ML053180028

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-mail, Ennis, NRR, to Shadis, NEC, VY EPU Draft SE
ML053180028
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/03/2005
From: Richard Ennis
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Shadis R
New England Coalition
References
%dam200601
Download: ML053180028 (5)


Text

- - .

I Rick Ennis - Re: DRAFT SER ? Page 1 Paqe I 1I I Rick Ennis Re: DRAFT SER?

From: Rick Ennis To: Ray Shadis Date: 11/3/05 10:10AM

Subject:

Re: DRAFT SER ? \ALPo5 t 3 Ray, m 5 Attached is a letter to Entergy dated 11/2/05 which transmitted Vermont Yankee EPU draft safety evaluation Revision 1 (public and non-public versions). The letter explains the differences betwee Revision 0 and Revision 1. I've also attached the publicly available version of the draft SE (Enclosure 1 to the letter). A hard copy of the letter and draft SE are being mailed to you separately. I will call you later this morning to confirm you received the electronic copy.

With regard to your concerns about the ACRS meeting being held during the day, as noted in the Federal Register notice for the meeting, the public may also provide written comments (e.g., if they are not able to attend in person).

During the 3/31/04 public meeting in Vernon, Bill Ruland said the NRC would be back to hold another meeting when we were further along in the review process. During the 12/16/04 VSNAP meeting in Brattleboro, Wayne Lanning said there will be a future meeting to discuss the power uprate review. My personal opinion is that this meeting is consistent with those statements and provides the public an opportunity to provide specific comments regarding the review given that the draft SE is now publicly available.

thanks, Rick 301-415-1420 CC: Catherine Haney; Cliff Anderson; Cornelius Holden; Darrell Roberts; Diane Screnci; Edwin Hackett; Neil Sheehan; Scott Burnell

I c:\temPXGW}00001.TMP I c:tempW3VflOOOO1 .TMP Paae I1I1.

Paae Mail Envelope Properties (436A284E.C65: 11: 372)

Subject:

Re: DRAFT SER ?

Creation Date: 11/3/05 10:10AM From: Rick Ennis Created By: RXE~nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time oNvfl_po.OWFNDO SRB3 CC (Scott Burnell) twf5po.TWFNDO EMHI CC (Edwin Hackett) nrc.gov kplpo.KP DO CJA CC (Cliff Anderson)

DPS CC (Diane Screnci)

NAS CC (Neil Sheehan) nrc.gov owvf4_po.OWFNDO Delivered 11/03/05 10:10 AM CFH CC (Cornelius Holden)

DJR CC (Darrell Roberts) nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO Delivered 11/03/05 10:10AM CXH CC (Catherine Haney) prexar.com shadis (Ray Shadis)

Post Office Delivered Route owfl_po.OWFNDO Pending twf5_po.TWFNDO Pending kpl po.KP_DO Pending nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFNDO 11/03/05 10:10 AM nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO 11/03/05 10:10 AM nrc.gov Pending prexar.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1948 11/03/05 10:10AM Mail ML053010145.pdf 461384 11/02/05 03:11PM

l . .. A Page Ic:\temP\GW\(00001.TMP I c:temp\GW1OOOO1.TMP Page 21 21 ML053010167.pdf 11572117 11/02/05 03:1 IPM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened

Rick Ennis - DRAFT SER? Page 1 From: Raymond Shadis <shadiseprexar.com>

To: Rick Ennis <RXE@nrc.gov>

Date: 11/2/05 10:09AM

Subject:

DRAFT SER ?

I Rick Ennis - TEX(T.htm Page I Rick Ennis TEXT.htm Page I1II

Dear Mr. Ennis,

In our phone conversation last week I expressed concern that the draft SER will only be available to New England Coalition and to the public a very short period of time before the November 15-16 meeting of the ACRS Sub-Committee on Thermal-Hydraulics. By this E-mail message, I am reaffirming that we are very concerned that we will not have adequate time to the review the draft SER or pass it before our consulting experts for their review before the meeting. As of, November 1, it had not yet been posted in ADAMS or in the Electronic Hearing Docket. Please make every effort to provide it to us as soon as it is ready.

In addition, I expressed concern that combining the public meeting promised in 2004 by the staff and a meeting of the ACRS Sub-Committee would be confusing and counter-productive; not the least because the purposes of the two meetings are quite different. You promised that you would discuss this at NRC and get back. While, I have been waiting, I received a call from a New England reporter who reminded me that meetings scheduled for work day/ work hours preclude participation by the majority of othervise interested persons.

I remain, as you may imagine, anxious for a response.

Thanks, Ray Shadis PS: I have copied this to NRC legal staff entered in the ASLB case as I thought they would want to keep up with our concerns. R.

Raymond Shadis Staff Technical Advisor New England Coalition Post Office Box 98 Edgecomb, Maine 04556 207-882-7801 shadis@prexar.com