05000255/FIN-2013005-04: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71124.02 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71124.02 | ||
| Inspector = A Scarbeary, E Duncan, E Sanchez, | | Inspector = A Scarbeary, E Duncan, E Sanchez Santiago, J Cassidy, J Laughlin, M Holmberg, M Phalen, N Feliz Adomo, T Taylora, Garmoea Scarbeary, E Duncan, E Sanchez Santiago, G Hansen, J Cassidy, J Lennartz, M Jones, M Phalen, T Bilik, T Taylor | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = During the August 2012 forced outage, numerous work tasks were performed, including repairs of the CRD-24 housing. The initial dose estimate for this work as reflected on the Radiation Work Permit (RWP) was 2.950 Rem. The actual dose expended was 26.563 Rem. The data provided by the licensee at the time of the onsite inspection was not sufficient for the inspectors to complete their regulatory review of the collective dose received during this work activity. The licensee provided additional data to the NRC on January 7, 2014, that will be used to determine whether the dose received was within the licensees ability to control. This issue is an URI pending completion of the inspectors evaluation of the additional information provided by the licensee. | | description = During the August 2012 forced outage, numerous work tasks were performed, including repairs of the CRD-24 housing. The initial dose estimate for this work as reflected on the Radiation Work Permit (RWP) was 2.950 Rem. The actual dose expended was 26.563 Rem. The data provided by the licensee at the time of the onsite inspection was not sufficient for the inspectors to complete their regulatory review of the collective dose received during this work activity. The licensee provided additional data to the NRC on January 7, 2014, that will be used to determine whether the dose received was within the licensees ability to control. This issue is an URI pending completion of the inspectors evaluation of the additional information provided by the licensee. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:49, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Palisades  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000255/2013005 Section 2RS2 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2013 (2013Q4) |
| Type: | URI: |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71124.02 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | A Scarbeary E Duncan E Sanchez Santiago J Cassidy J Laughlin M Holmberg M Phalen N Feliz Adomo T Taylora Garmoea Scarbeary E Duncan E Sanchez Santiago G Hansen J Cassidy J Lennartz M Jones M Phalen T Bilik T Taylor |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |