IR 07200039/2010001: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
Inspection | ==REGION I== | ||
INSPECTION REPORT Inspection N /2010001 Docket N License N SFGL-21 Licensee: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Location: 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, CT 06424 Inspection Date: November 29, 2010 Inspectors: Stephen Hammann Senior Health Physicist Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Mark Roberts Senior Health Physicist Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Approved By: Judith A. Joustra, Chief Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Document Name: C:\FileNET\ML103560542.doc Enclosure | |||
Docket | |||
License | |||
Licensee: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company | |||
Location: 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, CT 06424 | |||
Inspection Date: November 29, 2010 | |||
Inspectors: Stephen Hammann Senior Health Physicist Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety | |||
Mark Roberts Senior Health Physicist Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety | |||
Approved By: Judith A. Joustra, Chief Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety | |||
=EXECUTIVE SUMMARY= | =EXECUTIVE SUMMARY= | ||
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company | Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company | ||
The inspection was a review of the operation of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). The report covers an announced safety inspection conducted by two regional inspectors. The inspection was an evaluation of the licensee | NRC Inspection Report No. 07200039/2010001 The inspection was a review of the operation of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). The report covers an announced safety inspection conducted by two regional inspectors. The inspection was an evaluation of the licensee=s programs for radiation protection, fire protection, emergency preparedness, surveillance, environmental monitoring, training, and quality assurance (QA) activities. | ||
=s programs for radiation protection, fire protection, emergency preparedness, surveillance, | |||
The licensee implemented its radiation protection, environmental monitoring, and fire protection programs in accordance with the Certificate of Compliance (CoC), CoC Technical Specifications (TS), and applicable regulations. The licensee maintains appropriate surveillance activities to ensure the spent fuel storage casks are adequately maintained. Emergency plan drills, equipment inventories, and emergency contact list updates were performed at designated frequencies. The licensee performed a self-assessment and maintained an adequate QA program for documenting issues and developing corrective actions. The licensee | The licensee implemented its radiation protection, environmental monitoring, and fire protection programs in accordance with the Certificate of Compliance (CoC), CoC Technical Specifications (TS), and applicable regulations. The licensee maintains appropriate surveillance activities to ensure the spent fuel storage casks are adequately maintained. Emergency plan drills, equipment inventories, and emergency contact list updates were performed at designated frequencies. The licensee performed a self-assessment and maintained an adequate QA program for documenting issues and developing corrective actions. The licensee=s training records indicated all personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks. | ||
=s training records indicated all personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks. | |||
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. | Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. | ||
ii | |||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
1.0 Operation of an Away-from-Reactor Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation 1.1 Radiation Protection and Environmental Monitoring | 1.0 Operation of an Away-from-Reactor Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation 1.1 Radiation Protection and Environmental Monitoring | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors reviewed the facility | The inspectors reviewed the facility=s radiation protection and environmental monitoring programs to verify compliance with the CoC, the CoC TS, and applicable regulations. | ||
=s radiation protection and environmental monitoring programs to verify compliance with the CoC, the CoC TS, and applicable regulations. The inspectors toured the ISFSI, interviewed personnel, and reviewed the licensee | |||
=s relevant procedures, records, and reports. | The inspectors toured the ISFSI, interviewed personnel, and reviewed the licensee=s relevant procedures, records, and reports. | ||
====b. Observations and Findings==== | ====b. Observations and Findings==== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
The licensee utilizes a contractor to provide most of | The licensee utilizes a contractor to provide most of its radiological protection needs, including personnel monitoring, environmental monitoring, radiation survey meter calibration, and radiological and contamination surveys. Work within the radiologically controlled area was controlled through the use of radiation work permits (RWPs). Also, an annual review of the radiation protection program is performed by the contractor. The licensee monitored site personnel through the use of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The inspectors evaluated personnel monitoring records, radiation and contamination surveys, and RWPs issued since the last inspection conducted September 16-18, 2008. | ||
The licensee monitored direct radiation from the ISFSI using TLDs located near and along the perimeter of the site. The environmental TLDs are exchanged on a quarterly basis. The licensee determined that the annual dose equivalent to any individual who is | The licensee monitored direct radiation from the ISFSI using TLDs located near and along the perimeter of the site. The environmental TLDs are exchanged on a quarterly basis. The licensee determined that the annual dose equivalent to any individual who is located at the boundary of the controlled area would not exceed 25 millirem to the whole body from direct radiation from the ISFSI as required by 10 CFR 72.104. The inspectors reviewed the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports that were transmitted to the NRC as required. | ||
located at the boundary of the controlled area would not exceed 25 millirem to the whole body from direct radiation from the ISFSI as required by 10 CFR 72.104. The inspectors reviewed the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports that were transmitted to the NRC as required. | |||
The reports did not indicate any dose to the public or effluent releases. | The reports did not indicate any dose to the public or effluent releases. | ||
| Line 77: | Line 58: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors reviewed the facility | The inspectors reviewed the facility=s fire protection and emergency planning programs to verify compliance with the applicable regulations. The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel, reviewed records and documents, and toured the facility. | ||
=s fire protection and emergency planning programs to verify compliance with the applicable regulations. The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel, reviewed records and | |||
====b. Observations and Findings==== | ====b. Observations and Findings==== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
The inspectors performed a walkdown of the ISFSI pad and verified the absence of any transient combustibles on the pad and in the vicinity of the casks. The | The inspectors performed a walkdown of the ISFSI pad and verified the absence of any transient combustibles on the pad and in the vicinity of the casks. The licensees fire hazard analysis provided administrative controls for limiting the quantity of fuel in vehicles authorized near the ISFSI concrete pad and also provided minimum brush clearing cutback distances to limit the impact of a wildfire. The licensee has procedures for fire-fighting, reporting fires and emergencies, and maintaining equipment required in the event of a fire. The licensee conducted emergency drills that incorporated responses by the offsite fire department and the offsite ambulance association. Critiques following completion of each of the drills documented strengths and areas of improvement. | ||
The | The licensees emergency plan and emergency plan implementing procedures were current. Emergency plan drills, equipment inventories, and emergency contact list updates were performed at the designated frequencies. | ||
====c. Conclusions==== | ====c. Conclusions==== | ||
| Line 93: | Line 73: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors reviewed the licensee | The inspectors reviewed the licensee=s surveillance activities program associated with the dry storage of the spent fuel to verify compliance with the CoC, CoC TS, Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), and applicable regulations. The inspectors toured the ISFSI pad, interviewed individuals, and reviewed selected procedures and records. | ||
=s surveillance activities program associated with the dry storage of the spent fuel to verify compliance with the CoC, CoC TS, Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), and applicable regulations. The inspectors toured the ISFSI pad, interviewed individuals, and reviewed selected procedures and records. | |||
====b. Observations and Findings==== | ====b. Observations and Findings==== | ||
| Line 103: | Line 82: | ||
Specific surveillance requirements are conducted in accordance with approved procedures. As part of the daily surveillance activities, the licensee staff performed a visual examination of the cask vents to ensure that the vent openings were not blocked. | Specific surveillance requirements are conducted in accordance with approved procedures. As part of the daily surveillance activities, the licensee staff performed a visual examination of the cask vents to ensure that the vent openings were not blocked. | ||
The temperature of the air exiting the cask vents is continuously monitored and is recorded twice per day. Required daily performance checks are incorporated into the daily security logs. The annual visual inspection of the vertical concrete cask (VCC) is performed as required. A Condition Report (CR) and a Trouble Report/Work Request | The temperature of the air exiting the cask vents is continuously monitored and is recorded twice per day. Required daily performance checks are incorporated into the daily security logs. The annual visual inspection of the vertical concrete cask (VCC) is performed as required. A Condition Report (CR) and a Trouble Report/Work Request are generated to implement corrective actions for surveillances that do not meet the acceptance criteria. | ||
are generated to implement corrective actions for | |||
====c. Conclusions==== | ====c. Conclusions==== | ||
| Line 113: | Line 90: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors reviewed the licensee | The inspectors reviewed the licensee=s training program to ensure personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks. The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed selected training materials and records. | ||
=s training program to ensure personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks. The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed selected training materials and records. | |||
====b. Observations and Findings==== | ====b. Observations and Findings==== | ||
| Line 124: | Line 100: | ||
====c. Conclusions==== | ====c. Conclusions==== | ||
The licensee | The licensee=s training records indicated all personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks. | ||
=s training records indicated all personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks. | |||
1.5 Quality Assurance | 1.5 Quality Assurance | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors reviewed the facility | The inspectors reviewed the facility=s QA program to verify compliance with the CoC and applicable regulations. The inspectors interviewed individuals and reviewed selected procedures, audits, and reports related to the licensees QA program. | ||
=s QA program to verify compliance with the CoC and applicable regulations. The inspectors interviewed individuals and reviewed selected procedures, audits, and reports related to the | |||
====b. Observations and Findings==== | ====b. Observations and Findings==== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
The licensee maintains a QA program that utilizes a | The licensee maintains a QA program that utilizes a corrective action program to identify potential safety issues and areas for quality improvement. Issues were identified through specific self-assessments (e.g., the annual QA audit) or from observations during daily activities. Deficiencies and areas of improvement from the most recent QA audit had been entered into the corrective action program. The inspectors selected several open and several closed CRs for review. Most of the CRs reviewed were related to the emergency program and represented areas for improvement rather than deficiencies. | ||
The closed CRs adequately described resolution of issues and actions to prevent recurrence. | The closed CRs adequately described resolution of issues and actions to prevent recurrence. | ||
| Line 151: | Line 125: | ||
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | |||
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED | PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED | ||
Licensee | |||
Licensee | : [[contact::M. Balderelli]], ISFSI Shift Supervisor | ||
: [[contact::M. Balderelli]], ISFSI Shift Supervisor | |||
: [[contact::J. Connell]], ISFSI Quality Assurance Manager | : [[contact::J. Connell]], ISFSI Quality Assurance Manager | ||
R.Desmarais, ISFSI Shift Supervisor | R.Desmarais, ISFSI Shift Supervisor | ||
: [[contact::S. Hemingway]], Operations Assistant | : [[contact::S. Hemingway]], Operations Assistant | ||
: [[contact::J. Lenois]], ISFSI Operations Manager | : [[contact::J. Lenois]], ISFSI Operations Manager | ||
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED | INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED | ||
60858 Away-From-Reactor ISFSI Inspection Guidance | |||
60858 Away-From-Reactor ISFSI Inspection Guidance | |||
ITEMS OPEN, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED | ITEMS OPEN, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED | ||
None | None | ||
| Line 184: | Line 154: | ||
ISFSI 2010 Emergency Plan Exercise (scenario), October 13, 2010 | ISFSI 2010 Emergency Plan Exercise (scenario), October 13, 2010 | ||
Yankee ISFSI Audit CY-10-A03-01 | Yankee ISFSI Audit CY-10-A03-01 | ||
ISFSI | ISFSI Emergency Plan (EP) | ||
OP-1, ISFSI Temperature Monitoring Program | OP-1, ISFSI Temperature Monitoring Program | ||
OP-2, ISFSI Routine Surveillance | OP-2, ISFSI Routine Surveillance | ||
OP-7, ISFSI VCC and ISFSI Pad Inspection Program | OP-7, ISFSI VCC and ISFSI Pad Inspection Program | ||
Quality Assurance Program for the Haddam Neck Plant. Independent Spent Fuel Storage | Quality Assurance Program for the Haddam Neck Plant. Independent Spent Fuel Storage | ||
Installation | |||
RP-1, ISFSI Conduct of Radiation Protection | |||
RP-2, Radiological Surveys and Postings | RP-2, Radiological Surveys and Postings | ||
RP-3, ISFSI Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program | RP-3, ISFSI Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program | ||
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED | LIST OF ACRONYMS USED | ||
ADAMS Agency Wide Document Access and Management System | ADAMS Agency Wide Document Access and Management System | ||
CFR | CFR Code of Federal Regulations | ||
CoC | CoC Certificate of Compliance | ||
CR | CR Condition Report | ||
FSAR | FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report | ||
ISFSI | ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation | ||
NRC | NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
QA | QA Quality Assurance | ||
RWP | RWP Radiation Work Permit | ||
TLD | TLD Thermoluminescent Dosimeters | ||
TS | TS Technical Specifications | ||
VCC | VCC Vertical Concrete Cask | ||
Attachment | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:14, 13 November 2019
| ML103560542 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/22/2010 |
| From: | Joustra J Decommissioning Branch I |
| To: | Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co |
| References | |
| IR-10-001 | |
| Download: ML103560542 (8) | |
Text
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
INSPECTION REPORT Inspection N /2010001 Docket N License N SFGL-21 Licensee: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Location: 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, CT 06424 Inspection Date: November 29, 2010 Inspectors: Stephen Hammann Senior Health Physicist Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Mark Roberts Senior Health Physicist Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Approved By: Judith A. Joustra, Chief Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Document Name: C:\FileNET\ML103560542.doc Enclosure
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
NRC Inspection Report No. 07200039/2010001 The inspection was a review of the operation of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). The report covers an announced safety inspection conducted by two regional inspectors. The inspection was an evaluation of the licensee=s programs for radiation protection, fire protection, emergency preparedness, surveillance, environmental monitoring, training, and quality assurance (QA) activities.
The licensee implemented its radiation protection, environmental monitoring, and fire protection programs in accordance with the Certificate of Compliance (CoC), CoC Technical Specifications (TS), and applicable regulations. The licensee maintains appropriate surveillance activities to ensure the spent fuel storage casks are adequately maintained. Emergency plan drills, equipment inventories, and emergency contact list updates were performed at designated frequencies. The licensee performed a self-assessment and maintained an adequate QA program for documenting issues and developing corrective actions. The licensee=s training records indicated all personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks.
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.
ii
REPORT DETAILS
1.0 Operation of an Away-from-Reactor Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation 1.1 Radiation Protection and Environmental Monitoring
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the facility=s radiation protection and environmental monitoring programs to verify compliance with the CoC, the CoC TS, and applicable regulations.
The inspectors toured the ISFSI, interviewed personnel, and reviewed the licensee=s relevant procedures, records, and reports.
b. Observations and Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
The licensee utilizes a contractor to provide most of its radiological protection needs, including personnel monitoring, environmental monitoring, radiation survey meter calibration, and radiological and contamination surveys. Work within the radiologically controlled area was controlled through the use of radiation work permits (RWPs). Also, an annual review of the radiation protection program is performed by the contractor. The licensee monitored site personnel through the use of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The inspectors evaluated personnel monitoring records, radiation and contamination surveys, and RWPs issued since the last inspection conducted September 16-18, 2008.
The licensee monitored direct radiation from the ISFSI using TLDs located near and along the perimeter of the site. The environmental TLDs are exchanged on a quarterly basis. The licensee determined that the annual dose equivalent to any individual who is located at the boundary of the controlled area would not exceed 25 millirem to the whole body from direct radiation from the ISFSI as required by 10 CFR 72.104. The inspectors reviewed the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports that were transmitted to the NRC as required.
The reports did not indicate any dose to the public or effluent releases.
c. Conclusions
The licensee implemented its radiation protection and environmental monitoring programs in accordance with its license, CoC TS, and applicable regulations.
1.2 Fire Protection and Emergency Planning
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the facility=s fire protection and emergency planning programs to verify compliance with the applicable regulations. The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel, reviewed records and documents, and toured the facility.
b. Observations and Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
The inspectors performed a walkdown of the ISFSI pad and verified the absence of any transient combustibles on the pad and in the vicinity of the casks. The licensees fire hazard analysis provided administrative controls for limiting the quantity of fuel in vehicles authorized near the ISFSI concrete pad and also provided minimum brush clearing cutback distances to limit the impact of a wildfire. The licensee has procedures for fire-fighting, reporting fires and emergencies, and maintaining equipment required in the event of a fire. The licensee conducted emergency drills that incorporated responses by the offsite fire department and the offsite ambulance association. Critiques following completion of each of the drills documented strengths and areas of improvement.
The licensees emergency plan and emergency plan implementing procedures were current. Emergency plan drills, equipment inventories, and emergency contact list updates were performed at the designated frequencies.
c. Conclusions
The licensee implemented its fire protection and emergency planning programs in accordance with its CoC TS and applicable regulations.
1.3 Surveillance Activities
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee=s surveillance activities program associated with the dry storage of the spent fuel to verify compliance with the CoC, CoC TS, Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), and applicable regulations. The inspectors toured the ISFSI pad, interviewed individuals, and reviewed selected procedures and records.
b. Observations and Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
The inspectors conducted a walk-down of the ISFSI with licensee staff. Temperature logs and survey records indicated that the casks operated as designed with no abnormalities in temperatures and no elevated radiation or contamination levels.
Specific surveillance requirements are conducted in accordance with approved procedures. As part of the daily surveillance activities, the licensee staff performed a visual examination of the cask vents to ensure that the vent openings were not blocked.
The temperature of the air exiting the cask vents is continuously monitored and is recorded twice per day. Required daily performance checks are incorporated into the daily security logs. The annual visual inspection of the vertical concrete cask (VCC) is performed as required. A Condition Report (CR) and a Trouble Report/Work Request are generated to implement corrective actions for surveillances that do not meet the acceptance criteria.
c. Conclusions
The licensee implemented its surveillance program in accordance with the CoC, CoC TS, and the FSAR.
1.4 Training
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee=s training program to ensure personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks. The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed selected training materials and records.
b. Observations and Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
The licensee has created a training matrix that has modules for each ISFSI related procedure. The training can include computer-based, classroom, and/or on the job training modules. The training is performed by shift supervisors and is given initially and then annually thereafter. During the interviews, the licensee staff was knowledgeable regarding their assigned duties.
Training is also given annually to offsite emergency responders.
c. Conclusions
The licensee=s training records indicated all personnel were trained to perform their designated tasks.
1.5 Quality Assurance
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the facility=s QA program to verify compliance with the CoC and applicable regulations. The inspectors interviewed individuals and reviewed selected procedures, audits, and reports related to the licensees QA program.
b. Observations and Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
The licensee maintains a QA program that utilizes a corrective action program to identify potential safety issues and areas for quality improvement. Issues were identified through specific self-assessments (e.g., the annual QA audit) or from observations during daily activities. Deficiencies and areas of improvement from the most recent QA audit had been entered into the corrective action program. The inspectors selected several open and several closed CRs for review. Most of the CRs reviewed were related to the emergency program and represented areas for improvement rather than deficiencies.
The closed CRs adequately described resolution of issues and actions to prevent recurrence.
c. Conclusions
The licensee QA program is adequate to meet the requirements of the CoC and applicable regulations.
Exit Meeting Summary
On November 29, 2010, the inspectors presented the inspection results to James Lenois, James Connell, and Shea Hemingway. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED
Licensee
- M. Balderelli, ISFSI Shift Supervisor
- J. Connell, ISFSI Quality Assurance Manager
R.Desmarais, ISFSI Shift Supervisor
- S. Hemingway, Operations Assistant
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED
60858 Away-From-Reactor ISFSI Inspection Guidance
ITEMS OPEN, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
None
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
AD-16, ISFSI Personnel Training and Qualifications
CR-6, Accident Analysis and Response
CR-12, Normal and Emergency Operating Procedures
CY ISFSI - 2010, Annual Radiological Program Assessment
CYPACo 2010 Emergency Plan Exercise (Assessment), (undated exercise critique)
CYAPCo ISFSI 10-021, Annual Review of Emergency Plan
EO-1, Emergency Plan Administration
EO-5, Emergency Plan Implementation
FP-2, ISFSI Fire Hazard Analysis
ISFSI Condition Report 10-088, 2010 Emergency Plan Recommendations
ISFSI Emergency contact list
ISFSI Environmental Radiation Exposure Reports, 2009 and 2010
ISFSI Memorandum 09-024, Connecticut Yankee ISFSI Emergency Plan Review
ISFSI Occupational Radiation Exposure Reports, 2009 and 2010
ISFSI 2010 Emergency Plan Exercise (scenario), October 13, 2010
Yankee ISFSI Audit CY-10-A03-01
OP-1, ISFSI Temperature Monitoring Program
OP-2, ISFSI Routine Surveillance
OP-7, ISFSI VCC and ISFSI Pad Inspection Program
Quality Assurance Program for the Haddam Neck Plant. Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation
RP-1, ISFSI Conduct of Radiation Protection
RP-2, Radiological Surveys and Postings
RP-3, ISFSI Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED
ADAMS Agency Wide Document Access and Management System
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CoC Certificate of Compliance
CR Condition Report
FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report
ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
QA Quality Assurance
RWP Radiation Work Permit
TLD Thermoluminescent Dosimeters
TS Technical Specifications
VCC Vertical Concrete Cask
Attachment