ENS 49362: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| event date = 09/19/2013 14:37 CDT | | event date = 09/19/2013 14:37 CDT | ||
| last update date = 09/19/2013 | | last update date = 09/19/2013 | ||
| title = Secondary Containment Inoperable Due | | title = Secondary Containment Inoperable Due to an Unattended Open Door | ||
| event text = Security personnel reported to the Main Control Room that at time 1437 CDT, an alarm indicated that a secondary containment door was open beyond the normal delay time allowed for entry and exit. Security personnel responded and found the door open and unattended with the dogs extended meaning that the door was unable to be closed. Security personnel secured the door at time 1441 CDT. No deficiencies were found with the door. The fact that the door was open and unattended beyond the time allowed for normal entry and exit violates Technical Specification 3.6.4.1, 'Secondary Containment- Operating,' because surveillance requirement SR 3.6.4.1.3 was not met. This surveillance requires that doors be closed except during normal entry and exit. | | event text = Security personnel reported to the Main Control Room that at time 1437 CDT, an alarm indicated that a secondary containment door was open beyond the normal delay time allowed for entry and exit. Security personnel responded and found the door open and unattended with the dogs extended meaning that the door was unable to be closed. Security personnel secured the door at time 1441 CDT. No deficiencies were found with the door. The fact that the door was open and unattended beyond the time allowed for normal entry and exit violates Technical Specification 3.6.4.1, 'Secondary Containment- Operating,' because surveillance requirement SR 3.6.4.1.3 was not met. This surveillance requires that doors be closed except during normal entry and exit. | ||
In summary, an SSC was inoperable in a required mode as a result of a personnel error and no redundant equipment in the same system was operable. Thus, the condition is reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(D). | In summary, an SSC was inoperable in a required mode as a result of a personnel error and no redundant equipment in the same system was operable. Thus, the condition is reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(D). | ||
Latest revision as of 21:00, 1 March 2018
| Where | |
|---|---|
River Bend  Louisiana (NRC Region 4) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+0.9 h0.0375 days <br />0.00536 weeks <br />0.00123 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Daniel Pipkin 20:31 Sep 19, 2013 |
| NRC Officer: | Howie Crouch |
| Last Updated: | Sep 19, 2013 |
| 49362 - NRC Website
| |
River Bend with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident | |