ML18106A267

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:59, 3 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to NFS-0163, Colr.
ML18106A267
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/1997
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Shared Package
ML18106A265 List:
References
NFS-0163, NFS-0163-R00, NFS-163, NFS-163-R, NUDOCS 9801230395
Download: ML18106A267 (7)


Text

_LR-N98 QO Oi

  • .P.TTJl.CHMENT
  • l
  • NFS-0163 Revision 0 December 17, 1997 l .O ' CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Salem Unit l Cycle 13 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.9.

The Technical Specifications affected by this report are listed below:

3/4.1.1.4 Moderator Temperature Coefficient 3/4.1.3.5 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3/4.2. l Axial Flux Difference 3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - F0(Z) 3/4.2.3 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - fN Mi qso1230395 980115 Page 1 of 7 PDR ADOCK 05000272 P PDR I_

LI~ - N9 8 0.0 0 7

  • ATTACHMENT 1
  • NFS-0163 Revision 0
  • December 17, 1997 2.0
  • OPERA TING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section l.O are presented in the following subsections. These limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.9. l. 9.

2.1 Moderator Temperature Coefficient (Specification 3/4.1. l .4) 2.1. l The Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) limits are:

The BOUAROrrIZP-MTC shall be less positive than 0 Afclk/°F.

The EOUARO/RTP-MTC shall be less negative than 4.4x 10-4 ~°F.

2.1.2 The MfC Surveillance limit is:

The 300 ppm/ARO/RTP-MfC should be less negative than or equal to-3.7xiQ-4 ~°F.

where: BOL stands for Beginning of Cycle Life ARO stands for All Rods Out HZP stands for Hot Zero THERMAL POWER EOL stands for End of Cycle Life RTP stands for Rated THERMAL POWER Page 2 of 7

LR-N980007

  • ATTACHMENT 1 2.2 . Control Rod Insertion Limits (Specification 3/4.1.3.5)
  • NFS-0163 Revision 0 December 17, 1997 2.2.1 The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown in Figure 1.

2.3 Axial Flux Difference (Specification 3/4.2. l)

[Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Methodology]

2.3.1 The Axial Flux Difference (AFD) target band is +6%, -9%.

2.3.2 The AFD Acceptable Operation Limits are provided in Figure 2.

2.4 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor* F0(Z) (Specification 3/4.2.2)

[Fxy Methodology] *

  • K(Z) for P > 0.5 FRTP Q
  • K(Z) forP~0.5 0.5 .

THERMAL POWER where: P=

RATED THERMAL POWER 2.4. l F J1P = 2.40 2.4.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure 3.

Page 3 of 7

LR-N980007

  • ATTACHMENT 1
  • NFS-0163 Revision 0 December 17, 1997

2.4.3 where

F~_R,TP

.. -- 1. 77 fior the unro dded core p lanes 2.13 for the core plane containing Bank D control rods PF,.v =0.3 2.5 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - fN t.H (Specification 3/4.2.3)

F~ = F,:;P [l.O + PFMl (1.0 - P)]

Operation with pNm values equal to or less than those given by the above equation are acceptable.

p = THERMAL POWER

~~~~~~~~~~~

where:

RATED THERMAL POWER 2.5.1 F:ff = 1.65 2.5.2. PFMl = 0.3 Page 4 of 7

LR.:;..N9 8 0 00 7

  • ATTACHMENT 1
  • NFS-0163 Revision 0 December 17, 1997 FIGURE l ROD BANK INSERTION LIMITS vs. THERMAL POWER 240

/

220 17,2281 ' 172,2281

/

200 I !BANK Bl /

180 I

10,1861

, I I

1100,1701 160 I

' I

/

!BANK Cl J

I 140 z

0 1-i e--

~ 120

  • V J I 0

c.

~

I I v

)

100

~

~ 80 I IBANK DI CJ 60

/ 0 58 I I

/

40

' I J

I 20 0*

0 10 2Q

~

I 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PERCENT OF RATED THERMAL POWER (\)

Page 5 of 7

LR ::_.N 9 8 0 0 0 7

  • ATTACHMENT 1
  • NFS-0163 Revision 0 December 17, 1997 FIGURE 2 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE LIMITS AS A FUNCTION OF RATED THERMAL POWER 100 I I I I ( -11, 90) I 1(+11, 90)1 80 I \

!UNACCEPTABLE' OPERATION I \ IUNACCEPTABLEI OPERATION I \

'ACCEPTABLE OPERATION v \

I r( - n, 50) I (+31, 50) I o~

~

20

~

0

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 FLUX DIFFERENCE (\ Delta I)

Page 6 of 7

  • LR-:N98.0 0 0 7
  • ATTACHMENT 1
  • NFS-0163 Revision 0 December 17, 1997 FIGURE3 K(Z) - NORMALIZED F0 (Z) AS A FUNCTION OF CORE HEIGHT
1. 2
1. 0 ~

-N

-~

~ 0 .8 0

E-<

~

i:... FQ K (z) HEIGHT (ft)

C!) ------ -------- ----------

z H

2.40 1.0 o.o

..:: 2.40 1. 0 6.0

~

2.22 0.925 12.0

~ 0. 6 Cl i::a N

H

..J

~

0 "

z

0. 4
0. 2

~

0. 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 CORE HEIGHT (Feet)

Page 7 of 7