|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:Pn cc 1 t-f 1RULES 1: ) DIRECTIVESAs of: January 14, 2014Received: | | {{#Wiki_filter:Pn cc 1 t-f 1 RULES 1: ) DIRECTIVES As of: January 14, 2014 Received: |
| January 09, 2014PUBLIC SUBM ISSION 4 J 14 PM 3:15 Status: Pending-Post Tracking No. ljy-89rt-8xlIy Comments Due: March 05, 2014Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2013-0283 RF CFIVEDDuke Energy Florida, Inc. Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportComment On: NRC-2013-0283-0001 Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Cyrstal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportDocument: | | January 09, 2014 PUBLIC SUBM ISSION 4 J 14 PM 3:15 Status: Pending-Post Tracking No. ljy-89rt-8xlIy Comments Due: March 05, 2014 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0283 RF CFIVED Duke Energy Florida, Inc. Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Comment On: NRC-2013-0283-0001 Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Cyrstal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Document: |
| NRC-2013-0283-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-31317 Submitter Information Name: William KranAddress:2218 Hennesen DriveClearwater, FL, 33764Email: wkran3@tampabay.rr.com General CommentHow is it reasonable that our Florida Power Company totally destroyed the Crystal River Nuclear powerfacilities and then, by Duke Power gaining control, that Duke Power assumes responsibility for the economicresults to repair or decommission the Crystal River facilities and then expect the customers to pay for thedecommissioning costs? In what commercial enterprise can a company make such huge economic | | NRC-2013-0283-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-31317 Submitter Information Name: William Kran Address: 2218 Hennesen Drive Clearwater, FL, 33764 Email: wkran3@tampabay.rr.com General Comment How is it reasonable that our Florida Power Company totally destroyed the Crystal River Nuclear power facilities and then, by Duke Power gaining control, that Duke Power assumes responsibility for the economic results to repair or decommission the Crystal River facilities and then expect the customers to pay for the decommissioning costs? In what commercial enterprise can a company make such huge economic mistakes, that are really criminal negligence, and then allowing Duke Power to make a profit. If Duke Power will not step up and resume responsibility, after acquiring Florida Power and their failures, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission bowing to Duke Power proposals then we the people must assume that there must be some under the table negotiations between Duke Power and the NRC that are happening. |
| : mistakes, thatare really criminal negligence, and then allowing Duke Power to make a profit. If Duke Power will not step upand resume responsibility, after acquiring Florida Power and their failures, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission bowing to Duke Power proposals then we the people must assume that there must be some underthe table negotiations between Duke Power and the NRC that are happening.
| | PLEASE be OPEN and HONEST and tell us why the NRC thinks the Duke Power proposals to charge customers for repairs, maintenance and construction related to the Crystal River Nuclear power plant decommissioning amounting to $1.466 billion while making a profit on this effort as well.Asking for HELP, William C. Kran Clearwater resident since June 1972. Please reply to wkran3@tampabay.rr.com. |
| PLEASE be OPEN and HONESTand tell us why the NRC thinks the Duke Power proposals to charge customers for repairs, maintenance andconstruction related to the Crystal River Nuclear power plant decommissioning amounting to $1.466 billionwhile making a profit on this effort as well.Asking for HELP,William C. Kran Clearwater resident since June 1972. Please reply to wkran3@tampabay.rr.com. | | SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= 0c.d https ://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 14f7f8b&for... |
| SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate | |
| = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= 0c.d https ://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 14f7f8b&for... | |
| 01/14/2014}} | | 01/14/2014}} |
Latest revision as of 16:55, 13 July 2018
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML19177A2322019-06-26026 June 2019
Comment (15) E-mail Regarding C.R. EIS Scoping Comments
ML14070A4042014-03-0505 March 2014
Comment (7) of Brian P. Moore on Crystal River, Unit 3, Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML14070A4032014-03-0404 March 2014
Comment (6) of Ricky Miles on Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML14063A2042014-02-19019 February 2014
Comment (5) of Warren K. Brewer on Crystal River, Unit 3, Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML14035A0722014-01-19019 January 2014
Comment (4) of an Anonymous Individual on Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML14017A0562014-01-10010 January 2014
Comment (3) of Anonymous Individual on Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Crystal River, Unit 3, Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML14017A0582014-01-0909 January 2014
Comment (2) of William Kran on Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Cyrstal River, Unit 3, Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML14017A0572014-01-0909 January 2014
Comment (1) of an Anonymous Individual on Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Crystal River, Unit 3, Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012
Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11209C4862011-07-26026 July 2011
Comment (9) of Joseph Walsh, on Behalf of Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, on Draft Supplement to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants for Crystal River Unit 3, NRC Report No. NUREG-14
ML11217A0192011-07-25025 July 2011
Comment (12) of Heinz J. Mueller on Behalf of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for Issuance of a Renewed Operating License for Crystal River Plant, Unit 3
ML11208C2722011-07-25025 July 2011
Comment (8) of Sara Barczak on Behalf of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, Opposing Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 44 Regarding Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant
ML11208C2712011-07-25025 July 2011
Comment (7) of Charles C. Alton on Behalf of Himself, Opposing Crystal River, Unit 3, Draft Supplement 44 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants
ML11208C2692011-07-25025 July 2011
Comment (5) of Michael Canney on Behalf of the Green Party of Florida Opposing NUREG-1437, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant (NUREG-1437, Sup
ML11203A4412011-07-21021 July 2011
Comment(4) of Andreas Auner, Supporting Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 44 Regarding Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant
ML11194A0372011-07-0707 July 2011
Comment (3) of Josh Wooten, on Behalf of the Citrus County Chamber of Commerce, Full Board of Directors, Supporting NRC Renewal of Nuclear Plant License for Nuclear Plant Site Located within Citrus County, Florida
ML11194A0362011-07-0505 July 2011
Comment (2) of C. Theresa Supporting Shut Down of Nuclear Power Plants in Florida & Opposing License for License of Crystal River Plant
ML0611103552006-04-11011 April 2006
Comment (4) of Brian Mccabe, Re NUREG-0800, Section 17.5, Quality Assurance Program Description - Design Certification, Early Site Permit and New License Applicants, Draft Revision 0
2019-06-26
[Table view] |
Text
Pn cc 1 t-f 1 RULES 1: ) DIRECTIVES As of: January 14, 2014 Received:
January 09, 2014 PUBLIC SUBM ISSION 4 J 14 PM 3:15 Status: Pending-Post Tracking No. ljy-89rt-8xlIy Comments Due: March 05, 2014 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0283 RF CFIVED Duke Energy Florida, Inc. Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Comment On: NRC-2013-0283-0001 Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Cyrstal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Document:
NRC-2013-0283-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-31317 Submitter Information Name: William Kran Address: 2218 Hennesen Drive Clearwater, FL, 33764 Email: wkran3@tampabay.rr.com General Comment How is it reasonable that our Florida Power Company totally destroyed the Crystal River Nuclear power facilities and then, by Duke Power gaining control, that Duke Power assumes responsibility for the economic results to repair or decommission the Crystal River facilities and then expect the customers to pay for the decommissioning costs? In what commercial enterprise can a company make such huge economic mistakes, that are really criminal negligence, and then allowing Duke Power to make a profit. If Duke Power will not step up and resume responsibility, after acquiring Florida Power and their failures, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission bowing to Duke Power proposals then we the people must assume that there must be some under the table negotiations between Duke Power and the NRC that are happening.
PLEASE be OPEN and HONEST and tell us why the NRC thinks the Duke Power proposals to charge customers for repairs, maintenance and construction related to the Crystal River Nuclear power plant decommissioning amounting to $1.466 billion while making a profit on this effort as well.Asking for HELP, William C. Kran Clearwater resident since June 1972. Please reply to wkran3@tampabay.rr.com.
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= 0c.d https ://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 14f7f8b&for...
01/14/2014
