IR 05000219/1986005: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- . ._
{{#Wiki_filter:-.._
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


==REGION I==
==REGION I==
Report N /86-05 Docket N License N DPR-16 Licensee: GPU Nuclear Corporation 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Facility Name: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Inspection At: Forked River, New Jersey Inspection Conducted: February 18-21, 1986 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: July 22-26, 1985 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection Inspectors:   h ecurity Inspector 3-Es-84 date
Report No.
  /:EckM.Dulap,Phy a
 
  *
50-219/86-05 Docket No.
 
50-219 License No.
 
DPR-16 Licensee:
GPU Nuclear Corporation 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Facility Name: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Inspection At:
Forked River, New Jersey Inspection Conducted:
February 18-21, 1986 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: July 22-26, 1985 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection Inspectors:
h 3-Es-84 a
ecurity Inspector date
/:EckM.Dulap,Phy
*
_
_
  . 'r 4 3-za-os date frliiam JJ Madden hys/fal Security Inspector V
'r 4 3-za-os
    ' '
.
Approved by:   J-28- 8 4
frliiam JJ Madden hys/fal Security date Inspector V
  .' R. Keim , Chie feguards Section date Inspection Summary: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on February 18-21, 1986 (Report No. 50-219/86-05)
Approved by:
J-28-8 4
' '
.' R. Keim, Chie feguards Section date Inspection Summary:
Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on February 18-21, 1986 (Report No. 50-219/86-05)
Areas Inspected: Management Effectiveness; Organization; Program Audits; Records and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers (Protected Area / Vital Areas) Compensatory Measures; Assessment Aids; Access Control (Personnel / Packages / Vehicles); Detection Aids (Protected Area / Vital Areas);
Areas Inspected: Management Effectiveness; Organization; Program Audits; Records and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers (Protected Area / Vital Areas) Compensatory Measures; Assessment Aids; Access Control (Personnel / Packages / Vehicles); Detection Aids (Protected Area / Vital Areas);
Alarm Stations; Communications; Safeguards Contingency Plan; and follow-up on oustanding item Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance in the areas inspecte PDR ADOCK 05000219 G  PDR
Alarm Stations; Communications; Safeguards Contingency Plan; and follow-up on oustanding items.


  . -_
Results:
l
The licensee was found to be in compliance in the areas inspected.
*
 
l I
8604210242 860414 PDR ADOCK 05000219 G
PDR
-
-
 
.
-_
l l
*
I
'
'
.
.
!
!
DETAILS l
DETAILS l
j 1. Key Persons Contacted l P. B. Fiedler, Vice-President / Director, Oyster Creek J. Knubel, Nuclear
j 1.
 
Key Persons Contacted l
P. B. Fiedler, Vice-President / Director, Oyster Creek J. Knubel, Nuclear Security Director, GPU D.G. Holland, Licensing Manager B. H. Hohman,
,
,
Security Director, GPU D.G. Holland, Licensing Manager B. H. Hohman, Licensing Engineer D. J. Long, Security Manager R. T. Ewart, Security Lieutenant J. Earley, Supervisor, I&C Corrective Maintenance W. Bateman, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC I Other licensee personnel and members of the proprietary and YOH contract security force were interviewed by the inspector . MC 30703 - Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on February 21, 1986, the inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 and reviewed the purpose and scope of the inspection and presented the finding Written material was not provided to the licensee by the inspectors at any time during this inspectio . MC 92701 - Status of Inspector Follow-up Item (Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item (85-02-01): A formal preventive main-tenance program is needed for CCTV, perim-alert, and radio comunications. By memorandum titled QDR-0098 (Security Preventive Maintenance Program), dated February 4,1986, the Security Manager advised the QA Lead Auditor that as of January 31, 1986, a full security preventive maintenance program has been in effect. The security preventive maintenance schedule, developed by JCP&L System Operations and Telecommunications for the assessment aids, perimeter intrusion alarm systems, radio communications, and security lighting, was reviewed by the inspectors and appeared to provide an adequate preventive maintenance schedule for this equipment. The preventive maintenance schedule for the remaining security equipment, which h w.intained by the facility Operations Maintenance Section and the 'nnrument and Computer Maintenance Section, was reviewed with the supervisors of those sections and appeared to be adequate. Site Protection Force Directive, No. 85-15, dated November 26, 1985, subject, Security Work Orders, was issued to assist security personnel in the preparation and distribution of security equipment work orders for the repair of any deficiencies which may occur between scheduled maintenance inspection _
Licensing Engineer D. J. Long, Security Manager R. T. Ewart, Security Lieutenant J. Earley, Supervisor, I&C Corrective Maintenance W. H.
_. _ _ _ _
 
'
Bateman, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC I
Other licensee personnel and members of the proprietary and YOH contract security force were interviewed by the inspectors.
 
2.
 
MC 30703 - Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on February 21, 1986, the inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 and reviewed the purpose and scope of the inspection and presented the findings.
 
Written material was not provided to the licensee by the inspectors at any time during this inspection.
 
3.
 
MC 92701 - Status of Inspector Follow-up Item (Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item (85-02-01): A formal preventive main-tenance program is needed for CCTV, perim-alert, and radio comunications. By memorandum titled QDR-0098 (Security Preventive Maintenance Program), dated February 4,1986, the Security Manager advised the QA Lead Auditor that as of January 31, 1986, a full security preventive maintenance program has been in effect. The security preventive maintenance schedule, developed by JCP&L System Operations and Telecommunications for the assessment aids, perimeter intrusion alarm systems, radio communications, and security lighting, was reviewed by the inspectors and appeared to provide an adequate preventive maintenance schedule for this equipment. The preventive maintenance schedule for the remaining security equipment, which h w.intained by the facility Operations Maintenance Section and the 'nnrument and Computer Maintenance Section, was reviewed with the supervisors of those sections and appeared to be adequate.
 
Site Protection Force Directive, No. 85-15, dated November 26, 1985, subject, Security Work Orders, was issued to assist security personnel in the preparation and distribution of security equipment work orders for the repair of any deficiencies which may occur between scheduled maintenance inspections.
 
-
--
- -
 
_
_.
 
_.
 
_ _ _ _
l
l
'
.
4.


.
MC 92702 - Follow-Up on Previous Violations (Closed) Violation (85-16-05):
4. MC 92702 - Follow-Up on Previous Violations (Closed) Violation (85-16-05): Failure to report degradation of security l per 10 CFR 73.71. The inspector reviewed security logs and records and
Failure to report degradation of security l
per 10 CFR 73.71. The inspector reviewed security logs and records and security event reports submitted by the licensee since tne violation. The
,
,
security event reports submitted by the licensee since tne violation. The
!
! inspectors determined that physical security events reportable under 10 CFR 73.71 and Oyster Creek Security Department Procedure 1150.20 are being correctly reported.
inspectors determined that physical security events reportable under 10 CFR 73.71 and Oyster Creek Security Department Procedure 1150.20 are being correctly reported.


,
,
5. MC 81020 - Management Effectiveness
5.
. The inspector noted the following improvements to the security program:
 
l New handguns have been purchased.
MC 81020 - Management Effectiveness
.
The inspector noted the following improvements to the security program:
l a.
 
New handguns have been purchased.
 
l l
b.
 
The firearms training program has been revised to make it more realistic and practical, including an upgrade of close distance firing tactics.
 
c.


l l The firearms training program has been revised to make it more realistic and practical, including an upgrade of close distance firing tactic The licensee is conducting a job task analysis for all Site '
The licensee is conducting a job task analysis for all Site
'
Protection Officer positions to determine the effectiveness of the
,
,
Protection Officer positions to determine the effectiveness of the
Training and Qualification Plan.
 
!
!
Training and Qualification Plan.
I d.
 
Four portal metal detectors, two explosive detectors and one x-ray scan unit have been purchased to enhance the search functions.


I Four portal metal detectors, two explosive detectors and one x-ray scan unit have been purchased to enhance the search functions.
e.


, An upgrade of computer system capability is in progress to add
An upgrade of computer system capability is in progress to add
,
!
!
redundancy and improve monitoring effectiveness. Softwate modifi-cations are being accomplished with this chang A new system of performance observations, which tests an individual's proficiency level on general operational security program criteria and on specific security officer positions, has been developed and implemented as a management / supervisory tool.
redundancy and improve monitoring effectiveness.
 
Softwate modifi-cations are being accomplished with this change.


! The intent of this system is to review the quality of security personnel performance and knowledge on a continuing basis and to identify and correct deficiencies as they are detected.
f.
 
A new system of performance observations, which tests an individual's proficiency level on general operational security program criteria and on specific security officer positions, has been developed and implemented as a management / supervisory tool.
 
!
The intent of this system is to review the quality of security personnel performance and knowledge on a continuing basis and to identify and correct deficiencies as they are detected.


!
!
,
,
6. MC 81022 - Security Organization l
6.
The inspector determined that the security management structure and chain i of command were in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan, contingency plan, procedures and applicable regulatory requirements. They are adequate and appropriate for their intended function.
 
MC 81022 - Security Organization l
The inspector determined that the security management structure and chain i
of command were in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan, contingency plan, procedures and applicable regulatory requirements. They are adequate and appropriate for their intended function.


i i
i i
I     ,
I
,
l
l


  . . - . - - . . _ _ _ - - . - - - . ~ _ . - . . -
.
,
.
-. - -.. _ _ _
-
-
.
- - -.
~ _. -..
-
,
!
!
-.
-.


0
0


7.- MC 81034 - Security Program Audit The inspector reviewed the annual QA audit of the security program, l
7.-
MC 81034 - Security Program Audit The inspector reviewed the annual QA audit of the security program, l
#S-0C-85-15, dated November 12, 1985, and confirmed that the licensee had
'
taken corrective actions on the four audit reconinendations. These recom-mendations included:
(1) further reducing the visibility of alarm
!
station features from outside the alarm station; (2) submittal of updated
 
l security plan drawings to NRC; (3) improvement of firearms cleaning l
. standards; and (4) the elimination of a fire hazard. The audit was comprehensive in scope and was conducted by qualified personnel.
 
8.
 
MC 81038 - Records and Reports The inspectors reviewed the daily logs and records and found no dis-crepancies. Two security event reports, submitted since the last inspec-tion, were reviewed and found to be factual, timely, and complete with compensatory measures, prompt and appropriate.
 
9.
 
MC 81052 - Physical Barriers - Protected Area l
The inspector verified, by visual observation of all the protected area physical barriers, that the licensee was maintaining the barriers in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.
 
10. MC 81054 - Physical Barriers Vital Areas
'
'
#S-0C-85-15, dated November 12, 1985, and confirmed that the licensee had taken corrective actions on the four audit reconinendations. These recom-mendations included: (1) further reducing the visibility of alarm
By letter dated October 25, 1985, subject: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generat-ing Static;n, Docket No. 50-219, Security Plan Revision #18, the licensee submitted a plan change in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(p).
! station features from outside the alarm station; (2) submittal of updated  1 l security plan drawings to NRC; (3) improvement of firearms cleaning l . standards; and (4) the elimination of a fire hazard. The audit was comprehensive in scope and was conducted by qualified personne . MC 81038 - Records and Reports The inspectors reviewed the daily logs and records and found no dis-crepancies. Two security event reports, submitted since the last inspec-tion, were reviewed and found to be factual, timely, and complete with compensatory measures, prompt and appropriat . MC 81052 - Physical Barriers - Protected Area l The inspector verified, by visual observation of all the protected area physical barriers, that the licensee was maintaining the barriers in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security pla . MC 81054 - Physical Barriers Vital Areas By letter dated October 25, 1985, subject: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generat-
      '
ing Static;n, Docket No. 50-219, Security Plan Revision #18, the licensee submitted a plan change in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(p).


r THis PAMGRAPH CONTAINS SATEUAIIDS   :
r THis PAMGRAPH CONTAINS SATEUAIIDS
IflF02"AT!E!! 5C ;S C01 F0ii FU2LIC DISCLCSEE, Itis utIENiiDMALL . EFT DLAN P
:
      '
IflF02"AT!E!! 5C ;S C01 F0ii FU2LIC DISCLCSEE, Itis utIENiiDMALLY.
 
1. EFT DLANX.
 
P
'
l l
l l
f
f
      .
- - - - - - - - - -
.


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Line 109: Line 226:


.
.
The licensee was advised that the inspectors would communicate their observations regarding this plan change to the appropriate NRC personnel engaged in reviewing the change. This is an Inspector Follow-up Ite (86-05-01)
The licensee was advised that the inspectors would communicate their observations regarding this plan change to the appropriate NRC personnel engaged in reviewing the change. This is an Inspector Follow-up Item.
11. MC 81064 - Compensatory Measures The inspectors detennined, by observation and interviews with security personnel, that the licensee implemented, and security personnel were knowledgeable of, the compensatory security measures for inoperable security systems necessary to meet the requirements of the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedure . MC 81070 - Access Control - Personnel By observation and review of records, the inspectors determined that the licensee was controlling personnel access to the protected and vital areas in confonnance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedure . MC 81072 - Access Control - Packages The inspectors observed that the security force controlled the entry of packages and material into the protected area in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedure MC 81074 - Access Control - Vehicles The inspectors observed that the security force properly controlled the access of vehicles into the protected area and conducted search and escort tasks in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedure \
 
15. MC 81078 - Detection Aids - Protected Areas   j The licensee demonstrated to the inspectors that the perimeter intrusion detection system detected penetration tests of the protected area in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security pla THIS PAMGRAN8 CONTAINS SAFECUARDS INF01"i!T'- " p;NOT FOR PUWC
(86-05-01)
  -
11. MC 81064 - Compensatory Measures The inspectors detennined, by observation and interviews with security personnel, that the licensee implemented, and security personnel were knowledgeable of, the compensatory security measures for inoperable security systems necessary to meet the requirements of the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedures.
DISCLOWE,:I;;1:UEtiiONALLY LEFT CLAH ;
 
This is an Inspector Follow-up Ite (IFI86-05-02).
12. MC 81070 - Access Control - Personnel By observation and review of records, the inspectors determined that the licensee was controlling personnel access to the protected and vital areas in confonnance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedures.
 
13. MC 81072 - Access Control - Packages The inspectors observed that the security force controlled the entry of packages and material into the protected area in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedures.
 
MC 81074 - Access Control - Vehicles The inspectors observed that the security force properly controlled the access of vehicles into the protected area and conducted search and escort tasks in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedures.
 
\\
15. MC 81078 - Detection Aids - Protected Areas j
The licensee demonstrated to the inspectors that the perimeter intrusion detection system detected penetration tests of the protected area in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.
 
THIS PAMGRAN8 CONTAINS SAFECUARDS INF01"i!T'-
" p;NOT FOR PUWC
-
DISCLOWE,:I;;1:UEtiiONALLY LEFT CLAHX.
 
;
This is an Inspector Follow-up Item.
 
(IFI86-05-02).


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
: <
:
>   6 L.
<
>
 
L.


l I
l I
l- 16. MC 81080 - Detection Aids - Vital Areas The inspectors observed the licensee conduct penetration tests of the
l-16. MC 81080 - Detection Aids - Vital Areas The inspectors observed the licensee conduct penetration tests of the vital area intrusion detection system (IDS) and confirmed that the IDS
<
<
vital area intrusion detection system (IDS) and confirmed that the IDS was functioning in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.
was functioning in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.


!
!
17. MC 81084 - Alarm Stations i
17. MC 81084 - Alarm Stations i
The inspectors observed and questioned the central alarm station (CAS)
The inspectors observed and questioned the central alarm station (CAS)
operator; and the secondary alarm station (SAS) operator and determined that the CAS and SAS operators were knowledgeable of their duties and that the stations were in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and adequate and appropriate for their intended function . MC 81088 -f.:ommunications The CAS operator demonstrated to the inspector that the internal and ex-ternal communication links established by the licensee were in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security pla . MC 81601 - Safeguards Contingency Plan A simulated threat and contingency were presented to the security force by the inspectors who requested that the licensee have the security force demonstrate its response. The inspectors found that their response was as outlined in the licensee's NRC-approved Safeguard Contingency Plan and its implementing procedure l
operator; and the secondary alarm station (SAS) operator and determined that the CAS and SAS operators were knowledgeable of their duties and that the stations were in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and adequate and appropriate for their intended functions.
        ,
 
18. MC 81088 -f.:ommunications The CAS operator demonstrated to the inspector that the internal and ex-ternal communication links established by the licensee were in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.
 
19. MC 81601 - Safeguards Contingency Plan A simulated threat and contingency were presented to the security force by the inspectors who requested that the licensee have the security force demonstrate its response. The inspectors found that their response was as outlined in the licensee's NRC-approved Safeguard Contingency Plan and its implementing procedures.
 
,
l l
l l
        ,
l
y       _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _
,
y
_.. _. _ _ _ _ _
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 01:43, 8 December 2024

Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-219/86-05 on 860218-21 (Ref 10CFR73.21 & 2.790).No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Effectiveness,Organization,Program Audits & Physical Barriers
ML20203C800
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 03/28/1986
From: Dunlap J, Keimig R, Madden W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20203C742 List:
References
50-219-86-05, 50-219-86-5, NUDOCS 8604210242
Download: ML20203C800 (6)


Text

-.._

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report No.

50-219/86-05 Docket No.

50-219 License No.

DPR-16 Licensee:

GPU Nuclear Corporation 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Facility Name: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Inspection At:

Forked River, New Jersey Inspection Conducted:

February 18-21, 1986 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: July 22-26, 1985 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection Inspectors:

h 3-Es-84 a

ecurity Inspector date

/:EckM.Dulap,Phy

_

'r 4 3-za-os

.

frliiam JJ Madden hys/fal Security date Inspector V

Approved by:

J-28-8 4

' '

.' R. Keim, Chie feguards Section date Inspection Summary:

Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on February 18-21, 1986 (Report No. 50-219/86-05)

Areas Inspected: Management Effectiveness; Organization; Program Audits; Records and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers (Protected Area / Vital Areas) Compensatory Measures; Assessment Aids; Access Control (Personnel / Packages / Vehicles); Detection Aids (Protected Area / Vital Areas);

Alarm Stations; Communications; Safeguards Contingency Plan; and follow-up on oustanding items.

Results:

The licensee was found to be in compliance in the areas inspected.

8604210242 860414 PDR ADOCK 05000219 G

PDR

-

-

.

-_

l l

I

'

.

!

DETAILS l

j 1.

Key Persons Contacted l

P. B. Fiedler, Vice-President / Director, Oyster Creek J. Knubel, Nuclear Security Director, GPU D.G. Holland, Licensing Manager B. H. Hohman,

,

Licensing Engineer D. J. Long, Security Manager R. T. Ewart, Security Lieutenant J. Earley, Supervisor, I&C Corrective Maintenance W. H.

Bateman, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC I

Other licensee personnel and members of the proprietary and YOH contract security force were interviewed by the inspectors.

2.

MC 30703 - Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on February 21, 1986, the inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 and reviewed the purpose and scope of the inspection and presented the findings.

Written material was not provided to the licensee by the inspectors at any time during this inspection.

3.

MC 92701 - Status of Inspector Follow-up Item (Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item (85-02-01): A formal preventive main-tenance program is needed for CCTV, perim-alert, and radio comunications. By memorandum titled QDR-0098 (Security Preventive Maintenance Program), dated February 4,1986, the Security Manager advised the QA Lead Auditor that as of January 31, 1986, a full security preventive maintenance program has been in effect. The security preventive maintenance schedule, developed by JCP&L System Operations and Telecommunications for the assessment aids, perimeter intrusion alarm systems, radio communications, and security lighting, was reviewed by the inspectors and appeared to provide an adequate preventive maintenance schedule for this equipment. The preventive maintenance schedule for the remaining security equipment, which h w.intained by the facility Operations Maintenance Section and the 'nnrument and Computer Maintenance Section, was reviewed with the supervisors of those sections and appeared to be adequate.

Site Protection Force Directive, No. 85-15, dated November 26, 1985, subject, Security Work Orders, was issued to assist security personnel in the preparation and distribution of security equipment work orders for the repair of any deficiencies which may occur between scheduled maintenance inspections.

-

--

- -

_

_.

_.

_ _ _ _

l

'

.

4.

MC 92702 - Follow-Up on Previous Violations (Closed) Violation (85-16-05):

Failure to report degradation of security l

per 10 CFR 73.71. The inspector reviewed security logs and records and security event reports submitted by the licensee since tne violation. The

,

!

inspectors determined that physical security events reportable under 10 CFR 73.71 and Oyster Creek Security Department Procedure 1150.20 are being correctly reported.

,

5.

MC 81020 - Management Effectiveness

.

The inspector noted the following improvements to the security program:

l a.

New handguns have been purchased.

l l

b.

The firearms training program has been revised to make it more realistic and practical, including an upgrade of close distance firing tactics.

c.

The licensee is conducting a job task analysis for all Site

'

Protection Officer positions to determine the effectiveness of the

,

Training and Qualification Plan.

!

I d.

Four portal metal detectors, two explosive detectors and one x-ray scan unit have been purchased to enhance the search functions.

e.

An upgrade of computer system capability is in progress to add

,

!

redundancy and improve monitoring effectiveness.

Softwate modifi-cations are being accomplished with this change.

f.

A new system of performance observations, which tests an individual's proficiency level on general operational security program criteria and on specific security officer positions, has been developed and implemented as a management / supervisory tool.

!

The intent of this system is to review the quality of security personnel performance and knowledge on a continuing basis and to identify and correct deficiencies as they are detected.

!

,

6.

MC 81022 - Security Organization l

The inspector determined that the security management structure and chain i

of command were in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan, contingency plan, procedures and applicable regulatory requirements. They are adequate and appropriate for their intended function.

i i

I

,

l

.

.

-. - -.. _ _ _

-

-

.

- - -.

~ _. -..

-

,

!

-.

0

7.-

MC 81034 - Security Program Audit The inspector reviewed the annual QA audit of the security program, l

  1. S-0C-85-15, dated November 12, 1985, and confirmed that the licensee had

'

taken corrective actions on the four audit reconinendations. These recom-mendations included:

(1) further reducing the visibility of alarm

!

station features from outside the alarm station; (2) submittal of updated

l security plan drawings to NRC; (3) improvement of firearms cleaning l

. standards; and (4) the elimination of a fire hazard. The audit was comprehensive in scope and was conducted by qualified personnel.

8.

MC 81038 - Records and Reports The inspectors reviewed the daily logs and records and found no dis-crepancies. Two security event reports, submitted since the last inspec-tion, were reviewed and found to be factual, timely, and complete with compensatory measures, prompt and appropriate.

9.

MC 81052 - Physical Barriers - Protected Area l

The inspector verified, by visual observation of all the protected area physical barriers, that the licensee was maintaining the barriers in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.

10. MC 81054 - Physical Barriers Vital Areas

'

By letter dated October 25, 1985, subject: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generat-ing Static;n, Docket No. 50-219, Security Plan Revision #18, the licensee submitted a plan change in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(p).

r THis PAMGRAPH CONTAINS SATEUAIIDS

IflF02"AT!E!! 5C ;S C01 F0ii FU2LIC DISCLCSEE, Itis utIENiiDMALLY.

1. EFT DLANX.

P

'

l l

f

- - - - - - - - - -

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

.

The licensee was advised that the inspectors would communicate their observations regarding this plan change to the appropriate NRC personnel engaged in reviewing the change. This is an Inspector Follow-up Item.

(86-05-01)

11. MC 81064 - Compensatory Measures The inspectors detennined, by observation and interviews with security personnel, that the licensee implemented, and security personnel were knowledgeable of, the compensatory security measures for inoperable security systems necessary to meet the requirements of the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedures.

12. MC 81070 - Access Control - Personnel By observation and review of records, the inspectors determined that the licensee was controlling personnel access to the protected and vital areas in confonnance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedures.

13. MC 81072 - Access Control - Packages The inspectors observed that the security force controlled the entry of packages and material into the protected area in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedures.

MC 81074 - Access Control - Vehicles The inspectors observed that the security force properly controlled the access of vehicles into the protected area and conducted search and escort tasks in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and implementing procedures.

\\

15. MC 81078 - Detection Aids - Protected Areas j

The licensee demonstrated to the inspectors that the perimeter intrusion detection system detected penetration tests of the protected area in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.

THIS PAMGRAN8 CONTAINS SAFECUARDS INF01"i!T'-

" p;NOT FOR PUWC

-

DISCLOWE,:I;;1:UEtiiONALLY LEFT CLAHX.

This is an Inspector Follow-up Item.

(IFI86-05-02).

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

<

>

L.

l I

l-16. MC 81080 - Detection Aids - Vital Areas The inspectors observed the licensee conduct penetration tests of the vital area intrusion detection system (IDS) and confirmed that the IDS

<

was functioning in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.

!

17. MC 81084 - Alarm Stations i

The inspectors observed and questioned the central alarm station (CAS)

operator; and the secondary alarm station (SAS) operator and determined that the CAS and SAS operators were knowledgeable of their duties and that the stations were in conformance with the NRC-approved physical security plan and adequate and appropriate for their intended functions.

18. MC 81088 -f.:ommunications The CAS operator demonstrated to the inspector that the internal and ex-ternal communication links established by the licensee were in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.

19. MC 81601 - Safeguards Contingency Plan A simulated threat and contingency were presented to the security force by the inspectors who requested that the licensee have the security force demonstrate its response. The inspectors found that their response was as outlined in the licensee's NRC-approved Safeguard Contingency Plan and its implementing procedures.

,

l l

l

,

y

_.. _. _ _ _ _ _