ML12331A086: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12331A086
| number = ML12331A086
| issue date = 11/26/2012
| issue date = 11/26/2012
| title = Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - E-mail Acceptance Review Fifth Interval IST Relief VR-02, ASME OM Code Test Frequencies (TAC No. MF0048)
| title = E-mail Acceptance Review Fifth Interval IST Relief VR-02, ASME OM Code Test Frequencies
| author name = Bamford P J
| author name = Bamford P
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| addressee name = Helker D, Loomis T
| addressee name = Helker D, Loomis T
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000289
| docket = 05000289
| license number = DPR-050
| license number = DPR-050
| contact person = Bamford P J, NRR/LPL1-2, 301-415-2833
| contact person = Bamford P, NRR/LPL1-2, 301-415-2833
| case reference number = TAC MF0048
| case reference number = TAC MF0048
| package number = ML12331A114
| package number = ML12331A114
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Bamford, Peter To: "thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com" Cc: "david.helker@exeloncorp.com"  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:           Bamford, Peter To:             "thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com" Cc:             "david.helker@exeloncorp.com"


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
TMI-1 Fifth Interval IST Relief Request VR-02, ASME OM Code Test Frequencies (TAC No. MF0048)
TMI-1 Fifth Interval IST Relief Request VR-02, ASME OM Code Test Frequencies (TAC No. MF0048)
Date:Monday, November 26, 2012 10:50:00 AMBy letter dated November 7, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and ManagementSystem Accession No. ML12313A344), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted three relief requests for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval (PR-01, PR-02, and VR-02).
Date:           Monday, November 26, 2012 10:50:00 AM By letter dated November 7, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML12313A344), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted three relief requests for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval (PR-01, PR-02, and VR-02). These relief requests apply to the Fifth Inservice Testing Interval at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1). This acceptance review applies only to request VR-02, Proposed Alternative Concerning ASME OM Code Test Frequencies In Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii). In general, and with some caveats, VR-02 requests that a 25% grace period be allowed for OM Code elapsed interval testing, similar to that allowed by the TMI-1 Technical Specification 1.25.
These relief requests apply to the Fifth InserviceTesting Interval at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1).
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of the subject relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
This acceptancereview applies only to request VR-02, "Proposed Alternative Concerning ASME OM Code Test Frequencies In Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii)."
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that the request does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to continue with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
In general, and with somecaveats, VR-02 requests that a 25% grace period be allowed for OM Code elapsed interval testing, similar to that allowed by the TMI-1 Technical Specification 1.25.
Peter Bamford NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Beaver Valley & TMI-1 Project Manager 301-415-2833}}
 
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of the subject relief request.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there issufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether theapplication has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that the request does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to continue with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptancereview as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review.
If additional informationis needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
Peter Bamford NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2Beaver Valley & TMI-1 Project Manager   301-415-2833}}

Latest revision as of 20:48, 11 November 2019

E-mail Acceptance Review Fifth Interval IST Relief VR-02, ASME OM Code Test Frequencies
ML12331A086
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Peter Bamford
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: David Helker, Tom Loomis
Exelon Generation Co
Bamford P, NRR/LPL1-2, 301-415-2833
Shared Package
ML12331A114 List:
References
TAC MF0048
Download: ML12331A086 (1)


Text

From: Bamford, Peter To: "thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com" Cc: "david.helker@exeloncorp.com"

Subject:

TMI-1 Fifth Interval IST Relief Request VR-02, ASME OM Code Test Frequencies (TAC No. MF0048)

Date: Monday, November 26, 2012 10:50:00 AM By letter dated November 7, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML12313A344), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted three relief requests for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval (PR-01, PR-02, and VR-02). These relief requests apply to the Fifth Inservice Testing Interval at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1). This acceptance review applies only to request VR-02, Proposed Alternative Concerning ASME OM Code Test Frequencies In Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii). In general, and with some caveats, VR-02 requests that a 25% grace period be allowed for OM Code elapsed interval testing, similar to that allowed by the TMI-1 Technical Specification 1.25.

The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of the subject relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that the request does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to continue with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Peter Bamford NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Beaver Valley & TMI-1 Project Manager 301-415-2833