ML12264A008: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Docket, Hearing From: Kristin Norderval | {{#Wiki_filter:Docket, Hearing From: Kristin Norderval [nordervalk@mac.com] | ||
[nordervalk@mac.com] | Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:11 PM To: NRCREP Resource | ||
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:11 PM To: NRCREP Resource | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Response from "Comment on NRC Documents" Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Kristin Norderval (nordervalk(mac.com) on Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 21:10:59........................................................................... | Response from "Comment on NRC Documents" Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Kristin Norderval (nordervalk(mac.com) on Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 21:10:59 | ||
DocumentTitle: | ........................................................................... | ||
Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Supplement 38 Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 --Draft Report for Comment NUREG-1437, Supplement 38, Volume 4, Draft Report Comments: | DocumentTitle: Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Supplement 38 Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 - - Draft Report for Comment NUREG-1437, Supplement 38, Volume 4, Draft Report Comments: | ||
Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission: | |||
I live in Northern Manhattan, New York City, about 25 miles from the Indian Point nuclear reactors, which are up for relicensing in 2013 and 2015. I am writing to urge that you deny them the new licenses and begin to remove the irradiated fuel rods.According to your own findings, one of the Indian Pt reactors, number 3, is the US reactor most likely to suffer core damage in the event of an earthquake, and the other reactor, number 2, was found by you on April 2, 2000, to be the most trouble-plagued reactor in the country.The 911 Commission found that Al Qaeda had the Indian Pt reactors in their documents as a potential target, when they decided, instead, to destroy the World Trade towers. NYC would have been a devastated sacrifice zone, as there is more irradiated fuel in the fuel pools there than in the fuel pools at Fukushima. | ==Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission:== | ||
There's no way that the more than 20 million people living in a 50 mile radius of Indian Pt. could be evacuated in the event of a terrorist attack or natural disaster. | |||
The US required that US citizens be evacuated within a 50 mile radius of the Fukushima reactors; surely you must know that it would be impossible in this dense urban-suburban area.Please do the right thing and deny the renewal licenses. | I live in Northern Manhattan, New York City, about 25 miles from the Indian Point nuclear reactors, which are up for relicensing in 2013 and 2015. I am writing to urge that you deny them the new licenses and begin to remove the irradiated fuel rods. | ||
We have numerous studies to show that there would be adequate replacement energy from efficiency, solar, wind, tidal. Thank you for your serious and conscientious attention to this request organization: | According to your own findings, one of the Indian Pt reactors, number 3, is the US reactor most likely to suffer core damage in the event of an earthquake, and the other reactor, number 2, was found by you on April 2, 2000, to be the most trouble-plagued reactor in the country. | ||
addressl: | The 911 Commission found that Al Qaeda had the Indian Pt reactors in their documents as a potential target, when they decided, instead, to destroy the World Trade towers. NYC would have been a devastated sacrifice zone, as there is more irradiated fuel in the fuel pools there than in the fuel pools at Fukushima. There's no way that the more than 20 million people living in a 50 mile radius of Indian Pt. could be evacuated in the event of a terrorist attack or natural disaster. The US required that US citizens be evacuated within a 50 mile radius of the Fukushima reactors; surely you must know that it would be impossible in this dense urban-suburban area. | ||
110 Seaman Avenue #4J address2: city: New York state: NY DOCKETED zip: 10034 USNRC country: USA September 14, 2012 (8:30 a.m.)phone: 212-304-4644 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF o3& -}} | Please do the right thing and deny the renewal licenses. We have numerous studies to show that there would be adequate replacement energy from efficiency, solar, wind, tidal. Thank you for your serious and conscientious attention to this request organization: | ||
addressl: 110 Seaman Avenue #4J address2: | |||
city: New York state: NY DOCKETED zip: 10034 USNRC country: USA September 14, 2012 (8:30 a.m.) | |||
phone: 212-304-4644 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF o3& -}} | |||
Latest revision as of 23:20, 11 November 2019
| ML12264A008 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/13/2012 |
| From: | Norderval K - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-247-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-286-LR, RAS E-1256 | |
| Download: ML12264A008 (1) | |
Text
Docket, Hearing From: Kristin Norderval [nordervalk@mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:11 PM To: NRCREP Resource
Subject:
Response from "Comment on NRC Documents" Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Kristin Norderval (nordervalk(mac.com) on Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 21:10:59
...........................................................................
DocumentTitle: Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Supplement 38 Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 - - Draft Report for Comment NUREG-1437, Supplement 38, Volume 4, Draft Report Comments:
Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
I live in Northern Manhattan, New York City, about 25 miles from the Indian Point nuclear reactors, which are up for relicensing in 2013 and 2015. I am writing to urge that you deny them the new licenses and begin to remove the irradiated fuel rods.
According to your own findings, one of the Indian Pt reactors, number 3, is the US reactor most likely to suffer core damage in the event of an earthquake, and the other reactor, number 2, was found by you on April 2, 2000, to be the most trouble-plagued reactor in the country.
The 911 Commission found that Al Qaeda had the Indian Pt reactors in their documents as a potential target, when they decided, instead, to destroy the World Trade towers. NYC would have been a devastated sacrifice zone, as there is more irradiated fuel in the fuel pools there than in the fuel pools at Fukushima. There's no way that the more than 20 million people living in a 50 mile radius of Indian Pt. could be evacuated in the event of a terrorist attack or natural disaster. The US required that US citizens be evacuated within a 50 mile radius of the Fukushima reactors; surely you must know that it would be impossible in this dense urban-suburban area.
Please do the right thing and deny the renewal licenses. We have numerous studies to show that there would be adequate replacement energy from efficiency, solar, wind, tidal. Thank you for your serious and conscientious attention to this request organization:
addressl: 110 Seaman Avenue #4J address2:
city: New York state: NY DOCKETED zip: 10034 USNRC country: USA September 14, 2012 (8:30 a.m.)
phone: 212-304-4644 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF o3& -