ML18101A591: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
INADEQUACY 5 Exhibit 1 -Same Source lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-311 SALEM2 03/10/95 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE: | INADEQUACY 5 Exhibit 1 -Same Source lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-311 SALEM2 03/10/95 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE: | ||
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. | R. HELLER 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. | ||
The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | ||
: 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) 2EC-3323, Pkg. 1 "Revision of Rod Control System Auctioned Ave Lead/Lag Module and Filter Module Time Constants" Rev. 0 -The purpose of this DCP is to implement a recommendation from the primary vendor to PSE&G that the filter time constant (module 2TM-412P be revised to 10 seconds, the lead/lag time constant (module 2TM-412Q) be revised to 40/10. These changes are being made to eliminate false rod stepping. | : 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) 2EC-3323, Pkg. 1 "Revision of Rod Control System Auctioned Ave Lead/Lag Module and Filter Module Time Constants" Rev. 0 -The purpose of this DCP is to implement a recommendation from the primary vendor to PSE&G that the filter time constant (module 2TM-412P be revised to 10 seconds, the lead/lag time constant (module 2TM-412Q) be revised to 40/10. These changes are being made to eliminate false rod stepping. | ||
Operation of the plant with the revised rod control system compensation parameters does not adversely affect any physical parameters or conditions which are addressed in the Technical Specifications. | Operation of the plant with the revised rod control system compensation parameters does not adversely affect any physical parameters or conditions which are addressed in the Technical Specifications. | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-020) | There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-020) | ||
* lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME:* DATE: 50-311 SALEM 2 03/10/95 COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE: | * lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME:* DATE: 50-311 SALEM 2 03/10/95 COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE: | ||
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 | R. HELLER 609-339-5162 | ||
: 3. Deficiency Reports (Use-As-Is) 950131128 "Justification For Allowing Uninsulated Portion of Pipe on 2PR3, 4 & 5 Inlet to Remain Uninsulated Until Next Outage" Rev. 0 -This proposal allows a small portion of the pressurizer safety relief valve (SRV) inlet piping to remain uninsulated until the next refueling outage. This proposal does not add, delete or modify any safety related equipment or components. | : 3. Deficiency Reports (Use-As-Is) 950131128 "Justification For Allowing Uninsulated Portion of Pipe on 2PR3, 4 & 5 Inlet to Remain Uninsulated Until Next Outage" Rev. 0 -This proposal allows a small portion of the pressurizer safety relief valve (SRV) inlet piping to remain uninsulated until the next refueling outage. This proposal does not add, delete or modify any safety related equipment or components. | ||
The lack of insulation on a small portion of the SR V inlet piping does not compromise the safety related function of any safety related electrical equipment, the SRV s, or their associated piping. As such, this proposal does not impact any anticipated operational transients or design basis accidents previously evaluated in the UFSAR. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-016) | The lack of insulation on a small portion of the SR V inlet piping does not compromise the safety related function of any safety related electrical equipment, the SRV s, or their associated piping. As such, this proposal does not impact any anticipated operational transients or design basis accidents previously evaluated in the UFSAR. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-016) | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES XŽNO 2. Scheduled date for next refueling: | MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES XŽNO 2. Scheduled date for next refueling: | ||
April 6. 1996 Scheduled date for restart following refueling: | April 6. 1996 Scheduled date for restart following refueling: | ||
June 5. 1996 50-311 SALEM2 03/10/95 R. HELLER 609-339-5162 | June 5. 1996 50-311 SALEM2 03/10/95 R. HELLER 609-339-5162 | ||
: 3. a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required? | : 3. a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required? | ||
YES_ NO NOT DETERMINED TO DATE X b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee? | YES_ NO NOT DETERMINED TO DATE X b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee? | ||
YES NO X If no, when is it scheduled? | YES NO X If no, when is it scheduled? | ||
April 1996 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ___ | April 1996 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ___ | ||
___ _ 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | ___ _ 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | ||
: 7. Number ofFuel Assemblies: | : 7. Number ofFuel Assemblies: | ||
: a. Incore b. In Spent Fuel Storage 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: | : a. Incore b. In Spent Fuel Storage 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: | ||
Future spent fuel storage capacity: | Future spent fuel storage capacity: | ||
: 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: | : 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: | ||
8-1-7.R4 193 556 1632 1632 March 2012 | 8-1-7.R4 193 556 1632 1632 March 2012 |
Revision as of 15:21, 25 April 2019
ML18101A591 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem ![]() |
Issue date: | 02/28/1995 |
From: | MORRONI M, SUMMERS J C Public Service Enterprise Group |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
NUDOCS 9503210060 | |
Download: ML18101A591 (10) | |
Text
I I . .. e Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 2 DOCKET NO: 50-311 March 15, 1995 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of February are being sent to you. RH:vls Enclosures C Mr. Thomas T. Martin Sincerely yours, 1ftfu.__, John C. Summers General Manager -Salem Operations Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 8-1-7.R4 ..... *f 0 -# r. -< ;:: l ' J_ ::: _( -
: PDR ADOCK 05000311 ' R PDR I The power is in your hands. jBJf1, 95-2168 REV. 6/94 _j OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No: Date: Completed*
by: Mike Morroni Telephone:
Operating Status 1. Unit Name Salem No. 2 Notes 2 . Reporting Period February 1995 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) Report, Give Reason NA 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any 11. Hours in Reporting Period 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 14. Hours Generator On-Line 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) 19. Unit Service Factor 20. Unit Availability Factor 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate NA This Month Year to Date 672 1416 266 266 0 0 89.2 89.2 0 0 136886.4 13886.4 30350 30350 12090 -5777 13.3 6.3 13.3 6.3 1. 6 0 1.6 0 85.1 85.1 50-311 03/10/95 339-2122 since Last N/A Cumulative 117289 75881. 2 0 73057.1 0 181110670.6 76480358 72717767 62.3 62.3 56.1 55.6 22.2 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each) We are presently in a maintenance outage. 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: 3 07 95. 8-1-7.R2
.ERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LE .. Docket No.: 50-311 Unit Name: Salem #2 Date: 03-10-95 Completed*
by: Mike Morroni Telephone:
339-2122 Month February 1995 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 339 2 ,o 18 401 3 0 19 239 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0-11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 14 0 30 15 0 31 16 128 P. 8.1-7 Rl
'i, I_ 1-----------
1 _____
,. I ;J '.*1 .: .! 'I .. I !. ,. '.* *1 r<L-1 : ' :, *!*" ,_ ' '* *" ! 'NO.**_;, f:: 1.:DATE *' TYPE 1 *;1 2078 . 02/01/95.
,,.*, s.: _': i I : . 2346 02/03/95 ... F -; " DURATION r I'. (HOURS)* !' REASON 2 I 72 l*, c ', 291.3. '. D UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH FEBRUARY 1995 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DOWN I EVENT .\ REACTOR *REPORT # 4 ------------
RC 4 .. ......................
IA SYSTEM CODE 4 2371 02/19/95 . . , F .. 236 A 1 ------------
CB : : : i : 1 F: Forced S: Scheduled " : 2 ... :.*c Reason * .:: .A-Equipment Failure (explain)
'. ,,. B-Maintenance or Test ' * * * *. ,,*.*:C-Refuel ing -.* .. ' D-Requlatory Restriction
,,,
& License Examination
-: **'-' F-Admini strative G-Operational Error (Explain)
H-Other (Explain) 3 Method: *1-Manual 2-Manual Scram 3-Automatic Scram 4-Continuation of Previous outage 5-Load Reduction 9-0ther .*COMPONENT CAUSE CODE 5 TO DOCKET NO. UNIT NAME DATE COMPLETED BY TELEPHONE AND CORRECTIVE 50-272 Salem #2 3-10-95 Mike Morroni 339-5142 ACTION PREVENT RECURRENCE FUELXXXXXX NORMAL REFUELING xxxxxxxxxx SSPS DESIGN PUMPXXXXXX 21 RCP SEAL 4 Exhibit G -Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report CLER) File CNUREG-0161)
INADEQUACY 5 Exhibit 1 -Same Source lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-311 SALEM2 03/10/95 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59.
The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.
- 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) 2EC-3323, Pkg. 1 "Revision of Rod Control System Auctioned Ave Lead/Lag Module and Filter Module Time Constants" Rev. 0 -The purpose of this DCP is to implement a recommendation from the primary vendor to PSE&G that the filter time constant (module 2TM-412P be revised to 10 seconds, the lead/lag time constant (module 2TM-412Q) be revised to 40/10. These changes are being made to eliminate false rod stepping.
Operation of the plant with the revised rod control system compensation parameters does not adversely affect any physical parameters or conditions which are addressed in the Technical Specifications.
The FSAR accident analysis remains bounding.
Therefore, the margin of safety, as defined in the bases to the Technical Specifications is not reduced. (SORC 95-013) 2EC-3351, Pkgs.1&2 "SSPS Turbine Building Inputs" Rev. 0 -This modification reconfigures the SSPS input bay wiring such that the logic power supplies will not be affected by a postulated short to ground of the SSPS input wiring that interfaces with contacts in the turbine building. The new configuration moves the 120 V AC power feed for the SSPS logic power supplies upstream of existing 15 amp fuses such that fuses feed only the input relays through contacts located in the turbine building.
The power supplies are individually fused. The modification also replaces existing 15 amp fuses with 5 amp fuses to properly coordinate with the upstream breaker. These modifications only correct a condition which was not previously thought to be credible, that is, a loss of the SSPS functionality due to a Design Basis Event. These modifications do not, in any way, alter
- lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-311 SALEM 2 03/10/95 2EE-0088, Pkg. 1 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 the function of SSPS. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-017) No. 22 Charging Safety Injection Pump Inboard Mechanical Seal Housing Replacement" Rev. 0 -This modification entails the replacement of a leaking inboard mechanical seal assembly and seal housing on No. 22 Charging Safety Injection (C/SI) pump. The seal housing of the new mechanical seal assembly, which is a later design, does not have the jacket water cooling connections or a design requirement for these cooling connections.
As noted in Dresser Pacific (pump manufacturer) letter dated 8/24/84, the later design seal housings were revised to eliminate the cooling water jackets in 1976 and all pumps manufactured since have no seal housing water jackets. Nos. 11, 12 and 21 C/SI pumps have already been updated with new mechanical seals and housing and the component cooling connections have been cut back and capped. Unlike the other pumps, at this time, the proposed change to No. 22 C/SI pump will not change the outboard mechanical seal, which still has active connections for cooling the seal housing. The operability and reliability of the charging pump is not affected by the installation of a replacement seal assembly.
The acceptance criteria for the design basis accidents continue to be met and the margin of safety as defined in the Technical Specifications is unchanged. (SORC 95-025) 2. Temporary Modifications (T-Mods)95-020 "Blind Flange Installation at Relief Valves 21-23CN141/142 and 21 and 22BF82" Rev. 0 -The purpose ofthis T-Mod is to remove reliefvalves 21-23CN141/142 and 21 and 22BF82 and install blind flanges to restore the leak tight integrity of the condensate and feedwater systems lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-311 SALEM 2 03/10/95 (Cont'd)93-140 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 respectively.
The subject valves which are currently leaking through the valve seats, were installed to provide thermal relief protection for sections of piping/components in the condensate and feed water system, which if isolated during system heatup or power operations, could be ovepressurized.
The subject relief valves were not designed/
installed to provide overall system overpressurization protection during normal system operations or transient conditions.
The piping/components being temporarily modified are classified as non-safety related/non-seismic and perform no safety function.
Therefore, this modification will have no impact on any systems or equipment required for safe shutdown.
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-020) "Salem Unit 2 Fuel Handling Crane Upgrade for Spent Fuel Pool Reracking
-Revision to Ambient Temperature Requirement in Fuel Handling Building and Installation of Heater Plates on Top of Rack Handling Trolley" Rev. 1 -To increase the spent fuel storage capacity of the Spent Fuel Pool (SFP), the existing nine Exxon racks will be removed and replaced with nine new Holtec racks. Due to the weight of the racks, the Fuel Handling Crane capacity needs to be increased from 5 tons to 20 tons. This T-Mod will install a new trolley and hoist for the removal and installation of racks. The existing trolley and hoist will be used for moving the spent fuel. The purpose of this revision is to add heater strips to the fracture critical members of the new trolley to maintain a temperature above 45°F when the ambient temperature falls below that level. This upgrading is in compliance with the provisions ofNUREG-0554, and in accordance with Appendix C to NUREG-0612.
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-020)
- lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME:* DATE: 50-311 SALEM 2 03/10/95 COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
R. HELLER 609-339-5162
- 3. Deficiency Reports (Use-As-Is) 950131128 "Justification For Allowing Uninsulated Portion of Pipe on 2PR3, 4 & 5 Inlet to Remain Uninsulated Until Next Outage" Rev. 0 -This proposal allows a small portion of the pressurizer safety relief valve (SRV) inlet piping to remain uninsulated until the next refueling outage. This proposal does not add, delete or modify any safety related equipment or components.
The lack of insulation on a small portion of the SR V inlet piping does not compromise the safety related function of any safety related electrical equipment, the SRV s, or their associated piping. As such, this proposal does not impact any anticipated operational transients or design basis accidents previously evaluated in the UFSAR. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-016)
,,
- REFUELING INFORMATION MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995
- DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
MONTH: FEBRUARY 1995 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES XŽNO 2. Scheduled date for next refueling:
April 6. 1996 Scheduled date for restart following refueling:
June 5. 1996 50-311 SALEM2 03/10/95 R. HELLER 609-339-5162
- 3. a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?
YES_ NO NOT DETERMINED TO DATE X b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?
YES NO X If no, when is it scheduled?
April 1996 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ___
___ _ 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
- 7. Number ofFuel Assemblies:
- a. Incore b. In Spent Fuel Storage 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity:
Future spent fuel storage capacity:
- 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity:
8-1-7.R4 193 556 1632 1632 March 2012
>
- SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING
SUMMARY
-UNIT 2 FEBRUARY 1995 SALEM UNIT NO. 2 The Unit began the period shutdown as the refueling outage activities continued.
The Unit entered Mode 2 (Startup) on February 10, 1995, and was synchronized to the grid on February 16, 1995. During the subsequent power escalation, problems developed with No. 21 Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) seal leakoffflow and on February 19, 1995, the Unit was removed from service. The Unit remained shutdown throughout the rest of the period while the RCP seal replacement was in progress.
J