ML12285A245: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML12285A245 | | number = ML12285A245 | ||
| issue date = 10/03/2012 | | issue date = 10/03/2012 | ||
| title = | | title = Lr - Draft Request for Additional Information Limerick Generating Station LRA | ||
| author name = | | author name = | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Draft RAI | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:LimerickNPEm Resource From: Milano, Patrick Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 3:30 PM To: Christopher.Wilson2@exeloncorp.com; john.hufnagel@exeloncorp.com Cc: LimerickHearingFile Resource; gfettus@nrdc.org; Smith, Maxwell; Homiack, Matthew; aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
DRAFT Request for Additional Information re: Limerick Generating Station LRA Attachments: | DRAFT Request for Additional Information re: Limerick Generating Station LRA Attachments: Limerick RAI B 1 4 Operating Experience OI.docx | ||
Limerick RAI B 1 4 Operating Experience OI.docx Chris, Attached is a DRAFT Request for Information related to the license renewal application for Limerick Generating Station. If Exelon would like clarification on the attached let me know and I will set up a teleconference. | : Chris, Attached is a DRAFT Request for Information related to the license renewal application for Limerick Generating Station. If Exelon would like clarification on the attached let me know and I will set up a teleconference. | ||
Patrick Milano Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB1 (301) 415-1457 | Patrick Milano Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB1 (301) 415-1457 1 | ||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: Limerick_LR_NonPublic Email Number: 1537 Mail Envelope Properties (9C2386A0C0BC584684916F7A0482B6CAA3BA25B8EF) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
DRAFT Request for Additional Information re: Limerick Generating Station LRA | DRAFT Request for Additional Information re: Limerick Generating Station LRA Sent Date: 10/3/2012 3:30:03 PM Received Date: 10/3/2012 3:30:05 PM From: Milano, Patrick Created By: Patrick.Milano@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Tracking Status: None | "LimerickHearingFile Resource" <LimerickHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None "gfettus@nrdc.org" <gfettus@nrdc.org> | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None "Smith, Maxwell" <Maxwell.Smith@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Homiack, Matthew" <Matthew.Homiack@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com" <aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Christopher.Wilson2@exeloncorp.com" <Christopher.Wilson2@exeloncorp.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None "john.hufnagel@exeloncorp.com" <john.hufnagel@exeloncorp.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 326 10/3/2012 3:30:05 PM Limerick RAI B 1 4 Operating Experience OI.docx 29122 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received: | |||
LIMERICK GENERATION STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section B.1.4, Operating Experience RAI B.1.4-4 | |||
LIMERICK GENERATION STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | |||
Section B.1.4, | |||
===Background=== | ===Background=== | ||
On July 10, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory | On July 10, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff issued request for additional information (RAI) B.1.4-3 requesting changes to the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) supplement to reflect the time frame for implementation of the operating experience program enhancements described in the applicants response to RAI B.1.4-2. In the background discussion of this RAI, the staff stated that it had reviewed the proposed time frame and its basis for the implementation of the programs, as described in the June 19, 2012, response to RAI B1.4-2 and determined it to be acceptable. However, subsequent to the issuance of RAI B.1.4-3, on July 31, 2012, the staff issued the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items Related to the License Renewal of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, which includes Open Item 3.0.5-1 regarding the applicants proposed implementation schedule. | ||
By letter dated September 12, 2012, the applicant responded to this open item. | By letter dated September 12, 2012, the applicant responded to this open item. | ||
Issue As proposed, the UFSAR supplement description of the operating experience review activities, as contained in license renewal application Section A.1.6, | Issue As proposed, the UFSAR supplement description of the operating experience review activities, as contained in license renewal application Section A.1.6, Operating Experience, allows for a two-year period after license renewal before operating experience related to aging is considered in maintaining the aging management programs. This consideration of operating experience begins at a later date rather than immediately upon receipt of a renewed operating license. As such, the applicants response does not provide reasonable assurance that the applicant will consider relevant plant-specific and industry operating experience and incorporate it into the aging management activities on an ongoing basis. | ||
Request Revise the UFSAR supplement to clearly address how plant-specific and industry operating experience will be considered on an ongoing basis prior to full implementation of operating experience program enhancements, or justify why no revisions to the UFSAR supplement are necessary.}} | Request Revise the UFSAR supplement to clearly address how plant-specific and industry operating experience will be considered on an ongoing basis prior to full implementation of operating experience program enhancements, or justify why no revisions to the UFSAR supplement are necessary.}} |
Latest revision as of 17:45, 5 December 2019
ML12285A245 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Limerick |
Issue date: | 10/03/2012 |
From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
To: | Division of License Renewal |
References | |
Download: ML12285A245 (3) | |
Text
LimerickNPEm Resource From: Milano, Patrick Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 3:30 PM To: Christopher.Wilson2@exeloncorp.com; john.hufnagel@exeloncorp.com Cc: LimerickHearingFile Resource; gfettus@nrdc.org; Smith, Maxwell; Homiack, Matthew; aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com
Subject:
DRAFT Request for Additional Information re: Limerick Generating Station LRA Attachments: Limerick RAI B 1 4 Operating Experience OI.docx
- Chris, Attached is a DRAFT Request for Information related to the license renewal application for Limerick Generating Station. If Exelon would like clarification on the attached let me know and I will set up a teleconference.
Patrick Milano Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB1 (301) 415-1457 1
Hearing Identifier: Limerick_LR_NonPublic Email Number: 1537 Mail Envelope Properties (9C2386A0C0BC584684916F7A0482B6CAA3BA25B8EF)
Subject:
DRAFT Request for Additional Information re: Limerick Generating Station LRA Sent Date: 10/3/2012 3:30:03 PM Received Date: 10/3/2012 3:30:05 PM From: Milano, Patrick Created By: Patrick.Milano@nrc.gov Recipients:
"LimerickHearingFile Resource" <LimerickHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "gfettus@nrdc.org" <gfettus@nrdc.org>
Tracking Status: None "Smith, Maxwell" <Maxwell.Smith@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Homiack, Matthew" <Matthew.Homiack@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com" <aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com>
Tracking Status: None "Christopher.Wilson2@exeloncorp.com" <Christopher.Wilson2@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "john.hufnagel@exeloncorp.com" <john.hufnagel@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 326 10/3/2012 3:30:05 PM Limerick RAI B 1 4 Operating Experience OI.docx 29122 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
LIMERICK GENERATION STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section B.1.4, Operating Experience RAI B.1.4-4
Background
On July 10, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff issued request for additional information (RAI) B.1.4-3 requesting changes to the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) supplement to reflect the time frame for implementation of the operating experience program enhancements described in the applicants response to RAI B.1.4-2. In the background discussion of this RAI, the staff stated that it had reviewed the proposed time frame and its basis for the implementation of the programs, as described in the June 19, 2012, response to RAI B1.4-2 and determined it to be acceptable. However, subsequent to the issuance of RAI B.1.4-3, on July 31, 2012, the staff issued the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items Related to the License Renewal of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, which includes Open Item 3.0.5-1 regarding the applicants proposed implementation schedule.
By letter dated September 12, 2012, the applicant responded to this open item.
Issue As proposed, the UFSAR supplement description of the operating experience review activities, as contained in license renewal application Section A.1.6, Operating Experience, allows for a two-year period after license renewal before operating experience related to aging is considered in maintaining the aging management programs. This consideration of operating experience begins at a later date rather than immediately upon receipt of a renewed operating license. As such, the applicants response does not provide reasonable assurance that the applicant will consider relevant plant-specific and industry operating experience and incorporate it into the aging management activities on an ongoing basis.
Request Revise the UFSAR supplement to clearly address how plant-specific and industry operating experience will be considered on an ongoing basis prior to full implementation of operating experience program enhancements, or justify why no revisions to the UFSAR supplement are necessary.