ML20141E516: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =  
| project = TAC:57555, TAC:57556
| stage = Request
| stage = Request
}}
}}
Line 23: Line 23:
l il                  POnER COMPANY 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 VPNPD-86-61 l      NRC-86-14 l      February 14, 1986 I
l il                  POnER COMPANY 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 VPNPD-86-61 l      NRC-86-14 l      February 14, 1986 I
l Mr. H. R. Denton, Director
l Mr. H. R. Denton, Director
,      Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l      U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C.                  20555 Attention:            Mr. G. Lear, Project Director PWR Project Directorate No. 1 Genticmon DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301 MODIFICATION TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 103 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP OPERATION POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Our letter dated April 10, 1985 requestod licanso amendmonts            ;
,      Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l      U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C.                  20555 Attention:            Mr. G. Lear, Project Director PWR Project Directorate No. 1 Genticmon DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301 MODIFICATION TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 103 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP OPERATION POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Our {{letter dated|date=April 10, 1985|text=letter dated April 10, 1985}} requestod licanso amendmonts            ;
for Point Loach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.          Those amendments I l
for Point Loach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.          Those amendments I l
would change the limiting conditions for operation of the reactor coolant pumps. Subsequently, your letter dated September 6,
would change the limiting conditions for operation of the reactor coolant pumps. Subsequently, your letter dated September 6,

Latest revision as of 12:08, 12 December 2021

Revised Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-24 & DPR-27, Changing Tech Specs to Allow Single Reactor Coolant Pump Operation W/Power Above 3.5%
ML20141E516
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/14/1986
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: Harold Denton, Lear G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20141E521 List:
References
CON-NRC-86-14 TAC-57555, TAC-57556, VPNPD-86-61, NUDOCS 8602250273
Download: ML20141E516 (2)


Text

r -

l il POnER COMPANY 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 VPNPD-86-61 l NRC-86-14 l February 14, 1986 I

l Mr. H. R. Denton, Director

, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Mr. G. Lear, Project Director PWR Project Directorate No. 1 Genticmon DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301 MODIFICATION TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 103 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP OPERATION POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Our letter dated April 10, 1985 requestod licanso amendmonts  ;

for Point Loach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. Those amendments I l

would change the limiting conditions for operation of the reactor coolant pumps. Subsequently, your letter dated September 6,

, . 1985 requested additional information. We provided that informa-l tion to you in a submittal dated November 1, 1985.

l l Following our last submittal, another question was raised by l your staff regarding proposed Technical Specification 15.3.1.A.l.a.

Tho question was whether or not the Point Beach Nuclear Plant can operato at 10% rated thermal power with natural circulation.

Based on our review of past analyscu and tests of natural l circulation operation, we are submitting a revision to our proposed Technical Specification 15.3.1.A.l.a. The specification

now states that 3.5%, in place of 10%, is the power above which single reactor coolant pump operation is not allowed. Tho ,

specification has also boon revised regarding action taken in l f

$Dg22go g gg 6 p P ,e l

i- .

l +.

l 457: )

Mr. H. R. Denton February 14, 1986 Page 2 +

the event of the loss of both reactor coolant pumps stating that if both pumps are lost while power is greater than 3.5%,

reactor shutdown shall commence immediately and reactor trip breakers opened within one hour. We feel that this revision provides a specification which is justifiable in reference to the existing analysis in Section 14.1.11 of the FSAR. The proposed technical specifications are attached with specific changes identified by margin bars. .

We have reviewed the 10 CFR 50.91 significant hazards consideration  ;

determination provided with our April 10 application. The modifi-cations to our change request provided with this letter do not change the basis or conclusion of that determination.

We have enclosed three signed originals and 40 copies of this t modification to Technical Specification Change Request 103; }

the revised Technical Specification pages supersede those pages  ;

i provided with our April 10 letter.

i Please contact us if you have any questions.

5 i

Very truly yours,  ;

h'c/  ;

C. W. Fay'  !

Vice President Nuclear Power Enclosurc Copies to R. S. Cullen, PSCW NRC Resident Inspector Subscribe and sworn to before me this ,/ day of February, 1986.

YA$NAJ AL Notary Publfe,

~

a$b o,. Wisconsin My Commission expires /Eadf /fff. -

( pr l

l