ML15266A293: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SECRETARY Mr. Brian Huffine, President Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, Ml 49043  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON
, D.C. 20555-0001 SECRETARY Mr. Brian Huffine, President Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, Ml 49043  


==Dear Mr. Huffine:==
==Dear Mr. Huffine:==
September 21, 2015 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter dated August 4, 2015, and your email dated September 10, 2015. In your correspondence, you expressed concern about the reactor pressure vessel at Entergy's Palisades Nuclear Plant. Specifically, you requested that the NRC require the licensee, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., to conduct direct testing of physical samples from the Palisades reactor. Along those lines, you further recommended that the Commission uphold the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's recent decision to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding materials issues associated with Palisades' reactor pressure vessel. As your letter and email indicate, a hearing request on this subject is currently pending before the NRC. In March 2015, Beyond Nuclear, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future -Shoreline Chapter, and the Nuclear Energy Information Service (collectively, "the petitioners") sought a hearing on Entergy's license amendment request concerning whether the Palisades' reactor vessel plate and weld materials provide adequate margins of safety against fracture. The Licensing Board granted the petitioners' request for a hearing on June 18, 2015. Entergy has appealed the Board's decision to the Commission; that appeal is pending. Given the pendency of the matter before both the Commission and the Licensing Board, the Commission cannot at this time discuss or comment on any issues involved in this matter. Under NRC regulations, the Commission has an adjudicatory role in this case, and all members of the Commission must remain impartial while the case is pending. A copy of your letter, your email, and this response will be served on all the participants in this and a related Palisades proceeding. Sincerely, Annette L. Vietti-Cook August 4, 2015 PALISADES PARK COUNTRY CLUB, INC. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, MI 49043 Brian Huffine, President huffineb@comcast.net Mr. Stephen G. Burns, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, Cove1i, MI Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel decisions Docket No. 50-255-LA-2; ASLBP No. 15-939-04-LA-BDO 1 June 18,2015, and July 9, 2015  
September 21, 2015 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter dated August 4, 2015, and your email dated September 10, 2015. In your correspondence
, you expressed concern about the reactor pressure vessel at Entergy's Palisades Nuclear Plant. Specifically
, you requested that the NRC require the licensee, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., to conduct direct testing of physical samples from the Palisades reactor. Along those lines, you further recommended that the Commission uphold the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's recent decision to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding materials issues associated with Palisades
' reactor pressure vessel. As your letter and email indicate, a hearing request on this subject is currently pending before the NRC. In March 2015, Beyond Nuclear, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future -Shoreline Chapter, and the Nuclear Energy Information Service (collectively
, "the petitioners
") sought a hearing on Entergy's license amendment request concerning whether the Palisades
' reactor vessel plate and weld materials provide adequate margins of safety against fracture. The Licensing Board granted the petitioners
' request for a hearing on June 18, 2015. Entergy has appealed the Board's decision to the Commission
; that appeal is pending. Given the pendency of the matter before both the Commission and the Licensing Board, the Commission cannot at this time discuss or comment on any issues involved in this matter. Under NRC regulations
, the Commission has an adjudicatory role in this case, and all members of the Commission must remain impartial while the case is pending.
A copy of your letter, your email, and this response will be served on all the participants in this and a related Palisades proceeding
. Sincerely
,
Annette L. Vietti-Cook August 4, 2015 PALISADES PARK COUNTRY CLUB, INC. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, MI 49043 Brian Huffine, President huffineb@comcast.net Mr. Stephen G. Burns, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, Cove1i, MI Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel decisions Docket No. 50-255-LA-2; ASLBP No. 15-939-04-LA-BDO 1 June 18,2015, and July 9, 2015 Dear Chairman Burns: We are the nearest homeowners to the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant in Covert, Michigan.
The plant's southern border is the northern border of our homeowner community of 205 homes. The name of the plant comes from the name of our community, Palisades Park Country Club (the "Park" as we call it), which has been in existence since 1905 (the name is deceiving
-there is no golf course and our homes are modest).
Some of our homeowners live in the Park year round and others vacation here with extended families that go back six and seven generations.
We are asking the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to require the direct embrittlement testing of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant's reactor vessel necessary to ensure that the homes we have come back to for generations will be habitable for the long-term future. When the power plant was originally
: proposed, our suppo1i was sought and a promise was made that the plant would always be a "good neighbor" to us. As Anthony Vitale, Vice President of Entergy, admitted to us at a meeting of our members on August 1, 2015, they have not been good neighbors.
Communication has been far from freely provided.
In fact, leaks of water containing radioactive material has been released into Lake Michigan, the source of the drinking water that supplies our well system, not to mention the drinking water of millions of others. At our annual members meeting, the membership voted unanimously that the board send a letter to you expressing our strong support for requiring that physical samples from the Palisades reactor be tested and that Entergy NOT be granted any relief or exception to such direct physical testing for embrittlement.
In 2007, the NRC granted Entergy, the current corporate owner of Palisades, a twenty year extension of its operating permit despite deep concerns of residents and environmental groups about the safety of its badly embrittled reactor pressure vessel. Entergy has now applied for regulat01y relief from nuclear safetystandards regulating the reactor pressure vessel at Palisades.
The conservative safety protocols adopted in August 4, 2015 Mr. Stephen G. Burns Page 2 1985 under 1 OCFR50.61 should be maintained especially in regard to the Palisades nuclear plant. Palisades' reactor pressure vessel is acknowledged as the most embrittled in the U.S. and one of the oldest in the entire world. Entergy's unprecedented alternative proposal would allow Palisades to avoid testing actual samples of the facility's most critical safety component, the reactor pressure vessel. Instead, Entergy would submit mathematical "interpolations" from other nuclear plants, while omitting any direct analysis of physical data taken from the Palisades reactor pressure vessel itself. We feel any alternative to physical testing of the pressure vessel at Palisades, built in 1972, does not pertain to Palisades and should not be allowed.
Such indirect interpolation will endanger our safety and the safety of anyone living around Lake Michigan.
The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel on June 18, 2015, found that testimony by intervening enviromnental petitioners demonstrated sufficient doubt as to the integrity of Palisades' pressure vessel. The Atomic Safety Board mandated a full evidentiary hearing regarding the safety of the em brittled pressure vessel at Palisades.
We strongly concur with this decision and urge the NRC to uphold its ASLBP Memorandum and Order of June 18, 2015. Margins of safety which have been built into the construction of and the regulation of nuclear power plants for many decades should not be weakened, especially in the case of critical pressure vessels at aging nuclear facilities like Palisades' pressurized water reactor.
Palisades has alreadyexceeded its original expected life of operation, foiiy years. Scrutiny of the Palisades reactor pressure vessel should be strengthened, not weakened, as Entergy proposes.
We support the recent ASLBP decision calling for evidentiary hearings into the embrittlement of the pressure vessel and we ask for direct testing of actual samples from the Palisades reactor pressure vessel to assure public safety.
Brian Huffine /r President Board of Directors Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. cc: Ronald M. Spritzer, Administrative Judge Ronald.spritzer@mc.gov PPCC Board and Members Senator Gary Peters Senator Debbie Stabenow Congressman Fred Upton Mark Muhich, Sierra Club 1CHAIRMAN Resource From:Carolyn Ferry <carolynferry@sbcglobal.net>
Sent:Tuesday, August 04, 2015 2:42 PM To:CHAIRMAN Resource Cc:Spritzer, Ronald; huffineb@comcast.net


==Dear Chairman Burns:==
==Subject:==
We are the nearest homeowners to the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant in Covert, Michigan. The plant's southern border is the northern border of our homeowner community of 205 homes. The name of the plant comes from the name of our community, Palisades Park Country Club (the "Park" as we call it), which has been in existence since 1905 (the name is deceiving -there is no golf course and our homes are modest). Some of our homeowners live in the Park year round and others vacation here with extended families that go back six and seven generations. We are asking the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to require the direct embrittlement testing of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant's reactor vessel necessary to ensure that the homes we have come back to for generations will be habitable for the long-term future. When the power plant was originally proposed, our suppo1i was sought and a promise was made that the plant would always be a "good neighbor" to us. As Anthony Vitale, Vice President of Entergy, admitted to us at a meeting of our members on August 1, 2015, they have not been good neighbors. Communication has been far from freely provided. In fact, leaks of water containing radioactive material has been released into Lake Michigan, the source of the drinking water that supplies our well system, not to mention the drinking water of millions of others. At our annual members meeting, the membership voted unanimously that the board send a letter to you expressing our strong support for requiring that physical samples from the Palisades reactor be tested and that Entergy NOT be granted any relief or exception to such direct physical testing for embrittlement. In 2007, the NRC granted Entergy, the current corporate owner of Palisades, a twenty year extension of its operating permit despite deep concerns of residents and environmental groups about the safety of its badly embrittled reactor pressure vessel. Entergy has now applied for regulat01y relief from nuclear safetystandards regulating the reactor pressure vessel at Palisades. The conservative safety protocols adopted in August 4, 2015 Mr. Stephen G. Burns Page 2 1985 under 1 OCFR50.61 should be maintained especially in regard to the Palisades nuclear plant. Palisades' reactor pressure vessel is acknowledged as the most embrittled in the U.S. and one of the oldest in the entire world. Entergy's unprecedented alternative proposal would allow Palisades to avoid testing actual samples of the facility's most critical safety component, the reactor pressure vessel. Instead, Entergy would submit mathematical "interpolations" from other nuclear plants, while omitting any direct analysis of physical data taken from the Palisades reactor pressure vessel itself. We feel any alternative to physical testing of the pressure vessel at Palisades, built in 1972, does not pertain to Palisades and should not be allowed. Such indirect interpolation will endanger our safety and the safety of anyone living around Lake Michigan. The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel on June 18, 2015, found that testimony by intervening enviromnental petitioners demonstrated sufficient doubt as to the integrity of Palisades' pressure vessel. The Atomic Safety Board mandated a full evidentiary hearing regarding the safety of the em brittled pressure vessel at Palisades. We strongly concur with this decision and urge the NRC to uphold its ASLBP Memorandum and Order of June 18, 2015. Margins of safety which have been built into the construction of and the regulation of nuclear power plants for many decades should not be weakened, especially in the case of critical pressure vessels at aging nuclear facilities like Palisades' pressurized water reactor. Palisades has alreadyexceeded its original expected life of operation, foiiy years. Scrutiny of the Palisades reactor pressure vessel should be strengthened, not weakened, as Entergy proposes. We support the recent ASLBP decision calling for evidentiary hearings into the embrittlement of the pressure vessel and we ask for direct testing of actual samples from the Palisades reactor pressure vessel to assure public safety. Brian Huffine /r President Board of Directors Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. cc: Ronald M. Spritzer, Administrative Judge Ronald.spritzer@mc.gov PPCC Board and Members Senator Gary Peters Senator Debbie Stabenow Congressman Fred Upton Mark Muhich, Sierra Club 1CHAIRMAN ResourceFrom:Carolyn Ferry <carolynferry@sbcglobal.net>Sent:Tuesday, August 04, 2015 2:42 PMTo:CHAIRMAN ResourceCc:Spritzer, Ronald; huffineb@comcast.net
[External_Sender] Palisades Nu clear Power Plant, Covert, MI Attachments:
Palisades Park Country Club letter.pdfSee attached letter from Brian Huffine, re hearing scheduled for August 7, 2015. Re Docket No. 50-255-LA-2, ASLBP No. 15-939-04-LA-BDO1.
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Jody Flynn <jodygflynn@gmail.com>  
: Thursday, September 10, 2015 8:34 AM CHAIRMAN Resource


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, Covert, MIAttachments:Palisades Park Country Club letter.pdfSee attached letter from Brian Huffine, re hearing scheduled for August 7, 2015. Re Docket No. 50-255-LA-2, ASLBP No. 15-939-04-LA-BDO1.
 
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Jody Flynn <jodygflynn@gmail.com> Thursday, September 10, 2015 8:34 AM CHAIRMAN Resource
[External_Sender]
Entergy Palisades Nuclear Power Plant Coupons Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged From: Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, Michigan 49043 To: Mr Stephen G. Bums, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D>C> 20555-0001


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Entergy Palisades Nuclear Power Plant Coupons Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged From: Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, Michigan 49043 To: Mr Stephen G. Bums, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D>C> 20555-0001


==Subject:==
Entergy Nuclear Power Plant-Covert, Michigan Pressurized Reactor Vessel -Embrittlement We are writing you again in hopes you will make Entergy pull the coupons and read the state of embrittlement of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. We are concerned homeowners that border that plant in Covert, Michigan.
Entergy Nuclear Power Plant-Covert, Michigan Pressurized Reactor Vessel -Embrittlement We are writing you again in hopes you will make Entergy pull the coupons and read the state of embrittlement of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. We are concerned homeowners that border that plant in Covert, Michigan. The name of the plant comes from our community, Palisades Park. We have been in existence since 1905 and currently consist of about two hundred homes. As a member of the regulating body, we are asking you to look into a very timely and critical situation concerning embrittlement testing of the Palisades Nuclear 1 Power Plants reactor pressure vessel. Palisades' pressure vessel is acknowledged as the most em brittled in the United States and one of the oldest in the world. Anthony Vitale, Site Vice President at Entergy Palisades Nuclear Plant, and seven other employees of Entergy came to our members meeting in early August of this year and made a direct statement that pulling the coupons would not give Entergy more accurate information than using mathematical "interpolations". If this were true, why would Entergy be so adamantly avoiding pulling the coupons? If the concern of Entergy were to assure the vessels embrittlement state is safe, why would they not do both? We do not believe that Entergy wants to find out the level of embrittlement of this critical vessel. We are hoping the NRC will mandate the physical testing of these coupons as the Atomic Safety Board mandated in June of this year. Please help us feel safe by making them .read the data from the pulled coupons. You know they have not read that data since 2003. Entergy' s' Palisades Nuclear Power Plant is on the shores of Lake Michigan, one of the largest body of freshwater in North America. It is the source of drinking water for millions of Americans. Safety margins that have been built into the regulation of nuclear power plants should not be weakened, especially in the case of pressure vessels at aging facilities. Palisades has exceeded its original design life of forty years. Scrutiny of the Palisades pressure vessel should be strengthened, not diminished, as Entergy proposes. We rely on you to help protect us from potential harm. When it comes to safety, the precautionary principal should apply. Continuing to use a potentially embrittled pressure vessel that raises threats of harm to human health and/or the environment should not be allowed. They should be made to test the coupons, which were put there specifically to gather embrittlement data. Thank you for protecting us* and using the precautionary principal to make sure we will all be safe and our environment will as well. Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )  ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.  )  Docket No. 50-255-LA-2 (Entergy)  )     
The name of the plant comes from our community, Palisades Park. We have been in existence since 1905 and currently consist of about two hundred homes. As a member of the regulating body, we are asking you to look into a very timely and critical situation concerning embrittlement testing of the Palisades Nuclear 1 Power Plants reactor pressure vessel. Palisades' pressure vessel is acknowledged as the most em brittled in the United States and one of the oldest in the world. Anthony Vitale, Site Vice President at Entergy Palisades Nuclear Plant, and seven other employees of Entergy came to our members meeting in early August of this year and made a direct statement that pulling the coupons would not give Entergy more accurate information than using mathematical "interpolations".
   )          (Palisades Nuclear Plant) )  )    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE TO AUGUST 4, 2015 BRIAN HUFFINE LETTER have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.
If this were true, why would Entergy be so adamantly avoiding pulling the coupons?
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop: O-7H4 Washington, DC  20555-0001 ocaamail@nrc.gov   U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC  20555-0001 Hearing Docket hearingdocket@nrc.gov   U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3F23 Washington, DC  20555-0001  
If the concern of Entergy were to assure the vessels embrittlement state is safe, why would they not do both? We do not believe that Entergy wants to find out the level of embrittlement of this critical vessel. We are hoping the NRC will mandate the physical testing of these coupons as the Atomic Safety Board mandated in June of this year. Please help us feel safe by making them .read the data from the pulled coupons.
You know they have not read that data since 2003. Entergy' s' Palisades Nuclear Power Plant is on the shores of Lake Michigan, one of the largest body of freshwater in North America.
It is the source of drinking water for millions of Americans.
Safety margins that have been built into the regulation of nuclear power plants should not be weakened, especially in the case of pressure vessels at aging facilities.
Palisades has exceeded its original design life of forty years. Scrutiny of the Palisades pressure vessel should be strengthened, not diminished, as Entergy proposes.
We rely on you to help protect us from potential harm. When it comes to safety, the precautionary principal should apply. Continuing to use a potentially embrittled pressure vessel that raises threats of harm to human health and/or the environment should not be allowed.
They should be made to test the coupons, which were put there specifically to gather embrittlement data. Thank you for protecting us* and using the precautionary principal to make sure we will all be safe and our environment will as well. Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )  ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.  )  Docket No. 50-255-LA-2 (Entergy)  )     
   )          (Palisades Nuclear Plant) )  )    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE TO AUGUST 4, 2015 BRIAN HUFFINE LETTER have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.  
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop: O-7H4 Washington, DC  20555-0001  
 
ocaamail@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC  20555-0001  
 
Hearing Docket  
 
hearingdocket@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3F23 Washington, DC  20555-0001
 
Ronald M. Spritzer, Chair Administrative Judge ronald.spritzer@nrc.gov
 
Gary S. Arnold,
 
Administrative Judge
 
gary.arnold@nrc.gov
 
Thomas J. Hirons
 
Administrative Judge
 
thomas.hirons@nrc.gov Sachin Desai, Law Clerk sachin.desai@nrc.gov
 
Nicole Pepperl, Law Clerk nicole.pepperl@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O-15D21 Washington, DC  20555-0001  


Ronald M. Spritzer, Chair Administrative Judge ronald.spritzer@nrc.gov Gary S. Arnold, Administrative Judge gary.arnold@nrc.gov Thomas J. Hirons Administrative Judge thomas.hirons@nrc.gov  Sachin Desai, Law Clerk sachin.desai@nrc.gov Nicole Pepperl, Law Clerk nicole.pepperl@nrc.gov  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O-15D21 Washington, DC  20555-0001 Anita Ghosh, Esq.
Anita Ghosh, Esq.
Joseph Lindell, Esq. David Roth, Esq. Daniel Straus, Esq.
Joseph Lindell, Esq. David Roth, Esq. Daniel Straus, Esq.
John Tibbetts, Paralegal Edward Williamson, Esq.
John Tibbetts, Paralegal Edward Williamson, Esq.
anita.ghosh@nrc.gov joseph.lindell@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov daniel.straus@nrc.gov john.tibbetts@nrc.gov edward.williamson@nrc.gov Docket No. 50-255-LA-2 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE TO AUGUST 4, 2015 BRIAN HUFFINE LETTER   2 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC  20004 Raphael P. Kuyler, Esq. Paul Bessette, Esq.
anita.ghosh@nrc.gov joseph.lindell@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov daniel.straus@nrc.gov john.tibbetts@nrc.gov edward.williamson@nrc.gov
 
Docket No. 50-255-LA-2 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSI ON RESPONSE TO AUGUST 4, 2015 BRIAN HUFFINE LETTER 2
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP  
 
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC  20004 Raphael P. Kuyler, Esq. Paul Bessette, Esq.
Ryan Lighty, Esq.
Ryan Lighty, Esq.
Martin O'Neill, Esq.
Martin O'Neill, Esq.
rkuyler@morganlewis.com pbessette@morganlewis.com rlighty@morganlewis.com martin.oneill@morganlewis.com Beyond Nuclear, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future - Shoreline Chapter, Nuclear Energy Information Service "The Petitioners" 316 N. Michigan St., Street, 520 Toledo, OH  43604-5627 Terry Lodge, Counsel for the Petitioners tjlodge50@yahoo.com Entergy William B. Glew, Jr., Esq.
rkuyler@morganlewis.com pbessette@morganlewis.com rlighty@morganlewis.com martin.oneill@morganlewis.com
Jeanne Cho, Esq. 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 wglew@entergy.com jcho1@entergy.com        
 
Beyond Nuclear, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future - Shoreline Chapter, Nuclear Energy Information Service "The Petitioners" 316 N. Michigan St., Street, 520 Toledo, OH  43604-5627 Terry Lodge, Counsel for the Petitioners  
 
tjlodge50@yahoo.com
 
Entergy William B. Glew, Jr., Esq.  
 
Jeanne Cho, Esq. 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601  
 
wglew@entergy.com jcho1@entergy.com
 
[Original signed by Brian Newell      ]                                            Office of the Secretary of the Commission  
[Original signed by Brian Newell      ]                                            Office of the Secretary of the Commission  


Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 23rd day of September, 2015}}
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 23rd day of September, 2015}}

Revision as of 20:00, 30 June 2018

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Response to Brian Huffine Letter
ML15266A293
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/21/2015
From: Vietti-Cook A L
NRC/SECY
To: Huffine B
Palisades Park Country Club
SECY RAS
References
50-255-LA-2, ASLBP 15-939-04-LA-BD01, RAS 28311
Download: ML15266A293 (8)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON

, D.C. 20555-0001 SECRETARY Mr. Brian Huffine, President Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, Ml 49043

Dear Mr. Huffine:

September 21, 2015 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter dated August 4, 2015, and your email dated September 10, 2015. In your correspondence

, you expressed concern about the reactor pressure vessel at Entergy's Palisades Nuclear Plant. Specifically

, you requested that the NRC require the licensee, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., to conduct direct testing of physical samples from the Palisades reactor. Along those lines, you further recommended that the Commission uphold the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's recent decision to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding materials issues associated with Palisades

' reactor pressure vessel. As your letter and email indicate, a hearing request on this subject is currently pending before the NRC. In March 2015, Beyond Nuclear, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future -Shoreline Chapter, and the Nuclear Energy Information Service (collectively

, "the petitioners

") sought a hearing on Entergy's license amendment request concerning whether the Palisades

' reactor vessel plate and weld materials provide adequate margins of safety against fracture. The Licensing Board granted the petitioners

' request for a hearing on June 18, 2015. Entergy has appealed the Board's decision to the Commission

that appeal is pending. Given the pendency of the matter before both the Commission and the Licensing Board, the Commission cannot at this time discuss or comment on any issues involved in this matter. Under NRC regulations

, the Commission has an adjudicatory role in this case, and all members of the Commission must remain impartial while the case is pending.

A copy of your letter, your email, and this response will be served on all the participants in this and a related Palisades proceeding

. Sincerely

,

Annette L. Vietti-Cook August 4, 2015 PALISADES PARK COUNTRY CLUB, INC. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, MI 49043 Brian Huffine, President huffineb@comcast.net Mr. Stephen G. Burns, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, Cove1i, MI Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel decisions Docket No. 50-255-LA-2; ASLBP No. 15-939-04-LA-BDO 1 June 18,2015, and July 9, 2015 Dear Chairman Burns: We are the nearest homeowners to the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant in Covert, Michigan.

The plant's southern border is the northern border of our homeowner community of 205 homes. The name of the plant comes from the name of our community, Palisades Park Country Club (the "Park" as we call it), which has been in existence since 1905 (the name is deceiving

-there is no golf course and our homes are modest).

Some of our homeowners live in the Park year round and others vacation here with extended families that go back six and seven generations.

We are asking the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to require the direct embrittlement testing of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant's reactor vessel necessary to ensure that the homes we have come back to for generations will be habitable for the long-term future. When the power plant was originally

proposed, our suppo1i was sought and a promise was made that the plant would always be a "good neighbor" to us. As Anthony Vitale, Vice President of Entergy, admitted to us at a meeting of our members on August 1, 2015, they have not been good neighbors.

Communication has been far from freely provided.

In fact, leaks of water containing radioactive material has been released into Lake Michigan, the source of the drinking water that supplies our well system, not to mention the drinking water of millions of others. At our annual members meeting, the membership voted unanimously that the board send a letter to you expressing our strong support for requiring that physical samples from the Palisades reactor be tested and that Entergy NOT be granted any relief or exception to such direct physical testing for embrittlement.

In 2007, the NRC granted Entergy, the current corporate owner of Palisades, a twenty year extension of its operating permit despite deep concerns of residents and environmental groups about the safety of its badly embrittled reactor pressure vessel. Entergy has now applied for regulat01y relief from nuclear safetystandards regulating the reactor pressure vessel at Palisades.

The conservative safety protocols adopted in August 4, 2015 Mr. Stephen G. Burns Page 2 1985 under 1 OCFR50.61 should be maintained especially in regard to the Palisades nuclear plant. Palisades' reactor pressure vessel is acknowledged as the most embrittled in the U.S. and one of the oldest in the entire world. Entergy's unprecedented alternative proposal would allow Palisades to avoid testing actual samples of the facility's most critical safety component, the reactor pressure vessel. Instead, Entergy would submit mathematical "interpolations" from other nuclear plants, while omitting any direct analysis of physical data taken from the Palisades reactor pressure vessel itself. We feel any alternative to physical testing of the pressure vessel at Palisades, built in 1972, does not pertain to Palisades and should not be allowed.

Such indirect interpolation will endanger our safety and the safety of anyone living around Lake Michigan.

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel on June 18, 2015, found that testimony by intervening enviromnental petitioners demonstrated sufficient doubt as to the integrity of Palisades' pressure vessel. The Atomic Safety Board mandated a full evidentiary hearing regarding the safety of the em brittled pressure vessel at Palisades.

We strongly concur with this decision and urge the NRC to uphold its ASLBP Memorandum and Order of June 18, 2015. Margins of safety which have been built into the construction of and the regulation of nuclear power plants for many decades should not be weakened, especially in the case of critical pressure vessels at aging nuclear facilities like Palisades' pressurized water reactor.

Palisades has alreadyexceeded its original expected life of operation, foiiy years. Scrutiny of the Palisades reactor pressure vessel should be strengthened, not weakened, as Entergy proposes.

We support the recent ASLBP decision calling for evidentiary hearings into the embrittlement of the pressure vessel and we ask for direct testing of actual samples from the Palisades reactor pressure vessel to assure public safety.

Brian Huffine /r President Board of Directors Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. cc: Ronald M. Spritzer, Administrative Judge Ronald.spritzer@mc.gov PPCC Board and Members Senator Gary Peters Senator Debbie Stabenow Congressman Fred Upton Mark Muhich, Sierra Club 1CHAIRMAN Resource From:Carolyn Ferry <carolynferry@sbcglobal.net>

Sent:Tuesday, August 04, 2015 2:42 PM To:CHAIRMAN Resource Cc:Spritzer, Ronald; huffineb@comcast.net

Subject:

[External_Sender] Palisades Nu clear Power Plant, Covert, MI Attachments:

Palisades Park Country Club letter.pdfSee attached letter from Brian Huffine, re hearing scheduled for August 7, 2015. Re Docket No. 50-255-LA-2, ASLBP No. 15-939-04-LA-BDO1.

CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Jody Flynn <jodygflynn@gmail.com>

Thursday, September 10, 2015 8:34 AM CHAIRMAN Resource

Subject:

[External_Sender]

Entergy Palisades Nuclear Power Plant Coupons Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged From: Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 79336 Ravine Way Covert, Michigan 49043 To: Mr Stephen G. Bums, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D>C> 20555-0001

Subject:

Entergy Nuclear Power Plant-Covert, Michigan Pressurized Reactor Vessel -Embrittlement We are writing you again in hopes you will make Entergy pull the coupons and read the state of embrittlement of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. We are concerned homeowners that border that plant in Covert, Michigan.

The name of the plant comes from our community, Palisades Park. We have been in existence since 1905 and currently consist of about two hundred homes. As a member of the regulating body, we are asking you to look into a very timely and critical situation concerning embrittlement testing of the Palisades Nuclear 1 Power Plants reactor pressure vessel. Palisades' pressure vessel is acknowledged as the most em brittled in the United States and one of the oldest in the world. Anthony Vitale, Site Vice President at Entergy Palisades Nuclear Plant, and seven other employees of Entergy came to our members meeting in early August of this year and made a direct statement that pulling the coupons would not give Entergy more accurate information than using mathematical "interpolations".

If this were true, why would Entergy be so adamantly avoiding pulling the coupons?

If the concern of Entergy were to assure the vessels embrittlement state is safe, why would they not do both? We do not believe that Entergy wants to find out the level of embrittlement of this critical vessel. We are hoping the NRC will mandate the physical testing of these coupons as the Atomic Safety Board mandated in June of this year. Please help us feel safe by making them .read the data from the pulled coupons.

You know they have not read that data since 2003. Entergy' s' Palisades Nuclear Power Plant is on the shores of Lake Michigan, one of the largest body of freshwater in North America.

It is the source of drinking water for millions of Americans.

Safety margins that have been built into the regulation of nuclear power plants should not be weakened, especially in the case of pressure vessels at aging facilities.

Palisades has exceeded its original design life of forty years. Scrutiny of the Palisades pressure vessel should be strengthened, not diminished, as Entergy proposes.

We rely on you to help protect us from potential harm. When it comes to safety, the precautionary principal should apply. Continuing to use a potentially embrittled pressure vessel that raises threats of harm to human health and/or the environment should not be allowed.

They should be made to test the coupons, which were put there specifically to gather embrittlement data. Thank you for protecting us* and using the precautionary principal to make sure we will all be safe and our environment will as well. Palisades Park Country Club, Inc. 2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-255-LA-2 (Entergy) )

) (Palisades Nuclear Plant) ) ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE TO AUGUST 4, 2015 BRIAN HUFFINE LETTER have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop: O-7H4 Washington, DC 20555-0001

ocaamail@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Hearing Docket

hearingdocket@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Ronald M. Spritzer, Chair Administrative Judge ronald.spritzer@nrc.gov

Gary S. Arnold,

Administrative Judge

gary.arnold@nrc.gov

Thomas J. Hirons

Administrative Judge

thomas.hirons@nrc.gov Sachin Desai, Law Clerk sachin.desai@nrc.gov

Nicole Pepperl, Law Clerk nicole.pepperl@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O-15D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Anita Ghosh, Esq.

Joseph Lindell, Esq. David Roth, Esq. Daniel Straus, Esq.

John Tibbetts, Paralegal Edward Williamson, Esq.

anita.ghosh@nrc.gov joseph.lindell@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov daniel.straus@nrc.gov john.tibbetts@nrc.gov edward.williamson@nrc.gov

Docket No. 50-255-LA-2 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSI ON RESPONSE TO AUGUST 4, 2015 BRIAN HUFFINE LETTER 2

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Raphael P. Kuyler, Esq. Paul Bessette, Esq.

Ryan Lighty, Esq.

Martin O'Neill, Esq.

rkuyler@morganlewis.com pbessette@morganlewis.com rlighty@morganlewis.com martin.oneill@morganlewis.com

Beyond Nuclear, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future - Shoreline Chapter, Nuclear Energy Information Service "The Petitioners" 316 N. Michigan St., Street, 520 Toledo, OH 43604-5627 Terry Lodge, Counsel for the Petitioners

tjlodge50@yahoo.com

Entergy William B. Glew, Jr., Esq.

Jeanne Cho, Esq. 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

wglew@entergy.com jcho1@entergy.com

[Original signed by Brian Newell ] Office of the Secretary of the Commission

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 23rd day of September, 2015

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15266A293&oldid=773807"