ML17228A875: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PRIDRIT'Y Z (."JUDOCS OFFSITE FACILITY)REGULAR Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDE)A<'.CESSION NBR:9410170006 DOC.DATE: 94/10/03 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:PRIDRIT'Y
NO FACIL:50-335 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.50-389 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power&I ight Co.AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BOHLKE,W.H.
(."JUDOCS OFFSITE FACILITY)
Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Docketing&Services Branch~DOCKET 05000335 05000389 P  
Z REGULAR         Y INFORMATION     DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDE)
A<'.CESSION   NBR:9410170006                 DOC.DATE: 94/10/03       NOTARIZED: NO      ~
DOCKET FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power & Light Co.                           05000335 50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power & I ight Co.                       05000389 AUTH. NAME               AUTHOR AFFILIATION BOHLKE,W.H.               Florida       Power & Light Co.
RECIP.NAME               RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Docketing       & Services Branch                                   P


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Comment opposing proposed rule re pilot program for NRC recognition of good performance by nuclear power plants.DISTRIBUTION CODE: DS09D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: SECY/DSB Dist: Public Comment on Proposed Rulq PR)-Misc Notice;Reg G NOTES: 0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME INTERNAL: LE CENTER RES TR RES/PMPDAS COPIES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME OGC/DR 15-B-18 RES/DSIR COPIES LTTR ENCL EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 02 D 0 U N YOTE To ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENT S: PLEASE HELP US To REDUCE O'ASTE!COYTACTTHE DOCL'lEIEiT COYTROL DESI', ROO~I P!-S7<EXV.S04-O<N3 I TO EL@I!YATE VOuR~AWE FROiI*DISTRIBI I'IOY.LISTS FOR DOCUNIEYTS YOU Doi'T.PEED!
Comment           opposing proposed rule re pilot program for NRC recognition of           good performance by nuclear power plants.
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 6 ENCL  
DISTRIBUTION CODE: DS09D                   COPIES RECEIVED:LTR           ENCL   SIZE:
TITLE: SECY/DSB         Dist: Public         Comment on Proposed       Rulq PR)-Misc Notice;Reg G NOTES:
0 RECIPIENT                   COPIES              RECIPIENT        COPIES ID CODE/NAME                 LTTR ENCL         ID CODE/NAME     LTTR ENCL INTERNAL:        LE CENTER                                    OGC/DR   15-B-18 RES    TR                                      RES/DSIR RES/PMPDAS EXTERNAL: NRC PDR                   02 D
0 U
RECIPIENT N
YOTE To ALL"RIDS"                 S:
PLEASE HELP US To REDUCE O'ASTE! COYTACTTHE DOCL'lEIEiTCOYTROL
* DESI', ROO~I P! -S7 <EXV. S04-O<N3 I TO EL@I!YATE VOuR ~AWE FROiI DISTRIBI I'IOY. LISTS FOR DOCUNIEYTS YOU Doi'T.PEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR                         6   ENCL


~~.v Florida Power fk Light Company, P.O.Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 0 PAL RE'C t=)@co~re Ocr 12 g~~or4><orr-6 p3:o2 The Chief, Rules RevievPanB'33jrectLves.Branc~
~ ~ .v Florida Power fk Light Company, P.O. Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 0                                 USHRC RE'C t=)@co PAL                                                                                OCT      3  ~9N
U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commi'Ni8gg 0~"I~0~SE"I'ETAR" Attn: Docketing and Service Branch Washington, DC 20555 USHRC OCT 3~9N L-94-249~.>plZP~g~pZ q'53~~Cj]I gP Re: Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance By Nuclear Power Plants Re uest for Comments 59 FR45315 Se tember 1 1994 CO." ii)On September 1, 1994, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested public c+ipment-on the'ilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power gaiits.ches(.comments are submitted on behalf of Florida Power and Light Company (FP@,.a QMns'ed operator of two nuclear power plant units in Dade County, Florida and two units!in S@Lu i'ounty, Florida.The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)is offering comments on this program.FPL endorses NEI comments and recommendations.
                                    ~re Ocr 12 g~ ~or4><orr
The NRC is responsible for assuring public health and safety by the development of sound regulation and licensee compliance to these regulations.
                                                                    -6 p3:o2 L-94-249 The Chief, Rules RevievPanB'33jrectLves.Branc~
The NRC's good performance program is not based on compliance with the regulations and includes elements of subjective judgement by NRC management.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commi'Ni8gg 0~"I~ 0~ SE"I'ETAR" Attn: Docketing and Service Branch Washington, DC 20555
The impact that this program can have on the financial standing and public image of licensees is inappropriate.
                                                                                              ~.         >plZP~
FPL believes that this program should be discontinued.
q'53~~
Our industry faces the challenge of improving economic performance while sustaining and further enhancing high standards of safety and reliability.
g~pZ                                      I Cj]                     gP Re:     Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance By Nuclear Power Plants Re uest for Comments 59 FR45315 Se tember               1   1994                       CO
Economic influences from our public utility commissions, Wall Street, and deregulation provide incentives for excellent safety and performance standards.
                                                                                                                              ."       ii)
FPL appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments.Very truly yours, W.H.Bohlke Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Licensing WHB/msd 94i017000b 94i003 l I PDR'PR 59FR453i3 PDR an FPL Group company 0 v-ca l g II ,)I I I I I L i Qs}}
On September 1, 1994, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested public c+ipment-on Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power gaiits. ches(.
the'ilot comments are submitted on behalf of Florida Power and Light Company (FP@,.a QMns'ed operator of two nuclear power plant units in Dade County, Florida and two units!in S@Lu Florida.                                                                                                    i'ounty, The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is offering comments on this program. FPL endorses NEI comments and recommendations.
The NRC is responsible for assuring public health and safety by the development of sound regulation and licensee compliance to these regulations. The NRC's good performance program is not based on compliance with the regulations and includes elements of subjective judgement by NRC management. The impact that this program can have on the financial standing and public image of licensees is inappropriate.           FPL believes that this program should be discontinued.
Our industry faces the challenge of improving economic performance while sustaining and further enhancing high standards of safety and reliability. Economic influences from our public utility commissions, Wall Street, and deregulation provide incentives for excellent safety and performance standards.
FPL appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments.
Very truly yours, W. H. Bohlke Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Licensing WHB/msd 94i017000b 94i003           l I PDR 'PR 59FR453i3               PDR an FPL Group company
 
v- ca 0
l g II
          ,
            )I I I I
I L   i Qs}}

Revision as of 21:08, 29 October 2019

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power Plants
ML17228A875
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/03/1994
From: Bohlke W
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
FRN-59FR45315 59FR45315-00002, 59FR45315-2, L-94-249, NUDOCS 9410170006
Download: ML17228A875 (4)
v • d • e


Text

PRIDRIT'Y

(."JUDOCS OFFSITE FACILITY)

Z REGULAR Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDE)

A<'.CESSION NBR:9410170006 DOC.DATE: 94/10/03 NOTARIZED: NO ~

DOCKET FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000335 50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power & I ight Co. 05000389 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BOHLKE,W.H. Florida Power & Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Docketing & Services Branch P

SUBJECT:

Comment opposing proposed rule re pilot program for NRC recognition of good performance by nuclear power plants.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: DS09D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: SECY/DSB Dist: Public Comment on Proposed Rulq PR)-Misc Notice;Reg G NOTES:

0 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL INTERNAL: LE CENTER OGC/DR 15-B-18 RES TR RES/DSIR RES/PMPDAS EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 02 D

0 U

RECIPIENT N

YOTE To ALL"RIDS" S:

PLEASE HELP US To REDUCE O'ASTE! COYTACTTHE DOCL'lEIEiTCOYTROL

  • DESI', ROO~I P! -S7 <EXV. S04-O<N3 I TO EL@I!YATE VOuR ~AWE FROiI DISTRIBI I'IOY. LISTS FOR DOCUNIEYTS YOU Doi'T.PEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 6 ENCL

~ ~ .v Florida Power fk Light Company, P.O. Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 0 USHRC RE'C t=)@co PAL OCT 3 ~9N

~re Ocr 12 g~ ~or4><orr

-6 p3:o2 L-94-249 The Chief, Rules RevievPanB'33jrectLves.Branc~

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commi'Ni8gg 0~"I~ 0~ SE"I'ETAR" Attn: Docketing and Service Branch Washington, DC 20555

~. >plZP~

q'53~~

g~pZ I Cj] gP Re: Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance By Nuclear Power Plants Re uest for Comments 59 FR45315 Se tember 1 1994 CO

." ii)

On September 1, 1994, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested public c+ipment-on Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power gaiits. ches(.

the'ilot comments are submitted on behalf of Florida Power and Light Company (FP@,.a QMns'ed operator of two nuclear power plant units in Dade County, Florida and two units!in S@Lu Florida. i'ounty, The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is offering comments on this program. FPL endorses NEI comments and recommendations.

The NRC is responsible for assuring public health and safety by the development of sound regulation and licensee compliance to these regulations. The NRC's good performance program is not based on compliance with the regulations and includes elements of subjective judgement by NRC management. The impact that this program can have on the financial standing and public image of licensees is inappropriate. FPL believes that this program should be discontinued.

Our industry faces the challenge of improving economic performance while sustaining and further enhancing high standards of safety and reliability. Economic influences from our public utility commissions, Wall Street, and deregulation provide incentives for excellent safety and performance standards.

FPL appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments.

Very truly yours, W. H. Bohlke Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Licensing WHB/msd 94i017000b 94i003 l I PDR 'PR 59FR453i3 PDR an FPL Group company

v- ca 0

l g II

,

)I I I I

I L i Qs

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17228A875&oldid=2002403"