ML23065A047
| ML23065A047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 12/28/2022 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB |
| To: | Constellation Energy Generation |
| Travis Iskierka-Boggs | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML21188A265 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML23065A047 (1) | |
Text
Travis D. Iskierka-Boggs Digitally signed by Travis D. Iskierka-Boggs Date: 2022.12.21 07:34:07 -05'00' Travis D. Iskierka-Boggs Digitally signed by Travis D. Iskierka-Boggs Date: 2022.12.21 07:34:39 -05'00' April M. Nguyen Digitally signed by April M. Nguyen Date: 2022.12.28 09:51:50 -06'00' Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: LaSalle Date of Examination: 05/2023 Item Task Description (Y)es / (N)o a
b*
c#
- a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the r
z instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) categories are
'/
w I=
appropriately sampled.
a:
- b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
y y
~
- c. Justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are acceptable.
'I y
- a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, instrument y y w and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients.
a:
- b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of 0 5 applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule y '( -rvcf without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on
~
subsequent days.
en
- c. Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 y y /w and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).
- d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and i y w
quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.
- a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on
'I y w Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the aoolicants' audit test(s).
- b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in y
(/)
the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' y
w
~
Q.
audit test(s).
- c. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is r
sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are y w
duplicated on subsequent days.
- a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including y y w probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).
- b. Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41, 1 O CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is y f w
..J appropriate.
<(
- c. Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater a:
V We/
w than or equal to 2.5.
'I z
w y y we/
(!)
- d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams.
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
y y We/
I
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior y y /w reactor operator).
tL, u__;rinted : *~r~:.___
Date /,;//,,l~
- a. Author t>.1'> I 1C:::-r'> /
__. :>e..
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- *.. ** ':!.0111. :::?* iL:,,; */,,.
~~~---~
~~,.:J_ _.,.,
c...-
- c. NRC Reviewer(#)
NRC Chief Examiner NRC Supervisor
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC*developed tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column "c." This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.