ML061160369

NOP-LP-2001-01 Condition Report, Officer Inallentive to Duty, CR Number 03-02794

ML061160369
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	03/12/2003
From:	Young R - No Known Affiliation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CR-03-02794, FOIA/PA-2005-0235 NOP-LP-2001-01
Download: ML061160369 (2)

Text

el-,4.Rl s -1.2 -zo NOP-LP-2001-01 Bea3ver Valley Aq CONDITION REPORT CR Nimber TITLE: OFFICER INATTENTIVE TO DUTY

, .. _ . _ _ . _ .. . _ . __ . _. _ . _ .

DISCOVERY DATE TIME EVENT DATE TIME SYSTEM / ASSET#

3/11/2003 0555 03/11/03 0555 N/A N/A E QUIPMENT DESCRIPTION N/A DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION and PROBABLE CAUSE (if known) Summarize any attachments. Identify what, when, where, why, how.

Officer while on duty was observed being inattentive to duty.

0 R

I G

l N

A T IMMEDIATE ACTIONS TAKEN I SUPV COMMENTS (Discuss CORRECTIVE ACTIONS completed, basis for closure.)

l 'rhe Officer was relieved of duty and replaced with another Officer.

0 N QUALITY ORGANIZATION USE ONLY IDENTIFIED BY (Check one) El Self-Revealed ATTACHMENTS Quality Org. Initiated El Yes El Individual/Work Group El Intemal Oversight I Quality Org. Follow-up El Yes_, El No EJ Supervision/Management

_ l Extemal Oversight

_ , AE El Ye,. No__ 8N

) ORIGINATOR ORGANIZATION DATE ,3SUPERVISOR DATE PHONE EXT.

YOUNG, R. 3 l 0070 3112/2003 MIKLAVIC, L

• 1 3/12/2003 4- 7811 SRO EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY ORG. 4MMEDIATE ORG. WM =D CHANG17 REVIEW OPERABLE ASSESSMENT NOTIFIED INVESTIGATION NOTIFIED RESTRAINT P REQUIRED REQUIRED L D Yes ij No 0 Yes 0 No il N/ Rl Yes iR No N/A Yes R]No N/A n Yes TV No A MODE I ASSOCIATED TECH SPEC NUMBER(S) I ASSOCIATED LCO ACTION STATEMENT(S)

N NIAA EgN/A'  :: #1 N/A -__

T #2 _ _ _ _ _

_ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ '_ '_ _ - ,;__

_ . #3 -_ __._._'_., _.

0 DECLARED INOPERABLE REPORTABLE? One Hour N/A APPLICABLIE UNIT(S)

P (Date I Time) Four Hour N/A E N/A n Eval Eight Hour N/A 0 lU U. L-i Both R lLiEval Required Other N/A A

T COMMENTS NIA 0

N Current Mode - Unit 1' Power Level - Unit 1 Current Mode - Unit 2 Power Level - Unit 2 S NN/AN/ N/A N/A SRO - UNIT I SRO - UNIT 2 DATE Approved By Supv Approved By Supv 3/12/2003 CATEGORY I EVAL ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION DUE DATE R REPORTABLE?

CF

_  !

0070 4/26/2003 G

E ElYes R No ElLER No.

CRPA TREND CODES Comp Type I ID Cause uL REPORTABILITY REVIEWER Process I Activity /Cause Code(s) (If Cause T or W) Org A Fedin, R SUPV LP1 0100 H04 0070 T_

01 DATE MRB Y. 03/12/03 INVESTIGATION OPTIONS I CLOSED BY DATE

[]Maint.Rule [JOEEvaluation l 3/31/2003

-I-Page 1 of I

1, INVESTIGATION

SUMMARY

CR Number:

03-(12794 NOP-LP-2001 -06 Category I Eval: CF Assigned Organization: 0070 Quality Followup Req'd: C] Yes [-/j No For Fix Investigations Only:

,1 Hardware / Degraded Condition Resolution Required? L1 Yes i; No If Yes: LI Repair Scicap D Rework F1 Use-As-Is

.J Acceptance of the CR Investigation signifies acceptance of the following items, as applicable:

Originator Identification Date Corrective Actions ( listed below) (listed below, if any) (listed below, if any)

Cause Analysis Generic Implications I0 CFR 21 Decision Checklist Acceptance of Investigation: Date: Quality Approval: Date:

Halliday, K 3/28/2003 Site-VP Acceptance: Date:

Closuro Comments:

An investigation was conducted in accordance with the security contractor's company policy. During the investigation, the employee admitted to willful misconduct and his employment relationship with thE security contractor was terminated.

Quality Comments:

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Resp CA Sched CA Cause Org. Accept Due Completed Number: Type: Type: Code: Codes: CA Acceptance: Date: Date: Date:

Page 1 of 1