ML22340A186: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                                           Revised: 27.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT                                                           Table:     6.1-1 Page:     1 of 1 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Net Positive Suction Heads for Post-DBA Operational Pumps NPSHa           NPSHr           Water Flow and Condition                                                                                    Temp (available      (required)
{{#Wiki_filter:INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 27.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.1-1 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 1 of 1
Pump                          (per pump)                   Suction Source                 minimum) gpm 1 ftabs           ftabs           °F Refueling Water
 
: 1. Safety Injection                     678 max. flow                                                     45.4           31.8         105 max.
Net Positive Suction Heads for Post-DBA Operational Pumps
Storage Tank Refueling Water
 
: 2. Centrifugal Charging                 530 max. flow                                                     39.8           17.6         105 max.
Flow and Condition NPSHa NPSHr Water Pu mp (per pump) Suction Source (available (required) Te mp mi ni mum) gpm 1 ftabs ftabs °F
: 1. Safety Injection 678 max. flow Refueling Water 45.4 31.8 105 max.
Storage Tank
: 2. Centrifugal Charging 530 max. flow Refueling Water 39.8 17.6 105 max.
Storage Tank
Storage Tank
: 3. Residual Heat Removal               4,175 max. flow               Recirculation Sump                   26.3           17.1             190
: 3. Residual Heat Removal 4,175 max. flow Recirculation Sump 26.3 17.1 190
: 4. Containment Spray                   3,406 max. flow               Recirculation Sump                   27.8           14.9             190
: 4. Containment Spray 3,406 max. flow Recirculation Sump 27.8 14.9 190
: 5. Component Cooling                   11,200 max. flow                   Closed Loop                     37.1           25.5             160 Screenhouse
: 5. Component Cooling 11,200 max. flow Closed Loop 37.1 25.5 160
: 6. Essential Service Water             12,200 max. flow                     (forebay at                   37.5           34.1             88.8 Elevation 562 ft.)
 
Screenhouse
: 6. Essential Service Water 12,200 max. flow (forebay at 37.5 34.1 88.8 Elevation 562 ft.)
 
1 NPSH values represent bounding conditions lowest NPSH margin for the most conservative operating conditions and component alignments analyzed of either unit.
1 NPSH values represent bounding conditions lowest NPSH margin for the most conservative operating conditions and component alignments analyzed of either unit.
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-1 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1
SAFETY INJECTIONSYSTEM CODE REQUIREMENTS 1
Component Code
Refueling Water Storage Tank Not applicable Residual Heat Exchanger
Tube Side ASME B&PV Code S ect i o n III C l as s C
Shell Side ASME B&PV Code S ect i o n V III
Accumulators ASME B&PV Code Section III Class C
Valves ANSI B16.5, MSS-SP-66, and ASME B&PV Code Section III, 1968 Edition 1 Piping USAS B31.1, 1967 Edition 1 ASME III Appendix F 2
Boron Injection Tank ASME B&PV Code S ect i o n III C l as s C
Recirculation Sump Strainers Edition (Main and Remote) A IS C-69, 7th Debris Interceptors (CEQ Fan Room, Flood-Up Overflow Wall, and A IS C-69, 7th Edition Entrance to Containment Wide Range Sump Level Instrument)
1 Repairs and replacements for pressure retaining components within the code boundary, and their supports, are conducted in accordance with ASME Section XI.
2 The evaluation criteria of ASME III Appendix F (faulted conditions) is applicable to accumulator fill line piping from outside containment isolation valve to the normally closed inlet valv es at each accumulator and the normally closed valves in the flow path to the low head SI hot leg loops (CPN 32).
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-2 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R EE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1 R
ACCUMULATORDESIGN PARAMETERS
Number 4 per unit
T ype Stainless steel clad / carbon steel
Design pressure, psig 700
Design temperature, ºF 300
Operating temperature, ºF 120
Normal pressure, psig 621.5
Minimum pressure, psig 585.0
Total volume, ft3 1350 Maximum water volume at operating conditions, ft3 971
Minimum water volume at operating conditions, ft3 921
Boron concentration (as boric acid), ppm 2400 to 2600
Code ASME B&PV Code Section III Class C
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-3 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1
BORON INJECTIONTANK DESIGN PARAMETERS
Number 1 per unit
Total Volume, gal (also useable volume) 900
Boron concentration, (ppm) 0 to 2600
Design pressure, psig 2735
Design temperature, ºF 300
Operating pressure, psig (Injection Mode) 2340
Operating pressure, psig (Standby) atmospheric
Operating temperature, ºF ambient
Material SS Clad Carbon Steel
Code ASME B&PV Code Section III Class C
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.3 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-4 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1
REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK DESIGN PARAMETERS
Number 1 per unit
Tank Capacity, gal. 420,000
Required Capacity, gal. 375,500
Design pressure, psig Static head and sloshing
Design temperature, ºF -30 to 100
Normal pressure, psig Atmospheric
Liquid temperature,º F 70 - 100
Inside diameter, ft (approx.) 48
Straight side height, ft 31
Material Stainless Steel
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 21.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-5 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                  Revision:      22 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:    6.2-1 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                                  Page:    1 of 1 SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM CODE REQUIREMENTS1 Component                                                Code Refueling Water Storage Tank                                      Not applicable Residual Heat Exchanger ASME B&PV Code Tube Side Section III Class C ASME B&PV Code Shell Side Section VIII ASME B&PV Code Accumulators Section III Class C ANSI B16.5, MSS-SP-66, and ASME B&PV Code Valves Section III, 1968 Edition 1 Piping                                      USAS B31.1, 1967 Edition 1 ASME III Appendix F 2 ASME B&PV Code Boron Injection Tank Section III Class C Recirculation Sump Strainers AISC-69, 7th Edition (Main and Remote)
DESIGN PARAMETERS - ECCS PUMPS
Debris Interceptors (CEQ Fan Room, Flood-Up Overflow Wall, and AISC-69, 7th Edition Entrance to Containment Wide Range Sump Level Instrument) 1 Repairs and replacements for pressure retaining components within the code boundary, and their supports, are conducted in accordance with ASME Section XI.
2 The evaluation criteria of ASME III Appendix F (faulted conditions) is applicable to accumulator fill line piping from outside containment isolation valve to the normally closed inlet valves at each accumulator and the normally closed valves in the flow path to the low head SI hot leg loops (CPN 32).


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                            Revision:  16.1 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:    6.2-2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                              Page:    1 of 1 ACCUMULATOR DESIGN PARAMETERS Number                                                               4 per unit Type                                                    Stainless steel clad / carbon steel Design pressure, psig                                                    700 Design temperature, ºF                                                  300 Operating temperature, ºF                                                120 Normal pressure, psig                                                  621.5 Minimum pressure, psig                                                585.0 Total volume, ft3                                                      1350 Maximum water volume at operating conditions, ft 3 971 Minimum water volume at operating conditions, ft3                        921 Boron concentration (as boric acid), ppm                          2400 to 2600 Code                                                  ASME B&PV Code Section III Class C
Centrifugal Charging Safety Injection Residual Heat Pumps Pumps Removal Pumps Number per unit 2 2 2


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                    Revision:    16.1 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:      6.2-3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                          Page:      1 of 1 BORON INJECTION TANK DESIGN PARAMETERS Number                                                          1 per unit Total Volume, gal (also useable volume)                              900 Boron concentration, (ppm)                                        0 to 2600 Design pressure, psig                                               2735 Design temperature, ºF                                              300 Operating pressure, psig (Injection Mode)                          2340 Operating pressure, psig (Standby)                              atmospheric Operating temperature, ºF                                        ambient Material                                                    SS Clad Carbon Steel Code                                                  ASME B&PV Code Section III Class C
Design pressure, psig 2800 1700 600


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                    Revision:  16.3 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:    6.2-4 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                          Page:    1 of 1 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK DESIGN PARAMETERS Number                                                        1 per unit Tank Capacity, gal.                                            420,000 Required Capacity, gal.                                        375,500 Design pressure, psig                                Static head and sloshing Design temperature, ºF                                      -30 to 100 Normal pressure, psig                                      Atmospheric Liquid temperature,º F                                        70 - 100 Inside diameter, ft (approx.)                                    48 Straight side height, ft                                        31 Material                                                  Stainless Steel
Design temperature, oF 300 300 400


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                              Revision:    21.1 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:      6.2-5 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                              Page:      1 of 1 DESIGN PARAMETERS - ECCS PUMPS Centrifugal Charging      Safety Injection        Residual Heat Pumps                  Pumps            Removal Pumps Number per unit                          2                      2                      2 Design pressure, psig                  2800                    1700                    600 Design temperature, oF                  300                    300                    400 Design flow rate, gpm                   150                     400                   3000 Design head, ft.                       5800                   2500                   350 Max. flow rate, gpm                     550                   7001                   4500 Head at max. flow rate, ft.           1400                   1500                   300 Motor horsepower                       600                     400                   400 Pump Speed, rpm                       48102                   3570                   1780 Horizontal             Horizontal         Vertical, in-line Type                                Multistage             Multistage           Single stage Centrifugal             Centrifugal           Centrifugal Stainless Steel or Stainless               Stainless             Stainless Material Steel clad               Steel                 Steel Carbon steel The motor starting times from electrical activation to full speed (steady- state-voltage) as obtained by a computer simulation are as follows:
Design flow rate, gpm 150 400 3000
Centrifugal Charging Pump                                       1.14 seconds Safety Injection Pump                                           1.13 seconds Residual Heat Removal Pump                                     0.704 seconds 1
 
Maximum flow rate is limited to 675 gpm for pumps that have not been qualified to a higher flow rate, up to a maximum of 700 gpm.
Design head, ft. 5800 2500 350
 
Max. flow rate, gpm 550 7001 4500
 
Head at max. flow rate, ft. 1400 1500 300
 
Motor horsepower 600 400 400
 
Pump Speed, rpm 48102 3570 1780 Horizontal Horizontal Vertical, in-line T yp e Multistage Multistage Single stage Centrifugal Centrifugal Centrifugal Stainless Steel or Material Stainless Stainless Stainless Steel clad Steel Steel Carbon steel
 
The motor starting times from electrical activation to full speed (steady - state -voltage) as obtained by a computer simulation are as follows:
Centrifugal Charging Pump 1.14 seconds
 
Safety Injection Pump 1.13 seconds
 
Residual Heat Removal Pump 0.704 seconds
 
1 Maximum flow rate is limited to 675 gpm for pumps that have not been qualified to a higher flow rate, up to a maximum of 700 gpm.
2 Equipped with speed increaser gear.
2 Equipped with speed increaser gear.
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-6 U PP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT U
Page: 1 of 3
SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCYCORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATIONPHASE


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                                Revision:      22 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:      6.2-6 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page:      1 of 3 SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATION PHASE Component                         Malfunction                             Comments Totally passive system with one accumulator per loop.
Component Malfunction Comments Totally passive system with one accumulator per loop.
Deliver to A. Accumulator                                                             Evaluation based on three accumulators delivering to the broken loop core and one spilling from ruptured loop.
A. Accumulator Deliver to broken loop Evaluation based on three accumulators delivering to the core and one spilling from ruptured loop.
B. Pump:
B. Pump:
: 1) Centrifugal Charging                               Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
: 1) Centrifugal Charging Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
: 2) Safety Injection                                   Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
: 2) Safety Injection Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
: 3) Residual Heat Removal                              Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
: 3) Residual H eat R emoval Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
C. Automatically Operated Valves:
C. Automatically Operated Valves:
: 1) Boron injection tank isolation Two parallel lines; one valve in either line is required to a)   inlet valve                                 Fails to open open.
: 1) Boron injection tank isolation a) inlet valve Fails to open Two parallel lines; one valve in either line is required to open.
Two parallel lines; one valve in either line is required to b)  outlet valve                                Fails to open open.
b) outlet valve Fails to open Two parallel lines; one valve in either line is required to open.
: 2) Centrifugal Charging pumps Two parallel lines; only one valve in either line is required a)  suction line from RWST isolation valve      Fails to open to open.
: 2) Centrifugal Charging pumps a) suction line from RWST isolation valve Fails to open Two parallel lines; only one valve in either line is required to open.
discharge line to the normal charging path b)                                              Fails to close Two valves in series; only one valve required to close.
b) discharge line to the normal charging path Fails to close Two valves in series; only one valve required to close.
isolation valve1 c)   minimum flow line isolation valve           Fails to close Two trains in parallel; only one train required.
isolation valve1 c) minimum flow line isolation valve Fails to close Two trains in parallel; only one train required.
suction from volume control tank isolation d)                                              Fails to close Two valves in series; only one valve required to close.
d) suction from volume control tank isolation Fails to close Two valves in series; only one valve required to close.
valve 1
valve
The reactor coolant pump seal water path is left open.
 
1 The reactor coolant pump seal water path is left open.
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-6 U PP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT U
Page: 2 of 3
 
SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCYCORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATIONPHASE


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                                Revision:        22 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:        6.2-6 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page:        2 of 3 SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATION PHASE Component                             Malfunction                             Comments Recirculation Phase A. Valves operated From Control Room for Recirculation:
Component Malfunction Comments Recirculation Phase A. Valves operated From Control Room for Recirculation:
Two lines parallel; only one valve in either line is required
: 1) Containment sump recirculation isolation Fails to open Two lines parallel; only one valve in either line is required to open.
: 1) Containment sump recirculation isolation            Fails to open to open.
: 2) Residual heat removal pumps suction line from Fails to close Check valve in series with two gate valves; operation of RWST isolation only one valve required.
Residual heat removal pumps suction line from                     Check valve in series with two gate valves; operation of
: 3) Safety injection pumps suction line from RWST Fails to close Check valve in series with gate valve; operation of only one valve required.
: 2)                                                    Fails to close RWST isolation                                                   only one valve required.
Check valve in series with gate valve; operation of only one
: 3) Safety injection pumps suction line from RWST       Fails to close valve required.
Check valve in series with two parallel gate valves.
Check valve in series with two parallel gate valves.
Centrifugal Charging pumps suction line from
: 4) Centrifugal Charging pumps suction line from RWST isolation valve Fails to close Operating of either the check valve or the gate valves required.
: 4)                                                    Fails to close Operating of either the check valve or the gate valves RWST isolation valve required.
Separate and independent high head injection path via the centrifugal charging pumps taking suction from discharge of
Separate and independent high head injection path via the centrifugal charging pumps taking suction from discharge of Safety injection pump suction line isolation valve
: 5) Safety injection pump suction line isolation valve at discharge of the west residual heat exchanger Fails to open the East residual heat residual head exchanger. A cross over line allows the flow from one heat exchanger to reach both safety injection and charging pumps if necessary.
: 5)                                                    Fails to open the East residual heat residual head exchanger. A cross over at discharge of the west residual heat exchanger line allows the flow from one heat exchanger to reach both safety injection and charging pumps if necessary.
: 6) Residual Heat Removal discharge bypass line Fails to close The second isolation valve for RWST backflow is still available.
The second isolation valve for RWST backflow is still
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-6 U PP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT U
: 6) Residual Heat Removal discharge bypass line         Fails to close available.
Page: 3 of 3
 
SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCYCORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATIONPHASE


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                            Revision:      22 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:      6.2-6 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page:      3 of 3 SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATION PHASE Component                 Malfunction                             Comments B. Pumps:
Component Malfunction Comments B. Pumps:
Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one. One
Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one. One
: 1) Component Cooling Water Pump             Fails to start pump is running during normal operation. An additional shared pump is available.
: 1) Component Cooling Water Pump Fails to start pump is running during normal operation. An additional shared pump is available.
Four provided for both units. Two pumps are required for
: 2) Essential Service Water Pump Fails to start Four provided for both units. Two pumps are required for normal operation.
: 2) Essential Service Water Pump              Fails to start normal operation.
: 3) Residual Heat Removal Pump Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
: 3) Residual Heat Removal Pump               Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
: 4) Charging Pump Fails to operate Same as injection phase.
: 4) Charging Pump                           Fails to operate Same as injection phase.
: 5) Safety Injection Pumps Fails to operate Same as injection phase.
: 5) Safety Injection Pumps                   Fails to operate Same as injection phase.
 
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-7 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1
 
SINGLE PASSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS - EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM
 
RECIRCULATION PHASE
 
Flow Path Indication of Loss of Flow Path Alternate Flow Path
 
COLD LEG From containment recirculation sump to low head Reduced flow in the discharge line, from cold leg injection header via the residual heat one of the residual heat exchangers (one Via the independent identical low head flow path utilizing removal pumps and the residual heat exchangers. flow monitor in each discharge line) and/or the pumps second residual heat exchanger leakage sump level alarm HOT LEG From containment recirculation sump to hot leg Same as above Same as above lo w - head injection header via RHR pumps and RHR heat exchangers.
COLD LEG From containment recirculation sump to the high Reduced flow in the discharge lines from From containment recirculation sump to the high head cold head cold leg injection header via the west the safety injection pumps (one flow leg injection headers via east residual heat removal pump, residual heat removal pump, west residual heat monitor in each discharge line) and/or east residual heat exchanger and the centrifugal charging exchanger and the safety injection pumps. leakage sump level alarm. pumps cross - tie to SI pump suction.
HOT LEG Fro m containment recirculation sump to the high Reduced flow in the discharge lines from From containment spray to the high head hot leg injection head hot leg injection headers via west residual the safety injection pumps (one flow points via East residual heat removal heat removal pump, removal pump, west residual heat exchanger and monitor in each discharge line) and/or East residual heat exchanger and the centrifugal charging the safety injection pumps. leakage sump level alarm. pumps cross tie to SI Pump suction
 
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 19.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-8 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R EE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1 R
 
ACCUMULATOR INLEAKAGE
 
TIME PERIOD BETWEEN LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS (OBSERVED LEAK OBSERVED LEAK (BETWEEN LEVEL ALARM) 1, 2 RATE) DIVIDED BY RATE CC/HR (MAX ALLOWED MAXIMUM ANTICIPATED DESIGN) 3
 
1538 1 mo nth 16 days 77
 
513 3 months 7 weeks 25.7
 
256 6 mo nths 13 weeks 12.8
 
171 9 months 20 weeks 8.6


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                                            Revision:    16.1 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:      6.2-7 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page:      1 of 1 SINGLE PASSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS - EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATION PHASE Flow Path                                        Indication of Loss of Flow Path            Alternate Flow Path COLD LEG Reduced flow in the discharge line, from From containment recirculation sump to low head one of the residual heat exchangers (one    Via the independent identical low head flow path utilizing cold leg injection header via the residual heat flow monitor in each discharge line) and/or the pumps second residual heat exchanger removal pumps and the residual heat exchangers.
128 1 year 27 weeks 6.4
leakage sump level alarm HOT LEG From containment recirculation sump to hot leg  Same as above                              Same as above low - head injection header via RHR pumps and RHR heat exchangers.
COLD LEG From containment recirculation sump to the high  Reduced flow in the discharge lines from    From containment recirculation sump to the high head cold head cold leg injection header via the west      the safety injection pumps (one flow        leg injection headers via east residual heat removal pump, residual heat removal pump, west residual heat  monitor in each discharge line) and/or      east residual heat exchanger and the centrifugal charging exchanger and the safety injection pumps.        leakage sump level alarm.                  pumps cross - tie to SI pump suction.
HOT LEG From containment recirculation sump to the high  Reduced flow in the discharge lines from    From containment spray to the high head hot leg injection head hot leg injection headers via west residual the safety injection pumps (one flow        points via East residual heat removal heat removal pump, removal pump, west residual heat exchanger and  monitor in each discharge line) and/or      East residual heat exchanger and the centrifugal charging the safety injection pumps.                      leakage sump level alarm.                  pumps cross tie to SI Pump suction


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                  Revision:    19.1 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:      6.2-8 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                                  Page:      1 of 1 ACCUMULATOR INLEAKAGE TIME PERIOD BETWEEN LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS                      (OBSERVED LEAK OBSERVED LEAK                        (BETWEEN LEVEL ALARM) 1, 2                      RATE) DIVIDED BY RATE CC/HR                                                                            (MAX ALLOWED MAXIMUM                    ANTICIPATED                    DESIGN) 3 1538                      1 month                      16 days                        77 513                      3 months                      7 weeks                      25.7 256                      6 months                    13 weeks                      12.8 171                      9 months                    20 weeks                        8.6 128                        1 year                      27 weeks                        6.4 1
1 25.0 cu. ft. between level alarms.
25.0 cu. ft. between level alarms.
2 Accumulator initially at "Lo" level and pressure conditions.
2 Accumulator initially at "Lo" level and pressure conditions.
3 Maximum allowed leak rate for manufacturers acceptance test is 20 cc/hr (Back Leakage through check valves).
3 Maximum allowed leak rate for manufacturers acceptance test is 20 cc/hr (Back L eakage through check valves).
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 21.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-9 U PP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT U
Page: 1 of 1
 
RECIRCULATION LOOP LEAKAGE
 
No. of Type of Leakage Control and Unit Leakage Leakage to Leakage to It e ms Units Rate Used in the Original Analysis1 Atmosphere Drain Tank cc/hr cc/hr
: 1. Residual Heat Removal Pumps (Low Head Safety Injection) 2 Mechanical seal with leakoff - 1 drop/min 0 6
: 2. Centrifugal Charging Pump 2 Same as residual heat removal pump 0 6
: 3. Safety Injection Pump 2 Same as residual heat removal pump 0 6
: 4. Flanges: Gasket adjusted to zero leakage following any test 10 drops/min/flange used in analysis
: a. P ump 8 240 0
: b. Valves Bonnet Body (larger than 2") 40 1200 0
: c. Control Valves 6 180 0
: 5. Valves Stem Leakoffs 40 Back-seated, double packing with leakoff 0 40 1 cc/hr/in. stem diameter
: 6. Misc. Small Valves 50 Flanged body packed stems - 1 drop/min used 150 0 TOTALS 1770 58
 
1 License amendments 49 (Unit 1) and 34 (Unit 2) require implementation of a program to reduce leakage from systems outside containment that would or could contain highly radioactive fluids during a serious transient or accident to as low as practical levels. This table is retained as part of the original FSAR and is not intended to be updated. The original FSAR assumed approximately 1770 cc/hr ECCS leakage and 2806 cc/hr CTS leakage for a total of approximately 4576 cc/hr total ESF leakage. See Section 14.3.5.19 and Section 14.3.5.20.4 for current information.
 
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-10 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1
 
RECIRCULATION SUMP COMPONENT DESIGN LOADCOMBINATIONS 1


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                                                  Revision:    21.1 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:      6.2-9 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page:      1 of 1 RECIRCULATION LOOP LEAKAGE Leakage to     Leakage to No. of    Type of Leakage Control and Unit Leakage Items                                                                                                    Atmosphere      Drain Tank Units          Rate Used in the Original Analysis1 cc/hr          cc/hr
Load Combination Description Load Combination Case No.
: 1. Residual Heat Removal Pumps (Low Head Safety Injection)               2          Mechanical seal with leakoff - 1 drop/min                0              6
Full Recirculation Flow with 0 Clean Main and Remote DW2 + TAL 3 + DBE 4 + FRHL 5 + DL 6 +
: 2. Centrifugal Charging Pump                                              2           Same as residual heat removal pump                    0              6
Strainers; Applicable to Main NL(t)7 and Remote Strainers Loads Immediately after the 1 Pipe Rupture; Applicable to DW(2) + TBL 8 + DBE(4) + NL(t) (7)
: 3. Safety Injection Pump                                                  2          Same as residual heat removal pump                    0              6 Gasket adjusted to zero leakage following any
Main and Remote Strainers Containment Fill; Forward 2 Flow through Main Strainer DW(2) + TFL 9 + DBE (4) + NL(t) (7) +
: 4. Flanges:
with Reverse Flow through PFHL10 Waterway to Remote Strainer Plugged Main Strainer with DW(2) + TAL (3) + DBE (4) + FRHL (5) + DL (6) 3 Recirculation Flow from + NL(t)(7)
test 10 drops/min/flange used in analysis
Remote Strainer Pressure Pulse at Instant of 4 Pipe Rupture; Applicable to DW(2) + TOL 11 + PP 12 + NL(t) (7)
: a. Pump                                                                8                                                                240              0
Main and Remote Strainers
: b. Valves Bonnet Body (larger than 2")                               40                                                                1200              0
: c. Control Valves                                                      6                                                                180              0 Back-seated, double packing with leakoff
: 5. Valves Stem Leakoffs                                                  40                                                                  0              40 1 cc/hr/in. stem diameter
: 6. Misc. Small Valves                                                    50      Flanged body packed stems - 1 drop/min used                150              0 TOTALS                                1770            58 1
License amendments 49 (Unit 1) and 34 (Unit 2) require implementation of a program to reduce leakage from systems outside containment that would or could contain highly radioactive fluids during a serious transient or accident to as low as practical levels. This table is retained as part of the original FSAR and is not intended to be updated. The original FSAR assumed approximately 1770 cc/hr ECCS leakage and 2806 cc/hr CTS leakage for a total of approximately 4576 cc/hr total ESF leakage. See Section 14.3.5.19 and Section 14.3.5.20.4 for current information.


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                        Revision:      22 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:      6.2-10 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                                      Page:        1 of 1 RECIRCULATION SUMP COMPONENT DESIGN LOAD COMBINATIONS1 Load Combination Description                            Load Combination Case No.
1 The load combinations are used for the design and qualification of the main and remote strainers and waterway, unless otherwise indicated in the Description column.
Full Recirculation Flow with Clean Main and Remote                  DW2 + TAL3 + DBE4 + FRHL5 + DL6 +
0 Strainers; Applicable to Main          NL(t)7 and Remote Strainers Loads Immediately after the 1              Pipe Rupture; Applicable to            DW(2) + TBL8 + DBE(4) + NL(t)(7)
Main and Remote Strainers Containment Fill; Forward Flow through Main Strainer            DW(2) + TFL9 + DBE(4) + NL(t)(7) +
2 with Reverse Flow through              PFHL10 Waterway to Remote Strainer Plugged Main Strainer with DW(2) + TAL(3) + DBE(4) + FRHL(5) + DL(6) 3              Recirculation Flow from
                                                                      + NL(t)(7)
Remote Strainer Pressure Pulse at Instant of 4              Pipe Rupture; Applicable to            DW(2) + TOL11 + PP12 + NL(t)(7)
Main and Remote Strainers 1
The load combinations are used for the design and qualification of the main and remote strainers and waterway, unless otherwise indicated in the Description column.
2 DW - Dead Weight.
2 DW - Dead Weight.
3 TAL - Thermal effects at accident temperature of 160°F when recirculation is initiated for a large break LOCA consistent with the time of maximum hydrodynamic load.
3 T AL - Thermal effects at accident temperature of 160°F when recirculation is initiated for a large break LOCA consistent with the time of maximum hydrodynamic load.
4 DBE - Design Basis Earthquake.
4 DBE - Design Basis Earthquake.
5 FRHL - Full Recirculation Hydraulic Loads at 14,400 gpm, the bounding value for ECCS flow 6
5 FRHL - Full Recirculation Hydraulic Loads at 14,400 gpm, the bounding value for ECCS flow 6 DL - Debris Load. For s tructural analysis of main and remote strainers, bounding debris mass values of 1986 lbs and 1530 lbs, respectively, were used.
DL - Debris Load. For structural analysis of main and remote strainers, bounding debris mass values of 1986 lbs and 1530 lbs, respectively, were used.
7 NL(t) - Nozzle Loads. Loads applicable only to the remote strainer and local conditions at the time of the load case.
7 NL(t) - Nozzle Loads. Loads applicable only to the remote strainer and local conditions at the time of the load case.
8 TBL - Thermal Break Load. Thermal effects at post-break containment environment temperature of 236°F.
8 TBL - Thermal Break Load. Thermal effects at post -break containment environment temperature of 236°F.
9 TFL - Thermal Fill Loads During Pool Fill (200°F).
9 TFL - Thermal Fill Loads During Pool Fill (200°F).
10 PFHL - Pool Fill Hydraulic Loads - reverse flow and waterway loads.
10 PFHL - Pool Fill Hydraulic Loads - reverse flow and waterway loads.
11 TOL - Thermal effects at normal (maximum) operating temperature of 160°F for the main strainer and 120°F for the remote strainer.
11 TOL - Thermal effects at normal (maximum) operating temperature of 160°F for the main strainer and 120°F for the remote strainer.
12 PP - Pressure Pulse. Short term pressure pulse of 5.0 psid acting outward from within the main strainer and waterway and 2.5 psid acting outward from within the interface between the waterway and the remote strainer.
12 PP - Pressure Pulse. Short term pressure pulse of 5.0 psid acting outward from within the main strainer and waterway and 2.5 psid acting outward from within the interface between the waterway and the remote strainer.
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.3-1 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R EE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1 R


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                    Revision:  16.1 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:    6.3-1 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                          Page:    1 of 1 CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP DESIGN PARAMETERS Quantity                            2 (per unit)
CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMPDESIGN PARAMETERS
Type                          Vertical, centrifugal Design Pressure                          600 psig o
Design Temperature                          400 F Design flow rate                          3200 gpm Design head                              490 ft.
Motor horsepower                          600 hp.
Motor speed                            1780 rpm


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                      Revised:  28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT                    Table:  6.3-2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                  Page:    1 of 2 Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Design Parameters Heat Exchanger                              Heat Exchanger Quantity, Unit 1 / Unit 2                        2 (1-HE-18E / W) / 2 (2-HE-18E / W)
Quantity 2 (per unit)
Type                                                  Vertical / Shell and U Tube Heat Transfer per unit (Btu / hr)                             114.2 x 106 Flow, tube side, gpm                                              2942 Flow, shell side, gpm                                              2400 Shell side inlet temperature, ºF                                    90 Tube side inlet temperature, ºF                                    164 Shell side outlet temperature, ºF                                137.87 Tube side outlet temperature, ºF                                  124.20 Material Shell / Tube                                      Carbon Steel / SS Design Pressure, Shell / Tube psig                              150 / 300 Design Temperature, Shell / Tube, ºF                            200 / 200


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                Revised:  28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT              Table:    6.3-2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT            Page:    2 of 2 Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Code Requirements Shell Side              ASME 1968 B&PV Code Section VIII Div. 1 Tube Side                ASME 1968 B&PV Code Section III Class C
T ype Vertical, centrifugal


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                Revision:    17 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table:    6.3-3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT                      Page:    1 of 1 SPRAY ADDITIVE TANK DESIGN PARAMETERS Quantity                                                1 (per unit)
Design Pressure 600 psig
Volume, gal                                                  5218 Design temperature, °F                                        200 Design pressure, psig                                         10 Material                                                stainless steel SPRAY ADDITIVE TANK CODE REQUIREMENTS ASME 1968 B&PV Section VIII Div. 1


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                                     Revised: 26.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT                                                   Table:   6.3-4 Page:   1 of 2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Containment Spray System Malfunction Analysis Component               Malfunction                             Comments and Consequences Rupture of Pump         Isolate train.
Design Temperature 400oF
: 1. Containment Spray Pump casing                 Redundant train continues to operate requirement is one train.
 
: 2. Containment Spray Pump   Pump fails to start. One of two pumps operating will supply 100 percent of required flow This is prevented by pre startup checks. During power operation, each pump is tested on a periodic basis. During these tests checks will be Pump suction line       made to confirm that a motor operated valve (from the refueling water
Design flow rate 3200 gpm
: 3. Containment Spray Pump closed                 storage tank) is open. The manual valve from the recirculation sump is locked or sealed open. Motor operated valve positions (open or closed) are indicated in the control room Pump discharge motor Motor operated valves are redundant and only one of the two need
 
: 4. Containment Spray Pump   operated valve fails to operate. Valve positions (open or closed) are indicated in the control open.                   room.
Design head 490 ft.
Discharge Check         The check valves were checked in preoperational tests and are checked
 
: 5. Containment Spray Pump Valve fails to open     during periodic tests.
Motor horsepower 600 hp.
 
Motor speed 1780 rpm
 
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.3-2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 1 of 2
 
Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Design Parameters
 
Heat Exchanger Heat Exchanger
 
Quantity, Unit 1 / Unit 2 2 (1-HE-18E / W) / 2 (2 -HE-18E / W)
 
T ype Vertical / Shell and U Tube
 
Heat Transfer per unit (Btu / hr) 114.2 x 106
 
Flow, tube side, gpm 2942
 
Flow, shell side, gpm 2400
 
Shell side inlet temperature, ºF 90
 
Tube side inlet temperature, ºF 164
 
Shell side outlet temperature, ºF 137.87
 
Tube side outlet temperature, ºF 124.20
 
Material Shell / Tube Carbon Steel / SS
 
Design P ressure, Shell / Tube psig 150 / 300
 
Design Temperature, Shell / Tube, ºF 200 / 200
 
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.3-2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 2 of 2
 
Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Code Requirements
 
Shell Side ASME 1968 B&PV Code Section VIII Div. 1
 
Tube Side ASME 1968 B&PV Code Section III Class C
 
I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 17 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.3-3 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1
 
SPRAYADDITIVE TANK DESIGN PARAMETERS
 
Quantity 1 (per unit)
 
Volume, gal 5218
 
Design temperature, ° F 200
 
Design pressure, psig 10
 
Material stainless steel
 
SPRAY ADDITIVE TANK CODE REQUIREMENTS
 
ASME 1968 B&PV Section VIII Div. 1
 
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 26.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.3-4 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 1 of 2
 
Containment Spray System Malfunction Analysis
 
Component Malfunction Comments and Consequences
: 1. Containment Spray Pump Rupture of Pump Isolate train.
casing Redundant train continues to operate requirement is one train.
: 2. Containment Spray Pump Pump fails to start. One of two pumps operating will supply 100 percent of required flow
 
This is prevented by pre startup checks. During power operation, each pump is tested on a periodic basis. During these tests checks will be
: 3. Containment Spray Pump Pump suction line made to confirm that a motor operated valve (from the refueling water closed storage tank) is open. The manual valve from the recirculation sump is locked or sealed open. Motor operated valve positions (open or closed) are indicated in the control room Pump discharge motor Motor operated valves are redundant and only one of the two need
: 4. Containment Spray Pump operated valve fails to operate. Valve positions (open or closed) are indicated in the control open. room.
: 5. Containment Spray Pump Discharge Check The check valves were checked in preoperational tests and are checked Valve fails to open during periodic tests.
This is prevented by pre-startup checks.
This is prevented by pre-startup checks.
: 6. Containment Spray Heat   Drain Valve left open / Leak detection sumps in the spray system compartments are provided Exchanger                 Manways left open       with level alarms which are initiated if a drain valve is open and discharging into the compartment
: 6. Containment Spray Heat Drain Valve left open / Leak detection sumps in the spray s ystem compartments are provided Exchanger Manways left open with level alarms which are initiated if a drain valve is open and discharging into the compartment INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 26.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.3-4 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 2 of 2
 
Containment Spray System Malfunction Analysis


UFSAR Revision 31.0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER                                                Revised: 26.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT                                              Table:    6.3-4 Page:    2 of 2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Containment Spray System Malfunction Analysis Component                 Malfunction                           Comments and Consequences Isolate train.
Component Malfunction Comments and Consequences
: 7. Containment Spray Heat Tube or shell rupture Redundant train continues to operate.
: 7. Containment Spray Heat Isolate train.
Exchangers One train will provide 100% flow.
Exchangers Tube or shell rupture Redundant train continues to operate.
Motor Operated The motive water supply valve is normally open and is checked by
One train will provide 100% flow.
: 8. Containment Spray Eductors Supply Valve fails to periodic test.
Motor Operated The motive water suppl y valve is normally open and is checked by
: 8. Containment Spray Eductors Supply Valve fails to periodic test.
open The suction supply valves (from the spray additive tank) are redundant and only one of the two need be open.
open The suction supply valves (from the spray additive tank) are redundant and only one of the two need be open.
Valve position is indicated in the Control Room.}}
Valve position is indicated in the Control Room.}}

Revision as of 15:48, 15 November 2024

1 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 6, Tables
ML22340A186
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2022
From:
Indiana Michigan Power Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML22340A137 List: ... further results
References
AEP-NRC-2022-62
Download: ML22340A186 (19)


Text

INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 27.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.1-1 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 1 of 1

Net Positive Suction Heads for Post-DBA Operational Pumps

Flow and Condition NPSHa NPSHr Water Pu mp (per pump) Suction Source (available (required) Te mp mi ni mum) gpm 1 ftabs ftabs °F

1. Safety Injection 678 max. flow Refueling Water 45.4 31.8 105 max.

Storage Tank

2. Centrifugal Charging 530 max. flow Refueling Water 39.8 17.6 105 max.

Storage Tank

3. Residual Heat Removal 4,175 max. flow Recirculation Sump 26.3 17.1 190
4. Containment Spray 3,406 max. flow Recirculation Sump 27.8 14.9 190
5. Component Cooling 11,200 max. flow Closed Loop 37.1 25.5 160

Screenhouse

6. Essential Service Water 12,200 max. flow (forebay at 37.5 34.1 88.8 Elevation 562 ft.)

1 NPSH values represent bounding conditions lowest NPSH margin for the most conservative operating conditions and component alignments analyzed of either unit.

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-1 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1

SAFETY INJECTIONSYSTEM CODE REQUIREMENTS 1

Component Code

Refueling Water Storage Tank Not applicable Residual Heat Exchanger

Tube Side ASME B&PV Code S ect i o n III C l as s C

Shell Side ASME B&PV Code S ect i o n V III

Accumulators ASME B&PV Code Section III Class C

Valves ANSI B16.5, MSS-SP-66, and ASME B&PV Code Section III, 1968 Edition 1 Piping USAS B31.1, 1967 Edition 1 ASME III Appendix F 2

Boron Injection Tank ASME B&PV Code S ect i o n III C l as s C

Recirculation Sump Strainers Edition (Main and Remote) A IS C-69, 7th Debris Interceptors (CEQ Fan Room, Flood-Up Overflow Wall, and A IS C-69, 7th Edition Entrance to Containment Wide Range Sump Level Instrument)

1 Repairs and replacements for pressure retaining components within the code boundary, and their supports, are conducted in accordance with ASME Section XI.

2 The evaluation criteria of ASME III Appendix F (faulted conditions) is applicable to accumulator fill line piping from outside containment isolation valve to the normally closed inlet valv es at each accumulator and the normally closed valves in the flow path to the low head SI hot leg loops (CPN 32).

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-2 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R EE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1 R

ACCUMULATORDESIGN PARAMETERS

Number 4 per unit

T ype Stainless steel clad / carbon steel

Design pressure, psig 700

Design temperature, ºF 300

Operating temperature, ºF 120

Normal pressure, psig 621.5

Minimum pressure, psig 585.0

Total volume, ft3 1350 Maximum water volume at operating conditions, ft3 971

Minimum water volume at operating conditions, ft3 921

Boron concentration (as boric acid), ppm 2400 to 2600

Code ASME B&PV Code Section III Class C

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-3 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1

BORON INJECTIONTANK DESIGN PARAMETERS

Number 1 per unit

Total Volume, gal (also useable volume) 900

Boron concentration, (ppm) 0 to 2600

Design pressure, psig 2735

Design temperature, ºF 300

Operating pressure, psig (Injection Mode) 2340

Operating pressure, psig (Standby) atmospheric

Operating temperature, ºF ambient

Material SS Clad Carbon Steel

Code ASME B&PV Code Section III Class C

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.3 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-4 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1

REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK DESIGN PARAMETERS

Number 1 per unit

Tank Capacity, gal. 420,000

Required Capacity, gal. 375,500

Design pressure, psig Static head and sloshing

Design temperature, ºF -30 to 100

Normal pressure, psig Atmospheric

Liquid temperature,º F 70 - 100

Inside diameter, ft (approx.) 48

Straight side height, ft 31

Material Stainless Steel

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 21.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-5 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1

DESIGN PARAMETERS - ECCS PUMPS

Centrifugal Charging Safety Injection Residual Heat Pumps Pumps Removal Pumps Number per unit 2 2 2

Design pressure, psig 2800 1700 600

Design temperature, oF 300 300 400

Design flow rate, gpm 150 400 3000

Design head, ft. 5800 2500 350

Max. flow rate, gpm 550 7001 4500

Head at max. flow rate, ft. 1400 1500 300

Motor horsepower 600 400 400

Pump Speed, rpm 48102 3570 1780 Horizontal Horizontal Vertical, in-line T yp e Multistage Multistage Single stage Centrifugal Centrifugal Centrifugal Stainless Steel or Material Stainless Stainless Stainless Steel clad Steel Steel Carbon steel

The motor starting times from electrical activation to full speed (steady - state -voltage) as obtained by a computer simulation are as follows:

Centrifugal Charging Pump 1.14 seconds

Safety Injection Pump 1.13 seconds

Residual Heat Removal Pump 0.704 seconds

1 Maximum flow rate is limited to 675 gpm for pumps that have not been qualified to a higher flow rate, up to a maximum of 700 gpm.

2 Equipped with speed increaser gear.

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-6 U PP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT U

Page: 1 of 3

SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCYCORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATIONPHASE

Component Malfunction Comments Totally passive system with one accumulator per loop.

A. Accumulator Deliver to broken loop Evaluation based on three accumulators delivering to the core and one spilling from ruptured loop.

B. Pump:

1) Centrifugal Charging Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
2) Safety Injection Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
3) Residual H eat R emoval Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.

C. Automatically Operated Valves:

1) Boron injection tank isolation a) inlet valve Fails to open Two parallel lines; one valve in either line is required to open.

b) outlet valve Fails to open Two parallel lines; one valve in either line is required to open.

2) Centrifugal Charging pumps a) suction line from RWST isolation valve Fails to open Two parallel lines; only one valve in either line is required to open.

b) discharge line to the normal charging path Fails to close Two valves in series; only one valve required to close.

isolation valve1 c) minimum flow line isolation valve Fails to close Two trains in parallel; only one train required.

d) suction from volume control tank isolation Fails to close Two valves in series; only one valve required to close.

valve

1 The reactor coolant pump seal water path is left open.

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-6 U PP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT U

Page: 2 of 3

SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCYCORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATIONPHASE

Component Malfunction Comments Recirculation Phase A. Valves operated From Control Room for Recirculation:

1) Containment sump recirculation isolation Fails to open Two lines parallel; only one valve in either line is required to open.
2) Residual heat removal pumps suction line from Fails to close Check valve in series with two gate valves; operation of RWST isolation only one valve required.
3) Safety injection pumps suction line from RWST Fails to close Check valve in series with gate valve; operation of only one valve required.

Check valve in series with two parallel gate valves.

4) Centrifugal Charging pumps suction line from RWST isolation valve Fails to close Operating of either the check valve or the gate valves required.

Separate and independent high head injection path via the centrifugal charging pumps taking suction from discharge of

5) Safety injection pump suction line isolation valve at discharge of the west residual heat exchanger Fails to open the East residual heat residual head exchanger. A cross over line allows the flow from one heat exchanger to reach both safety injection and charging pumps if necessary.
6) Residual Heat Removal discharge bypass line Fails to close The second isolation valve for RWST backflow is still available.

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-6 U PP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT U

Page: 3 of 3

SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS EMERGENCYCORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATIONPHASE

Component Malfunction Comments B. Pumps:

Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one. One

1) Component Cooling Water Pump Fails to start pump is running during normal operation. An additional shared pump is available.
2) Essential Service Water Pump Fails to start Four provided for both units. Two pumps are required for normal operation.
3) Residual Heat Removal Pump Fails to start Two provided. Evaluation based on operation of one.
4) Charging Pump Fails to operate Same as injection phase.
5) Safety Injection Pumps Fails to operate Same as injection phase.

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-7 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1

SINGLE PASSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS - EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM

RECIRCULATION PHASE

Flow Path Indication of Loss of Flow Path Alternate Flow Path

COLD LEG From containment recirculation sump to low head Reduced flow in the discharge line, from cold leg injection header via the residual heat one of the residual heat exchangers (one Via the independent identical low head flow path utilizing removal pumps and the residual heat exchangers. flow monitor in each discharge line) and/or the pumps second residual heat exchanger leakage sump level alarm HOT LEG From containment recirculation sump to hot leg Same as above Same as above lo w - head injection header via RHR pumps and RHR heat exchangers.

COLD LEG From containment recirculation sump to the high Reduced flow in the discharge lines from From containment recirculation sump to the high head cold head cold leg injection header via the west the safety injection pumps (one flow leg injection headers via east residual heat removal pump, residual heat removal pump, west residual heat monitor in each discharge line) and/or east residual heat exchanger and the centrifugal charging exchanger and the safety injection pumps. leakage sump level alarm. pumps cross - tie to SI pump suction.

HOT LEG Fro m containment recirculation sump to the high Reduced flow in the discharge lines from From containment spray to the high head hot leg injection head hot leg injection headers via west residual the safety injection pumps (one flow points via East residual heat removal heat removal pump, removal pump, west residual heat exchanger and monitor in each discharge line) and/or East residual heat exchanger and the centrifugal charging the safety injection pumps. leakage sump level alarm. pumps cross tie to SI Pump suction

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 19.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-8 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R EE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1 R

ACCUMULATOR INLEAKAGE

TIME PERIOD BETWEEN LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS (OBSERVED LEAK OBSERVED LEAK (BETWEEN LEVEL ALARM) 1, 2 RATE) DIVIDED BY RATE CC/HR (MAX ALLOWED MAXIMUM ANTICIPATED DESIGN) 3

1538 1 mo nth 16 days 77

513 3 months 7 weeks 25.7

256 6 mo nths 13 weeks 12.8

171 9 months 20 weeks 8.6

128 1 year 27 weeks 6.4

1 25.0 cu. ft. between level alarms.

2 Accumulator initially at "Lo" level and pressure conditions.

3 Maximum allowed leak rate for manufacturers acceptance test is 20 cc/hr (Back L eakage through check valves).

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 21.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-9 U PP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS RR EE PP OO RR TT U

Page: 1 of 1

RECIRCULATION LOOP LEAKAGE

No. of Type of Leakage Control and Unit Leakage Leakage to Leakage to It e ms Units Rate Used in the Original Analysis1 Atmosphere Drain Tank cc/hr cc/hr

1. Residual Heat Removal Pumps (Low Head Safety Injection) 2 Mechanical seal with leakoff - 1 drop/min 0 6
2. Centrifugal Charging Pump 2 Same as residual heat removal pump 0 6
3. Safety Injection Pump 2 Same as residual heat removal pump 0 6
4. Flanges: Gasket adjusted to zero leakage following any test 10 drops/min/flange used in analysis
a. P ump 8 240 0
b. Valves Bonnet Body (larger than 2") 40 1200 0
c. Control Valves 6 180 0
5. Valves Stem Leakoffs 40 Back-seated, double packing with leakoff 0 40 1 cc/hr/in. stem diameter
6. Misc. Small Valves 50 Flanged body packed stems - 1 drop/min used 150 0 TOTALS 1770 58

1 License amendments 49 (Unit 1) and 34 (Unit 2) require implementation of a program to reduce leakage from systems outside containment that would or could contain highly radioactive fluids during a serious transient or accident to as low as practical levels. This table is retained as part of the original FSAR and is not intended to be updated. The original FSAR assumed approximately 1770 cc/hr ECCS leakage and 2806 cc/hr CTS leakage for a total of approximately 4576 cc/hr total ESF leakage. See Section 14.3.5.19 and Section 14.3.5.20.4 for current information.

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 22 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.2-10 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1

RECIRCULATION SUMP COMPONENT DESIGN LOADCOMBINATIONS 1

Load Combination Description Load Combination Case No.

Full Recirculation Flow with 0 Clean Main and Remote DW2 + TAL 3 + DBE 4 + FRHL 5 + DL 6 +

Strainers; Applicable to Main NL(t)7 and Remote Strainers Loads Immediately after the 1 Pipe Rupture; Applicable to DW(2) + TBL 8 + DBE(4) + NL(t) (7)

Main and Remote Strainers Containment Fill; Forward 2 Flow through Main Strainer DW(2) + TFL 9 + DBE (4) + NL(t) (7) +

with Reverse Flow through PFHL10 Waterway to Remote Strainer Plugged Main Strainer with DW(2) + TAL (3) + DBE (4) + FRHL (5) + DL (6) 3 Recirculation Flow from + NL(t)(7)

Remote Strainer Pressure Pulse at Instant of 4 Pipe Rupture; Applicable to DW(2) + TOL 11 + PP 12 + NL(t) (7)

Main and Remote Strainers

1 The load combinations are used for the design and qualification of the main and remote strainers and waterway, unless otherwise indicated in the Description column.

2 DW - Dead Weight.

3 T AL - Thermal effects at accident temperature of 160°F when recirculation is initiated for a large break LOCA consistent with the time of maximum hydrodynamic load.

4 DBE - Design Basis Earthquake.

5 FRHL - Full Recirculation Hydraulic Loads at 14,400 gpm, the bounding value for ECCS flow 6 DL - Debris Load. For s tructural analysis of main and remote strainers, bounding debris mass values of 1986 lbs and 1530 lbs, respectively, were used.

7 NL(t) - Nozzle Loads. Loads applicable only to the remote strainer and local conditions at the time of the load case.

8 TBL - Thermal Break Load. Thermal effects at post -break containment environment temperature of 236°F.

9 TFL - Thermal Fill Loads During Pool Fill (200°F).

10 PFHL - Pool Fill Hydraulic Loads - reverse flow and waterway loads.

11 TOL - Thermal effects at normal (maximum) operating temperature of 160°F for the main strainer and 120°F for the remote strainer.

12 PP - Pressure Pulse. Short term pressure pulse of 5.0 psid acting outward from within the main strainer and waterway and 2.5 psid acting outward from within the interface between the waterway and the remote strainer.

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 16.1 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.3-1 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R EE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1 R

CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMPDESIGN PARAMETERS

Quantity 2 (per unit)

T ype Vertical, centrifugal

Design Pressure 600 psig

Design Temperature 400oF

Design flow rate 3200 gpm

Design head 490 ft.

Motor horsepower 600 hp.

Motor speed 1780 rpm

INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.3-2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 1 of 2

Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Design Parameters

Heat Exchanger Heat Exchanger

Quantity, Unit 1 / Unit 2 2 (1-HE-18E / W) / 2 (2 -HE-18E / W)

T ype Vertical / Shell and U Tube

Heat Transfer per unit (Btu / hr) 114.2 x 106

Flow, tube side, gpm 2942

Flow, shell side, gpm 2400

Shell side inlet temperature, ºF 90

Tube side inlet temperature, ºF 164

Shell side outlet temperature, ºF 137.87

Tube side outlet temperature, ºF 124.20

Material Shell / Tube Carbon Steel / SS

Design P ressure, Shell / Tube psig 150 / 300

Design Temperature, Shell / Tube, ºF 200 / 200

INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 28.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.3-2 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 2 of 2

Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Code Requirements

Shell Side ASME 1968 B&PV Code Section VIII Div. 1

Tube Side ASME 1968 B&PV Code Section III Class C

I NIN DD II AA NN AA MM II CC HH II GG AA NN PP OO WW EE RR Revision: 17 D.D. CC.. CC OO OO KK NN UU CC LL EE AA RR PP LL AA NN TT Table: 6.3-3 U PUP DD AA TT EE DD FF II NN AA LL SS AA FF EE TT YY AA NN AA LL YY SS II SS R ERE PP OO RR TT Page: 1 of 1

SPRAYADDITIVE TANK DESIGN PARAMETERS

Quantity 1 (per unit)

Volume, gal 5218

Design temperature, ° F 200

Design pressure, psig 10

Material stainless steel

SPRAY ADDITIVE TANK CODE REQUIREMENTS

ASME 1968 B&PV Section VIII Div. 1

INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 26.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.3-4 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 1 of 2

Containment Spray System Malfunction Analysis

Component Malfunction Comments and Consequences

1. Containment Spray Pump Rupture of Pump Isolate train.

casing Redundant train continues to operate requirement is one train.

2. Containment Spray Pump Pump fails to start. One of two pumps operating will supply 100 percent of required flow

This is prevented by pre startup checks. During power operation, each pump is tested on a periodic basis. During these tests checks will be

3. Containment Spray Pump Pump suction line made to confirm that a motor operated valve (from the refueling water closed storage tank) is open. The manual valve from the recirculation sump is locked or sealed open. Motor operated valve positions (open or closed) are indicated in the control room Pump discharge motor Motor operated valves are redundant and only one of the two need
4. Containment Spray Pump operated valve fails to operate. Valve positions (open or closed) are indicated in the control open. room.
5. Containment Spray Pump Discharge Check The check valves were checked in preoperational tests and are checked Valve fails to open during periodic tests.

This is prevented by pre-startup checks.

6. Containment Spray Heat Drain Valve left open / Leak detection sumps in the spray s ystem compartments are provided Exchanger Manways left open with level alarms which are initiated if a drain valve is open and discharging into the compartment INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Revised: 26.0 D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT Table: 6.3-4 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Page: 2 of 2

Containment Spray System Malfunction Analysis

Component Malfunction Comments and Consequences

7. Containment Spray Heat Isolate train.

Exchangers Tube or shell rupture Redundant train continues to operate.

One train will provide 100% flow.

Motor Operated The motive water suppl y valve is normally open and is checked by

8. Containment Spray Eductors Supply Valve fails to periodic test.

open The suction supply valves (from the spray additive tank) are redundant and only one of the two need be open.

Valve position is indicated in the Control Room.