05000255/FIN-2011008-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71003 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71003 | ||
| Inspector = A Stone, G O, | | Inspector = A Stone, G O'Dwyer, J Gavula, J Neurauter, M Munir, T Bilika, Stonec Brown, S Sheldon | ||
| CCA = H.7 | | CCA = H.7 | ||
| INPO aspect = WP.3 | | INPO aspect = WP.3 | ||
| description = A finding of very low safety significance and associated NCV of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, Test Control, was identified by the inspectors for the failure to evaluate test results for tank wall thickness under the scope of the Diesel Fuel Quality and Storage Monitoring Program. Specifically, the licensee did not evaluate the test results associated with the ultrasonic measurement of thickness of the bottom of the A emergency diesel generator day tank and both diesel fire pump day tanks. In addition, the licensee had not developed acceptance criteria for this activity. The licensee entered this issue into their corrective action program. The corrective actions that were been considered at the time of this inspection were the development of an acceptance criteria for tank wall thickness and performing an apparent cause evaluation. The finding was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the mitigating systems cornerstone attribute of equipment performance and affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The finding screened as of very low safety significance because the finding involved a design or qualification deficiency that did not result in a loss of operability or functionality. Specifically, the ultrasonic examination results showed that the wall thicknesses of the inspected tanks were close to the nominal thickness or greater. The finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance because the licensee did not have complete design documentation, procedures, and work packages for performing non-destructive examinations of the bottom walls of the tanks under the scope of the Diesel Fuel Monitoring and Storage Aging Management Program. [H.2(c)] | | description = A finding of very low safety significance and associated NCV of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, Test Control, was identified by the inspectors for the failure to evaluate test results for tank wall thickness under the scope of the Diesel Fuel Quality and Storage Monitoring Program. Specifically, the licensee did not evaluate the test results associated with the ultrasonic measurement of thickness of the bottom of the A emergency diesel generator day tank and both diesel fire pump day tanks. In addition, the licensee had not developed acceptance criteria for this activity. The licensee entered this issue into their corrective action program. The corrective actions that were been considered at the time of this inspection were the development of an acceptance criteria for tank wall thickness and performing an apparent cause evaluation. The finding was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the mitigating systems cornerstone attribute of equipment performance and affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The finding screened as of very low safety significance because the finding involved a design or qualification deficiency that did not result in a loss of operability or functionality. Specifically, the ultrasonic examination results showed that the wall thicknesses of the inspected tanks were close to the nominal thickness or greater. The finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance because the licensee did not have complete design documentation, procedures, and work packages for performing non-destructive examinations of the bottom walls of the tanks under the scope of the Diesel Fuel Monitoring and Storage Aging Management Program. [H.2(c)] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:17, 22 February 2018
| Site: | Palisades  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000255/2011008 Section 4OA5 |
| Date counted | Mar 31, 2011 (2011Q1) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71003 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | A Stone G O'Dwyer J Gavula J Neurauter M Munir T Bilika Stonec Brown S Sheldon |
| CCA | H.7, Documentation |
| INPO aspect | WP.3 |
| ' | |