ML053180028: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:- - . | {{#Wiki_filter:- - . | ||
I Rick Ennis - Re: DRAFT SER ? Page 1 Paqe I 1I I Rick Ennis Re: DRAFT SER? | I Rick Ennis - Re: DRAFT SER ? Page 1 Paqe I 1I I Rick Ennis Re: DRAFT SER? | ||
From: Rick Ennis To: Ray Shadis Date: 11/3/05 10:10AM | From: Rick Ennis To: Ray Shadis Date: 11/3/05 10:10AM | ||
Line 38: | Line 37: | ||
Post Office Delivered Route owfl_po.OWFNDO Pending twf5_po.TWFNDO Pending kpl po.KP_DO Pending nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFNDO 11/03/05 10:10 AM nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO 11/03/05 10:10 AM nrc.gov Pending prexar.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1948 11/03/05 10:10AM Mail ML053010145.pdf 461384 11/02/05 03:11PM | Post Office Delivered Route owfl_po.OWFNDO Pending twf5_po.TWFNDO Pending kpl po.KP_DO Pending nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFNDO 11/03/05 10:10 AM nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO 11/03/05 10:10 AM nrc.gov Pending prexar.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1948 11/03/05 10:10AM Mail ML053010145.pdf 461384 11/02/05 03:11PM | ||
l . .. A Page Ic:\temP\GW\(00001.TMP I c:temp\GW1OOOO1.TMP Page 21 21 ML053010167.pdf 11572117 11/02/05 03:1 IPM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | l . .. A Page Ic:\temP\GW\(00001.TMP I c:temp\GW1OOOO1.TMP Page 21 21 ML053010167.pdf 11572117 11/02/05 03:1 IPM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | ||
Line 44: | Line 42: | ||
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened | No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened | ||
Rick Ennis - DRAFT SER? Page 1 From: Raymond Shadis <shadiseprexar.com> | Rick Ennis - DRAFT SER? Page 1 From: Raymond Shadis <shadiseprexar.com> | ||
To: Rick Ennis <RXE@nrc.gov> | To: Rick Ennis <RXE@nrc.gov> | ||
Line 52: | Line 49: | ||
DRAFT SER ? | DRAFT SER ? | ||
I Rick Ennis - TEX(T.htm Page I Rick Ennis TEXT.htm | I Rick Ennis - TEX(T.htm Page I Rick Ennis TEXT.htm Page I1II | ||
Page I1II | |||
==Dear Mr. Ennis,== | ==Dear Mr. Ennis,== |
Latest revision as of 13:21, 14 March 2020
ML053180028 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Vermont Yankee ![]() |
Issue date: | 11/03/2005 |
From: | Richard Ennis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
To: | Shadis R New England Coalition |
References | |
%dam200601 | |
Download: ML053180028 (5) | |
Text
- - .
I Rick Ennis - Re: DRAFT SER ? Page 1 Paqe I 1I I Rick Ennis Re: DRAFT SER?
From: Rick Ennis To: Ray Shadis Date: 11/3/05 10:10AM
Subject:
Re: DRAFT SER ? \ALPo5 t 3 Ray, m 5 Attached is a letter to Entergy dated 11/2/05 which transmitted Vermont Yankee EPU draft safety evaluation Revision 1 (public and non-public versions). The letter explains the differences betwee Revision 0 and Revision 1. I've also attached the publicly available version of the draft SE (Enclosure 1 to the letter). A hard copy of the letter and draft SE are being mailed to you separately. I will call you later this morning to confirm you received the electronic copy.
With regard to your concerns about the ACRS meeting being held during the day, as noted in the Federal Register notice for the meeting, the public may also provide written comments (e.g., if they are not able to attend in person).
During the 3/31/04 public meeting in Vernon, Bill Ruland said the NRC would be back to hold another meeting when we were further along in the review process. During the 12/16/04 VSNAP meeting in Brattleboro, Wayne Lanning said there will be a future meeting to discuss the power uprate review. My personal opinion is that this meeting is consistent with those statements and provides the public an opportunity to provide specific comments regarding the review given that the draft SE is now publicly available.
thanks, Rick 301-415-1420 CC: Catherine Haney; Cliff Anderson; Cornelius Holden; Darrell Roberts; Diane Screnci; Edwin Hackett; Neil Sheehan; Scott Burnell
I c:\temPXGW}00001.TMP I c:tempW3VflOOOO1 .TMP Paae I1I1.
Paae Mail Envelope Properties (436A284E.C65: 11: 372)
Subject:
Re: DRAFT SER ?
Creation Date: 11/3/05 10:10AM From: Rick Ennis Created By: RXE~nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time oNvfl_po.OWFNDO SRB3 CC (Scott Burnell) twf5po.TWFNDO EMHI CC (Edwin Hackett) nrc.gov kplpo.KP DO CJA CC (Cliff Anderson)
NAS CC (Neil Sheehan) nrc.gov owvf4_po.OWFNDO Delivered 11/03/05 10:10 AM CFH CC (Cornelius Holden)
DJR CC (Darrell Roberts) nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO Delivered 11/03/05 10:10AM CXH CC (Catherine Haney) prexar.com shadis (Ray Shadis)
Post Office Delivered Route owfl_po.OWFNDO Pending twf5_po.TWFNDO Pending kpl po.KP_DO Pending nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFNDO 11/03/05 10:10 AM nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO 11/03/05 10:10 AM nrc.gov Pending prexar.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1948 11/03/05 10:10AM Mail ML053010145.pdf 461384 11/02/05 03:11PM
l . .. A Page Ic:\temP\GW\(00001.TMP I c:temp\GW1OOOO1.TMP Page 21 21 ML053010167.pdf 11572117 11/02/05 03:1 IPM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened
Rick Ennis - DRAFT SER? Page 1 From: Raymond Shadis <shadiseprexar.com>
To: Rick Ennis <RXE@nrc.gov>
Date: 11/2/05 10:09AM
Subject:
DRAFT SER ?
I Rick Ennis - TEX(T.htm Page I Rick Ennis TEXT.htm Page I1II
Dear Mr. Ennis,
In our phone conversation last week I expressed concern that the draft SER will only be available to New England Coalition and to the public a very short period of time before the November 15-16 meeting of the ACRS Sub-Committee on Thermal-Hydraulics. By this E-mail message, I am reaffirming that we are very concerned that we will not have adequate time to the review the draft SER or pass it before our consulting experts for their review before the meeting. As of, November 1, it had not yet been posted in ADAMS or in the Electronic Hearing Docket. Please make every effort to provide it to us as soon as it is ready.
In addition, I expressed concern that combining the public meeting promised in 2004 by the staff and a meeting of the ACRS Sub-Committee would be confusing and counter-productive; not the least because the purposes of the two meetings are quite different. You promised that you would discuss this at NRC and get back. While, I have been waiting, I received a call from a New England reporter who reminded me that meetings scheduled for work day/ work hours preclude participation by the majority of othervise interested persons.
I remain, as you may imagine, anxious for a response.
Thanks, Ray Shadis PS: I have copied this to NRC legal staff entered in the ASLB case as I thought they would want to keep up with our concerns. R.
Raymond Shadis Staff Technical Advisor New England Coalition Post Office Box 98 Edgecomb, Maine 04556 207-882-7801 shadis@prexar.com