ML17331B061: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-,'CCELERA.0DOCUMENTMSTIUTIONSYSTEM~.~REGUL.RYINFORMATIONDISTRIBUTSYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSIONNBR:9311190273DOC!DATE:93/11/12NOTARIZED:YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONFIYZPATRICK,E.IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerlyIndianaSMichiganEleRECIP.NAMERECIPIENTAFFILIATIONMURLEY,T.E.DocumentControlBranch(DocumentControlDesk)
{{#Wiki_filter:-,'CCELERA.
0DOCUMENTMSTIUTIONSYSTEM~.~REGUL.RYINFORMATION DISTRIBUT SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9311190273 DOC!DATE:
93/11/12NOTARIZED:
YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION FIYZPATRICK,E.
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly IndianaSMichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.
DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ApplicationforamendstolicensesDPR-58SDPR-74,deletingTS5.9.16Table5.9-1,Unit16TS5.7.1&Table5.7-1,Unit2ofTSentitled,"ComponentCyclicorTransientLimits,"pernewSTSpublishedbyNRCasNUREG-1431,dtd920928.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTRJENCL/SIZE:0+TITLE:ORSubmittal:GeneralDistributionNOTES:DRECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD3-1LAWETZEL,BINTERNAL:NRR/DE/EELBNRR/DRCH/HICBNRR/DSSA/SRXB0&/BBBGB.EGFLE01EXTERNAL:NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1122111111101111RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD3-1PDNRR/DORS/OTSBNRR/DSSA/SPLBNUDOCS-ABSTRACTOGC/HDS2NSICCOPIESLTTRENCL111111111011DDDDNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE}CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMPl-31(EXT.504-2065)TOELIMINATEYOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTIONLISTSFORDOCUMENTSYOUDON'TNEED1DTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR15ENCL13 IndianaMichiga~~PowerCompan~P.O.Box16631Columbus,OH43216AEP:NRC:0980UDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONCHANGEREQUESTrDELETIONOFCOMPONENTCYCLICORTRANSIENTLIMITTABLEU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionDocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555Attn:T.E.MurleyNovember12,1993
Application foramendstolicensesDPR-58SDPR-74,deleting TS5.9.16Table5.9-1,Unit 16TS5.7.1&Table5.7-1,Unit 2ofTSentitled, "Component CyclicorTransient Limits,"pernewSTSpublished byNRCasNUREG-1431,dtd 920928.DISTRIBUTION CODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR JENCL/SIZE:0+TITLE:ORSubmittal:
GeneralDistribution NOTES:DRECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LAWETZEL,BINTERNAL:
NRR/DE/EELB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB 0&/BBBGB.EGFLE01EXTERNAL:
NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1122111111101111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DORS/OTSB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2NSICCOPIESLTTRENCL111111111011DDDDNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE}CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMPl-31(EXT.504-2065)
TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEED1DTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR15ENCL13 IndianaMichiga~~
PowerCompan~P.O.Box16631Columbus, OH43216AEP:NRC:0980U DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGEREQUESTrDELETIONOFCOMPONENT CYCLICORTRANSIENT LIMITTABLEU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Attn:T.E.MurleyNovember12,1993


==DearDr.Murley:==
==DearDr.Murley:==
ThisletteranditsattachmentsconstituteanapplicationforamendmenttotheTechnicalSpecifications(T/S)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2inaccordancewith10CFR50.90.TheproposedchangedeletesT/S5.9.1andTable5.9-1(Unit1)andT/S5.7.1andTable5.7-1(Unit2)oftheT/S,entitled"ComponentCyclicorTransientLimits."ThischangeisconsistentwiththenewStandardTechnicalSpecificationsforWestinghousePlants,publishedbytheNRCasNUREG1431,datedSeptember28,1992.Attachment1providesadetaileddescriptionoftheproposedchange,thejustificationforthechange,andourproposeddeterminationofnosignificanthazardsconsiderationperformedpursuantto10CFR50.92.Attachment2containstheexistingT/Spagesmarkedtoreflecttheproposedchange.Attachment3containstheproposed,revisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangewillnotresultin(1)asignificantchangeinthetypesofeffluentsorasignificantincreaseintheamountofanyeffluentsthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificantincreaseinindividualorcumulativeoccupationalradiationexposure.TheproposedchangehasbeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommitteeandbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee.Incompliancewiththerequirementsof10CFR50.91(b)(l),copiesofthisletteranditsattachmentshavebeentransmittedtoMr.J.R.PadgettoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommissionandtotheMichiganDepartmentofPublicHealth.93i1190273931112PDR'ADOCK05000315PPDR  
Thisletteranditsattachments constitute anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/S)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2inaccordance with10CFR50.90.TheproposedchangedeletesT/S5.9.1andTable5.9-1(Unit1)andT/S5.7.1andTable5.7-1(Unit2)oftheT/S,entitled"Component CyclicorTransient Limits."Thischangeisconsistent withthenewStandardTechnical Specifications forWestinghouse Plants,published bytheNRCasNUREG1431,datedSeptember 28,1992.Attachment 1providesadetaileddescription oftheproposedchange,thejustification forthechange,andourproposeddetermination ofnosignificant hazardsconsideration performed pursuantto10CFR50.92.Attachment 2containstheexistingT/Spagesmarkedtoreflecttheproposedchange.Attachment 3containstheproposed, revisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangewillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
''h4 Dr.T.E.MurleyAEP:NRCt0980UThisletterissubmittedpursuantto10CFR50.30(b)and,assuch,anoathstatementisattached.Sincerely,E.E.Fitz.trickVicePresidentdrAttachmentscc:A.A.Blind-BridgmanG.CharnoffJ.B.Martin>>RegionIIINFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector-BridgmanJ.R.Padgett STATEOFOHIO)COUNTYOFFRANKLIN)E.E.Fitzpatrick,beingdulysworn,deposesandsaysthatheistheVicePresidentoflicenseeIndianaMichiganPowerCompany,thathehasreadtheforegoingTechnicalSpecificationChangeRequest:DeletionofComponentCyclicorTransientLimitTableandknowsthecontentsthereof;andthatsaidcontentsaretruetothebestofhisknowledgeandbelief.SubscribedandsworntomebeforethisdayofNOTARYUBLIC~anAo.Htlt.~NOTARYPUBLIC.STATOFOHIOAYCOhihIISSIONEXPIRE ATTACHMENT1TOAEP:NRC:0980U10CFR50.92ANALYSZSFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNZTS1AND2TECHNZCALSPECZFZCATZONS Attachment1toAEP:NRC:0980UPage1DESCRIPTIONOFCHANGESWeproposetodeletefromthetechnicalspecifications(T/S)T/S5.9.1/Table5.9-1(Unit1)andT/S5.7.1/Table5.7-1(Unit2),entitled"ComponentCyclicorTransientLimits."ThelimitsoftheseT/SwouldberelocatedtotheUFSAR,andwouldbeadministrativelycontrolled.Additionally,theIndexSectionisrevisedaccordingly.REASONFORTHECHANGEThechangeachievesconsistencywiththenewStandardT/SforWestinghousePlants,publishedbytheNRCasNUREG1431onSeptember28,1992.Thetablecontainscyclicandtransientlimitsforthereactorcoolantandsecondarysystems.Forexample,thetableliststhenumberofheatupandcooldowncyclesthereactorcoolantsystemmayundergo,aswellasthenumberofhydrostaticpressureteststhereactorcoolantsystemandsecondarysystemmayundergo.Althoughlimitsareprovidedinthetable,therearenospecificlimitingconditionsforoperationoractionstatementsprovided.NUREG1431wastheresultofatechnicalspecificationimprovementprogramundertakenbytheNRCandthenuclearindustry.OneoftheresultsoftheprogramwasthestreamliningoftheT/Sbyremovalofrequirementsthatwerebetterlocatedelsewhere.ThechangesallowedthenewT/Stobemoreclearlyfocusedonthoserequirementsnecessarytosupportthesafetyanalyses,versusrequirementsinvogueatthetimeofplantlicensing.FourgeneralcriterionwereusedtodetermineifarecpirementfromtheformerStandardT/SwouldremaininthenewStandardT/S.Thesecriterioninvolve:1~Installedinstrumentationthatisusedtodetect,andindicateinthecontrolroom,asignificantabnormaldegradationofthereactorcoolantpressureboundary.2~Aprocessvariablethatisaninitialconditionofadesignbasisaccidentortransientanalysisthateither'assumesthefailureoforpresentsachallengetotheintegrityofafissionproductbarrier.3~Astructure,system,orcomponentthatispartoftheprimarysuccesspathandwhichfunctionsoractuatestomitigateadesignbasis'accidentortransientthateitherassumesthefailureoforpresentsachallengetotheintegrityofafissionproductbarrier.4.Equipmentthatprobabilisticriskassessmentoroperatingexperiencehasshowntobeimportanttopublichealthandsafety.
TheproposedchangehasbeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee.
Attachment1toAEP:NRC:0980UPage2TheT/Sandtableweareproposingtoremovecontainscomponentcyclicandtransientlimits.Thetableisessentiallyarequirementforrecordkeepingregardingthenumberofcyclesortransientsthathavebeenexperiencedbythereactorcoolantorsecondarysystems.Znthissense,therequirementsareadministrativeinnature,andclearlydidnotmeetanyofthecriterialistedabove.Thus,thetablewasnotincludedinthenewStandardT/S.RemovalofthetablefromtheT/Swillstreamlinethedocument,andwillhelptoachievetheappropriatefocusofthedocument.3~JUSTIFICATIONFORTHECHANGEThechangeisconsistentwiththenewStandardT/SgaspublishedinNUREG1431.Znthissense,thechangehasalreadybeenreviewedandfoundacceptablebytheNRC.TherearenoCookNuclearPlantspecificfeaturesthatwouldmakethechangenotapplicable.ThereisalreadyaplantprocedurethatverifiesthattherequirementsoftheT/Stableareimplemented.ThetablecurrentlyintheT/SwillberelocatedtotheUFSAR.Anotewillbeaddedtotheproceduretoensurethatanychangestothecomponentcyclicortransientlimitsundergoanunreviewedsafetycpxestlondeterminationpertheretirementsof10CFR50.59.Per10CFR50.59,thechangecanonlybemadeifthechangedoesnot:increasetheprobabilityofoccurrenceorconsequencesofanaccidentormalfunctionofequipmentimportanttosafetypreviouslyevaluatedinthesafetyanalysisreport,2.createthepossibilityforanaccidentormalfunctionofadifferenttypethananyevaluatedpreviouslyinthesafetyanalysisreport,or3~reducethemarginofsafetyasdefinedinthebasisforanyT/S.Anychangestotherequirementsofthepresenttablewouldhavetopassthestringentcriteriaof10CFR50.59inordertobeimplemented.  
Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(l),
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.J.R.PadgettoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andtotheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.93i1190273 931112PDR'ADOCK05000315PPDR  
''h4 Dr.T.E.MurleyAEP:NRCt0980U Thisletterissubmitted pursuantto10CFR50.30(b)and,assuch,anoathstatement isattached.
Sincerely, E.E.Fitz.trickVicePresident drAttachments cc:A.A.Blind-BridgmanG.CharnoffJ.B.Martin>>RegionIIINFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector
-BridgmanJ.R.Padgett STATEOFOHIO)COUNTYOFFRANKLIN)
E.E.Fitzpatrick, beingdulysworn,deposesandsaysthatheistheVicePresident oflicenseeIndianaMichiganPowerCompany,thathehasreadtheforegoing Technical Specification ChangeRequest:DeletionofComponent CyclicorTransient LimitTableandknowsthecontentsthereof;andthatsaidcontentsaretruetothebestofhisknowledge andbelief.Subscribed andsworntomebeforethisdayofNOTARYUBLIC~anAo.Htlt.~NOTARYPUBLIC.STATOFOHIOAYCOhihIISSION EXPIRE ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:0980U 10CFR50.92ANALYSZSFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNZTS1AND2TECHNZCAL SPECZFZCATZONS Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page1DESCRIPTION OFCHANGESWeproposetodeletefromthetechnical specifications (T/S)T/S5.9.1/Table 5.9-1(Unit1)andT/S5.7.1/Table 5.7-1(Unit2),entitled"Component CyclicorTransient Limits."ThelimitsoftheseT/Swouldberelocated totheUFSAR,andwouldbeadministratively controlled.
Additionally, theIndexSectionisrevisedaccordingly.
REASONFORTHECHANGEThechangeachievesconsistency withthenewStandardT/SforWestinghouse Plants,published bytheNRCasNUREG1431onSeptember 28,1992.Thetablecontainscyclicandtransient limitsforthereactorcoolantandsecondary systems.Forexample,thetableliststhenumberofheatupandcooldowncyclesthereactorcoolantsystemmayundergo,aswellasthenumberofhydrostatic pressureteststhereactorcoolantsystemandsecondary systemmayundergo.Althoughlimitsareprovidedinthetable,therearenospecificlimitingconditions foroperation oractionstatements provided.
NUREG1431wastheresultofatechnical specification improvement programundertaken bytheNRCandthenuclearindustry.
Oneoftheresultsoftheprogramwasthestreamlining oftheT/Sbyremovalofrequirements thatwerebetterlocatedelsewhere.
ThechangesallowedthenewT/Stobemoreclearlyfocusedonthoserequirements necessary tosupportthesafetyanalyses, versusrequirements invogueatthetimeofplantlicensing.
Fourgeneralcriterion wereusedtodetermine ifarecpirement fromtheformerStandardT/SwouldremaininthenewStandardT/S.Thesecriterion involve:1~Installed instrumentation thatisusedtodetect,andindicateinthecontrolroom,asignificant abnormaldegradation ofthereactorcoolantpressureboundary.
2~Aprocessvariablethatisaninitialcondition ofadesignbasisaccidentortransient analysisthateither'assumesthefailureoforpresentsachallenge totheintegrity ofafissionproductbarrier.3~Astructure, system,orcomponent thatispartoftheprimarysuccesspathandwhichfunctions oractuatestomitigateadesignbasis'accident ortransient thateitherassumesthefailureoforpresentsachallenge totheintegrity ofafissionproductbarrier.4.Equipment thatprobabilistic riskassessment oroperating experience hasshowntobeimportant topublichealthandsafety.
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page2TheT/Sandtableweareproposing toremovecontainscomponent cyclicandtransient limits.Thetableisessentially arequirement forrecordkeeping regarding thenumberofcyclesortransients thathavebeenexperienced bythereactorcoolantorsecondary systems.Znthissense,therequirements areadministrative innature,andclearlydidnotmeetanyofthecriterialistedabove.Thus,thetablewasnotincludedinthenewStandardT/S.RemovalofthetablefromtheT/Swillstreamline thedocument, andwillhelptoachievetheappropriate focusofthedocument.
3~JUSTIFICATION FORTHECHANGEThechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/Sgaspublished inNUREG1431.Znthissense,thechangehasalreadybeenreviewedandfoundacceptable bytheNRC.TherearenoCookNuclearPlantspecificfeaturesthatwouldmakethechangenotapplicable.
Thereisalreadyaplantprocedure thatverifiesthattherequirements oftheT/Stableareimplemented.
Thetablecurrently intheT/Swillberelocated totheUFSAR.Anotewillbeaddedtotheprocedure toensurethatanychangestothecomponent cyclicortransient limitsundergoanunreviewed safetycpxestlon determination pertheretirements of10CFR50.59.Per10CFR50.59,thechangecanonlybemadeifthechangedoesnot:increasetheprobability ofoccurrence orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction ofequipment important tosafetypreviously evaluated inthesafetyanalysisreport,2.createthepossibility foranaccidentormalfunction ofadifferent typethananyevaluated previously inthesafetyanalysisreport,or3~reducethemarginofsafetyasdefinedinthebasisforanyT/S.Anychangestotherequirements ofthepresenttablewouldhavetopassthestringent criteriaof10CFR50.59inordertobeimplemented.  


Attachment1toAEP:NRC:0980UPage34~10CFR50.92CRITERIAPer10CFR50.92,aproposedamendmentdoesnotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsiderationifthechangedoesnot:involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated,2~createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated,or3~involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Criterion1TheproposedchangeisadministrativeinnatureinthatitsimplyrelocatesatablecontainingcomponentcyclicandtransientlimitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Anychangetotherequirementsofthetablewouldhavetobereviewedagainstthecriteriaof10CFR50.59toensurethechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewedsafetyquestion.Additionally,itisnotedthatthechangeisconsistentwiththenewStandardT/S,recentlyissuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Basedontheseconsiderations,theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Criterion2ThechangeonlyinvolvesrelocationofatablecontainingcomponentcyclicandtransientlimitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Nospecificphysicalchangestotheplantorchangesinplantoperationwillresultdirectlyfromthischange.Anychangeinthelimitscontainedinthecurrenttablewillundergoareviewagainsttherequirementsof10CFR50.59toensurethatthechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewedsafetyquestion.Thus,thechangewillnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Criterion3TheproposedchangeisadministrativeinnatureinthatitsimplyrelocatesatablecontainingcomponentcyclicandtransientlimitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Anychangetotherequirementsofthetablewouldhavetobereviewedagainstthecriteriaof10CFR50.59toensurethechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewedsafetyquestion.Additionally,itisnotedthatthechangeisconsistentwiththenewStandardT/S,recentlyissuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Basedontheseconsiderations,theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page34~10CFR50.92CRITERIAPer10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment doesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration ifthechangedoesnot:involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, 2~createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated, or3~involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Criterion 1Theproposedchangeisadministrative innatureinthatitsimplyrelocates atablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Anychangetotherequirements ofthetablewouldhavetobereviewedagainstthecriteriaof10CFR50.59toensurethechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.
Attachment1toAEP:NRC!0980UPage4Lastly,wenotethattheNRChasprovidedguidanceconcerningthedeterminationofsignificanthazardsbyprovidingcertainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendmentsconsiderednotlikelytoinvolvesignificanthazardsconsideration.Thesixthoftheseexamplesreferstochangeswhichmayresultinsomeincreasetotheprobabilityorconsecpencesofapreviouslyevaluatedaccident,buttheresultsofwhicharewithinacceptablelimits.Asdiscussedabove,theremovalofthecyclicandtransientlimittablefromtheT/SisconsistentwiththenewStandardT/S,issuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.SincethechangehasalreadybeenfoundacceptablebytheNRC,weconcludethattheexamplecitedisapplicableandthatthechangeshouldnotinvolvesignificanthazardsconsideration.}}
Additionally, itisnotedthatthechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,recentlyissuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Basedontheseconsiderations, theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Criterion 2Thechangeonlyinvolvesrelocation ofatablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Nospecificphysicalchangestotheplantorchangesinplantoperation willresultdirectlyfromthischange.Anychangeinthelimitscontained inthecurrenttablewillundergoareviewagainsttherequirements of10CFR50.59toensurethatthechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.
Thus,thechangewillnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Criterion 3Theproposedchangeisadministrative innatureinthatitsimplyrelocates atablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Anychangetotherequirements ofthetablewouldhavetobereviewedagainstthecriteriaof10CFR50.59toensurethechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.
Additionally, itisnotedthatthechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,recentlyissuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Basedontheseconsiderations, theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC!0980UPage4Lastly,wenotethattheNRChasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermination ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration.
Thesixthoftheseexamplesreferstochangeswhichmayresultinsomeincreasetotheprobability orconsecpences ofapreviously evaluated
: accident, buttheresultsofwhicharewithinacceptable limits.Asdiscussed above,theremovalofthecyclicandtransient limittablefromtheT/Sisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,issuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Sincethechangehasalreadybeenfoundacceptable bytheNRC,weconcludethattheexamplecitedisapplicable andthatthechangeshouldnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration.}}

Revision as of 08:16, 29 June 2018

Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,deleting TS 5.9.1 & Table 5.9-1,Unit 1 & TS 5.7.1 & Table 5.7-1,Unit 2 of TS Entitled, Component Cyclic or Transient Limits, Per New STS Published by NRC as NUREG-1431,dtd 920928
ML17331B061
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 11/12/1993
From: FITZPATRICK E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: MURLEY T E
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17331B062 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-1431 AEP:NRC:098OU, AEP:NRC:98OU, NUDOCS 9311190273
Download: ML17331B061 (11)
v • d • e


Text

-,'CCELERA.

0DOCUMENTMSTIUTIONSYSTEM~.~REGUL.RYINFORMATION DISTRIBUT SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9311190273 DOC!DATE:

93/11/12NOTARIZED:

YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION FIYZPATRICK,E.

IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly IndianaSMichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.

DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)

SUBJECT:

Application foramendstolicensesDPR-58SDPR-74,deleting TS5.9.16Table5.9-1,Unit 16TS5.7.1&Table5.7-1,Unit 2ofTSentitled, "Component CyclicorTransient Limits,"pernewSTSpublished byNRCasNUREG-1431,dtd 920928.DISTRIBUTION CODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR JENCL/SIZE:0+TITLE:ORSubmittal:

GeneralDistribution NOTES:DRECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LAWETZEL,BINTERNAL:

NRR/DE/EELB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB 0&/BBBGB.EGFLE01EXTERNAL:

NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1122111111101111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DORS/OTSB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2NSICCOPIESLTTRENCL111111111011DDDDNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:

PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE}CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMPl-31(EXT.504-2065)

TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEED1DTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:

LTTR15ENCL13 IndianaMichiga~~

PowerCompan~P.O.Box16631Columbus, OH43216AEP:NRC:0980U DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGEREQUESTrDELETIONOFCOMPONENT CYCLICORTRANSIENT LIMITTABLEU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Attn:T.E.MurleyNovember12,1993

DearDr.Murley:

Thisletteranditsattachments constitute anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/S)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2inaccordance with10CFR50.90.TheproposedchangedeletesT/S5.9.1andTable5.9-1(Unit1)andT/S5.7.1andTable5.7-1(Unit2)oftheT/S,entitled"Component CyclicorTransient Limits."Thischangeisconsistent withthenewStandardTechnical Specifications forWestinghouse Plants,published bytheNRCasNUREG1431,datedSeptember 28,1992.Attachment 1providesadetaileddescription oftheproposedchange,thejustification forthechange,andourproposeddetermination ofnosignificant hazardsconsideration performed pursuantto10CFR50.92.Attachment 2containstheexistingT/Spagesmarkedtoreflecttheproposedchange.Attachment 3containstheproposed, revisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangewillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.

TheproposedchangehasbeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee.

Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(l),

copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.J.R.PadgettoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andtotheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.93i1190273 931112PDR'ADOCK05000315PPDR

h4 Dr.T.E.MurleyAEP:NRCt0980U Thisletterissubmitted pursuantto10CFR50.30(b)and,assuch,anoathstatement isattached.

Sincerely, E.E.Fitz.trickVicePresident drAttachments cc:A.A.Blind-BridgmanG.CharnoffJ.B.Martin>>RegionIIINFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector

-BridgmanJ.R.Padgett STATEOFOHIO)COUNTYOFFRANKLIN)

E.E.Fitzpatrick, beingdulysworn,deposesandsaysthatheistheVicePresident oflicenseeIndianaMichiganPowerCompany,thathehasreadtheforegoing Technical Specification ChangeRequest:DeletionofComponent CyclicorTransient LimitTableandknowsthecontentsthereof;andthatsaidcontentsaretruetothebestofhisknowledge andbelief.Subscribed andsworntomebeforethisdayofNOTARYUBLIC~anAo.Htlt.~NOTARYPUBLIC.STATOFOHIOAYCOhihIISSION EXPIRE ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:0980U 10CFR50.92ANALYSZSFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNZTS1AND2TECHNZCAL SPECZFZCATZONS Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page1DESCRIPTION OFCHANGESWeproposetodeletefromthetechnical specifications (T/S)T/S5.9.1/Table 5.9-1(Unit1)andT/S5.7.1/Table 5.7-1(Unit2),entitled"Component CyclicorTransient Limits."ThelimitsoftheseT/Swouldberelocated totheUFSAR,andwouldbeadministratively controlled.

Additionally, theIndexSectionisrevisedaccordingly.

REASONFORTHECHANGEThechangeachievesconsistency withthenewStandardT/SforWestinghouse Plants,published bytheNRCasNUREG1431onSeptember 28,1992.Thetablecontainscyclicandtransient limitsforthereactorcoolantandsecondary systems.Forexample,thetableliststhenumberofheatupandcooldowncyclesthereactorcoolantsystemmayundergo,aswellasthenumberofhydrostatic pressureteststhereactorcoolantsystemandsecondary systemmayundergo.Althoughlimitsareprovidedinthetable,therearenospecificlimitingconditions foroperation oractionstatements provided.

NUREG1431wastheresultofatechnical specification improvement programundertaken bytheNRCandthenuclearindustry.

Oneoftheresultsoftheprogramwasthestreamlining oftheT/Sbyremovalofrequirements thatwerebetterlocatedelsewhere.

ThechangesallowedthenewT/Stobemoreclearlyfocusedonthoserequirements necessary tosupportthesafetyanalyses, versusrequirements invogueatthetimeofplantlicensing.

Fourgeneralcriterion wereusedtodetermine ifarecpirement fromtheformerStandardT/SwouldremaininthenewStandardT/S.Thesecriterion involve:1~Installed instrumentation thatisusedtodetect,andindicateinthecontrolroom,asignificant abnormaldegradation ofthereactorcoolantpressureboundary.

2~Aprocessvariablethatisaninitialcondition ofadesignbasisaccidentortransient analysisthateither'assumesthefailureoforpresentsachallenge totheintegrity ofafissionproductbarrier.3~Astructure, system,orcomponent thatispartoftheprimarysuccesspathandwhichfunctions oractuatestomitigateadesignbasis'accident ortransient thateitherassumesthefailureoforpresentsachallenge totheintegrity ofafissionproductbarrier.4.Equipment thatprobabilistic riskassessment oroperating experience hasshowntobeimportant topublichealthandsafety.

Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page2TheT/Sandtableweareproposing toremovecontainscomponent cyclicandtransient limits.Thetableisessentially arequirement forrecordkeeping regarding thenumberofcyclesortransients thathavebeenexperienced bythereactorcoolantorsecondary systems.Znthissense,therequirements areadministrative innature,andclearlydidnotmeetanyofthecriterialistedabove.Thus,thetablewasnotincludedinthenewStandardT/S.RemovalofthetablefromtheT/Swillstreamline thedocument, andwillhelptoachievetheappropriate focusofthedocument.

3~JUSTIFICATION FORTHECHANGEThechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/Sgaspublished inNUREG1431.Znthissense,thechangehasalreadybeenreviewedandfoundacceptable bytheNRC.TherearenoCookNuclearPlantspecificfeaturesthatwouldmakethechangenotapplicable.

Thereisalreadyaplantprocedure thatverifiesthattherequirements oftheT/Stableareimplemented.

Thetablecurrently intheT/Swillberelocated totheUFSAR.Anotewillbeaddedtotheprocedure toensurethatanychangestothecomponent cyclicortransient limitsundergoanunreviewed safetycpxestlon determination pertheretirements of10CFR50.59.Per10CFR50.59,thechangecanonlybemadeifthechangedoesnot:increasetheprobability ofoccurrence orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction ofequipment important tosafetypreviously evaluated inthesafetyanalysisreport,2.createthepossibility foranaccidentormalfunction ofadifferent typethananyevaluated previously inthesafetyanalysisreport,or3~reducethemarginofsafetyasdefinedinthebasisforanyT/S.Anychangestotherequirements ofthepresenttablewouldhavetopassthestringent criteriaof10CFR50.59inordertobeimplemented.

Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page34~10CFR50.92CRITERIAPer10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment doesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration ifthechangedoesnot:involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, 2~createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated, or3~involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Criterion 1Theproposedchangeisadministrative innatureinthatitsimplyrelocates atablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Anychangetotherequirements ofthetablewouldhavetobereviewedagainstthecriteriaof10CFR50.59toensurethechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.

Additionally, itisnotedthatthechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,recentlyissuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Basedontheseconsiderations, theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.

Criterion 2Thechangeonlyinvolvesrelocation ofatablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Nospecificphysicalchangestotheplantorchangesinplantoperation willresultdirectlyfromthischange.Anychangeinthelimitscontained inthecurrenttablewillundergoareviewagainsttherequirements of10CFR50.59toensurethatthechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.

Thus,thechangewillnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.

Criterion 3Theproposedchangeisadministrative innatureinthatitsimplyrelocates atablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Anychangetotherequirements ofthetablewouldhavetobereviewedagainstthecriteriaof10CFR50.59toensurethechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.

Additionally, itisnotedthatthechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,recentlyissuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Basedontheseconsiderations, theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.

Attachment 1toAEP:NRC!0980UPage4Lastly,wenotethattheNRChasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermination ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration.

Thesixthoftheseexamplesreferstochangeswhichmayresultinsomeincreasetotheprobability orconsecpences ofapreviously evaluated

accident, buttheresultsofwhicharewithinacceptable limits.Asdiscussed above,theremovalofthecyclicandtransient limittablefromtheT/Sisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,issuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Sincethechangehasalreadybeenfoundacceptable bytheNRC,weconcludethattheexamplecitedisapplicable andthatthechangeshouldnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17331B061&oldid=736618"