ML15342A390: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Construction Permit Application | {{#Wiki_filter:NRC-013 Construction Permit Application Review SHINE Medical Technologies Environmental Panel December 15, 2015 | ||
*Jane Marshall | |||
-Deputy Director, Division of License Renewal, NRR | Panelists | ||
*David Wrona | * Jane Marshall | ||
-Branch Chief, NRR | - Deputy Director, Division of License Renewal, NRR | ||
*Michelle Moser | * David Wrona | ||
-Project Manager, NRR 2 | - Branch Chief, NRR | ||
Environmental Review | * Michelle Moser | ||
*National Environmental Policy Act | - Project Manager, NRR 2 | ||
*Environmental review process | |||
-Title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 51 | Environmental Review | ||
-Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1537) | * National Environmental Policy Act | ||
-Interim Staff Guidance 3 | * Environmental review process | ||
- Title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 51 | |||
- Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1537) | |||
- Interim Staff Guidance 3 | |||
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) | Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) | ||
*10 CFR 51.20 | * 10 CFR 51.20 | ||
*Project-specific decision | * Project-specific decision | ||
-Potential significant impacts | - Potential significant impacts | ||
-First-of-a-kind facility with a unique application of technologies | - First-of-a-kind facility with a unique application of technologies | ||
-Public involvement maximized 4 | - Public involvement maximized 4 | ||
Scoping*2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin | |||
*5 oral comments | Scoping | ||
*6 written comments 5 | * 2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin | ||
* 5 oral comments | |||
* 6 written comments 5 | |||
Department of Energy (DOE) | Department of Energy (DOE) | ||
*National Environmental Policy Act-Lead agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission -Cooperating agency: DOE | * National Environmental Policy Act | ||
*American Medical Isotopes Production Act-Complementary environmental | - Lead agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
- Cooperating agency: DOE | |||
* American Medical Isotopes Production Act | |||
- Complementary environmental reviews 6 | |||
Environmental Review Areas Air Quality Socioeconomics and Terrestrial Environmental Justice Resources Human Health Aquatic Resources Land Use Water Resources Soils Historic and Cultural Resources 7 | |||
Environmental Impacts Resource Area Impact Land Use and Visual Resources SMALL Air Quality and Noise SMALL Geologic Environment SMALL Ecological and Water Resources SMALL Historic and Cultural Resources SMALL Socioeconomics SMALL Human Health and Waste SMALL Transportation SMALL to MODERATE 8 | |||
Reasonable Alternatives | Reasonable Alternatives | ||
*No-action alternative | * No-action alternative | ||
*Alternative sites | * Alternative sites | ||
-Chippewa Falls | - Chippewa Falls | ||
-Stevens Point | - Stevens Point | ||
*Alternative technologies 9 | * Alternative technologies 9 | ||
Alternative Technologies | Alternative Technologies | ||
*Neutron capture | * Neutron capture | ||
*Aqueous homogenous reactor | * Aqueous homogenous reactor | ||
*Linear-accelerator-based | * Linear-accelerator-based | ||
-Analyzed in depth 10 Costs and Benefits | - Analyzed in depth 10 | ||
*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission | |||
*Costs-Environmental and financial | Costs and Benefits | ||
*Benefits-Societal, medical, and economic 11 Environmental | * Purpose | ||
*Economic benefits | - Inform recommendation to the Commission | ||
-Increased tax revenue | * Costs | ||
-New employment opportunities 13 | - Environmental and financial | ||
* Benefits | |||
- Societal, medical, and economic 11 | |||
Environmental Costs SMALL to MODERATE Proposed Janesville Site Traffic Chippewa Falls Alternative Traffic, Noise Stevens Point Alternative Traffic, Noise, Visual Alternative Technology Traffic No-action Alternative None | |||
* SMALL impacts for all other resource areas 12 | |||
Benefits | |||
* Support United States (U.S.) | |||
policy | |||
* Support U.S. public health needs | |||
* Economic benefits | |||
- Increased tax revenue | |||
- New employment opportunities 13 | |||
Consultations Regulation or Order Determination Endangered Species No Effect Act, Section 7 National Historic Preservation Act, No Adverse Effect Section 106 14 | |||
Draft Environmental Impact Statement | |||
* 2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin | |||
* 1 oral comment | |||
* 8 written comments 15 | |||
NRC Staffs Recommendation Staff recommends issuance of the construction permit. | |||
16 | |||
Future NEPA Analyses | |||
* 10 CFR 51.95(b) requires the staff to supplement the Final EIS | |||
- Matters that differ from the Final EIS | |||
- New significant information 17 | |||
Acronyms | |||
* NRR - Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 18 | |||
NRC-013 Construction Permit Application Review SHINE Medical Technologies Environmental Panel December 15, 2015 | |||
Panelists | |||
* Jane Marshall | |||
- Deputy Director, Division of License Renewal, NRR | |||
* David Wrona | |||
- Branch Chief, NRR | |||
* Michelle Moser | |||
- Project Manager, NRR 2 | |||
Environmental Review | |||
* National Environmental Policy Act | |||
* Environmental review process | |||
- Title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 51 | |||
- Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1537) | |||
- Interim Staff Guidance 3 | |||
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) | Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) | ||
*10 CFR 51.20 | * 10 CFR 51.20 | ||
*Project-specific decision | * Project-specific decision | ||
-Potential significant impacts | - Potential significant impacts | ||
-First-of-a-kind facility with a unique application of technologies | - First-of-a-kind facility with a unique application of technologies | ||
-Public involvement maximized 4 | - Public involvement maximized 4 | ||
Scoping*2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin | |||
*5 oral comments | Scoping | ||
*6 written comments 5 | * 2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin | ||
* 5 oral comments | |||
* 6 written comments 5 | |||
Department of Energy (DOE) | Department of Energy (DOE) | ||
*National Environmental Policy Act-Lead agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission -Cooperating agency: DOE | * National Environmental Policy Act | ||
*American Medical Isotopes Production Act-Complementary environmental | - Lead agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
- Cooperating agency: DOE | |||
* American Medical Isotopes Production Act | |||
- Complementary environmental reviews 6 | |||
Environmental Review Areas Air Quality Socioeconomics and Terrestrial Environmental Justice Resources Human Health Aquatic Resources Land Use Water Resources Soils Historic and Cultural Resources 7 | |||
Environmental Impacts Resource Area Impact Land Use and Visual Resources SMALL Air Quality and Noise SMALL Geologic Environment SMALL Ecological and Water Resources SMALL Historic and Cultural Resources SMALL Socioeconomics SMALL Human Health and Waste SMALL Transportation SMALL to MODERATE 8 | |||
Reasonable Alternatives | Reasonable Alternatives | ||
*No-action alternative | * No-action alternative | ||
*Alternative sites | * Alternative sites | ||
-Chippewa Falls | - Chippewa Falls | ||
-Stevens Point | - Stevens Point | ||
*Alternative technologies 9 | * Alternative technologies 9 | ||
Alternative Technologies | Alternative Technologies | ||
*Neutron capture | * Neutron capture | ||
*Aqueous homogenous reactor | * Aqueous homogenous reactor | ||
*Linear-accelerator-based | * Linear-accelerator-based | ||
-Analyzed in depth 10 Costs and Benefits | - Analyzed in depth 10 | ||
*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission | |||
*Costs-Environmental and financial | Costs and Benefits | ||
*Benefits-Societal, medical, and economic 11 Environmental | * Purpose | ||
*Economic benefits | - Inform recommendation to the Commission | ||
-Increased tax revenue | * Costs | ||
-New employment opportunities 13 | - Environmental and financial | ||
* Benefits | |||
- Societal, medical, and economic 11 | |||
Environmental Costs SMALL to MODERATE Proposed Janesville Site Traffic Chippewa Falls Alternative Traffic, Noise Stevens Point Alternative Traffic, Noise, Visual Alternative Technology Traffic No-action Alternative None | |||
* SMALL impacts for all other resource areas 12 | |||
Benefits | |||
* Support United States (U.S.) | |||
policy | |||
* Support U.S. public health needs | |||
* Economic benefits | |||
- Increased tax revenue | |||
- New employment opportunities 13 | |||
Consultations Regulation or Order Determination Endangered Species No Effect Act, Section 7 National Historic Preservation Act, No Adverse Effect Section 106 14 | |||
Draft Environmental Impact Statement | |||
* 2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin | |||
* 1 oral comment | |||
* 8 written comments 15 | |||
NRC Staffs Recommendation Staff recommends issuance of the construction permit. | |||
16 | |||
Future NEPA Analyses | |||
* 10 CFR 51.95(b) requires the staff to supplement the Final EIS | |||
- Matters that differ from the Final EIS | |||
- New significant information 17 | |||
Acronyms | |||
* NRR - Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 18}} | |||
Latest revision as of 04:36, 31 October 2019
ML15342A390 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | SHINE Medical Technologies |
Issue date: | 12/08/2015 |
From: | NRC/OGC |
To: | NRC/OCM |
SECY RAS | |
References | |
Mandatory Hearing 2, RAS 28630, 50-608-CP | |
Download: ML15342A390 (18) | |
Text
NRC-013 Construction Permit Application Review SHINE Medical Technologies Environmental Panel December 15, 2015
Panelists
- Jane Marshall
- Deputy Director, Division of License Renewal, NRR
- Branch Chief, NRR
- Project Manager, NRR 2
Environmental Review
- National Environmental Policy Act
- Environmental review process
- Title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 51
- Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1537)
- Interim Staff Guidance 3
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
- Project-specific decision
- Potential significant impacts
- First-of-a-kind facility with a unique application of technologies
- Public involvement maximized 4
Scoping
- 2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin
- 5 oral comments
- 6 written comments 5
Department of Energy (DOE)
- National Environmental Policy Act
- Lead agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Cooperating agency: DOE
- American Medical Isotopes Production Act
- Complementary environmental reviews 6
Environmental Review Areas Air Quality Socioeconomics and Terrestrial Environmental Justice Resources Human Health Aquatic Resources Land Use Water Resources Soils Historic and Cultural Resources 7
Environmental Impacts Resource Area Impact Land Use and Visual Resources SMALL Air Quality and Noise SMALL Geologic Environment SMALL Ecological and Water Resources SMALL Historic and Cultural Resources SMALL Socioeconomics SMALL Human Health and Waste SMALL Transportation SMALL to MODERATE 8
Reasonable Alternatives
- No-action alternative
- Alternative sites
- Chippewa Falls
- Stevens Point
- Alternative technologies 9
Alternative Technologies
- Neutron capture
- Aqueous homogenous reactor
- Linear-accelerator-based
- Analyzed in depth 10
Costs and Benefits
- Purpose
- Inform recommendation to the Commission
- Costs
- Environmental and financial
- Benefits
- Societal, medical, and economic 11
Environmental Costs SMALL to MODERATE Proposed Janesville Site Traffic Chippewa Falls Alternative Traffic, Noise Stevens Point Alternative Traffic, Noise, Visual Alternative Technology Traffic No-action Alternative None
- SMALL impacts for all other resource areas 12
Benefits
- Support United States (U.S.)
policy
- Support U.S. public health needs
- Economic benefits
- Increased tax revenue
- New employment opportunities 13
Consultations Regulation or Order Determination Endangered Species No Effect Act, Section 7 National Historic Preservation Act, No Adverse Effect Section 106 14
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
- 2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin
- 1 oral comment
- 8 written comments 15
NRC Staffs Recommendation Staff recommends issuance of the construction permit.
16
Future NEPA Analyses
- 10 CFR 51.95(b) requires the staff to supplement the Final EIS
- Matters that differ from the Final EIS
- New significant information 17
- NRR - Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 18
NRC-013 Construction Permit Application Review SHINE Medical Technologies Environmental Panel December 15, 2015
Panelists
- Jane Marshall
- Deputy Director, Division of License Renewal, NRR
- Branch Chief, NRR
- Project Manager, NRR 2
Environmental Review
- National Environmental Policy Act
- Environmental review process
- Title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 51
- Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1537)
- Interim Staff Guidance 3
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
- Project-specific decision
- Potential significant impacts
- First-of-a-kind facility with a unique application of technologies
- Public involvement maximized 4
Scoping
- 2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin
- 5 oral comments
- 6 written comments 5
Department of Energy (DOE)
- National Environmental Policy Act
- Lead agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Cooperating agency: DOE
- American Medical Isotopes Production Act
- Complementary environmental reviews 6
Environmental Review Areas Air Quality Socioeconomics and Terrestrial Environmental Justice Resources Human Health Aquatic Resources Land Use Water Resources Soils Historic and Cultural Resources 7
Environmental Impacts Resource Area Impact Land Use and Visual Resources SMALL Air Quality and Noise SMALL Geologic Environment SMALL Ecological and Water Resources SMALL Historic and Cultural Resources SMALL Socioeconomics SMALL Human Health and Waste SMALL Transportation SMALL to MODERATE 8
Reasonable Alternatives
- No-action alternative
- Alternative sites
- Chippewa Falls
- Stevens Point
- Alternative technologies 9
Alternative Technologies
- Neutron capture
- Aqueous homogenous reactor
- Linear-accelerator-based
- Analyzed in depth 10
Costs and Benefits
- Purpose
- Inform recommendation to the Commission
- Costs
- Environmental and financial
- Benefits
- Societal, medical, and economic 11
Environmental Costs SMALL to MODERATE Proposed Janesville Site Traffic Chippewa Falls Alternative Traffic, Noise Stevens Point Alternative Traffic, Noise, Visual Alternative Technology Traffic No-action Alternative None
- SMALL impacts for all other resource areas 12
Benefits
- Support United States (U.S.)
policy
- Support U.S. public health needs
- Economic benefits
- Increased tax revenue
- New employment opportunities 13
Consultations Regulation or Order Determination Endangered Species No Effect Act, Section 7 National Historic Preservation Act, No Adverse Effect Section 106 14
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
- 2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin
- 1 oral comment
- 8 written comments 15
NRC Staffs Recommendation Staff recommends issuance of the construction permit.
16
Future NEPA Analyses
- 10 CFR 51.95(b) requires the staff to supplement the Final EIS
- Matters that differ from the Final EIS
- New significant information 17
- NRR - Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 18