ML14230A908: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts, Slides and Viewgraphs | | document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts, Slides and Viewgraphs | ||
| page count = 12 | | page count = 12 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = RAI | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:EltfElements of anAgingManagementProgramAging Management ProgramDivision of Spent Fuel Storage and TransportationOffifNlMtilSftdSfdOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionMeeting to Discuss the Request for Additional Information Responses Regarding the Calvert Cliffs Independent Spend Fuel Storage Facility License Renewal July 17, 20141 Regulatory Basis10 CFR 72.42(a), 72.240(c): 1.TLAAs that demonstrate that ITS SSCs will continue to perform their intended function for the period of extended operation.2.A description of the AMP for management of issues associated with agingthatcouldadverselyaffectITSSSCsaging that could adversely affect ITS SSCs.Guidance: NUREG-1927 AMP Elements:1ScopeoftheProgram6AcceptanceCriteria1.Scope of the Program2.Preventive Actions3.Parameters Monitored/Inspected4.DetectionofAgingEffects6.Acceptance Criteria7.Corrective Actions 8.Confirmation Process 9.AdministrativeControlsFor in-scope SSCs, detailed AMPs addressing the 10 elements ldtffiittffidfftitfi4.Detection of Aging Effects5.Monitoring and Trending9.Administrative Controls10.Operating Experiencelead to efficient staff reviews and effective management of aging effects2 AMP Element 1:ScopeoftheProgramScope of the ProgramNUREG-1927:The scope of the program should include the specific structures andcomponentssubjecttoanAMRand components subject to an AMRIdentifies:In-scope components and subcomponentspppMaterials of constructionService environmentAging mechanisms for material/environment combinationggAging effects associated with each aging mechanism3 AMP Element 2:PreventiveActionsPreventive ActionsNUREG-1927:Preventive actions should mitigate or prevent the applicableagingeffectsapplicable aging effectsActions to minimize, control, or prevent the degradation mechanism, e.g. NRC-endorsed criteria (peak cladding temperatures below ISG-11, 3liitdidi)ddtddtrev. 3 limit during drying), consensus codes and standards, etc.4 AMP Element 3:ParametersMonitored/InspectedParameters Monitored/ InspectedNUREG-1927:Parameters monitored or inspected should be linked to the effects ofagingontheintendedfunctionsoftheparticularstructureandcomponentof aging on the intended functions of the particular structure and componentIdentifies:Parameters (e.g. cracking size monitoring, rate of material loss, temperature, neutron fluence, etc.)Location(s) to be monitored or inspected (e.g. at highest heat location, neutron fluenceat 1 m from cask)Learning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Informs parameters monitored/inspected (tiered approach)5 AMP Element 4:DetectionofAgingEffectsDetection of Aging EffectsNUREG-1927:Define method or technique, frequency, sample size, data collectionandtimingtoensuretimelydetectionofagingeffectscollection, and timing to ensure timely detection of aging effectsIdentifies:Method/technique (e.g. visual, volumetric, and/or surface inspections or surveys)surveys)Frequency of inspection (e.g. inspection intervals)Sample size (dependent on operational experience trending)CalibrationofequipmentCalibration of equipment Data collection (clearinghouse for operational experience)Timing (new or one-time inspections, time of year)Li/Pti/RiAMPLearning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Consensus codes and standardsIfthd/thifdttiifft/hi6Informs methods/techniques for detecting aging effects/mechanisms (tiered approach) | |||
AMP Element 5:Monitoring&TrendingMonitoring & TrendingNUREG-1927:Should provide for prediction of the extent of the effects of aging andtimelycorrectiveormitigativeactionsand timely corrective or mitigativeactionsTrending of aging effects (e.g. corrosion rate, crack growth rate, etc.)Assess effects per prior inspections and industry-wide operational iexperienceLearning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Informs monitoring and trending7 AMP Element 6:AcceptanceCriteriaAcceptance CriteriaNUREG-1927:Acceptance criteria, against which the need for corrective action will beevaluated;shouldensurethatSSCfunctionsaremaintainedbe evaluated; should ensure that SSC functions are maintainedCriteria for inspections, assessing aging effects, and decision-makingEstablish technical basis for specific acceptance criteriappDomestic and international consensus codes and standards whenever practicable, or previously justified and established criteriaSeparate criteria should be provided for each aging effectAlternative criteria may be used if justified:Supporting technical basis (OpEand/or engineering analysis/standards)Avoid non-quantifiable phrases (e.g. significant, moderate, minor, little, etc.)Learning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Informs acceptance criteria8 AMP Element 7:CorrectiveActionsCorrective ActionsNUREG-1927:Corrective actions, including root cause determination andpreventionofrecurrenceshouldbetimelyprevention of recurrence, should be timelyCAP commensurate with 10CFR72 Subpart G, or 10CFR50 Appendix BMaintenance plans and/or corrective actions for specific degradation fft(iltitititiiti&ttfeffects (e.g. repair, replacement, mitigation activities, & extent of condition)Actions to prevent reoccurrenceJustificationforactionssuchasrepairreplaceand/ormitigateJustification for actions such as repair, replace, and/or mitigateAnalysis of how action may affect other subcomponentsConsideration of corrective actions on other componentsPlansforOpEincorporationintotheremediationplanPlans for OpEincorporation into the remediation planLearning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Informscorrectiveactions9Informs corrective actions AMP Element 8:ConfirmationProcessConfirmation ProcessNUREG-1927: The confirmation process should ensure that preventive actions areadequateandappropriatecorrectiveactionshavebeencompletedandareare adequate and appropriate corrective actions have been completed and are effectiveElement should reference:Quality Assurance Program consistent with 10CFR72 Subpart G, or 10CFR50 Appendix B.Methods to confirm adequate actions are taken, and are verified as fftieffective10 AMP Element 9:AdministrativeControlsAdministrative ControlsNUREG-1927: Administrative controls should provide a formal review and approvalprocessapproval processElements should reference:Quality Assurance Program consistent with 10CFR72 Subpart G, or ygp,10CFR50 Appendix B.Inspector requirementsRecord retention requirementsReview process of inspection resultsFrequency/methods for:reporting inspection results to NRCevaluating suitability of AMP based on industry-wide OpE(tollgates)11 AMP Element 10:OperatingExperienceOperating ExperienceNUREG-1927:Include past corrective actions; provide objective evidence to supportadeterminationthattheeffectsofagingwillbeadequatelymanagedsosupport a determination that the effects of aging will be adequately managed so that the SSC intended functions will be maintained during the period of extended operationCriticalelementtoLearning/Proactive/ResponsiveAMPCritical element to Learning/Proactive/Responsive AMPReferenceand evaluate applicable Operational Experience:Industry-wideCondition Reports, Corrective Action Reports, NRC InformationNoticesApplicableindustryinitiatives(egDOEcaskInformation Notices, Applicable industry initiatives(e.g. DOE cask demo, EPRI-sponsored inspections)12}} |
Revision as of 00:52, 27 June 2018
ML14230A908 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Calvert Cliffs ![]() |
Issue date: | 08/18/2014 |
From: | Goshen J M NRC/NMSS/SFST |
To: | |
Goshen J M | |
Shared Package | |
ML14230A903 | List: |
References | |
TAC L24475 | |
Download: ML14230A908 (12) | |
Text
EltfElements of anAgingManagementProgramAging Management ProgramDivision of Spent Fuel Storage and TransportationOffifNlMtilSftdSfdOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionMeeting to Discuss the Request for Additional Information Responses Regarding the Calvert Cliffs Independent Spend Fuel Storage Facility License Renewal July 17, 20141 Regulatory Basis10 CFR 72.42(a), 72.240(c): 1.TLAAs that demonstrate that ITS SSCs will continue to perform their intended function for the period of extended operation.2.A description of the AMP for management of issues associated with agingthatcouldadverselyaffectITSSSCsaging that could adversely affect ITS SSCs.Guidance: NUREG-1927 AMP Elements:1ScopeoftheProgram6AcceptanceCriteria1.Scope of the Program2.Preventive Actions3.Parameters Monitored/Inspected4.DetectionofAgingEffects6.Acceptance Criteria7.Corrective Actions 8.Confirmation Process 9.AdministrativeControlsFor in-scope SSCs, detailed AMPs addressing the 10 elements ldtffiittffidfftitfi4.Detection of Aging Effects5.Monitoring and Trending9.Administrative Controls10.Operating Experiencelead to efficient staff reviews and effective management of aging effects2 AMP Element 1:ScopeoftheProgramScope of the ProgramNUREG-1927:The scope of the program should include the specific structures andcomponentssubjecttoanAMRand components subject to an AMRIdentifies:In-scope components and subcomponentspppMaterials of constructionService environmentAging mechanisms for material/environment combinationggAging effects associated with each aging mechanism3 AMP Element 2:PreventiveActionsPreventive ActionsNUREG-1927:Preventive actions should mitigate or prevent the applicableagingeffectsapplicable aging effectsActions to minimize, control, or prevent the degradation mechanism, e.g. NRC-endorsed criteria (peak cladding temperatures below ISG-11, 3liitdidi)ddtddtrev. 3 limit during drying), consensus codes and standards, etc.4 AMP Element 3:ParametersMonitored/InspectedParameters Monitored/ InspectedNUREG-1927:Parameters monitored or inspected should be linked to the effects ofagingontheintendedfunctionsoftheparticularstructureandcomponentof aging on the intended functions of the particular structure and componentIdentifies:Parameters (e.g. cracking size monitoring, rate of material loss, temperature, neutron fluence, etc.)Location(s) to be monitored or inspected (e.g. at highest heat location, neutron fluenceat 1 m from cask)Learning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Informs parameters monitored/inspected (tiered approach)5 AMP Element 4:DetectionofAgingEffectsDetection of Aging EffectsNUREG-1927:Define method or technique, frequency, sample size, data collectionandtimingtoensuretimelydetectionofagingeffectscollection, and timing to ensure timely detection of aging effectsIdentifies:Method/technique (e.g. visual, volumetric, and/or surface inspections or surveys)surveys)Frequency of inspection (e.g. inspection intervals)Sample size (dependent on operational experience trending)CalibrationofequipmentCalibration of equipment Data collection (clearinghouse for operational experience)Timing (new or one-time inspections, time of year)Li/Pti/RiAMPLearning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Consensus codes and standardsIfthd/thifdttiifft/hi6Informs methods/techniques for detecting aging effects/mechanisms (tiered approach)
AMP Element 5:Monitoring&TrendingMonitoring & TrendingNUREG-1927:Should provide for prediction of the extent of the effects of aging andtimelycorrectiveormitigativeactionsand timely corrective or mitigativeactionsTrending of aging effects (e.g. corrosion rate, crack growth rate, etc.)Assess effects per prior inspections and industry-wide operational iexperienceLearning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Informs monitoring and trending7 AMP Element 6:AcceptanceCriteriaAcceptance CriteriaNUREG-1927:Acceptance criteria, against which the need for corrective action will beevaluated;shouldensurethatSSCfunctionsaremaintainedbe evaluated; should ensure that SSC functions are maintainedCriteria for inspections, assessing aging effects, and decision-makingEstablish technical basis for specific acceptance criteriappDomestic and international consensus codes and standards whenever practicable, or previously justified and established criteriaSeparate criteria should be provided for each aging effectAlternative criteria may be used if justified:Supporting technical basis (OpEand/or engineering analysis/standards)Avoid non-quantifiable phrases (e.g. significant, moderate, minor, little, etc.)Learning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Informs acceptance criteria8 AMP Element 7:CorrectiveActionsCorrective ActionsNUREG-1927:Corrective actions, including root cause determination andpreventionofrecurrenceshouldbetimelyprevention of recurrence, should be timelyCAP commensurate with 10CFR72 Subpart G, or 10CFR50 Appendix BMaintenance plans and/or corrective actions for specific degradation fft(iltitititiiti&ttfeffects (e.g. repair, replacement, mitigation activities, & extent of condition)Actions to prevent reoccurrenceJustificationforactionssuchasrepairreplaceand/ormitigateJustification for actions such as repair, replace, and/or mitigateAnalysis of how action may affect other subcomponentsConsideration of corrective actions on other componentsPlansforOpEincorporationintotheremediationplanPlans for OpEincorporation into the remediation planLearning/Proactive/Responsive AMP:Operational experience and other quality data (tollgates)Informscorrectiveactions9Informs corrective actions AMP Element 8:ConfirmationProcessConfirmation ProcessNUREG-1927: The confirmation process should ensure that preventive actions areadequateandappropriatecorrectiveactionshavebeencompletedandareare adequate and appropriate corrective actions have been completed and are effectiveElement should reference:Quality Assurance Program consistent with 10CFR72 Subpart G, or 10CFR50 Appendix B.Methods to confirm adequate actions are taken, and are verified as fftieffective10 AMP Element 9:AdministrativeControlsAdministrative ControlsNUREG-1927: Administrative controls should provide a formal review and approvalprocessapproval processElements should reference:Quality Assurance Program consistent with 10CFR72 Subpart G, or ygp,10CFR50 Appendix B.Inspector requirementsRecord retention requirementsReview process of inspection resultsFrequency/methods for:reporting inspection results to NRCevaluating suitability of AMP based on industry-wide OpE(tollgates)11 AMP Element 10:OperatingExperienceOperating ExperienceNUREG-1927:Include past corrective actions; provide objective evidence to supportadeterminationthattheeffectsofagingwillbeadequatelymanagedsosupport a determination that the effects of aging will be adequately managed so that the SSC intended functions will be maintained during the period of extended operationCriticalelementtoLearning/Proactive/ResponsiveAMPCritical element to Learning/Proactive/Responsive AMPReferenceand evaluate applicable Operational Experience:Industry-wideCondition Reports, Corrective Action Reports, NRC InformationNoticesApplicableindustryinitiatives(egDOEcaskInformation Notices, Applicable industry initiatives(e.g. DOE cask demo, EPRI-sponsored inspections)12