ML18169A011: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of this licensing request will take approximately 90 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by September 20, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::90 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by September 20, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1387. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1387. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:19, 7 March 2020
| ML18169A011 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 06/15/2018 |
| From: | Tanya Hood Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Bryan Hanson Exelon Corp |
| References | |
| L-2018-LLA-0146 | |
| Download: ML18169A011 (3) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Hood, Tanya Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 2:32 PM To: bryan.hanson@exeloncorp.com Cc: Williams, Christian D:(GenCo-Nuc); Barstow, James:(GenCo-Nuc); Danna, James
Subject:
Acceptance Review: Fitzpatrick License Amendment Request for SLMCPR Change
SUBJECT:
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCEPTANCE OF LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR CHANGES TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATION (EPID L-2018-LLA-0146)
By letter dated May 17, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18137A418), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a license amendment request for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (Fitzpatrick). The proposed amendment would revise Technical Specifications (TSs) TS 2.1.1, Reactor Core SLs [safety limits] to change Cycle 24 Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio (SLMCPR) numeric values resulting from SLMCPR analyses performed.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
1
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of this licensing request will take approximately 90 hours3.75 days <br />0.536 weeks <br />0.123 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by September 20, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1387.
Tanya E. Hood Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 301-415-1387 Tanya.Hood@nrc.gov 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 425 Mail Envelope Properties (BLUPR09MB08354FA35C10BC10E5AA972A947C0)
Subject:
Acceptance Review: Fitzpatrick License Amendment Request for SLMCPR Change Sent Date: 6/15/2018 2:31:33 PM Received Date: 6/15/2018 2:31:00 PM From: Hood, Tanya Created By: Tanya.Hood@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Williams, Christian D:(GenCo-Nuc)" <Christian.Williams@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Barstow, James:(GenCo-Nuc)" <James.Barstow@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Danna, James" <James.Danna@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "bryan.hanson@exeloncorp.com" <bryan.hanson@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BLUPR09MB0835.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3906 6/15/2018 2:31:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: