ML17326B593: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:gcCELZRATED D1SIRIBU'EON DEMONSTRATIO'.i SYSTEMREGULRTCINFORMATION DISTRIBUTION+STEM (RIDE)ACCESSION NBR:8904210210 | ||
,DOC.DATE: | |||
89/04/07NOTARIZED: | |||
NODOCKETFACIL:50-31$ | |||
DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,Indiana60500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,Indiana&05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P. | |||
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly IndianaaMichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E. | |||
OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, Director(Post870411 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Application foramendstoLicensesDPR-58&DPR-74,revising TechSpecs.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR JENCLJSIZE:+"gTITLE:ORSubmittal: | |||
GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LASTANGFJINTERNAL: | |||
NRR/DEST/ADS 7ENRR/DEST/ESB 8DNRR/DEST/MTB 9HNRR/DOEA/TSB 11OCEGFILE01EXTERNAL: | |||
LPDRNSICCOPIESLTTRENCL11551111111110111111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DEST/CEB 8HNRR/DEST/ICSB NRR/DEST/RSB 8ENUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1RES/DSIR/EIB NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111~11101111NOXK'IOALL'RZDS>>RECIPIENTS g~8PIZASEHELPUS'Z0REDUCEgASTE!(EHIACT'IHEDOCXMWZCONI'ROLDESKRXNPl-37(EXT.20079)mELXMZHKTB YOURNAMEPBCHDIPI%UBlOTIGN LISTSFORDOCUMEHIS KXJDGNFTNEZD!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED: | |||
LTTR22ENCL20 IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyP.O.Box16631Columbus, OH432168AEP:NRC:0979 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.DPR-58andDPR-74.LicenseNos.50-315and50-316TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGEREQUEST:REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ONPRIMARYCOOLANTIODINESPIKES(GENERICLETTER85-19)Attn:T.E.MurleyApril7,1989 | |||
==DearDr.Murley:== | ==DearDr.Murley:== | ||
Thisletterconstitutes anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2.Specifically, weareproposing changestotheT/Srequirements associated withspecificactivityoftheprimarycoolant.Thechangesbeingproposedareinaccordance withchangesendorsedbytheNRCstaffinGenericLetter85-19.Adetaileddescription ofthechangesandouranalysesconcerning significant hazardsarecontained inAttachment 1.Attachment 2containstheproposedrevisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountsofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure. | |||
TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andwillbereviewedbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee attheirnextregularly scheduled meeting.Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(1), | |||
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andMr.GeorgeBruchmann oftheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.89<<2~0a>O 89OO07PDRADQCK05000315flPN~U Dr.T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC:0979 Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures thatincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoensureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned., | |||
Sincerely, M..Alexch.VicePresident ldpAttachments cc:D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanG.Bruchmann R.C.CallenG.CharnoffA.B.Davis-RegionIIINRCResidentInspector | |||
-Bridgman 1It)if ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:0979 DESCRIPTION AND10CFR50.92SIGNIFICANT HAZARDSEVALUATION FORCHANGESTOTHETECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FORTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITS1AND2 Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0979 Page1DescritionofChaneAspartofacontinuing programtodeleteunnecessary reporting requirements, theNRCstaffreviewedthereporting requirements relatedtoprimarycoolantspecificactivitylevelsanddetermined thatthesereporting requirements couldbemodifiedtorequirereporting intheAnnualOperating Reportratherthaninashortertermreport(SpecialReportorLicenseeEventReport).Thestaffendorsement ofthisapproachwasprovidedinGenericLetter85-19.GenericLetter85-19alsoendorsedelimination oftheplantshutdownrequirements forthecaseinwhichtheiodineactivitylimitsareexceededfor800hoursina12-monthperiod.Thislaterendorsement wasinresponsetotheNRCstaff'seffortstoeliminate unnecessary T/Srequirements. | |||
WebelievethechangesendorsedbyGenericLetter85-19wouldbebeneficial totheCookNuclearPlant,andwearetherefore proposing changestoourT/Sswhichfollowtheguidanceprovidedinthegenericletter.Wehavenotdeviatedfromthegenericletterguidanceinanyway;ourproposedchangesexactlyfollowthemodelspecification forWestinghouse plantsprovidedinthegenericletter.Wehavealsomadeappropriate changestotheBasesforthespecificactivitylimits.InmakingourT/Ssconsistent withthe'odelT/Ss,thefollowing changeswerenecessary. | |||
1)"3/4.4.8" wasaddedtothe'titleof,.thespecification. | |||
2)Thephrase"primarycoolant"waschangedto"reactorcoolant." | |||
3)Thelessthanorequaltosymbols(<),thegreaterthanorequaltosymbols(>),thegreaterthansymbols(>),andthelessthansymbols(<),wereconverted towords.4)The"1.0"waschangedto"1"inSpecification 3.4.8.a.5)Thephrase"uCi/gram" waschangedto"microCuries/gram." | |||
6)ActionaunderModes1,2and3*wasdeletedandActionbwaschangedtoActionaandActioncwaschangedtoActionb.7)TheportionofActionaunderModes1,2,3,4and5involving thereporting requirements wasdeleted.8)Thephrase"ofgrossradioactivity" wasaddedtoSpecification 3.4.8.b.9)Anadditional requirement hasbeenaddedtoSection6.9.1.5torequirethatinformation regarding anyinstances whentheI-131specificactivitylimitwasexceededbesubmitted intheannualreport. | |||
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0979 Page2Justification forChaneAsstatedinGenericLetter85-19,NRChasreviewedthereporting requirements relatedtoprimarycoolantspecificactivitylevelsanddetermined thatrequiring ashore-term reportisunnecessary andendorsedincluding therequiredinformation intheAnnualOperating Report.TheNRCalsoendorseddeletionoftherequirement toshutdownaplantifthecoolantiodineactivitylimitsexceededaspecified annuallimit.Asstatedinthegenericletter,thislimitisnolongernecessary onthebasisthatproper'uel management bylicensees andexistingreporting requirements shouldprecludeeverapproaching thislimit.AllotherchangesproposedtomakeourT/Ssconsistent withthemodelT/Ssareeditorial innature.AnalsisofSinificantHazardsPer10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment willnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration iftheproposedamendment doesnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofapreviously evaluated | |||
: accident, (2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated, or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Criterion 1Theproposedchangesareconsistent withthoseendorsedbytheNRCinGenericLetter85-19.ForthereasonsstatedinGenericLetter85-19,webelievethedeletedrequirements areunnecessary restrictions. | |||
Theproposedchangeswouldnotaffecttheaccidentanalysisandthelimitsforthereactorcoolantremainthesame.TheT/Srequirement toshu'tdowntheplantifthecoolantiodineactivitylimitsareexceededformorethan10%oftheunit'sannualoperating timeisanoperating restriction "thatisnolongernecessary basedonademonstration ofsuccessful operating experience asindicated inGenericLetter85-19.Basedontheaboveinformation, webelievethatdeletionoftheserequirements wouldnotsignificantly increasetheprobability orconsequences ofapreviously analyzedaccident. | |||
Criterion 2Theproposedchangesareconsistent withthechangesendorsedbyGenericLetter85-19andwillnotrequirephysicalalteration oftheplantorchangesinparameters governing normalplant Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0979 Page3operation. | |||
Wetherefore believethesechangeswouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously analyzedorevaluated. | |||
Criterion 3Theproposedchangesareconsistent withthechangesendorsedbyGenericLetter85-19andwouldnotmodifythepresentgrossactivitylimitordoseequivalent I-131limits.Wetherefore believetheproposedchangewouldnotsignificantly reduceamarginofsafety.Lastly,wenotethattheCommission hasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermination ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration. | |||
Thesixthoftheseexamplesreferstochangeswhichmayre'suitinsomeincreasetotheprobability ofoccurrence orconsequences ofapreviously analyzedaccident, buttheresultsofwhicharewithinlimitsestablished asacceptable. | |||
Sincetheproposedchangesareconsistent withtheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter85-13,we-believethesechangesfallwithinthescopeofthisexample.Thefourthoftheseexamplesreferstoreliefgrantedupondemonstration ofacceptable operation fromanoperating restriction thatwasimposedbecauseacceptable operation wasnotyetdemonstrated. | |||
Theproposeddeletionoftheshutdownrequirement iftheiodinelimitsareexceededformorethan10%oftheunit'sannualoperating timefallswithinthescopeofthisexample.Therefore webelievethesechangesdonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdefinedin10CFR50.92. | |||
ATTACHMENT 2TOAEP:NRC:0979 PROPOSEDTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES}} | |||
Revision as of 08:56, 29 June 2018
| ML17326B593 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 04/07/1989 |
| From: | ALEXICH M P INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| To: | MURLEY T E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17326B594 | List: |
| References | |
| AEP:NRC:0979, AEP:NRC:979, GL-85-19, NUDOCS 8904210210 | |
| Download: ML17326B593 (9) | |
Text
gcCELZRATED D1SIRIBU'EON DEMONSTRATIO'.i SYSTEMREGULRTCINFORMATION DISTRIBUTION+STEM (RIDE)ACCESSION NBR:8904210210
,DOC.DATE:
89/04/07NOTARIZED:
NODOCKETFACIL:50-31$
DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,Indiana60500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,Indiana&05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P.
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly IndianaaMichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.
OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, Director(Post870411
SUBJECT:
Application foramendstoLicensesDPR-58&DPR-74,revising TechSpecs.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR JENCLJSIZE:+"gTITLE:ORSubmittal:
GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LASTANGFJINTERNAL:
NRR/DEST/ADS 7ENRR/DEST/ESB 8DNRR/DEST/MTB 9HNRR/DOEA/TSB 11OCEGFILE01EXTERNAL:
LPDRNSICCOPIESLTTRENCL11551111111110111111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DEST/CEB 8HNRR/DEST/ICSB NRR/DEST/RSB 8ENUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1RES/DSIR/EIB NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111~11101111NOXK'IOALL'RZDS>>RECIPIENTS g~8PIZASEHELPUS'Z0REDUCEgASTE!(EHIACT'IHEDOCXMWZCONI'ROLDESKRXNPl-37(EXT.20079)mELXMZHKTB YOURNAMEPBCHDIPI%UBlOTIGN LISTSFORDOCUMEHIS KXJDGNFTNEZD!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR22ENCL20 IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyP.O.Box16631Columbus, OH432168AEP:NRC:0979 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.DPR-58andDPR-74.LicenseNos.50-315and50-316TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGEREQUEST:REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ONPRIMARYCOOLANTIODINESPIKES(GENERICLETTER85-19)Attn:T.E.MurleyApril7,1989
DearDr.Murley:
Thisletterconstitutes anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2.Specifically, weareproposing changestotheT/Srequirements associated withspecificactivityoftheprimarycoolant.Thechangesbeingproposedareinaccordance withchangesendorsedbytheNRCstaffinGenericLetter85-19.Adetaileddescription ofthechangesandouranalysesconcerning significant hazardsarecontained inAttachment 1.Attachment 2containstheproposedrevisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountsofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andwillbereviewedbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee attheirnextregularly scheduled meeting.Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(1),
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andMr.GeorgeBruchmann oftheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.89<<2~0a>O 89OO07PDRADQCK05000315flPN~U Dr.T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC:0979 Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures thatincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoensureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned.,
Sincerely, M..Alexch.VicePresident ldpAttachments cc:D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanG.Bruchmann R.C.CallenG.CharnoffA.B.Davis-RegionIIINRCResidentInspector
-Bridgman 1It)if ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:0979 DESCRIPTION AND10CFR50.92SIGNIFICANT HAZARDSEVALUATION FORCHANGESTOTHETECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FORTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITS1AND2 Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0979 Page1DescritionofChaneAspartofacontinuing programtodeleteunnecessary reporting requirements, theNRCstaffreviewedthereporting requirements relatedtoprimarycoolantspecificactivitylevelsanddetermined thatthesereporting requirements couldbemodifiedtorequirereporting intheAnnualOperating Reportratherthaninashortertermreport(SpecialReportorLicenseeEventReport).Thestaffendorsement ofthisapproachwasprovidedinGenericLetter85-19.GenericLetter85-19alsoendorsedelimination oftheplantshutdownrequirements forthecaseinwhichtheiodineactivitylimitsareexceededfor800hoursina12-monthperiod.Thislaterendorsement wasinresponsetotheNRCstaff'seffortstoeliminate unnecessary T/Srequirements.
WebelievethechangesendorsedbyGenericLetter85-19wouldbebeneficial totheCookNuclearPlant,andwearetherefore proposing changestoourT/Sswhichfollowtheguidanceprovidedinthegenericletter.Wehavenotdeviatedfromthegenericletterguidanceinanyway;ourproposedchangesexactlyfollowthemodelspecification forWestinghouse plantsprovidedinthegenericletter.Wehavealsomadeappropriate changestotheBasesforthespecificactivitylimits.InmakingourT/Ssconsistent withthe'odelT/Ss,thefollowing changeswerenecessary.
1)"3/4.4.8" wasaddedtothe'titleof,.thespecification.
2)Thephrase"primarycoolant"waschangedto"reactorcoolant."
3)Thelessthanorequaltosymbols(<),thegreaterthanorequaltosymbols(>),thegreaterthansymbols(>),andthelessthansymbols(<),wereconverted towords.4)The"1.0"waschangedto"1"inSpecification 3.4.8.a.5)Thephrase"uCi/gram" waschangedto"microCuries/gram."
6)ActionaunderModes1,2and3*wasdeletedandActionbwaschangedtoActionaandActioncwaschangedtoActionb.7)TheportionofActionaunderModes1,2,3,4and5involving thereporting requirements wasdeleted.8)Thephrase"ofgrossradioactivity" wasaddedtoSpecification 3.4.8.b.9)Anadditional requirement hasbeenaddedtoSection6.9.1.5torequirethatinformation regarding anyinstances whentheI-131specificactivitylimitwasexceededbesubmitted intheannualreport.
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0979 Page2Justification forChaneAsstatedinGenericLetter85-19,NRChasreviewedthereporting requirements relatedtoprimarycoolantspecificactivitylevelsanddetermined thatrequiring ashore-term reportisunnecessary andendorsedincluding therequiredinformation intheAnnualOperating Report.TheNRCalsoendorseddeletionoftherequirement toshutdownaplantifthecoolantiodineactivitylimitsexceededaspecified annuallimit.Asstatedinthegenericletter,thislimitisnolongernecessary onthebasisthatproper'uel management bylicensees andexistingreporting requirements shouldprecludeeverapproaching thislimit.AllotherchangesproposedtomakeourT/Ssconsistent withthemodelT/Ssareeditorial innature.AnalsisofSinificantHazardsPer10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment willnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration iftheproposedamendment doesnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofapreviously evaluated
- accident, (2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated, or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Criterion 1Theproposedchangesareconsistent withthoseendorsedbytheNRCinGenericLetter85-19.ForthereasonsstatedinGenericLetter85-19,webelievethedeletedrequirements areunnecessary restrictions.
Theproposedchangeswouldnotaffecttheaccidentanalysisandthelimitsforthereactorcoolantremainthesame.TheT/Srequirement toshu'tdowntheplantifthecoolantiodineactivitylimitsareexceededformorethan10%oftheunit'sannualoperating timeisanoperating restriction "thatisnolongernecessary basedonademonstration ofsuccessful operating experience asindicated inGenericLetter85-19.Basedontheaboveinformation, webelievethatdeletionoftheserequirements wouldnotsignificantly increasetheprobability orconsequences ofapreviously analyzedaccident.
Criterion 2Theproposedchangesareconsistent withthechangesendorsedbyGenericLetter85-19andwillnotrequirephysicalalteration oftheplantorchangesinparameters governing normalplant Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0979 Page3operation.
Wetherefore believethesechangeswouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously analyzedorevaluated.
Criterion 3Theproposedchangesareconsistent withthechangesendorsedbyGenericLetter85-19andwouldnotmodifythepresentgrossactivitylimitordoseequivalent I-131limits.Wetherefore believetheproposedchangewouldnotsignificantly reduceamarginofsafety.Lastly,wenotethattheCommission hasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermination ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
Thesixthoftheseexamplesreferstochangeswhichmayre'suitinsomeincreasetotheprobability ofoccurrence orconsequences ofapreviously analyzedaccident, buttheresultsofwhicharewithinlimitsestablished asacceptable.
Sincetheproposedchangesareconsistent withtheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter85-13,we-believethesechangesfallwithinthescopeofthisexample.Thefourthoftheseexamplesreferstoreliefgrantedupondemonstration ofacceptable operation fromanoperating restriction thatwasimposedbecauseacceptable operation wasnotyetdemonstrated.
Theproposeddeletionoftheshutdownrequirement iftheiodinelimitsareexceededformorethan10%oftheunit'sannualoperating timefallswithinthescopeofthisexample.Therefore webelievethesechangesdonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdefinedin10CFR50.92.
ATTACHMENT 2TOAEP:NRC:0979 PROPOSEDTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES