ML17333A315: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY1REGULATORNFORMATIONDISTRIBUTION.EM(RIDS)ACCFCSSIOUNBR:9602260305DOC.DATE:96/02/22NOTARIZED:YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315DonaldC.CookNuc'earPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONFITZPATRICK,E.IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerlyIndiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAMERECIPIENTAFFILIATIONDocumentControlBranch(DocumentControlDesk) | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
ApplicationforamendstolicensesDPR-58!'PR-74,modifyingTable4.8-1,DGTestSchedulebyrefRG1.9,Rev3ratherthanRG1.108,Rev1criteriafordeterminationofvalidDGtest.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR1ENCLISIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:GeneralDistributionNOTES:RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD3-1LAHICKMAN,JINTERNA:FAIRECRENATE>INRRDRCH/HICBNRR/DSSA/SRXBOGC/HDS2EXTERNAL:NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111111011RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD3-1PDNRR/DE/EMCBNRR/DSSA/SPLBNUDOCS-ABSTRACTNRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1111111111NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMOWFNSD-5(EXT.415-2083)TOELIMINATEYOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTIONLISTSFORDOCUMENTSYOUDON'TNEED!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR12ENCL,11 IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyPOBox16631Columbus,OH43216lNOIANANICHIGANPWMFebruary22,1996AEP:NRC:1243Docket:Nos.:50-31550-316U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionATTN:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555Gentlemen:DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2PROPOSEDAMENDMENTTOTECHNICALSPECIFICATIONSECTIONS3/4.8.1~1FORELECTRICALPOWERSYSTEMSThisletterand"itsattachmentsconstituteanapplicationforamendmenttothetechnicalspecifications,(T/Ss)forDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantunits1and2.Specifically,weareproposingtomodifyTable4.8-1,DieselGeneratorTestSchedule,byreferencingRegulatoryGuide1.9,Revision3ratherthanRegulatoryGuide1.108,Revision1criteriaforthedeterminationofavaliddieselgeneratortest.Attachment1providesadetaileddescriptionoftheproposedchanges,thejustificationforthechanges,andourdeterminationofnosignificanthazardsconsiderationperformedpursuantto10CFR50.92.Attachment2containstheexistingT/Spagesmarkedtoreflecttheproposedchanges.Attachment3containstheproposedT/Spages.Webelievetheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificantchangeinthetypesofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificantincreaseinindividualorcumulativeoccupationalradiationexposure.TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommitteeandtheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee.9'602260305960222PDRADQCK05000315PPDR U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionPage2AEP:NRC:1243Incompliancewiththerequirementsof10CFR50.91(b)(1),copiesofthisletteranditsattachmentshavebeentransmittedtotheMichiganPublicServiceCommissionandtot'eMichiganDepartmentofPublicHealth.Sincerely,C4.4E.E.FitzpatrickVicePresidentSWORNTOANDSUBSCRIBEDBEFOREMETHIS~~DAYOF1996otaryPubicpitAttachmentsCC:A.A.BlindG.CharnoffH.J,MillerNFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector-BridgmanJ.R.Padgett | |||
'lgr ATTACHMENT1TOAEP:NRC:1243DESCRIPTIONANDJUSTIFICATIONOFCHANGES10CFR50.92ANALYSISFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITS1AND2TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS ATTACHMENT1TOAEP:NRC:1243Page1DESCRIPTIONOFCHANGESTheproposedamendmenttoTechnicalSpecification(T/S)3/4.8.1.1makesthefollowingspecificchangetotheCookNuclearPlantunits1and2T/S:RevisesafootnoteinTable4.8-1toreadasfollows:CriteriafordeterminingnumberoffailuresandvalidtestsshallbeinaccordancewithRegulatoryPositionC.2.1ofRegulatoryGuide1.9,Revision3,wherethenumberoftestsandfailuresisdeterminedonaperdieselgeneratorbasis.Forthepurposesofthistestschedule,onlyvalidtestsconductedaftertheOLissuancedateshallbeincludedinthecomputationofthe"last20validtests."II.JUSTIFICATIONFORCHANGESTheproposedrevisiontotheT/SisbasedonthefactthatRegulatoryGuide1.9,Revision3hasincorporatedthepertinentguidancepreviouslyaddressedinRevision1ofRegulatoryGuide1.108,and,beingamorerecentdocument,itbetterreflectstheNRCrequirementsregardingdieselgeneratortesting.IIX.10CFR5092CRITERIAPer10CFR50.92,proposedchangesdonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsiderationifthechangesdonot:involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityofconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated,2.createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated,or3.involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafetyCriterion1ThisamendmentrequestdoesnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluatedbecausetheproposedchangetotheT/Sdoesnotaffecttheassumptions,parameters,orresultsofanyUFSARaccidentanalysis.Theproposedamendmentdoesnotmodifyanyexistingequipment,andtheproposedacceptancecriteriafordieselgeneratortestingwillconformtoNRCguidance.Basedontheseconsiderations,itisconcludedthatthechangesdonotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated. | |||
ATTACHMENT1TOAEP'NRC'1243Page2CriteronTheproposedchangesdonotinvolvephysicalchangestotheplantorchangesinplantoperatingconfiguration.Theproposedchangesupdateguidancefordieselgeneratortesting.Thus,itisconcludedthattheproposedchangesdonotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Criteion3Theproposedchangesupdateguidanceforthetestingofdieselgenerators.TheguidanceisendorsedbytheNRCinRegulatoryGuide1.9,andcompliancewiththisguidancewillensuretheoperabilityofthedieselgenerators.Thus,thereisnosignificantreductioninthemarginofsafety.}} |
Revision as of 04:19, 13 June 2018
ML17333A315 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook ![]() |
Issue date: | 02/22/1996 |
From: | FITZPATRICK E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
Shared Package | |
ML17333A316 | List: |
References | |
RTR-REGGD-01.009, RTR-REGGD-01.108, RTR-REGGD-1.009, RTR-REGGD-1.108 AEP:NRC:1243, NUDOCS 9602260305 | |
Download: ML17333A315 (8) | |
Text
CATEGORY1REGULATORNFORMATIONDISTRIBUTION.EM(RIDS)ACCFCSSIOUNBR:9602260305DOC.DATE:96/02/22NOTARIZED:YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315DonaldC.CookNuc'earPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONFITZPATRICK,E.IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerlyIndiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAMERECIPIENTAFFILIATIONDocumentControlBranch(DocumentControlDesk)
SUBJECT:
ApplicationforamendstolicensesDPR-58!'PR-74,modifyingTable4.8-1,DGTestSchedulebyrefRG1.9,Rev3ratherthanRG1.108,Rev1criteriafordeterminationofvalidDGtest.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR1ENCLISIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:GeneralDistributionNOTES:RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD3-1LAHICKMAN,JINTERNA:FAIRECRENATE>INRRDRCH/HICBNRR/DSSA/SRXBOGC/HDS2EXTERNAL:NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111111011RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD3-1PDNRR/DE/EMCBNRR/DSSA/SPLBNUDOCS-ABSTRACTNRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1111111111NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMOWFNSD-5(EXT.415-2083)TOELIMINATEYOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTIONLISTSFORDOCUMENTSYOUDON'TNEED!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR12ENCL,11 IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyPOBox16631Columbus,OH43216lNOIANANICHIGANPWMFebruary22,1996AEP:NRC:1243Docket:Nos.:50-31550-316U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionATTN:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555Gentlemen:DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2PROPOSEDAMENDMENTTOTECHNICALSPECIFICATIONSECTIONS3/4.8.1~1FORELECTRICALPOWERSYSTEMSThisletterand"itsattachmentsconstituteanapplicationforamendmenttothetechnicalspecifications,(T/Ss)forDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantunits1and2.Specifically,weareproposingtomodifyTable4.8-1,DieselGeneratorTestSchedule,byreferencingRegulatoryGuide1.9,Revision3ratherthanRegulatoryGuide1.108,Revision1criteriaforthedeterminationofavaliddieselgeneratortest.Attachment1providesadetaileddescriptionoftheproposedchanges,thejustificationforthechanges,andourdeterminationofnosignificanthazardsconsiderationperformedpursuantto10CFR50.92.Attachment2containstheexistingT/Spagesmarkedtoreflecttheproposedchanges.Attachment3containstheproposedT/Spages.Webelievetheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificantchangeinthetypesofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificantincreaseinindividualorcumulativeoccupationalradiationexposure.TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommitteeandtheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee.9'602260305960222PDRADQCK05000315PPDR U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionPage2AEP:NRC:1243Incompliancewiththerequirementsof10CFR50.91(b)(1),copiesofthisletteranditsattachmentshavebeentransmittedtotheMichiganPublicServiceCommissionandtot'eMichiganDepartmentofPublicHealth.Sincerely,C4.4E.E.FitzpatrickVicePresidentSWORNTOANDSUBSCRIBEDBEFOREMETHIS~~DAYOF1996otaryPubicpitAttachmentsCC:A.A.BlindG.CharnoffH.J,MillerNFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector-BridgmanJ.R.Padgett
'lgr ATTACHMENT1TOAEP:NRC:1243DESCRIPTIONANDJUSTIFICATIONOFCHANGES10CFR50.92ANALYSISFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITS1AND2TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS ATTACHMENT1TOAEP:NRC:1243Page1DESCRIPTIONOFCHANGESTheproposedamendmenttoTechnicalSpecification(T/S)3/4.8.1.1makesthefollowingspecificchangetotheCookNuclearPlantunits1and2T/S:RevisesafootnoteinTable4.8-1toreadasfollows:CriteriafordeterminingnumberoffailuresandvalidtestsshallbeinaccordancewithRegulatoryPositionC.2.1ofRegulatoryGuide1.9,Revision3,wherethenumberoftestsandfailuresisdeterminedonaperdieselgeneratorbasis.Forthepurposesofthistestschedule,onlyvalidtestsconductedaftertheOLissuancedateshallbeincludedinthecomputationofthe"last20validtests."II.JUSTIFICATIONFORCHANGESTheproposedrevisiontotheT/SisbasedonthefactthatRegulatoryGuide1.9,Revision3hasincorporatedthepertinentguidancepreviouslyaddressedinRevision1ofRegulatoryGuide1.108,and,beingamorerecentdocument,itbetterreflectstheNRCrequirementsregardingdieselgeneratortesting.IIX.10CFR5092CRITERIAPer10CFR50.92,proposedchangesdonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsiderationifthechangesdonot:involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityofconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated,2.createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated,or3.involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafetyCriterion1ThisamendmentrequestdoesnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluatedbecausetheproposedchangetotheT/Sdoesnotaffecttheassumptions,parameters,orresultsofanyUFSARaccidentanalysis.Theproposedamendmentdoesnotmodifyanyexistingequipment,andtheproposedacceptancecriteriafordieselgeneratortestingwillconformtoNRCguidance.Basedontheseconsiderations,itisconcludedthatthechangesdonotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.
ATTACHMENT1TOAEP'NRC'1243Page2CriteronTheproposedchangesdonotinvolvephysicalchangestotheplantorchangesinplantoperatingconfiguration.Theproposedchangesupdateguidancefordieselgeneratortesting.Thus,itisconcludedthattheproposedchangesdonotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Criteion3Theproposedchangesupdateguidanceforthetestingofdieselgenerators.TheguidanceisendorsedbytheNRCinRegulatoryGuide1.9,andcompliancewiththisguidancewillensuretheoperabilityofthedieselgenerators.Thus,thereisnosignificantreductioninthemarginofsafety.