garill Coles, PNNL 111.5.1 PRA technical adequacy Steve Dinsmore Garill Coles, PNNL 111.5.2 DID and safety margins Harry Barrett Layton/Bohlander , PNNL 111.6 Monitoring program Harry Barrett Team Regulatory Audit Team and Assignments SRP 9.5.1.2 Audit Plan Review Areas Lead Support Section 111.7.1-7.3 Documentation, Configuration Control, Quality Naeem Iqb al Pat Mackin, CNWRA Steve Short, PNNL Plant walk-downs As needed As needed VI. LOG I STICS Thi s regulatory audit i s planned to take p l ace during the week of November 7, 2011, and last approximately 5 days. This date is subject to change based on mutual agreement between the licensee and the NRC. An entrance meeting for this audit will be held on-site, the first day at 1 :30 p.m. and an exit meeting will be held th e fina l audit day at 9: 30 a.m. to provide preliminary feedback to the licensee.

The NRC audit l eader will provide a daily progress update to licensee personnel on the second, third, and fourth day of the audit. The audit will take place at the D.C. Cook site, Bridgman, MI and the Licensees' Engineering Building in Buchanan, MI where (1) the necessary reference material and (2) appropriate analysts will be avai l able to support the review. Because the audit scope includes NRC staff walkdowns of selected fire areas, the regulatory audit must be conducted in a location that supports escorted access to the p l ant protected area. VII. SPECIAL REQUESTS The regulatory audit team will require the following t o support the regulatory audit:

• Escorted access to fire areas within the prot ected area.

• Two or more computers with internet access.

• Private conference room(s) to support document review, and audit team meetings.

• Access to the FPP documentation, including the Fire Risks Evaluations, Safe Shutdown Ana l ysis, and the fire and internal events PRA.

• Access to licensee personnel knowledgeable in the FPP, fire modeling, safe shutdown and circuit analysis, fire and internal even ts PRA, non-power operations, radiological release analysis, and the NFPA 805 fire pro t ection design-basis document.

V II I. DELIVERABLES A regu l atory audit summary will be issued within approximately 30 days of the completion o f the audit. The summary will use the guidance of NRR Office In s truction LlC-111 for content. S i nce this audit wi ll likely result in formal request s for additional information from the licensee regarding the LAR, the summary itself i s expected to be an internal memorandum from the audit team leader to the responsible supervisor.

The audit summary will be placed in ADAMS. IX. REFERENCES

1. Letter from M. H. Carlson, Indi ana Michigan Power Company, to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Request for Li cense Amendment to Adopt National Fire Protection Association 805 Performance

-Based Standard for Li ght Water Reactor Generating Plants (2001 Edition)," July 1,2011 (ADAMS Accession Number ML11188A145). 2. Letter from J.P. Gebbie, I ndiana Michigan Power Company, to U.S. Nuclear Regu l atory Commission, "Supplement to Request for License Amendment to Adopt National Fire Protection Association 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generat in g Plants (2001 Edition)," Sep t ember 2,2011 (ADAMS Accession Number ML11256A030). 3. U.S. NRC, Standard Review Plan for the Review o f Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0800 , Section 9.5.1.2, "Risk-Informed, Performance

-Based Fire Protection Program," (ADAMS accession no. ML092590527). 4. Title 10 Code of Federal Regu l ations, Part 50, Section 48 (1 0 CFR 50.48), "Fire Protection." 5. NFPA 805, "Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plant s," 2001 Edition. 6. Regulatory Gu ide 1.205, Rev. 1, "Risk-I nformed, Performance-Based F i re Protection for Existing Li ght-Water Nu clear Powe r Plants," December 2009 (ADAMS accession no. ML092730314 ) 7. Nuclear Energy Institute, NEI 04-02, "Guidance for Implementing a Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program Under 10 CFR 50.48 (c)," Revis ion 2, April 2008 (ADAMS accession n o. ML081130188)

8. Nuclear Energy Institute, NEI 00-01, Guidance for Post-Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 2, May 2009 (ADAMS accession no. ML091770265)