05000293/FIN-2010005-03: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = The inspectors identified an NCV of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, Quality Assurance Program, for the failure to implement the experience and qualification requirements of the Quality Assurance Program. As a result, the licensee failed to ensure that an individual assigned to the position of Quality Assurance Manager met the qualification and experience requirements of ANSIIANS 3.1-1978 as required by the Quality Assurance Program. Specifically, the individual assigned to be the responsible person for the licensee's overall implementation of the Quality Assurance Program did not have at least one year of nuclear plant experience in the overall implementation of the Quality Assurance Program within the quality assurance organization prior to assuming those responsibilities. This issue was entered into the corrective action program as CRHQN- 2010-00386. The failure to ensure that an individual assigned to the position of Quality Assurance Manager met the qualification and experience requirements of ANSI/ANS 3.1-1978 as required by the Quality Assurance Program was a performance deficiency. This issue was more than minor because, if left uncorrected, it could create a more significant safety concern. The failure to have a fully qualified individual prOViding overall oversight to the Quality Assurance Program had the potential to affect all cornerstones, but the inspectors determined that this finding will be tracked under the Mitigating Systems cornerstone as the area most likely to be impacted. The issue was not suitable for quantitative assessment using existing NRC Significance Determination Process (SOP) guidance, so it was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) using NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Appendix M, Significance Determination Process Using Qualitative Criteria. The inspectors determined that there was no cross-cutting aspect associated with this finding because this issue was not indicative of current performance as it occurred more than three years ago. | | description = The inspectors identified an NCV of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, Quality Assurance Program, for the failure to implement the experience and qualification requirements of the Quality Assurance Program. As a result, the licensee failed to ensure that an individual assigned to the position of Quality Assurance Manager met the qualification and experience requirements of ANSIIANS 3.1-1978 as required by the Quality Assurance Program. Specifically, the individual assigned to be the responsible person for the licensee\'s overall implementation of the Quality Assurance Program did not have at least one year of nuclear plant experience in the overall implementation of the Quality Assurance Program within the quality assurance organization prior to assuming those responsibilities. This issue was entered into the corrective action program as CRHQN- 2010-00386. The failure to ensure that an individual assigned to the position of Quality Assurance Manager met the qualification and experience requirements of ANSI/ANS 3.1-1978 as required by the Quality Assurance Program was a performance deficiency. This issue was more than minor because, if left uncorrected, it could create a more significant safety concern. The failure to have a fully qualified individual prOViding overall oversight to the Quality Assurance Program had the potential to affect all cornerstones, but the inspectors determined that this finding will be tracked under the Mitigating Systems cornerstone as the area most likely to be impacted. The issue was not suitable for quantitative assessment using existing NRC Significance Determination Process (SOP) guidance, so it was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) using NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Appendix M, Significance Determination Process Using Qualitative Criteria. The inspectors determined that there was no cross-cutting aspect associated with this finding because this issue was not indicative of current performance as it occurred more than three years ago. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:40, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Pilgrim |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000293/2010005 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2010 (2010Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Miscellaneous |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | D Jones T Burns R Rolph B Smith M Schneider R Latta P Prescott D Jackson |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |