ML19319C906: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
          .
                              *
                      '
                    *
: l.                  ,
: l.                  ,
                          , ,
     $O jv Report on C?.DCS 3reaker Cabinet Seis=ic Qualification          '
     $O jv
* Report on C?.DCS 3reaker Cabinet Seis=ic Qualification          '
Thir report, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.53(e) on 'Significant Deficiencies, is to
Thir report, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.53(e) on 'Significant Deficiencies, is to
   -lSUO )
   -lSUO )
document the investigation of the significant deficiency 'in the seis=ic qual-ification on the Control Rod Drive Control Syste= Trip Breaker Cabinets.
document the investigation of the significant deficiency 'in the seis=ic qual-ification on the Control Rod Drive Control Syste= Trip Breaker Cabinets.
t f            Identification of Proble=s A reevaluation of the seis=ic qualification of the control rod drive control i              system AC breaker cabinets has found that the attach =ent of the cabinet to the i,            floor is inadequate to withstand the SSE acceleration levels.
t f            Identification of Proble=s A reevaluation of the seis=ic qualification of the control rod drive control i              system AC breaker cabinets has found that the attach =ent of the cabinet to the i,            floor is inadequate to withstand the SSE acceleration levels.
:
1 Analysis
1 Analysis
* l            The . Control Rod Drives are trippad by Loss of Power to the Drive Stators.      Pcwer
* l            The . Control Rod Drives are trippad by Loss of Power to the Drive Stators.      Pcwer
Line 36: Line 29:
     '                                                                                                    f.
     '                                                                                                    f.
breaker function be disabled in some =anner, the Control Rods would have to be driven into the core to shut the reactor down.
breaker function be disabled in some =anner, the Control Rods would have to be driven into the core to shut the reactor down.
    .
t O
                  -
j              In the event of an SSE, the AC Breaker Cabinets could, as per the analysis, i            break loose fco= the floor =ounting. With the cabinets unattached, the rando:
t
,
O j              In the event of an SSE, the AC Breaker Cabinets could, as per the analysis, i            break loose fco= the floor =ounting. With the cabinets unattached, the rando:
:
i            motion of dancing, bouncing, and even falling over could cause accelerations of the breakers that have not been analyzed or damage to the breakers, wiring, or I
i            motion of dancing, bouncing, and even falling over could cause accelerations of the breakers that have not been analyzed or damage to the breakers, wiring, or I
     ,              connections which could conpro=ise the ability of the breakers to trip the
     ,              connections which could conpro=ise the ability of the breakers to trip the f              control rods. Analyses cannot show that the failure will always be fail safe.
      .
f              control rods. Analyses cannot show that the failure will always be fail safe.
i l              Therefore, the deficiency in the design of the structural attach =ent of the AC l
i l              Therefore, the deficiency in the design of the structural attach =ent of the AC l
    ,
Breakers Cabinets to the floor could adversely affect safety. This i. roble: is t
Breakers Cabinets to the floor could adversely affect safety. This i. roble: is t
thus considered to be a Significant Deficiency as par 10 CFR 50.55 (e) .
thus considered to be a Significant Deficiency as par 10 CFR 50.55 (e) .
* i
i Corrective Acticn l
    .
l      -      'Ihe attach =ent of the AC Breaker Cabinet to the. floor has been redesigned. De-I              Pending upen the arrange =ent at the particular site, either additional bolts l    [            will be included or a fillet veld will be added to increase the attachnent strength, l'  )al'
Corrective Acticn
.
l l      -      'Ihe attach =ent of the AC Breaker Cabinet to the. floor has been redesigned. De-I              Pending upen the arrange =ent at the particular site, either additional bolts l    [            will be included or a fillet veld will be added to increase the attachnent strength, l'  )al'
               ]    Each plant is being evaluated on an individual basis.
               ]    Each plant is being evaluated on an individual basis.
j                                                                      8008040fST u=                .-        - . = .
j                                                                      8008040fST u=                .-        - . = .
                                             . = =          .. _. , .a _,
                                             . = =          .. _. , .a _,
                                                                        .
_ _ _ _ . = . _}}
_ _ _ _ . = . _}}

Revision as of 05:08, 1 February 2020

Deficiency Rept Re Attachment of Control Rod Drive Control Sys Ac Breaker Cabinets Inadequate to Withstand SSE Acceleration Levels.Caused by Design Error.Attachment of Cabinet to Floor Redesigned
ML19319C906
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River 
Issue date: 10/03/1974
From:
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19319C884 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003040856
Download: ML19319C906 (1)


Text

.

l. ,

$O jv Report on C?.DCS 3reaker Cabinet Seis=ic Qualification '

Thir report, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.53(e) on 'Significant Deficiencies, is to

-lSUO )

document the investigation of the significant deficiency 'in the seis=ic qual-ification on the Control Rod Drive Control Syste= Trip Breaker Cabinets.

t f Identification of Proble=s A reevaluation of the seis=ic qualification of the control rod drive control i system AC breaker cabinets has found that the attach =ent of the cabinet to the i, floor is inadequate to withstand the SSE acceleration levels.

1 Analysis

! is interrupted by disengaging either the AC or DC CRD breakers. Should the I f

' f.

breaker function be disabled in some =anner, the Control Rods would have to be driven into the core to shut the reactor down.

t O

j In the event of an SSE, the AC Breaker Cabinets could, as per the analysis, i break loose fco= the floor =ounting. With the cabinets unattached, the rando:

i motion of dancing, bouncing, and even falling over could cause accelerations of the breakers that have not been analyzed or damage to the breakers, wiring, or I

, connections which could conpro=ise the ability of the breakers to trip the f control rods. Analyses cannot show that the failure will always be fail safe.

i l Therefore, the deficiency in the design of the structural attach =ent of the AC l

Breakers Cabinets to the floor could adversely affect safety. This i. roble: is t

thus considered to be a Significant Deficiency as par 10 CFR 50.55 (e) .

i Corrective Acticn l

l - 'Ihe attach =ent of the AC Breaker Cabinet to the. floor has been redesigned. De-I Pending upen the arrange =ent at the particular site, either additional bolts l [ will be included or a fillet veld will be added to increase the attachnent strength, l' )al'

] Each plant is being evaluated on an individual basis.

j 8008040fST u= .- - . = .

. = = .. _. , .a _,

_ _ _ _ . = . _