ML17326B453: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/06/1988
| issue date = 09/06/1988
| title = Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,proposing to Delete Organization Charts from Section 6.0.Fee Paid
| title = Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,proposing to Delete Organization Charts from Section 6.0.Fee Paid
| author name = ALEXICH M P
| author name = Alexich M
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| addressee name = MURLEY T E
| addressee name = Murley T
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
| docket = 05000315, 05000316
| docket = 05000315, 05000316
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| page count = 10
| page count = 10
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCESSION NBR:8809190098 DOC.DATE:
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCESSION NBR:8809190098       DOC.DATE: 88/09/06  NOTARIZED: NO        DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana      S 05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana      S 05000316 AUTH. NAME          AUTHOR AFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P.       Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana  6  Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME         RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.           Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
88/09/06NOTARIZED:
NODOCKETFACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaS0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaS05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P.
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana6MichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.
DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Application foramendstoLicensesDPR-58SDPR-74,proposing todeleteorganization chartsfromSection6.0.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:
Application for amends to Licenses DPR-58 DPR-74,proposing S
GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LASTANGiJCOPIESLTTRENCL1011RECIPIENT COPIESIDCODE/NAME LTTR.ENCLPD3-1PD55INTERNAL:
to delete organization charts from Section 6.0.
ARM/DAF/LFMB NRR/DEST/CEB 8HNRR/DEST/MTB 9HNRR/DOEA/TSB 11NUDOC-BSTRACTGFE01EXTERNAL:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D    COPIES RECEIVED:LTR     ENCL    SIZE:
LPDRNSIC1011111111111111NRR/DEST/ADS 7ENRR/DEST/ESB 8DNRR/DEST/RSB 8ENRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OGC/HDS1RES/DSIR/EIB NRCPDR111111111"01111TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
TITLE: OR  Submittal: General Distribution NOTES:
LTTR22ENCL19 Indianahlichigan PowerCompanyP.O.Box16631Columbus, OH43216AEP:NRC:06590 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74GENERICLETTER88-06:REMOVALOFORGANIZATION CHARTSFROMTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLREQUIREMENTS U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Attn:T.E.MurleySeptember 6,1988
RECIPIENT       COPIES          RECIPIENT        COPIES ID CODE/NAME     LTTR ENCL    ID CODE/NAME     LTTR. ENCL PD3-1 LA              1    0    PD3-1 PD            5    5 STANGiJ              1    1 INTERNAL: ARM/DAF/LFMB           1    0    NRR/DEST/ADS 7E      1    1 NRR/DEST/CEB 8H      1    1    NRR/DEST/ESB 8D      1    1 NRR/DEST/MTB 9H      1    1    NRR/DEST/RSB 8E      1    1 NRR/DOEA/TSB 11      1    1    NRR/PMAS/ILRB12     1    1 NUDOC  BSTRACT      1    1    OGC/HDS1            1  "
0 GF  E      01    1    1    RES/DSIR/EIB         1    1 EXTERNAL: LPDR                  1    1    NRC PDR              1    1 NSIC                  1    1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR      22  ENCL  19
 
Indiana hlichigan Power Company P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:06590 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units            1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 GENERIC LETTER 88-06:             REMOVAL OF ORGANIZATION CHARTS FROM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document        Control Desk Washington, D. C.             20555 Attn:        T. E. Murley September        6, 1988
 
==Dear Dr. Murley:==
 
This    letter is in      response .to Generic Let'ter '(GL) 88-06 and constitutes an application for amendment to the Technical Specifications (T/Ss)"for .the Donald C."Cook Nuc1ear'lant'nits 1 and 2. Specifically;,. we, are'. proposin'g- to del'ete-'the organization charts from Section, 6.0 Administrative Controls'as'e'commended by GL 88-06.          A detailed description of the proposed chan'ges and our analyses concerning significant hazards considerations are included in Attachment l. Attachment 2 contains the proposed revised T/S pages.
We  believe that the proposed changes will not result in (1) a significant change in the types of effluents or a significant increase in the amount of any effluents that may be released offsite, or (2) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
These proposed changes have been reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and will be reviewed by the Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee at their next regularly scheduled meeting.
In compliance with the requirements,'of 10'CFR 50.91(b)(1), copies of this letter and its attachments'.have been transmitted to Mr. R. C. Callen of the Michigan Public'Service'Commis'sion and I
                                                        ~
Pursuant to 10 CFR 170:12(c),>>: we have'nclosed
                                                          ~,  >>f>> . ''
Mr.. G. Bruchmann of the Michigan Depart'ment of Public Health: '
p "an'pplication fee of $ 150.00 for the proposed amendments.
p>>>>o  /
8805'i 90098 PDR    ADOCK 880%Oh                                                                          l 0500031 5                                                            I PNU
 
~ 4 Dr. T. E. Murley                          AEP:NRC'06590 This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.
Sincerely, M. P. Alexi h Vice President ldp Attachments cc:  D. H. Williams, Jr.
W. G. Smith, Jr. - Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Bruchmann G. Charnoff NRC  Resident Inspector - Bridgman A. B. Davis -"Region  III
 
    ~~
~
1 Attachment'  to AEP:NRC:06590 Reasons  and 10 CFR 50.92 Significant Hazards Evaluation for  Changes to the Technical Specifications for Donald C. Cook Units 1 and 2
 
Attachment    1  to AEP:NRC:06590                                Page 1 The purpose    of this change is to eliminate duplicating and maintaining up-to-date organizational charts in both the FSAR and the technical specifications. We, therefore, are proposing to delete the organization charts from the Section 6.0 administrative controls T/Ss. This proposed change would permit us to implement changes to the structure of the onsite and offsite organizations without first having to obtain NRC approval to update the organization charts in the T/Ss. The NRC previously approved similar changes for the McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, on March 16, 1986, and for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, on January'27, 1988.
The content'equired in the administrative controls section of the T/Ss  is specified in 10 CFR 50.36C(5). The regulation requires that the T/Ss contain the controls and provisions that are needed to ensure operation of the plant in a safe manner but does not specifically require organizational charts in the T/Ss.
In accordance with the guidance provided in Generic Letter 88-06, we have added general requirements that capture the essential aspects of the organizational structure that are defined by existing organization charts.
Per 10  CFR  50.92, a proposed amendment will not involve a significant not:
hazards consideration  if the proposed amendment does (1)  involve  a significant increase in the probability or consequences  of an accident previously analyzed, (2)  create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed or evaluated, or (3)  involve    a significan" reduction in  a margin of safety.
Our  evaluation of the proposed change with respect to these criteria is    provided below.
Criterion  1 This proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously analyzed because the deletion of the organization charts from the T/Ss does not change plant operation. We will continue to inform the NRC of organizational changes through other required controls. The Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 50.34(b)(6)(i), requires us to have the organizational structure included in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). A
 
N hg to AEP:NRC:06590                            Page 2 description of the organization and detailed organization charts are contained in Chapter 1 of the FSAR. As required by 10 CFR 50.71(e), we submit annual updates to the FSAR. Also 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B govern changes to the organization as described in the Quality Assurance Program. Some of these changes require NRC approval before they can be made.
Criterion  2 This proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed or evaluated because the proposed change's administrative in nature. There are no physical changes to the plant configuration, the setpoints, or operating parameters to be made as a  result of this  proposed change.
Criterion  3 This proposed change does not involve a significant reduction  in a margin of safety for the reasons stated in Criterion l.
Lastly,  we note that the Commission has provided guidance concerning the determination of significant hazards by providing certain examples (48 FR 14870) of amendments considered not likely to involve a significant hazards consideration. This change is similar to the first example, which refers to changes that are purely administrative. Based on the above, we believe these changes do not involve a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10 CFR 50.92.'
 
Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:06590 Proposed Revised Technical Specifications Pages


==DearDr.Murley:==
>>Thisletterisinresponse.toGenericLet'ter'(GL)88-06andconstitutes anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)"for
.theDonaldC."CookNuc1ear'lant'nits 1and2.Specifically;,.
we,are'.proposin'g-todel'ete-'the organization chartsfromSection,6.0Administrative Controls'as'e'commended byGL88-06.Adetaileddescription oftheproposedchan'gesandouranalysesconcerning significant hazardsconsiderations areincludedinAttachment l.Attachment 2containstheproposedrevisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andwillbereviewedbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee attheirnextregularly scheduled meeting.Incompliance withtherequirements,'of 10'CFR50.91(b)(1),
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments'.have beentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMichiganPublic'Service'Commis'sion andMr..G.Bruchmann oftheMichiganDepart'ment ofPublicHealth:'~~,>>f>>.''.pIPursuantto10CFR170:12(c),>>:
wehave'nclosed "an'pplication feeof$150.00fortheproposedamendments.
8805'i90098880%OhPDRADOCK05000315PNUp>>>>o/lI
~4 Dr.T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC'06590 Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures whichincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoensureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned.
Sincerely, M.P.AlexihVicePresident ldpAttachments cc:D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.Bruchmann G.CharnoffNRCResidentInspector
-BridgmanA.B.Davis-"RegionIII
~~~1Attachment' toAEP:NRC:06590 Reasonsand10CFR50.92Significant HazardsEvaluation forChangestotheTechnical Specifications forDonaldC.CookUnits1and2 Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:06590 Page1Thepurposeofthischangeistoeliminate duplicating andmaintaining up-to-date organizational chartsinboththeFSARandthetechnical specifications.
We,therefore, areproposing todeletetheorganization chartsfromtheSection6.0administrative controlsT/Ss.Thisproposedchangewouldpermitustoimplement changestothestructure oftheonsiteandoffsiteorganizations withoutfirsthavingtoobtainNRCapprovaltoupdatetheorganization chartsintheT/Ss.TheNRCpreviously approvedsimilarchangesfortheMcGuireNuclearStation,Units1and2,onMarch16,1986,andfortheShearonHarrisNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,onJanuary'27, 1988.Thecontent'equired intheadministrative controlssectionoftheT/Ssisspecified in10CFR50.36C(5).
Theregulation requiresthattheT/Sscontainthecontrolsandprovisions thatareneededtoensureoperation oftheplantinasafemannerbutdoesnotspecifically requireorganizational chartsintheT/Ss.Inaccordance withtheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter88-06,wehaveaddedgeneralrequirements thatcapturetheessential aspectsoftheorganizational structure thataredefinedbyexistingorganization charts.Per10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment willnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration iftheproposedamendment doesnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously
: analyzed, (2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously analyzedorevaluated, or(3)involveasignifican" reduction inamarginofsafety.Ourevaluation oftheproposedchangewithrespecttothesecriteriaisprovidedbelow.Criterion 1Thisproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously analyzedbecausethedeletionoftheorganization chartsfromtheT/Ssdoesnotchangeplantoperation.
WewillcontinuetoinformtheNRCoforganizational changesthroughotherrequiredcontrols.
TheCodeofFederalRegulations, 10CFR50.34(b)(6)(i),
requiresustohavetheorganizational structure includedintheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR).A Nhg Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:06590 Page2description oftheorganization anddetailedorganization chartsarecontained inChapter1oftheFSAR.Asrequiredby10CFR50.71(e),
wesubmitannualupdatestotheFSAR.Also10CFR50.54(a)(3) and10CFR50,AppendixBgovernchangestotheorganization asdescribed intheQualityAssurance Program.SomeofthesechangesrequireNRCapprovalbeforetheycanbemade.Criterion 2Thisproposedchangedoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously analyzedorevaluated becausetheproposedchange'sadministrative innature.Therearenophysicalchangestotheplantconfiguration, thesetpoints, oroperating parameters tobemadeasaresultofthisproposedchange.Criterion 3Thisproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafetyforthereasonsstatedinCriterion l.Lastly,wenotethattheCommission hasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermination ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
Thischangeissimilartothefirstexample,whichreferstochangesthatarepurelyadministrative.
Basedontheabove,webelievethesechangesdonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdefinedin10CFR50.92.'
Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:06590 ProposedRevisedTechnical Specifications Pages
~f}}
~f}}

Latest revision as of 01:56, 4 February 2020

Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,proposing to Delete Organization Charts from Section 6.0.Fee Paid
ML17326B453
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/1988
From: Alexich M
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML17326B454 List:
References
AEP:NRC:06590, AEP:NRC:6590, GL-88-06, GL-88-6, NUDOCS 8809190098
Download: ML17326B453 (10)


Text

ACCESSION NBR:8809190098 DOC.DATE: 88/09/06 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana S 05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana S 05000316 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana 6 Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E. Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Application for amends to Licenses DPR-58 DPR-74,proposing S

to delete organization charts from Section 6.0.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal: General Distribution NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR. ENCL PD3-1 LA 1 0 PD3-1 PD 5 5 STANGiJ 1 1 INTERNAL: ARM/DAF/LFMB 1 0 NRR/DEST/ADS 7E 1 1 NRR/DEST/CEB 8H 1 1 NRR/DEST/ESB 8D 1 1 NRR/DEST/MTB 9H 1 1 NRR/DEST/RSB 8E 1 1 NRR/DOEA/TSB 11 1 1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 1 1 NUDOC BSTRACT 1 1 OGC/HDS1 1 "

0 GF E 01 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 19

Indiana hlichigan Power Company P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:06590 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 GENERIC LETTER 88-06: REMOVAL OF ORGANIZATION CHARTS FROM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Attn: T. E. Murley September 6, 1988

Dear Dr. Murley:

This letter is in response .to Generic Let'ter '(GL) 88-06 and constitutes an application for amendment to the Technical Specifications (T/Ss)"for .the Donald C."Cook Nuc1ear'lant'nits 1 and 2. Specifically;,. we, are'. proposin'g- to del'ete-'the organization charts from Section, 6.0 Administrative Controls'as'e'commended by GL 88-06. A detailed description of the proposed chan'ges and our analyses concerning significant hazards considerations are included in Attachment l. Attachment 2 contains the proposed revised T/S pages.

We believe that the proposed changes will not result in (1) a significant change in the types of effluents or a significant increase in the amount of any effluents that may be released offsite, or (2) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

These proposed changes have been reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and will be reviewed by the Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee at their next regularly scheduled meeting.

In compliance with the requirements,'of 10'CFR 50.91(b)(1), copies of this letter and its attachments'.have been transmitted to Mr. R. C. Callen of the Michigan Public'Service'Commis'sion and I

~

Pursuant to 10 CFR 170:12(c),>>: we have'nclosed

~, >>f>> .

Mr.. G. Bruchmann of the Michigan Depart'ment of Public Health: '

p "an'pplication fee of $ 150.00 for the proposed amendments.

p>>>>o /

8805'i 90098 PDR ADOCK 880%Oh l 0500031 5 I PNU

~ 4 Dr. T. E. Murley AEP:NRC'06590 This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.

Sincerely, M. P. Alexi h Vice President ldp Attachments cc: D. H. Williams, Jr.

W. G. Smith, Jr. - Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Bruchmann G. Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman A. B. Davis -"Region III

~~

~

1 Attachment' to AEP:NRC:06590 Reasons and 10 CFR 50.92 Significant Hazards Evaluation for Changes to the Technical Specifications for Donald C. Cook Units 1 and 2

Attachment 1 to AEP:NRC:06590 Page 1 The purpose of this change is to eliminate duplicating and maintaining up-to-date organizational charts in both the FSAR and the technical specifications. We, therefore, are proposing to delete the organization charts from the Section 6.0 administrative controls T/Ss. This proposed change would permit us to implement changes to the structure of the onsite and offsite organizations without first having to obtain NRC approval to update the organization charts in the T/Ss. The NRC previously approved similar changes for the McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, on March 16, 1986, and for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, on January'27, 1988.

The content'equired in the administrative controls section of the T/Ss is specified in 10 CFR 50.36C(5). The regulation requires that the T/Ss contain the controls and provisions that are needed to ensure operation of the plant in a safe manner but does not specifically require organizational charts in the T/Ss.

In accordance with the guidance provided in Generic Letter 88-06, we have added general requirements that capture the essential aspects of the organizational structure that are defined by existing organization charts.

Per 10 CFR 50.92, a proposed amendment will not involve a significant not:

hazards consideration if the proposed amendment does (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously analyzed, (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed or evaluated, or (3) involve a significan" reduction in a margin of safety.

Our evaluation of the proposed change with respect to these criteria is provided below.

Criterion 1 This proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously analyzed because the deletion of the organization charts from the T/Ss does not change plant operation. We will continue to inform the NRC of organizational changes through other required controls. The Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 50.34(b)(6)(i), requires us to have the organizational structure included in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). A

N hg to AEP:NRC:06590 Page 2 description of the organization and detailed organization charts are contained in Chapter 1 of the FSAR. As required by 10 CFR 50.71(e), we submit annual updates to the FSAR. Also 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B govern changes to the organization as described in the Quality Assurance Program. Some of these changes require NRC approval before they can be made.

Criterion 2 This proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed or evaluated because the proposed change's administrative in nature. There are no physical changes to the plant configuration, the setpoints, or operating parameters to be made as a result of this proposed change.

Criterion 3 This proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety for the reasons stated in Criterion l.

Lastly, we note that the Commission has provided guidance concerning the determination of significant hazards by providing certain examples (48 FR 14870) of amendments considered not likely to involve a significant hazards consideration. This change is similar to the first example, which refers to changes that are purely administrative. Based on the above, we believe these changes do not involve a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10 CFR 50.92.'

Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:06590 Proposed Revised Technical Specifications Pages

~f