ML061160369

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:29, 13 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NOP-LP-2001-01 Condition Report, Officer Inallentive to Duty, CR Number 03-02794
ML061160369
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 03/12/2003
From: Young R
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CR-03-02794, FOIA/PA-2005-0235 NOP-LP-2001-01
Download: ML061160369 (2)


Text

s -1.2 -zo NOP-LP-2001-01 Bea3ver Valley Aq CONDITION REPORT CR Nimber TITLE: OFFICER INATTENTIVE TO DUTY , .. _ ._ _ ._ .. ._ ._ _ ._ ._ ._ .DISCOVERY DATE 3/11/2003 TIME EVENT DATE 0555 03/11/03 TIME SYSTEM / ASSET#0555 N/A N/A E QUIPMENT DESCRIPTION N/A DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION and PROBABLE CAUSE (if known) Summarize any attachments.

Identify what, when, where, why, how.Officer while on duty was observed being inattentive to duty.0 R I G l N A T l 0 N IMMEDIATE ACTIONS TAKEN I SUPV COMMENTS (Discuss CORRECTIVE ACTIONS completed, basis for closure.)'rhe Officer was relieved of duty and replaced with another Officer.QUALITY ORGANIZATION USE ONLY IDENTIFIED BY (Check one) El Self-Revealed ATTACHMENTS Quality Org. Initiated El Yes El Individual/Work Group El Intemal Oversight I Quality Org. Follow-up El Yes El No EJ Supervision/Management l Extemal Oversight El Ye,. No__ 8N_ , _ _ , AE) ORIGINATOR YOUNG, R. 3 ORGANIZATION DATE ,3SUPERVISOR l 0070 3112/2003 MIKLAVIC, L DATE PHONE EXT.* 1 3/12/2003 4- 7811 P L A N T 0 P E R A T 0 N S SRO EQUIPMENT REVIEW OPERABLE D Yes ij No 0 Yes 0 No il N/OPERABILITY ASSESSMENT REQUIRED Rl Yes iR No ORG. 4MMEDIATE NOTIFIED INVESTIGATION REQUIRED N/A Yes R] No ORG. WM =D CHANG17 NOTIFIED RESTRAINT N/A n Yes TV No MODE I ASSOCIATED TECH SPEC NUMBER(S)

I ASSOCIATED LCO ACTION STATEMENT(S)

NIAA EgN/A' :: #1 N/A -__# 2 _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '_ '_ _ -,;__ _ .# 3 -_ __._._'_., _.DECLARED INOPERABLE REPORTABLE?

One Hour N/A APPLICABLIE UNIT(S)(Date I Time) Four Hour N/A N/A n Eval Eight Hour N/A l U 0 U. L-i BothlLiEval Required Other N/A COMMENTS NIA Current Mode -Unit 1' Power Level -Unit 1 Current Mode -Unit 2 Power Level -Unit 2 NN/AN/ N/A N/A SRO -UNIT I Approved By Supv SRO -UNIT 2 Approved By Supv DATE 3/12/2003 CATEGORY I EVAL ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION DUE DATE R REPORTABLE?

CF 0070 4/26/2003 E El Yes R No El LER No._ ! G TREND CODES Comp Type I ID Cause u CRPA L REPORTABILITY REVIEWER Process I Activity / Cause Code(s) (If Cause T or W) Org A Fedin, R SUPV LP1 0100 H04 0070 T_01 DATE MRB Y. 03/12/03 INVESTIGATION OPTIONS I CLOSED BY DATE[]Maint.Rule

[JOE Evaluation l 3/31/2003-I-Page 1 of I 1, INVESTIGATION

SUMMARY

CR Number: 03-(12794 NOP-LP-2001

-06 Category I Eval: CF Assigned Organization:

0070 Quality Followup Req'd: C] Yes [-/j No For Fix Investigations Only: ,1 Hardware / Degraded Condition Resolution Required?

L1 Yes i; No If Yes: LI Repair Scicap D Rework F1 Use-As-Is.J Acceptance of the CR Investigation signifies acceptance of the following items, as applicable:

Originator Identification Date Corrective Actions ( listed below) (listed below, if any) (listed below, if any)Cause Analysis Generic Implications I0 CFR 21 Decision Checklist Acceptance of Investigation:

Date: Quality Approval:

Date: Halliday, K 3/28/2003 Site-VP Acceptance:

Date: Closuro Comments: An investigation was conducted in accordance with the security contractor's company policy. During the investigation, the employee admitted to willful misconduct and his employment relationship with thE security contractor was terminated.

Quality Comments: CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Resp CA Sched CA Cause Org. Accept Due Completed Number: Type: Type: Code: Codes: CA Acceptance:

Date: Date: Date: Page 1 of 1