ML17223B000
| ML17223B000 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 10/29/1990 |
| From: | Boldt G FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-55FR35648, RULE-PR-26 55FR35648-00024, 55FR35648-24, NUDOCS 9011200094 | |
| Download: ML17223B000 (3) | |
Text
REGULATO Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION YSTEM (RIDS) i ACCESSION NBR:9011200094 DOC.DATE: 90/10/29 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power 6 Light Co.
50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power 6 Light Co.
AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BOLDTPG.L.
Florida Power S Light Co.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION CHILKPS.J.
Office of the Secretary of the Commission
SUBJECT:
Comment opposing proposed rule 10CFR26 re fitness-for-duty programs. Believes proposed rule unnecessary a places undue restriction on util mgt prerogative.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
DSIOD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR j ENCL Q SIZE:
TITLE: SECY/DSB Dist: Public Comment on Proposed Rule (PR)-10CFR NOTES:
DOCKET 05000335 05000389 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME COPIES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME COPIES LTTR ENCL INTERNAL: ADM/FIPS/RPB 1
OGC D -
.3, G~II(E~~0 1
EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 02 1
NMSS/IMOB OGC/SAIP15-B-18 RES DIR TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 7
ENCL
I O+4e o'O'o o@Q o
Oooo Florida Power CORPORATION t.re;)-,
USglic
'I ggy
> Nl:3g ip.r i'i
~ I Stj e
r October 29, 1990 LFH90-0085 Hr.
Samuel J. Chilk Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Attn:
Docketing and Services Branch
Subject:
Proposed Revision (55 FR 35648) to the Fitness-for-Duty Rule
Dear Hr. Chilk:
The purpose of this letter is to provide Florida Power Corporation's (FPC) comments on the subject proposed rule revision.
The revision would add a
sentence to the end'of paragraph 26.24(d) of the Fitness-for-Duty rule stating, "no individual may be removed or temporarily suspended from unescorted access based solely on unconfirmed positive initial screening test results in the absence of other evidence that the individual is impaired or that the individual might otherwise pose a safety hazard."
It is FPC's opinion that the proposed rule revision is unnecessary and places an undue restriction on utility management prerogative.
Utility management should have discretion with regard to the range of actions that could be taken in the event of positive drug testing results.
Therefore,
- FPC, recommends that the proposed Fitness-for-Duty rule revision not be adopted.
Sincerely, G..
oldt Vice President Nuclear Production GLB/GHF xc:
Hr. Rich Enkeboll, NUHARC 9011200094 901029 PDR FR 26 55FR35648 PDR POST OFFICE BOX 219 ~ CRYSTAL RIVER, FLORIDA 326294219
~ (904) 7954488 A Florida Progress Company
0 4
r