ML17079A490: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:o ualtv Checklist Facility: Date of Exam Exam Level: nO E sno [J Item Description lnitials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading¿-)DAA-ut 2 Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r'2n\-e3.Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations),L-)l$/L-l ov, 4 Grading for all borderline cases (80 t2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, t4o/o on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail/)s" etvl 5 All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified/)D\w otH 6.Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants n D\'j" 9h Printed NameiSig nature Date a. Grader''\rlzoiv.
{{#Wiki_filter:o ualtv Checklist Facility:                             Date of Exam             Exam Level: nO     E sno [J Item Description                                         lnitials a           b       c
t:J-tløo u )z1lt øb. FacilityReviewer(*)
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)torrlnl¿orc d. NRC Supervisor
                                                                            ¿-)       DAA-     ut 2         Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r'2        n\-     e
(*) 5 o.\;v-o-.,\
: 3.       Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations)
o The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC;two independent NRC reviews are required.ES-403, Page 6 of6 Qual itv Checkl ist Facility: Date of Exam Exam Level: no E snO X Item Description lnitials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 4 bl^Å-øhA 2 Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
                                                                            ,L-) l$/L-l ov, 4         Grading for all borderline cases (80 t2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, t4o/o on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail           /)       s" etvl 5         All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
/2 b\^P oy, 3.Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) 4úA-h', 4.Grading for all borderline cases (80 tzo/o overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, t4%o on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail h)wP I 5 All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified L)\f^P (2.\6 Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants r)5r//-cv, T Printed Name/Sig nature Date a. Grader ,'/t/tor,"* lq lzel6Izlltotc b. Facility Reviewer(*)
                                                                            /)       D\w otH
c NRC Chief Examiner (*)thr.-l'e-ç ní^ / ØJ, 1 't ko-"c',./,. ir,, d. NRC Supervisor
: 6.       Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants                 n D\'j"             9h Printed NameiSig nature                                     Date
(*)o The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC;two independent NRC reviews are required.ES-403, Page6 of6}}
: a. Grader
                                                                                    ''\rlzoiv.
: b. FacilityReviewer(*)                                                            t:J-tløo
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)                       tor                              u )z1lt ø
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)                   5   o.\;v-o-.,\                           rlnl¿orc o       The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of6
 
Qual itv Checkl ist Facility:                             Date of Exam             Exam Level: no E snO         X Item Description                                     lnitials a         b       c 1.
2 Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and 4       bl^Å-   øhA documented
                                                                              /2     b\^P oy,
: 3.         Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) 4       úA-     h',
: 4.         Grading for all borderline cases (80 tzo/o overall and 70 or 80,                     I 5
as applicable, t4%o on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades h) wP are justified L) \f^P           (2.\
6         Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants r) 5r//- cv, T
Printed Name/Sig nature                                 Date
: a. Grader                                                                         ,'/t/tor,"
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)
* lq lzel6 c   NRC Chief Examiner (*)         thr.-l'e-ç ní^ / ØJ, 1 '                     Izlltotc t
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)                            ko-"c'                         ,./,. ir,,
o         The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page6 of6}}

Latest revision as of 06:35, 30 October 2019

2016 LaSalle County Station Initial License Examination Forms ES-403-1
ML17079A490
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/2016
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML15274A408 List:
References
Download: ML17079A490 (2)


Text

o ualtv Checklist Facility: Date of Exam Exam Level: nO E sno [J Item Description lnitials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

¿-) DAA- ut 2 Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r'2 n\- e

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations)

,L-) l$/L-l ov, 4 Grading for all borderline cases (80 t2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, t4o/o on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail /) s" etvl 5 All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

/) D\w otH

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants n D\'j" 9h Printed NameiSig nature Date
a. Grader

\rlzoiv.

b. FacilityReviewer(*) t:J-tløo
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) tor u )z1lt ø
d. NRC Supervisor (*) 5 o.\;v-o-.,\ rlnl¿orc o The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of6

Qual itv Checkl ist Facility: Date of Exam Exam Level: no E snO X Item Description lnitials a b c 1.

2 Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and 4 bl^Å- øhA documented

/2 b\^P oy,

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) 4 úA- h',
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 tzo/o overall and 70 or 80, I 5

as applicable, t4%o on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades h) wP are justified L) \f^P (2.\

6 Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants r) 5r//- cv, T

Printed Name/Sig nature Date

a. Grader ,'/t/tor,"
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
  • lq lzel6 c NRC Chief Examiner (*) thr.-l'e-ç ní^ / ØJ, 1 ' Izlltotc t
d. NRC Supervisor (*) ko-"c' ,./,. ir,,

o The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page6 of6