ML20092C055
| ML20092C055 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 01/30/1992 |
| From: | Bohlke W FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Meyer D NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| References | |
| FRN-56FR50598, RTR-NUREG-1022 56FR50598-00029, 56FR50598-29, L-92-25, NUDOCS 9202110241 | |
| Download: ML20092C055 (2) | |
Text
,.. _ _ _.
2 e
i?
P.O. Box 14000, Juno B:sch.FL 33408-0420 jg' fp L/
A h/"
FPL JAN 3 01992 P
g A
c, L-92-25 d
(
10 CFR S 50. 72 &h. {,[2 "j
Q yg Os David L. Meyer, Chief-FJM Regulatory Publications-Branch 5$
- Division of Freedom of Information vi and-Publication Services W
q Office-of Admindstration U.
S. Nuclear RegulatoryLCommission Washington, D.
C.
20555 Re:
EventTReporting Systems -- 10 CFR S 50.72 and.50.73:
Clarification of NRC Systems and Guidelines for Reporting (NUREG-1022,. Rev. 1) 56 Fed. Reg. 50598 (October 7, 1991)
Recuest for Comments
Dear Mr. Meyer:
On October 7, 1991, the U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published for public comment a Notice of Availability (56 Fed. Reg. 50598) of draf t NUREG-1022, Revision 1,
" Event Reporting Systems --
10~ CFR S - 50.72 and 5d.73:
Clarification of NRC Systems and
. Guidelines-for Reporting."
These comments are submitted on behalf of Florida Power-and Light Company (FPL), a licensed operator of-two nuclear power plant units in Dade County, Florida and two units in-St. Lucie County, Florida.
'The Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) is offering comment _m the subject proposed revision to NUREG-1022.
FPL endorses the'NUMARC comments and recommendations.
The Nuclear Utility.Backfitting and Reform Group (NUBARG) is iiso offering-~ comments on the-subject proposed revision to NUREG-1022.
FPL endorses the NUBARG comments and recommendations.
For the reasons discussed in both the NUMARC and NUBARG comment
- letters, FPL, as well, ' urges the Commission to delete those portions of the proposed guidance which ' are contrary to the existing language of the regulations, and to perform a backfitting -
analysis of the_ portions of the guidance that are premised on new
-or'different~ Staff positions.
9202110241 920130 PDR NUREG 1022 C PDR en FPL Group company
w n.
L-92-25 Page 2 of 2 FPL's general concern over the positions in the draf t NUREG is that they would result in a substantially increased reporting obligation with no evidence that these positions would produce any material increase-in plant safety.
FPL would prefer to cont.inue to utilize the existing guidance for reporting versus the draft revision to NUREG-1022.
FPL appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments.
Very truly yours,
/
f'k' lii
/
W.
H. Bohlke Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Licensing WHB/DMB i