ML12276A210

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Limited Appearance Statement of Vincent J. Ammirato Supporting the Indian Point 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
ML12276A210
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/2012
From: Ammirato V
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS E-1332
Download: ML12276A210 (2)


Text

AM. E~T-/ -3:1 October 1, 2012 DOCKETED USNRC Office of the Secretary Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff October 1, 2012 (2:32 p.m.)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission OFFICE OF SECRETARY Washington, DC 20555-0001 RULEMAKINGS AND Fax to: (301) 415-1101 (verification (301) 415-1966) ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Email to : Hearing.docket@nrc.gov Re: Indian Point Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application NRC docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD10

Dear Sir or Madam:

I am writing to express my support for the relicensing of Indian Point 2 and 3 in Buchanan, NY. It is my understanding that the NRC is considering numerous issues in connection with the license renewal application, including the potential for alternative energy sources.

Indian Point is an important source of base-load energy, and it emits virtually not greenhouse gasses. It supplies between 25% and 30% of the electricity for New York City and the lower Westchester County area, at a reasonable cost, while supporting the reliability of the electric grid. The facility employs about 1,100 full-time workers and it contributes hundreds of millions of dollars in economic impact to the region.

Various alternative energy sources have been proposed over the years, but none of them would be an acceptable substitute for Indian Point. Last year, the City of New York's Department of Environmental Protection released the results of a study performed by Charles River Associates. That independent study demonstrated that any alternative to Indian Point would be higher priced, would reduce air quality and would reduce the reliability of the electric grid.

I strongly encourage you to issue a renewed license for Indian Point once you have completed your technical reviews of the facility. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Docket, Hearing From: Ammirato, Vincent [AMMIRATOV@coned.com]

Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 2:32 PM To: Docket, Hearing

Subject:

Indian Point 2 and 3 License Renewal Attachments: NRC letter.docx Please see my letter supporting the Indian Point 2 and 3 License Renewal.

<<NRC letter.docx>>

Vincent J Ammirato Washingtonville, NY Resident