ML16221A580: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm | {{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Williams, Shawn Sent:Monday, August 08, 2016 2:11 PM To:THOMPSON, BRUCE L Cc:GARZA, JOHN M (JGARZA@scana.com) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for the License Amendment Request Regarding the Cyber | Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for the License Amendment Request Regarding the Cyber Se curity Plan Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8074) | ||
==Dear Mr. Thompson,== | ==Dear Mr. Thompson,== | ||
By letter dated June 30, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and | By letter dated June 30, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Manageme nt System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16188A105), as supplemented on August 4, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16221A034) the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Virgil C. Summer, Unit 1. SCE&G proposes to change the implementation date for Milestone No. 8 of the Cyber Security Plan. | ||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1009. Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA | The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. | ||
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. | |||
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1009. | |||
Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 | |||
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Docket No. 50-395 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2983 Mail Envelope Properties (b02fdfa92dc8453786e34dfc7885aaec) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for the License Amendment Request Regarding the Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8074) Sent Date: 8/8/2016 2:11:07 PM Received Date: 8/8/2016 2:11:09 PM | Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for the License Amendment Request Regarding the Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8074) Sent Date: 8/8/2016 2:11:07 PM Received Date: 8/8/2016 2:11:09 PM From: Williams, Shawn Created By: Shawn.Williams@nrc.gov Recipients: "GARZA, JOHN M (JGARZA@scana.com)" <JGARZA@scana.com> Tracking Status: None "THOMPSON, BRUCE L" <BTHOMPSON@scana.com> Tracking Status: None | ||
Post Office: HQPWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2625 8/8/2016 2:11:09 PM | |||
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:}} | |||
Revision as of 04:07, 30 June 2018
| ML16221A580 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 08/08/2016 |
| From: | Shawn Williams Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Thompson B L South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| References | |
| MF8074 | |
| Download: ML16221A580 (2) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Williams, Shawn Sent:Monday, August 08, 2016 2:11 PM To:THOMPSON, BRUCE L Cc:GARZA, JOHN M (JGARZA@scana.com)
Subject:
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for the License Amendment Request Regarding the Cyber Se curity Plan Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8074)
Dear Mr. Thompson,
By letter dated June 30, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Manageme nt System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16188A105), as supplemented on August 4, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16221A034) the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Virgil C. Summer, Unit 1. SCE&G proposes to change the implementation date for Milestone No. 8 of the Cyber Security Plan.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required.
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1009.
Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Docket No. 50-395
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2983 Mail Envelope Properties (b02fdfa92dc8453786e34dfc7885aaec)
Subject:
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for the License Amendment Request Regarding the Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8074) Sent Date: 8/8/2016 2:11:07 PM Received Date: 8/8/2016 2:11:09 PM From: Williams, Shawn Created By: Shawn.Williams@nrc.gov Recipients: "GARZA, JOHN M (JGARZA@scana.com)" <JGARZA@scana.com> Tracking Status: None "THOMPSON, BRUCE L" <BTHOMPSON@scana.com> Tracking Status: None
Post Office: HQPWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2625 8/8/2016 2:11:09 PM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: