ML042940192

Condition Report No. 02-00891

ML042940192
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	02/27/2002
From:	Hennessy B - No Known Affiliation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2003-0187 02-00891
Download: ML042940192 (53)

Text

NOP-LP-2001 -01 CONDITION REPORT lC~me TITLE: CONTROL ROD DRIVE NOZZLE CRACK INDICATION 02-00891 DISCOVERY DATE1 TIME JEVENT DATEJ TIME I SYSTEM I ASSET#

2/2712002 1330 2/27/02 1330 064-02 NA EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Reactor Vessel Head DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION and PROBABLE CAUSE (if known) Summarize any attachments. Identify what, when, where, why, how.

0 Ultrasonic testing (UT) performed on the #3 Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) nozzle (location R

G9) revealed indications of through wall axial flaws in the weld region. (See report for nozzle #3 per I

procedure 54-ISI-100-08, M.G. Hacker, dated 2/27/02) These indications represent potential G

leakage paths. Further characterization will be performed per the Reactor head nozzle action plan I

using the "top-down" UT tooling.

N A

T SUPV COMMENTS / IMMEDIATE ACTIONS TAKEN (Discuss CORRECTIVE ACTIONS completed, basis for closure.)

I The observed cracking is axial only and does not appear to be the type identified in NRC bulletin o

2001-01. This CR is reportable as pressure boundary leakage per T.S. 3.4.6.2.a.

N QUALITY ORGANIZATION USE ONLY IDENTIFIED BY (Check one)

E Self-Revealed ATTACHMENTS Quality Org. Initiated El Yes 3

Individual/Work Group O

Internal Oversight Quality Org. Follow-up 0

Yes D3 No 0

Supervision/Management El External Oversight 95 Yes ED No ORIGINATOR ORGANIZATION DATE SUPERVISOR DATE I PHONE EXT.

LANG,T LCM 2/27/2002 LANG,T 2/27/2002 8116 SRO EQUIPMENT EVALUATION IMMEDIATE ORGANIZATION lMODE CHANGE REVIEW OPERABLE REQUIRED INVESTIGATION REQUIRED NOTIFIED RESTRAINT L i Yes El No E Yes i No [

N/A E Yes gI No a Yes i No NWA l

Yes E No A

MODE ASSOCIATED TECH SPEC NUMBER(S)

ASSOCIATED LCO ACTION STATEMENT(S)

N le-,,

181

1. 2 T

DECLARED REPORTABLE?

One Hour N/A APPLICABLE UNIT(S)

O NOPERABLE (Date/Time) E3Yes ENo F&Zi.H&6 A

P 2/27/02 1330 ElEvat Required Other 8-Hr Non-Emergency GL/ Ul E0 U2 0l Both E

COMMENTS R

Referred DB-OP-00002, Operations Section Event/Incident Notifications and Actions. Notified Duty A

Personnel of this reportable condition underl0 CFR 50.72 (b) (3). Notified NRC Operations center at T

1540, event # 38732 was assigned to this notification.

O Current Mode - Unit 1 Power Level - Unit 1 Current Mode - Unit 2 Power Level - Unit 2 N

6 0

S SRO - UNIT I SRO - UNIT 2 DATE Lewis, A Koch, S 2127/2002 CATEGORY / EVAL ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION DUE DATE R REPORTABLE?

ST NA 10/14/2002 E E} Yes Oh No EV LER No.

2002-002 CRP TREND CODES Comp Type/ID Resp u REPORTABILITYREVIEWER I

Process I Activity I Cause Code(s)

(If Cause T or W)

Org A Wolf, G SUPV HOW 0600 T DATE o

AT MRB Y

02/27/02 INVESTIGATION OPTIONS CLOSED BY DATE

_ l Generic Implications OPart 2i Maint.Rule IROE Evaluation l

Page 1 of 1

Attachment CONDITION REPORT CR Number 02-00891

_ REPORTABILITY DETERMINATION:

Technical Specification 3.4.6.2.a states that Reactor Coolant System leakage shall be limited to no pressure boundary leakage. The indication of through-wall axial flaws in the weld region described in this CR represents pressure boundary leakage of the Reactor Coolant System, and therefore represents a serious degradation of a principal safety barrier. Accordingly, this Issue was reported as a non-emergency, 8-hour report in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(A), a condition that resulted in the nuclear power plant, including its principal safety barriers being seriously degraded. This notification was made to the NRC Operations center at 1540 hours0.0178 days <br />0.428 hours <br />0.00255 weeks <br />5.8597e-4 months <br /> on February 27, 2002 as described by the Senior Reactor Operator's comments (reference Event #38732).

10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) requires any event or condition that resulted in the condition of the nuclear power plant, including its principle safety barriers, being seriously degraded be reported in a Licensee Event Report (LER). 1 OCFR50.73(a)(1) requires a LER be submitted within 60 days of the event or discovery of the event. LER 2002-002 is therefore required to be submitted on or before April 29, 2002 (the next working day following the 60-day period).

Page 1 of 1

CONDITION REPORT EVALUATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION EXTENSION REQUEST FORM CR #:

02-00891 CA: 0 YES

[3 NO IF YES, CAF #: 4,6,9 10,11,13,14 1l'° a u

• .x4

'(

r° CATEGORY:

ST CA TYPE:

a PR El RA V EA 3 OT Q CM ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION:

NAR CURRENT DUE DATE:

06/14/02 REQUESTED DUE DATE: 10/14/02 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Provide a description of the reason an extension to the due date is requested.

CR 02-00S91 (first CRDM crack that was found) is the host document for resolution of issues related to cracks in the CRDM nozzles and corrosion on the Reactor Head. As such, several other CRs have been folded into it, including CR 02-00685 and CR 02-00846 (presence of boric acid on the Reactor head and flange' CR 02-00932 (remainder of CRDM nozzle cracks), CR 02-01053 (machine tool rotation on nozzle #3), CR 02-1128 (Reactor head degradation), and CR 02-01583 (additional affected areas). A root cause team, including industry experts from Framatome, EPRI, Dominion Engineering, Beta labs, Davis Besse, and other FENOC sites have prepared a root cause report. This root cause report has been submitted to the NRC. However, the root cause investigation for the CR needs additional time to address CR programmatic requirements, to include the additional CRs, and to formulate corrective actions. This extension request is also extending the due dates of CA#4, 6, 9,10,11,13,&14 RISK ANALYSIS: Does this date extension impact the function or availability of an asset modeled In the site Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) or of Risk Significant Systems, Structures or Gomponents (SSC's)? (Refer to applicable Maintenance Rule System Scoping Sheets and NG-DB-00001 for additional guidance.)

D YES NO JUSTIFICATION: Regardless of the answer to the Risk Analysis question above, provide a justification (basis) for the requested due date extension taking Into account any risk significance. State the risks considered and the actions that are being implemented, if any, to mitigate this risk.

Although the function of the reactor head is within the scope of the PSA, "No" is marked above because the plant is being kept in a mode where the function is not required until the root cause is completed and Operability of the system is restored. Therefore, a delay in completing the root cause has no negative effect on the overall risk.

PreDared bv:

Approved by:

QA Approval:

Date:

06/05/02 Date: --

L/t Date (Only required If CR Is Initiated by an Audit Finding and is an SCAQ)

Rev. 01

DB-0095 REACTOR PLANT EVENT NOTIFICATION WORKSHEET

/-

Pag-e16 5

L5o/

De fl 73 2-1 Page 1 of 2

NRC OPERATION sTELEPHONEiNUM.BER

~;-'

~

tX ON7 a

i

=

P-1 NOTIFICATION TIME FACILITY OR ORGANIZATION UNIT NAME OF CALLER CALL BACK NUMBER

/S$/2 Ar6 I Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station I

Dale Miller 419-321-8888 EVENT TIME AND ZONE EVENT DATE POWER/MODE BEFORE POWER/MODE AFTER 10 EDT 2/27/02 016 016 1330 0EST__

EVEZ44§if1-H

r. Non-Emergency 10 CFR 50.72(b) (1) Q (vXA) Sale SOD Capability AINB 0 GENERAL EMERGENCY GENAAEC El TS Deviation (50.54x)

ADEV 0

(vXB) RHR Capabilty AJNB o

SITE AREA EMERGENCY SITIAAEC 4-Hr. Non-Emergency 10 CFR 50.72(b) (2) 0 (vXC) Control of Rad Release AINC o

ALERT ALEIAAEC 0 (i)

TS Required SID ASHU 0

(vXD) Accident Mitigation AIND Oa UNUSUAL EVENT UNUIAAEC O

(iv)(A) ECCS Discharge to RCS ACCS EO (xi)

Offsite Medical AMED

[a 50.72 NON-EMERGENCY see next columns EO fiv)(B) RPS Actuation (scram)

ARPS O

(xiil Loss Com/lAsmUtResp ACOM O

PHYSICAL SECURITY (73.71)

DDDD El (xi)

Offsite NobTcation APRE 60-Day Optional 10 CFR 50.73 (a)(1) o MATERIALUEXPOSURE B-Hr. Non-Emergency 10 CFR 50.72(b) (3) 0 J Invalid Specified System Actuation AINV FITNESS FOR DUTY HFI0 (iiXA) Degraded Condition ADEG Other Specified Requirement (Identify)

E OTHER UNSPECIFIED REaMT. see last column OA (ii)(B) Unanalyzed Condition AUNA 0

NONR o

INFORMATION ONLY NNF El iv)(A) SpecIfied System Actuation AESF El NONR

-§i 1'.

i

- *' _tS8 tli tt'rya l-4ti{ *,

"B" IEC}8o

• rY

-1 i!i2t'S

-xg9s Include: Systenns affeCted. actuations and their Ifrliatig signals, causes, effect of event on plant. actions taken or planned, etc. (Conlinue on back)

On February 26, 2002, following shutdown for a scheduled refueling outage, the Davis-Bcsse Nuclear Power Station performed a qualified visual examination of the Reactor Vessel head per NRC Bulletin 2001-0 1. This examination revealed evidence of boric acid build up around Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) nozzles but was inconclusive due to the previous known boric acid deposits. At approximately 1330 hours0.0154 days <br />0.369 hours <br />0.0022 weeks <br />5.06065e-4 months <br /> on February 27, 2002 Ultrasonic Testing (UT) data identified axial through weld indications on one CRDM. Engineering evaluation of this data confirmed Reactor Coolant System pressure boundary leakage exists. Technical Specification 3.4.6.2.a states that Reactor Coolant System leakage shall be limited to no pressure boundary leakage. As a result this is being reported as a non-emergency, 8-hour report in accordance with IOCFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(a), a condition that resulted in the nuclear power plant, including its principal safety barriers being seriously degraded.

eO4;&*s are CO+;,o;5;3 o

"tXc4 -

e 4-Hr Non-Emergency Involving Spent Fuel 10 CFR72.75(b)

EO (1)

An event that prevents Immediate actions necessary to avoid exposures or releases that exceed regulatory GInits (e.g. fire or explosion).

0 (2) AdefectInanySpentFuelStorage SCC ol (3)

A significant reduction i the effectiveness of any Spent Fuel Storage System.

El (4)

An action taken that departs Irom the COC necessary to protect the health and safety of the publi.

(5) An event that requires medical treatment at an ofsite facility of a contaminated Individual.

El (6) A fire or explosion that affects the Integrity of spent fuel or Its container.

NOTIFICATIONS YES NO WILL BE ANYTHING UNUSUAL OR NRC RESIDENT n

o 1(

NOT UNDERSTOOD?

YES (Explain above)

E NO STATE OF OHIO Of DID ALL SYSTEMS LOCAL O

FUNCTION AS REQUIRED?

0 YES Q

NO (Explain above)

OTHER GOV AGENCIES MODE OF OPERATION ESTIMATED RESTART DATE:

ADDITIONAL INFO ON MEDIAJPRESS RELEASE UNTIL CORRECTED:

March 23, 2002 NEXT PAGE?

L 1

6 E YES 03 NO

DB-0095 REACTOR PLANT EVENT NOTIFICATION WORKSHEET Page 2 of 2 RADIOLOGICAL RELEASES: CHECK OR FILL IN APPLICABLE ITEMS (specIfic detallslexplanatlons should be covered In event description).

O LIUID

[

GASEOUS UNPLANNED NED ONGOING l TERIINATED RELEASE RELEASE RELEASE RELEASE O

MONITORED 5

UNMONITORED O

OFFs5TE 5

ODCM O

RM I

5 AREAS I

RELEASE EXCEEDED ALARMS EVACUATED E

PERSONNEL EXPOSED OR CONTAMINTED E]

OFFSITE PROTECTIVE ACTIONS RECOMMENDED

• State release path In description

~.>.N.^

.>s9*t.;.-:;.RE SE RATE fCl

%'ODCMUMIT M1460 GUIDE ;-TOTAt C

)

%ODC UMTf Ot iDE Noble Gas 0.1 Cl/sec 1000 Ci lodine 10 uCusec 0.01 Ci Particulate 1 uCVsec 1 mCi Uquid (excluding Iuitum and 10 uC/rnin 0.1 CI dissolved noble gases)

Liquid (tutium) 0.2 Clrnin 5 CI Total ActivIty

^

4

_ i!;pL)J-STACt'.

}

COiDENSERIAIRiNJEC1

~

i iSi iAMLINE

` SGEBLOWDOO i:Z _

iO fE r

RAD MONITOR READINGS ALARM SETPOINTS

% ODCM UMIT li applcable)

RCS OR SG TUBE LEAKS: CHECK OR FILL IN APPLICABLE ITEMS: (specIfic details/explanations should be covered In event description).

LOCATION OF THE LEAK (e.g.. SG N. valve. pipe. etc.)

Reactor Vessel Head (CRDM Nozzle 3)

LEAK RATE UNITS: gpm/gpd T.S. UMITS SUDDEN OR LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT Pressure Boundary leakage unknown None Long term LEAK START DATE TIME COOLANT ACTIVITY PRIMARY SECONDARY unknown unknown AND UNITS:

LIST OF SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT NOT OPERATIONAL EVENT DESCRIPTION (conlinued from page 1)

0310712082 09:03 4348323177 FTI COMP PEP & REPL rllx UIL 22144-7 (12001)

Apt NONCONFORMANCE REPORT FRAMATOME ANP WORKING INSTRUCTION WI-9 I NCR#

I 6014069 lREV.#

0-t PAGE 1

OF 2 1 i r-rlnu i IsMMrnu CONTRACT*.:

1231216 CUSTOMERSITEAUNIT:

FENOC I Davis Besse TECHNICAL DOCUMENTI; 50-5015342-00 SEQUENCE/STEP F 160 DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCEJCONDITION:

El QA INITIATED During the machining of nozzle #3 (drive G9) the machining tool rotated after machiing - 4' of the nozzle length Indicabnq the nozzle was loose in the penetration. All machining was stopped. Video inspection of the nozzle indicated massive amount of base material erosion - 180 degrees circumference of the bore. All work associated with the Process Traveler is on hold.

INITIATOR:

Pete Strubhar (NAME)

DATEITIME:

03/05/2002 6:00 PM TAG PLACED D

YES ED NO SENT TO:

Fred Snow (NAMF1 REQUESTEO COMPLETION DATE TBD I -FFr.T-fU -j UI-FRl I IETMIJ A Nn "1FPnqTWInM NCR CLASSIFICATION:

SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL:

DISPOSITION OF NCR:

DISPOSITION:

0 SAFETY-RELATED 0 1 D II o REWORKIREINSPECT O REPLACE 0

OTHER O

NON SAFETY-RELATED 0

ASME CODE o

III 0

NONE O REPAIRIRE-INSPECT 0

USE AS IS Follow Instructions per FENOC i Davis Besse work order to investigate options and understand the scope of the erosion.

Report additional information on Rev 01 of this NCR.

CAUSE Material PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS:

None -As found condition.

CAR/RO REQUIRED a YES 0

NO NUMBER VENDOR pirfappscable)

APPLICABLE TO OTHER CONTRACTS:.

0 YES M NO RESOLUTION:

None AFFECTED ORGANIZATION:

CR&R RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAtENGINEER:

?24 ISIGNATUJF APPROVAL REQUIRED:

0 ANUANII 0

• CUSTOMI SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE:

317/02 Fred Snow 317102 ZE1 INAME1 lnATEI ER 5

GA 0 Al INSPECTOR

03/07/2002 89:03 4348323177 FTI COFMR FEP & REPL 22144-7 (12001)

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT CONTINUATION AFRAMATOME ANP WORK INSTRUCTION WI-9 NCR#

6014069 1 I REV.# 100 PAGE 2

OF 2

'SECTK)N 3 DISPOSmON APPROVAL REVIEWER '_

n f 317102 IFJG(NATt fNAME1)

DATE)

UNIT MANAGER:

O f

Dave Waskey 3-7-02 (SeRe Unle I Belowl S)GNATURF (NAME1 (DATE)

CUSTOMER APPROVAL:

,/' i7- /

14tt A& kAd s

/i ANIANIVAJ I Inspector Review AV37 The tAMs G.- LAPS (itf required)

(SIGNATUREU

((NAME)

(DAT QA Approval (If rnuairpril ISIGNATURE)

(NAME1 (DATE)

Note: 1:

For significance Level I and If NCRs. the Unit Managers sgnature indicates that the CARIRO actions have been completed or tor a CAR that work may continue.

SECTION 4 DISPOSMTION COMPLETION THE DISPOSITION ACTIONS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 2 HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.

VERIFIED BY:

(SIGNATURE1 (NAME1 (DATE)

QA VERIFICATION:

NA (If recuired)

(SIGNATURE)

(NAME)

(DATE)

SECTION 5 PREVENTATIVE ACTION COMPLETION THE PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 2 HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. THIS NCR IS CLOSED.

VERIFIED BY:

(SIGNATUREI (NAME1 IDATEI QA VERIFICATION:

NA (if reouired)

(SIGNATURE1 (NAME)

(DATE)

DURTRUIBIFfON Project Engineer Records Management - - T5.16 Oher Unit Technical Manager OA Spec4fy

CONDITION REPORT EVALUATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION EXTENSION REQUEST FORM CR #:

02-00891 CA: [2 YES E NO IF YES, CAF #:

CATEGORY:

ST CA TYPE:

E PR 0 RA E EA a OT El CM ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION:

LCM CURRENT DUE DATE:

03/29/02 l REQUESTED DUE DATE: 04/26102 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Provide a description of the reason an extension to the due date is requested.

CR 02-00891 has become the host document for resolution of several other CRs related to cracks in CRDM nozzles and resultant effects, including CR 02-00685, 02-00846, 02-00932, 02-01053, and 02-1128. The last of these CRs, CR'02-1128 deals with the boric acid corrosion issue on the ReactorHead and was issued on 3/8/02 at the "ST" level, with original due date of 4n/02. The root cause team, including industry experts from Framatome, EPRI Dominion Engineering, Beaver Valley, Beta labs, and Davis Besse has been actively preparing the root cause report. However, due to the scope ot the effort, including overall site and NRC involvement, the standard time allocation per NOP-LP 02001 is not sufficient to complete the task.

RISK ANALYSIS: Does this date extension Impact the function or availability of an asset modeled in the site Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) or of Risk Significant Systems, Structures or Components (SSC's)? (Refer to applicable Maintenance Rule System Scoping Sheets and NG-DB-00001 for additional guidance.)

LJYES 3

NO JUSTIFICATION: Regardless of the answer to the Risk Analysis question above, provide a justification (basis) for the requested due date extension taking Into account any risk significance. State the risks considered and the actions that, are being implemented, if any, to mitigate this risk.

Although the function of the reactor head is within the scope of the PSA, "No" is marked above because the plant is being kept in a mode where the function is not required until the root cause is completed and Operability of the system is restored. Therefore, a delay in completing the root cause has no negative effect on the overall risk.

PreDared bv:

Ted Lang X Date:

04/02102

-NA

&,m&

afi.

Approved by:

QA Approval:

7 tpl 6Date:

yCoDaII&

ri (Only required If CR is iniliated by an Audit Finding and Ls an SCAG)

Date Rev. 01

CONDITION REPORT EVALUATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION EXTENSION REQUEST FORM CR #:

02-00891 CA: Z YES Li NO IF YES, CAF #: 4,6,9 CATEGORY:

ST CA TYPE:

E PR E RA Li EA Z OT El CM ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION:

LCM dhQabj4ctd-(n ataa- - Pm4i1Z5 CURRENT DUE DATE:

04/26/02 l REQUESTED DUE DATE: 06/14/02 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Provide a description of the reason an extension to the due date is requested.

CR 02-00891 (first CRDM crack that was found) is the host document for resolution of issues related to cracks in the CRDM rnozzles and corrosion on the Reactor Head. As such, several other CRs have been folded into it, including CR 02-00685 and CR 02-00846 (presence of boric acid on the Reactor head and flange, CR 02-00932 (remainder of CRDM nozzle cracks), CR 02-01053 (machine tool rotation on nozzle #3), CR 02-1128 (Reactor head degradation), and CR 02-01583 (additional affected areas). A root cause tearn, including industry experts from Framatome, EPRI, Dominion Engineering, Beta labs, Davis Besse, and other FENOC sites have prepared a root cause report. This root cause report has been submitted to the NRC. However, the root cause investigation for the CR needs additional time to address CR programmatic requirements, to include the additional CRs, and to formulate corrective actions. This extension request is also extending the due dates of CA#4, 6, and 9 (for rollover CRs listed above) from 4/26/02 to 6/14/02.

RISK ANALYSIS: Does this date extension impact the function or availability of an asset modeled in the site Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) or of Risk Significant Systems, Structures or Components (SSC's)? (Refer to applicable Maintenance Rule System Scoping Sheets and NG-DB-00001 for additional guidance.)

l YES Z NO JUSTIFICATION: Regardless of the answer to the Risk Analysis question above, provide ajustification (basis) forthe requested due date extension taking Into account any risk significance. State the risks considered and the actions that are being Implemented, if any, to mitigate this risk.

Although the function of the reactor head is within the scope of the PSA, "No" is marked above because the plant is being kept in a mode where the function is not required until the root cause is completed and Operability of the system is restored. Therefore, a delay in completing the root cause has no negative effect on the overall risk.

Ted Lang If PreDared bv:

Approved bv.

--?Ail, Date:

04/23/02 141-'d jI.

I A,

QA Approval:

'-3

(.

i (Only required If CR Is initiated by an Audit Finding and Is an SCAQ)

Date:

Date Rev. 01

a CR 02-00891 items needed to be completed prior to closing the evaluation.

Understand the intent of the hardware analysis and align the corrective actions (CA) to the causes identified in the report, document the CA Owner, due date, and type of action such as Preventative, Remedial, or Enhancement and then obtain concurrence from (Steve) the team on changes made.

Document the Hardware extent of Condition Plan actions.

Document the Human Performance or non-hardware extent of Condition Plan actions.

Document the'Effectiveness Review required actions.

Perform the non-hardware Human Performnance Evaluation documenting the root and contributing causes and corrective actions, owner, due date and type of action.

Perform and document the Corrective Action Evaluation and any root and contributing causes and corrective actions, owner, due date and type of action.

Enter the datainito CREST Obtain Approvals.

CONDITION REPORT EVALUATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION EXTENSION REQUEST FORM CR #:

02-00891 CA: Z YES El NO IFYES,CAF#:3 CATEGORY:

ST CA TYPE:

O PR 3 RA

[j EA ED OT r CM ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION:

LCM CURRENT DUE DATE:

04/30102 REQUESTED DUE DATE: 12105/02 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Provide a description of the reason an extension to the due date is requested.

CR 02-00891 is the host CR that resolves most of the CRDM nozzle cracking and reactor head corrosion issues..CA #3 was written to perform an effectiveness review. This review is normally done at a time interval of up to approximately a year following the implementation of corrective actions. The present due date was entered too early to properly assess the effectiveness of the actions.

RISK ANALYSIS: Does this date extension Impact the function or availability of an asset modeled in the site Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) or of Risk Significant Systems, Structures or Components (SSC's)? (Refer to applicable Maintenance Rule System Scoping Sheets and NG-DB-00001 for additional guidance.)

5YES 3NO JUSTIFICATION: Regardless of the answer to the Risk Analysis question above, provide a justification (basis) for the requested due date extension taking Into account any risk significance. State the risks considered and the actions that are being implemented, if any, to mitigate this risk.

~There is no risk associated with the requested extension. Since it acts as a verification that corrective actions are appropriate and functional (and that verification will require time In order to be effective itself) the extension is appropriate.

PreDared bv:

Approved by:

Ted Lang; 0X5 e

Date:

4/23/02 Date:

4 1 0 7 QA Approval:

Date (Only required If CR is Initiated by an Audit Finding and Is an SCAO)

Rev. 01

[ 5/20/2002 MON 06:55 FAX 4193218563 DB-LC ICII CONDITION REPORT EVALUA:

H ii 001 TION/CORRECTIVE ACTION EXTENSION REQUEST FORM CR #:

-00891 l CA: Z YES El NO IFYES, CAF#: 10 CATEGORY:

SCAQ-ST CA TYPE:

a PR E RA S EA

[1 OT El CM ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION:

LCM CURRENT DUE DATE:

5/20/02 i REQUESTED DUE DATE::6L1 71 (?40t ?42 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Provide a description of the reason an extension to the due date is requested.

CR 02-00891 has had a preliminary root cause performed, but is continuing to develop with respect to extent of condition and corrective actions. This action is to provide a comprehensive OE to replace/augment previous OEs on this topic, including relevant management issues and any corrections to earlier information if required. It is desired to complete a final OE that does not require further revision to close this action. The current due date for the CR investigation is 6/14/02.

RISK ANALYSIS: Does this date extension Impact the function or availability of an asset modeled in the site Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) or of Risk Significant Systems, Structures or Components (SSC's)? (Refer to applicable Maintenance Rule System Scoping Sheets and NG-DB-00001 for additional guidance.)

aYES E NO JUSTIFICATION: Regardless of the answer to the Risk Analysis question above, provide a justification (basis) for the requested due date extension taking Into account any risk significance. State the risks considered and the actions that are being Implemented, if any, to mitigate this risk.

Previous OEs (as of 4/9102) that have been issued are: OE13398, OE13454, OE13480, OE135 14. Through these OEs and several other documents including NRC BuUetin 2002-01, the industry is well aware of the issue. Issuance of the OE has no risk significance and does not affect the PRA or any SSC.

Drr~mnrnr4 kif

i (115b

&LAIV&)

I aIlalc

-v.

CI U

I e

D j i)

Approved by:

Date:

51-/°Z Date:

/I (voC)z Date QA Approval:

(Only required It CR Is InIated by an Audit Finding and Is an SCAQ)

Rev. 01

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (0O) OE

( A) Normal Work Management 1

Corrective Acti on Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0

( OT) Other

( NA ) Not Applicable LCM R

==

Description:==

I Determine if an OE evaluation is required via NG-NA-00305. If you have questions, please contact G

John Johnson at 8345.

N CR 02-01053, which is being rolled into this CR, also includes an action to evaluate for an OE.

A Please consider this also in your response.

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization: I Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI, K RA 2/28/2002 8590 l

Yes R No If a Refueling Outage Is required, IR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC.

Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R __U N/WA 4112/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG, T LCM 4/212002 DUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

[TY I

M P

L E

M E

N T

l N

G

Response

AN OE evaluation is required for this event. However, to date, several OE's and updates have already been Issued (in addition to NRC bulletin 2002-01 and Info Notice 2002-13). The OEs include:

OE13398, Control Rod Drive Mechanism Nozzle Circumferential Flaws and Material Void at Davis-Besse, 3/11/02 OE13454, Update to OE13398, 3/19/02 OE13480, Update to OE1 3454, 3/26/02 OE13514, Update to OE13480, 4/03/02 These documents have provided a continuing source of fresh information as it became available.

However, a comprehensive summary OE, including pertinent management issues, would be advantageous.

Therefore, a new Corrective action will be entered to accomplish that objective.

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

4/9/02

.tJ Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

Completed By:

LANG, T Date:

4/9/2002 JI Signature indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

0 R

G

J Enter Name and Sign

Implementing Organization Approval:

LANG, T Date:

4/9/2002 Page 1 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 o V Comments:

U E A R L I I F T I y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 2 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category: lAction Type:

lSchedule Type:

CA Number:

ST l(

K) OTHER

( A)

Normnal Work Management 2

Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0

( OT ) Other

( NA ) Not Applicable LCM R

==

Description:==

The MRB requests that this event be evaluated for potential maintenance rule functional failure in G

accordance with the Maintenance Rule Program Manual. Please document why or why not the I

failure is a functional failure. If you need assistance, contact the Maintenance Rule Coordinator, N

Gary Melssen, at extension 7697.

A T

0 R

Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI, K RA 2/28/2002 8590 D Yes i No If a Refueling Outage Is required, a IR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R N/A N/A l

4/26/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG, T LCM 4/2/2002 QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M This condition is considered a Maintenance Rule Functional Failure since the RCS pressure barrier P

was not maintained. This Is indicated by the Pressure Boundary Leakage being greater than the zero leakage as allowed by Tech Specs. This was determined in a Maintenance Rule Expert Panel L

meeting on 3/21/02. Based on the Performance Criteria of no Functional Failures allowed for E

Function #1, the RCS has been placed in (a)(1) status.

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

4/9102 N

Li Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By.

LANG, T Date:

4/9/2002 if Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

0 Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R

.j Enter Name and Sign:

a Implementing Organization Approval:

LANG, T Date:

4/23/2002 Comments:

UE A R LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 3 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP_2001-05 02-00891 CR Category.

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CANumber:

ST (E) EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW (A) Normal Work Management l

3 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

(OT) Other (NA)

Not Applicable LCM R

==

Description:==

I Perform an Effectiveness Review in accordance with Attachment 15 of the Davis-Besse Condition G

Report Programmatic Guideline. Submit the Effectiveness Review to the Corrective Action Review I

Board (CARB) for approval.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI. K RA 2/28/2002 8590 l

Yes LI No If a Refueling Outage Is required, 1R Other Tracking N Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

L 2R N/A N/A 12/5/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG T LCM 412002 QUAL.

Ouallty Organization Approval:

Date:

MTY l

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N Zf Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

j Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

0 Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R

,, Enter Name and Sign:

a Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

o V UE A R LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 4 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (J)

ROLL-OVER (A) Normal Work Management 4

Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

(OT) Other (NA)

Not Applicable LCM R

==

Description:==

I This Condition Report will address the issues identified in CR 02-00685 and 02-00846.

G N

A T

0 R

Completed Byl Organization: I Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 3/412002 8507 lIJ Yes 0 No If a Refueling Outage Is required, El 1R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

El 2R N/A NIA 10/14/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG, T LCM 412/2002 OUAL Ouallty Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N U Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

L Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

0 Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R j

Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

QV UE A R LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 5 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST

( B)

REVIEW

( A) Normal Work Management 5

Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0

( OT) Other

( NA ) Not Applicable LCM R

==

Description:==

I MODE 5 ADMINISTRATIVE RESTRAINT. This CR has been identified as a Mode Restraint by the G

Management Review Board (MRB). Please provide the appropriate documentation to clear the I

Mode Restraint, which may include an evaluation or work completion documents (e.g. WO N

Completion) by 3/6/02. If the evaluation cannot be completed by this date, the MRB shall approve A

the new date. Notify Quality Programs when the CAF has been completed to remove the CR from T

the Mode Restraint list.

0 R

Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI, K RA 3/4/2002 8590 l

l Yes i

No If a Refueling Outage Is required, 0

1R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC.

Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R _13RF NIA 3/8/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG T LCM 3/5/2002 DUAL.

Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M This item was discussed with the night outage engineering manager. Completion of repairs to the P

CRDM nozzles will require a considerable effort and is being thoroughly tracked on its own under MWO 01-5072. Therefore, this particular action should be closed and the mode restraint moved to L

completion of that MWO. (There should be a mode 5 restraint against completion of MWO 01 -5072.)

E N

T I

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

3/5/02 N

aI Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By LANG, T Date:

3/5/2002 J Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

0 Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R I Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

LANG, T Date:

3/5/2002 Comments:

QV UE A R LI IF TI YE R Approval:

Date:

Page 6 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (J) ROLL-OVER (A) Normal Work Management 6

Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

O (OT) Other (NA)

Not Applicable LCM R

==

Description:==

I MRB NOTE: This CR will include the evaluation for CR 02-00932.

G I

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI, K RA 3/6/2002 8590 Pi Yes El No If a Refueling Outage Is required, O IR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC.

Enter the Refueling Outage number:

El 2R N1A N/A l

10/14/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG. T LCM 4/2/2002 QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By Date:

.1 Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

O Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R j Enter Name and Sign:

r Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

av UE A R LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 7 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category: lAction Type:

lSchedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (B8) R(EVIEW

( A) Normal Work Management 7

Corrective Acti on Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0 (OT) Other (NA)

NotApplicable MAIN R

==

Description:==

I Complete repairs to the CRDM nozzles under MWO 01-005072-000.

G I

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI, K RA 316/2002 8590 l

Yes l No If a Refueling Outage Is required, IR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R 13RFO 01-005072-000 6/30/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

ONEILL, J MAIN 3/6/2002 QUAL-Ouality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

.X Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

.i Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

0 Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R 1J Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

a V Comments:

UE AR LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page B of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (J) ROLL-OVER (A) Normal Work Management 8

Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0 (OT) Other (NA)

Not Applicable NA R

==

Description:==

I This condition report will investigate and disposition the condition identified under Framatome G

Nonconformance Report 6014069, Rev 00.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

l Attachments:

ONEILL, J l

RA 3/8/2002 7949 l

D Yes R] No If a Refueling Outage is required, El IR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R N'A N/A l

4129/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG, T NA 4116/2002 QUAL-Quality Organization Approval:

(Dale:

MTYl I

Response

M Framatome NCR 6014069 describes the machine tool rotating due to nozzle #3 being loose and P

notes the existence of the corrosion cavity around the nozzle #3 bore. CR 02-01053 was specifically written to investigate the machine tool movement at nozzle #3, and was closed to this CR L

(see CA #9 and CA #1). The fact that the machne tool rotated is simply a symptom of the extensive E

corrosion and is not itself a significant issue. The originally envisioned repair (that was attempted M

prior to knowledge of the corrosion void) was to roll (expand) the nozzle in the bore to make sure it E

was secure in place without the weld. Then mount and affix the machine tool to the nozzle and N

machine off the lower portion of the nozzle, up through the weld, and just past the maximum extent T

of the cracks to reach "solid" nozzle material. The shortened nozzle would then have been welded I

higher in the bore than the original weld with a temper bead weld process. The nozzle was N

supposed to be held captive during machining by the roll expansion against the nozzle bore.

G However, with the corrosion that was present, the nozzle was only held in plate by the J-groove weld even after rolling. Thus, as the machining progressed to where the weld was cut, the nozzle and the 0

affixed machine were no longer secured, and they rotated.

R The significant issue is the corrosion around nozzle #3. That corrosion is the focus of the root G

cause report for this CR, which included remedial action, numerous CATPR actions, extent of conditiori, etc.

Because the machine rotation is understood and is not significant in itself, and because the corrosion issue is already covered by this CR (therefore this CA serves no other purpose), this CA should be considered complete.

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

4116/02

.Ij Signature indicates Corrective Action complete; Completed By:

LANG, T Date:

4/16/2002 Is Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

Page 9 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001 -05 0-09 Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

a Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

LANG, T Date:

4/23/2002 Comments:

Q V U E A R L I I F T I Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 10 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

02-00891 NOP-LP-2001-05 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST I ( J) ROLL-OVER

( A) Normal Work Management 9

Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

O ( OT ) Other

( NA ) Not Applicable LCM 0

R

==

Description:==

I This CR will include the evaluations for CRs 02-01128 and 02-01053.

GG MRB NOTE from CR 02-01053: Make sure you address that the CRDM moved 15 degrees.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

lAttachments:

NOWICKI. K I

RA l

412/2002 8590 l

Yes O No If a Refueling Outage is required, El 1R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

5 2R N

N/A 10/14/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG, T LCM 4/2/2002 QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

iTY I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N LI Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

rI Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

O Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R nj Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

UE AR LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 11 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category: I Action Type:

lSchedule Type:

CA Number:

ST l(O)

OE l(A)

Normal Work Management l

10 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

(EA)

Enhancement Action (NA)

Not Applicable LCM R

==

Description:==

I Provide a comprehensive OE to replace/augment previous OEs on this topic, including relevant G

management issues and any corrections to earlier information if required.

N Previous OEs (as of 4/9/02), are:

A OE13398 T

OE13454 O

OE1 3480 R

OE13514 Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

LANG,T LCM 4/9/2002 8116 l

Yes ENo It a Refueling Outage Is required, OIR lOther Tracking #

lCorrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

E 2R NIA N/A l

10/14/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign) ectlon-LANG, T LCM l4/912002 QUAL Duality Organization Approval:

ITy I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j

Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By Date:

L Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

O Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

.R J Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

o V Comumients:

UE AR LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 12 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST l(J)

ROLL-OVER I

(A)

Normal Work Management 11 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

O ( OT ) Other

( NA ) Not Applicable LCM 0

R

==

Description:==

I MRB NOTE: This CR will include address the issues identified in CR 02-1489 GI LCM Note: Acceptance of this CA is based on simply reporting/evaluating clean' inspection results N

in the extent of condition section of the root cause report. CR 02-01489 corrective action will drive A

performance of the inspection of the lower headfincore nozzles. If any adverse condition is found, it T

will require issuance of a new CR. Further, CR02-00891 will not necessarily include provision for (or O

consideration of need for) continuing periodic inspection of the lower head region. TAL R

Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI. K RA 4/9/2002 8590 l

Yes E3 No if a Refueling Outage is required, 1R Other Tracking U Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC.

Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R N/A N/A l

10114102 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG, T LCM 5/20/2002 QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

l Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N If Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

Ij Signature indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

0 Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R 2 Enter Name and Sign:

implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Q V Comments:

UE A R LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 13 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST

( J) ROLL-OVER

( A) Normal Work Management 13 Corrective Acti on Type:

lCause Code:

lResp Org:

0 (OT) Other (NA)

NotApplicable LCM R

==

Description:==

I This CR will include the evaluation for CR 02-01583, General Thinning of Reactor Vessel Closure G

Head Outside Nozzle 3 Area..

N A

T 0

R Completed By:l Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI, K RA 4/22/2002 8590 X

Yes D No If a Refueling Outage Is required, IR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

El 2R N/A

/A 10/14/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LANG, T LCM 5/9/2002 QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

[TYl I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

l Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N a Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

'LI Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

Q Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R j Enter Name and Sign:

irplementing Organization Approval; Date:

Comments:

Qv UE A R LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 14 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CRNumber:

NOP-LP-2001 -05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST l( J) ROLL-OVER

( C ) Refuel Outage Required 14 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

lResp Org:

(RA ) Remedial Action (W19) Other PE R

==

Description:==

I This CR is to address CR 02-01378 extent of condition identifying Boric acid buildup is occurring on G

components throughout containment. Most of the components affected are either below or in the I

vicinity of service water piping. In several locations (CAC plenum, service water valve SW 392, and N

JT 3952), corrosion is occurring.

A

- Structural steel and conduits above PTRC2A5 and FTRC1A2 T

- Deposits and potential corrosion on JT3951 and JT3952, including the associated cable trays and 0

JT flexible conduits and penetrations.

R

- SW 392 yoke

- Cable trays BLBE02 and BCBDO2 located on the 585' elevation of containment where they penetrate the shield wall

- CAC plenum Boric acid buildup was also noted on CH A packing area and CF 9 packing. A trail of boric acid was Identified at the top of CFT 1-1. The cause of the CFT 1-1 buildup is not known. Plant engineering was notified of the CFT 1-1 boric acid trail issue and notified the potential hole in the CAC plenum.

The containment inspection also identified that the containment ventilation ductwork registers (565 elevation) need to be cleaned. There is evidence of paint chips, etc in the registers. The potential for boric acid buildup in the ductwork also needs to be evaluated.

It is recommended that an extent of condition be perform to ensure all areas susceptible to boric acid buildup due to condensation be performed. Affected components should be cleaned, inspected and repaired as required.

Pictures are located on the S:\\DBcommon\\Outage Pics\\CTMT boric acid buildup. Several pictures will also be scanned into this CR.

Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

HENNESSY, B I

RA 5/10/2002 8592 l

Yes ai No If a Refueling Outage is required, DI 1R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

El 2R 8 NIA 10/14/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

ESHELMAN, D PE 6/1/2002 Page 15 of 17

CO R RECTIVE ACTIO N CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 l

02-00891 OUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

'ITY I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j Signature indicates Corrective. Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

.U Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

O Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

R

, Enter Name and Sign:

implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

o V Comments:

UE A R LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 16 of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

J CANumber ST l(0O) OE l( A) Normal Workc Management ist Corrective Action Type:

Cause Coe Rs O (OT) Other NA) NotApplicable RA R

==

Description:==

I Coordinate the determination of if Davis-Besse should Issue Operating Experience Reports G

according to NG-NA-305, step 6.7.3. for the issues evaluated by the root cause.

N For the issues determined to need Operating Experience Reports issued, ensure a CAF is A

generated for the action (or ensure an Operating Experience Report was issued).

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

JOHNSON, J RA 5/20/2002 8345 l

l Yes ElNo If a Refueling Outage Is required, 0R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0l 2R _MFOQ N/A 12/31/02 EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

ESHELMAN, D RA 5/29/2002 QUAL Ouality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY.l l

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N U Signature indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

.,j Signature Indicates verification for SCAC CRs:

0 Implementing Organization Superyisor:

Date:

R

j. Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approvai:

Date:

O V Comments:

UE AR LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 17of 17

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category, Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST

( J) ROLL-OVER

( A) Normal Work Management 1 2 Corrective Action Typ-e:

} C-ause Code:

Resp Org:

0 (OT) Other (NA)

NotApplicable LCM R

==

Description:==

I This CR will include the evaluation of the program elements for CR 02-01516.

G N

A T

0 R

Completed By:

Organization: I Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

NOWICKI, K RA 4/11/2002 8590 l

J Yes E No If a Refueling Outage Is required, E IA Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R N/A N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

LCM OUAL.

Ouality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

l Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N

,J Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

j. Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G j Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

UE A R LI IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 1 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CRCategory:

ActionType:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST l(

P) PROCEDUR(E/ INSTRUCTION I ( A) Normal Work Management 1 6 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

.Resp Org:

O

( PR) Preventive Action PE R

==

Description:==

1. Develop a plan to monitor for CRDM nozzle leakage. The plan must include steps to repair once G

leakage is detected.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA lal 8507 El Yes I No If a Refueling Outage Is required, 0I R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

] 2R NIA N/A I

EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

PE QUAL-Cuallty Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY.

M

Response

M p

L E

M E

N T

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0

.I Signature Indicates verification for SCAQ CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G j

Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

U E A R L I IlF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 2 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category-Action Type:

ScheduleType:

CA Number:

ST (G)

EVALUATION (A) Normal Work Management 17 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0 (PR) Preventive Action j

C)DBE R

==

Description:==

2. Review Davis-Besse results for CRDM nozzle crack initiation/propagation against the G

susceptibility model.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS. S RA 8507 El Yes l No If a Refueling Outage is required, IR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R N/A NIA EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

DBE QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY

Response

M p

L E

M E

N Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N Jf Signature -indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By.

Date:

O Ij Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G

_j Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

UE A R L I IF TI Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 3 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CRNumber:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (G) EVALUATION

( (A) Normal Work Management 18 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0 (RA) Remedial Action

( )

PE R

==

Description:==

l

3. An extent of condition review for boric acid damage will be performed to ensure that there are no G

latent unidentified issues related to boric acid corrosion. The results will be reviewed by the senior I

management team prior to startup.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA I

l 8507 l

l Yes 2l No If a Refueling Outage Is required, 0

iROther Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R 1_RFO NWA EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

PE QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N LI Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

Q

.j Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G Hj Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

aQV U E AR L I I F TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 4 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

lScheduleType:

l CA Number:

ST (P) PROCEDURE / INSTRUCTION (A) Normal Work Management 19 Corrective Acti on Type:

CueCode:l epOg

( PR ) Preventive Action RA R

==

Description:==

I The self evaluation program will be revised and ties completed to the Ownership Model. Bench G

marking and FENOC common process methods will be used to produce a best-in-industry program.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

l Organization:

Date:

Phone:

lAttachments:

CHILDRESS, S l

RA l

l 8507 El Yes E No If a Refueling Outage Is required, IR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0l 2R N/A N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

RA OUAL DualityOrganizatlon Approval:

Date:

[TY I

Response

M P

E E

M E

N T

l

-Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N jI Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

Q UJ Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G Ij Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

Q V U E AR LI IF TI YE R Approval:

Date:

Page 5 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category.

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST I( S) SELF - ASSESSMENT

( A) Normal Work Management 20 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

(PR) Preventive Action PE R

==

Description:==

Perform Self-Assessments of the boric acid corrosion control and ISI programs. (Plant Engineering G

Completion prior to restart) The purpose of these Self-Assessments is to evaluate the deficiencies I

documented in this report. Items to be considered should include:

N Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program A

Incorporating as areas for inspection, industry issues such as CRDM nozzle leakage T

Incorporating into the inspection plan systems that carry borated water and provide mitigating type 0

functions that help to preserve the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary during plant transients R

and/or accidents Incorporate Boric Acid Corrosion Control Inspection Checklist document retention requirements (retention should be at least several fuel cycles)

Incorporating a signature block for the Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program Owner to document his review and concurrence with the disposition activities Review the use of "should" versus "shall" throughout the procedure.

Incorporating requirement that boric acid "shall" be removed from affected areas and the affected area inspected to identify any signs of potential corrosion.

Incorporating a signature block for the System Engineers supervisor to document his review and concurrence with the disposition activities Review station commitments to determine if other areas or equipment must be included in the Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program Establish a hard link between the Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program and the ISI Program that requires both groups to approve the close out of a Boric Acid Corrosion Control Inspection Checklist.

ISI Program Improve the text descriptions of the areas to be inspected, include sketches of the area and provide a pre-job brief prior to inspecting for bolted connections and Mode 3 leakage during plant heat up Eliminate the conflicting text descriptions that are contained in some of the inspection plans Evaluate the techniques employed for monitoring CRDM nozzle welds for leakage.

Reinforce the obligation the ISI program has to protect and preserve the RCS pressure boundary including addressing Boric Acid deposits on the RCS pressure boundary when that specific area was not included in the original inspection plan Establish a hard link between the ISI Program and the Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program that requires both groups to approve the close out of a Boric Acid Corrosion Control Inspection Checklist Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S

• RA I

I 8507 I1 EYes [0 No If a Refueling Outage Is required, 0

iROther Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

a 2R N_

A NWA EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

PE Page 6 of 23

CO RRECTIVE ACTIO N CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 OUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date ITY I I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j

Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

O j

Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G LI Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

Q V U E A R L I I F T I Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 7 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001 -05 02-00891 CR Categoryr Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (F) WORK ORDER I REPAIR TAG (C) Refuel Outage Required 21 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

(RA) Remedial Action

( )

DBE R

==

Description:==

I

1. Provide improved access for inspection and cleaning of the RPV head.

G l

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S PA I l 8507 l

Yes Ri No If a Refueling Outage Is required, E 1R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

O 2R.&.

N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

DBE QUAL.

Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

l Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N

• .i Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By.

• Date:

0

• .Ij Signature indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G Li Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments~

U E A1R L I I F T I Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 8 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

ScheduleType:

CA Number:

ST

( B)

REVIEW

( A) Normal Work Management 22 Corrective Acti on Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

( PR) Preventive Action STAT R

==

Description:==

I 3. Develop a plan for increased presence of management in the field both during outages and during G

normal operations. Formalization of this program is intended to look for degraded conditions, open I

opportunities for coaching, and enforcement of management expectations.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 8507 l Yes E No If a Refueling Outage is required, 1 R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R N/A N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

STAT QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N

i Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By Date:

0 Zf Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G J Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

U E A R L I IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 9 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 x

CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST

( T) TRAINING

( A) Normal Work Management 23 Corrective Acti on Type:

Cause Code:l epOg

( PR) Preventive Action TRAN R

==

Description:==

l

4. Standards and expectations will be immediately adjusted. Pre-startup training will be conducted in G

small groups to all site personnel ensuring internalization of the missed opportunities associated with I

the degradation on the reactor head. A case study based on this condition, the missed opportunities, N

and lessons learned will be created and provided to all site personnel.

A T

0 R

Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 8507 El Yes iZ No If a Refueling Outage Is required, IR Other Tracking Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

E 2R NIA N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

TRAN QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M p

L E

M E

N T

l Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N Li Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0j IJ Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G J Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

QV U E A R L I IF T I Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 10 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category.

Acio Tye Sced

_y CA Number:

ST

( T) TRAINING l(

A) Normal Work Management 24 Corrective Acti on Type:

Cause Code:

lResp Org:

(PR) Preventive Action E&S R

==

Description:==

I Follow-up training will be held over the next 12 months to reinforce technical standards and problem G

solving skills. This will be required of appropriate management and technical staff.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 8507 0 Yes 2 No If a Refueling Outage Is required, I R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC.

Enter the Refueling Outage number:

a 2R NAL_

N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

E&S QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

_TY___

I

Response

M P

i E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j

Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

Q j

Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G

.J Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

QV U E AR LI IF TI Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 11 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category.

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

_ST

( T) TRAINING

( A) Normal Work Management 25 Corrective Acti on Type:

Case Code:

Resp Org:

(PR)

Preventive Action STAT R

==

Description:==

1

6. An operational/decision-making model will be developed and presented to the management team.

G N

A T

0 R

Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA.

8507 E Yes 2 No 11 a Refueling Outage Is required, 1 iR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

al 2R NIA N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

STAT QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

_TY l

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j Signature indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By.

Date:

Q ji Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G 4 Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

QCV U E A R L I IF TI YE R

Approval:

Date:

Page 12 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CRNumber:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category.l Action Type:

lScheduteType: *CA Number:

ST

( P ) PROCEDURE / INSTRUCTION I( A) Norrnal Work Management 26 Corrective Actlian Type:

lCause Code:

Resp Org:

O

((PR) Preventive Action NA R

==

Description:==

1

7. Review/revise charter and membership for the Project Review Committee and Corrective Action G

Review Board.

I N

A T

0 R

Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 8

l Q507 l

Yes RINo If a Refueling Outage Is required, Oi R OtherTracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0l 2R N/A WN/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

I NA QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

[TY M

P L

E M

E N

T

Response

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

0 U

A T

Y J Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

Completed By:

Date:

aJ Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

SJ Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

Approval:

Date:

Page 13 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CRNumber:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category: lAction Type:

lSchedule Type:

CA Number:

ST

( K) OTHER

( A) Normal Work Management 27 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

lResp Org:

( PR) Preventive Action E&S R

==

Description:==

1

8. Augment engineering staff to shore up technical capability and improve engineering rigor and G

standards.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 8507 0 Yes [Z No If a Refueling Outage is required, iR Other Tracking U Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R NIA NWA EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Sectlon:

Date:

E&S QUAL-Ouality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N U.F Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By.

Date:

0 jg Signature Indicates verification for SCAa CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G j Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

U E A R L I I F TI Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 14 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (T) TRAINING (A) Normal Work Management 28 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0 (PR) Preventive Action

( )

E&S R

==

Description:==

l

9. Clarify technical staff expectations to ensure that degraded conditions on systems are promptly G

identified, corrected, and prevented from recurring.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA I

l 8507 l

Yes R No It a Refueling Outage is required, El 1R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACCO Enter the Refueling Outage number:

Q 2R

/A NIA EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

UES QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY X

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j Signature indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0 L Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs: -

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G j Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

QV UE A R IF TI Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 15 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category: lAction Type:

lSchedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (E)

EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW (A) Normal Work Management 29 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

(PR) Preventive Action STAF R

==

Description:==

I

10. A restart review board will be put in place made up of independent industry experts to verify G

effectiveness of actions taken, and to ensure the management issues are fully developed and I

addressed prior to startup.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS S RA 8507 El Yes i

No It a Refueling Outage Is required, 1R OtherTracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

a3 2R A

NAI EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

STAF QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY M

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N U Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0 Uf Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G j

Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

aQV U E A R L I I F T I Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 16 of 23

1.

CORRECTIVE ACTION J

CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category.

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (E)

REVIEW (A) Normal Work Management 30 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0 (RA) Remedial Action

( )

STAT R

==

Description:==

l11. A operation confidence review will be performed prior to startup. The following items should be G

considered for review: outage issues, condition reports, modifications, work orders, etc. and I

interviews with the technical staff and program owners. The aggregate system health must be N

discussed including challenges to reliable operation that may self reveal during operating cycle.

A T

0 R

Completed By.

Organization: I Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 8507 0 Yes 21 No If a Refueling Outage Is required, C l in OtherTracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

El 2R

_A_

N/A I

EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

STAT QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N ZI Signature indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0 I Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G j Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

'Comments:

Q V U E A R LI I F TI Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 17 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (P) PROCEDURE / INSTRUCTION (A) Normal Work Management 31 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

( PR) Preventive Action OUTM R

==

Description:==

l

12. Develop a formal restart readiness review process to be used whenever the plant is to be G

restarted following plant outages.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 8507 El Yes F6 No If a Refueling Outage Is required, El 1R lOther Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

2 2R N/A N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

OUTM DUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

i Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N

._ Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0 j

Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G f Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

QV U E AR L I IF TI Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 18 of 23

c CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category.

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST I (K) OTHER (A) Normal Work Management 32 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

(PR ) Preventive Action

( )

QA R

==

Description:==

1 13. Quality Assurance will increase oversight of engineering activities.

G N

A T

0 Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA I

l 8507 l

Yes 9 No If a Refueling Outage is required, 1R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC.

Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R N/A N/A I

EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

OA.

QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N

. _ Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0

.Li Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G

• j Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

QV U E AR L I IF.

TI Y E R Approval:

Date:

Page 19 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category: lActionType:l Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST

( B) REVIEW

( A) Normal Work Management 33 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org 0

((PR) Preventive Action OPID R

==

Description:==

l

14. The CNRB safety focus will be improved by less emphasis on status and LARs and more review G

of key technical and safety issues. The interval between CNRB oversight visits will be evaluated.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA 8507 El Yes il No It a Refueling Outage Is required, 1E R

Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

0 2R N/A l

N/A rPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

FE QUAL.

Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY I

Response

M P

E M

E N

T I

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N j Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0 Li Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G 4 Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

U i Comments:

U E A R L I IF TI Y E R Approval:

Date:

Page 20 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category: lAction Type:

lSchedule Type:

CA Number:

ST

( G) EVALUATION l( A) Normal Work Management 34 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

0

((PR) Preventive Action NA R

==

Description:==

1

15. Improve Operating Experience and benchmarking programs to verify lessons from in-house and G

industry experience are brought to the Davis-Besse team, meeting programmatic requirements and I

management expectations.

N A

T 0

R Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS, S RA l

8507 U Yes E No If a Refueling Outage Is required, UIR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC.

Enter the Refueling Outage number:

a 2R N/A NA EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

NA QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

ITY

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

l Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N

, i Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

Q j Signature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G

j Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

Comments:

U E A R L I I F TI Y E R

Approval-Date:

Page 21 of 23

CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

02-00891 2001-05 Category Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (8) REVIEW (A) Normal Work Management 35 rective t~ction Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

R ) Preventive Action

( )

RA cription:

Review the PCAQR 94-0295 disposition, and initiate commitments and associated document anges as appropriate for performing RPV head visual inspections.

Aleted By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

HILDRESS, S RA 8507 D

Yes i No 1efueling Outage is required, LI iR Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

r the Refueling Outage number:

z 2R WN/A oval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

ity Organization Approval:

Date:

.nse:

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

nature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

mpleted By:

Date:

nature Indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

iementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

er Name and Sign:

ilementing Organization Approval:

Date:

its:

Date:

Page 22 of 23

• r CORRECTIVE ACTION CR Number:

NOP-LP-2001-05 02-00891 CR Category:

Action Type:

Schedule Type:

CA Number:

ST (S)

SELF-ASSESSMENT (A) Normal Work Management 36 Corrective Action Type:

Cause Code:

Resp Org:

(PR) Preventive Action

( )

NA R

==

Description:==

I Perform an effectiveness assessment of the Corrective Action program. The purpose of the Self-G Assessment is to ensure the categorization of issues, thoroughness of investigation, and that I

initiation of Condition Reports occurs in accordance with programmatic requirements and N

management expectations.

A T

0 R

Completed By:

Organization:

Date:

Phone:

Attachments:

CHILDRESS. S RA 8507 a Yes il No If a Refueling Outage Is required, El 1R Other Tracking #

Corrective Action Due Date:

ACC-Enter the Refueling Outage number:

a 2R N/A N/A EPT Approval: (Enter Name and Sign)

Section:

Date:

NA QUAL Quality Organization Approval:

Date:

I

Response

M P

L E

M E

N T

I.

Corrective Action Implementation Date:

N

.1 Signature Indicates Corrective Action complete:

G Completed By:

Date:

0 Ml Signature indicates verification for SCAO CRs:

R Implementing Organization Supervisor:

Date:

G Li Enter Name and Sign:

Implementing Organization Approval:

Date:

V Comments:

U E A R LI IIF TI Y E R

Approval:

Date:

Page 23 of 23

NOP-LP-2001-04 Does the Condition Report Involve:

Information obtained or an observation made of a BASIC COMPONENT that El Yes No could compromise safety.

(See logic flow diagram defining terms and applicability Information on the next page.)

If the answer Is No. Stop here (sign and date on the Originator Signature lab)

If the answer Is Yes, Items A & B must be answered. (Parts A & B tab)

A. Does the Condition Report Involve a:

BASIC COMPONENT of a plant structure. system. component, or part thereof necessary to assure:

I. The Integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary.

ID Yes El No

2. The capability to shutdown the reactor and maintain It In safe shutdown El Yes El No condition.

3. The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which El Yes El No could result in potential offsite exposures comparable to those referred to in I OCFR1 00. I 1.

B. Does the potential Issue or defect Involve:

1. A deviation In a delivered component?

IEn Yes FIl No

2. Deviation in a portion of a facility offered for acceptance?

F' Yes Mi No

3. Design Installation test, use, or operation of a defective structure, system or 3 Yes El No component?

4. A condition or circumstance that could contribute to exceeding a Technical E Yes El No Specification safety limit?

if any Items In A are marked 'Yes' AND any Items In B are marked 'Yes', contact Regulatory Personnel Immediately to discuss and determine If a SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARD may exist, or If the Issue Is reportable.

Based on discussions with Regulatory Personnel that a SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARD or reportability Issue does not exist, provide explanation / Justification below:

Remember CR 02-01128 needs to be Included with this evaluation.

Based on the determination that a SUBSTANTIAL SAFELY HAZARD or reportability Issue may exist, draft a Corrective Action Form (CAF) to be accepted by the Regulatory Personnel to complete the 10CFR Part 21 requirements for the CR.

CAF Generated?

E Yes RI No (If no, provide explanation / justification above)

If Yes, CAF#

Completed By:

DATE:

Page 1 of 1