ML18106A386: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*                Attachment 1
{{#Wiki_filter:*                Attachment 1 1.0  CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Salem Unit 1 Cycle 13 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.9.
* 1.0  CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Salem Unit 1 Cycle 13 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.9.
The Technical Specifications affected by this report are listed below:
The Technical Specifications affected by this report are listed below:
3/4.1.1.4 Moderator Temperature Coefficient 3I 4 .1. 3 .5 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3/4.2.1      Axial Flux Difference 3/4.2.2      Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQ(Z) 3/4.2.3      Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - FNt.H
3/4.1.1.4 Moderator Temperature Coefficient 3I 4 .1. 3 .5 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3/4.2.1      Axial Flux Difference 3/4.2.2      Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQ(Z) 3/4.2.3      Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - FNt.H
Line 33: Line 32:
The 300 pprn/ARO/RTP-MTC should be less negative than or equal to -3.7xl0 4 &/k/°F.
The 300 pprn/ARO/RTP-MTC should be less negative than or equal to -3.7xl0 4 &/k/°F.
where:      BOL stands for Beginning of Cycle Life ARO stands for All Rods Out HZP stands for Hot Zero THERMAL POWER EOL stands for End of Cycle Life RTP stands for Rated THERMAL POWER Page 2 of 7
where:      BOL stands for Beginning of Cycle Life ARO stands for All Rods Out HZP stands for Hot Zero THERMAL POWER EOL stands for End of Cycle Life RTP stands for Rated THERMAL POWER Page 2 of 7
* Attachment 1
* Attachment 1 2.2 Contr~l Rod Insertion Limits (Specification 3/4.1.3.5) 2.2.1 The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown in Figure 1.
* 2.2 Contr~l Rod Insertion Limits (Specification 3/4.1.3.5) 2.2.1 The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown in Figure 1.
2.3 Axial Flux Difference (Specification 3/4.2.1)
2.3 Axial Flux Difference (Specification 3/4.2.1)
[Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Methodology]
[Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Methodology]
Line 45: Line 43:
Page 3 of 7
Page 3 of 7
* Attachment 1
* Attachment 1
                                                                      *


====2.4.3 where====
====2.4.3 where====
Line 55: Line 52:
* FIGURE 3 K(Z) - NORMALIZED FQ(Z) AS A FUNCTION OF CORE HEIGHT
* FIGURE 3 K(Z) - NORMALIZED FQ(Z) AS A FUNCTION OF CORE HEIGHT
: 1. 2
: 1. 2
                                              --
           ~
           ~
: 1. 0
: 1. 0
          *
                                        ---........  ""-----
          *                                                                    --
- N a: 0. 8 0
- N a: 0. 8 0
e..
e..
u          *
u          *
~                              FQ            K(:z;)          HEIGHT (ft)
~                              FQ            K(:z;)          HEIGHT (ft) z H
                            ..........  . .............      . ...............
"'
z H
:.::
2.40 2.40
2.40 2.40
: 1. 0                    0.0
: 1. 0                    0.0
Line 77: Line 66:
0
0
           ~
           ~
z 0.4
z 0.4 0.2 0.0 0      2        4                          8            10            12 CORE HE::HT (Feet)
          *
          .
0.2 0.0 0      2        4                          8            10            12 CORE HE::HT (Feet)
Page 5 of 7
Page 5 of 7
* Attachment 1
* Attachment 1 FIGURE 1 ROD BANK INSERTION LIMITS vs. THERMAL POWER 24 0
* FIGURE 1 ROD BANK INSERTION LIMITS vs. THERMAL POWER 24 0
                   /
                   /
v
v
Line 92: Line 77:
         ~
         ~
v        1117.5,2281                          170.8,2281 20 o    I      IBANK Bl
v        1117.5,2281                          170.8,2281 20 o    I      IBANK Bl
:I10' 1861                              I 18 0
:I10' 1861                              I 18 0 I                          1100,1701 I
* I                          1100,1701 I
--
16 0 I
16 0 I
II IBANK Cl                        v v
II IBANK Cl                        v v
Line 105: Line 88:
I 120
I 120
         ~
         ~
        *
v                                    I v
* v                                    I v
100              /
100              /
* 80
80
         ~
         ~
I      IBANK Cl ii II 60 I
I      IBANK Cl ii II 60 I
Line 115: Line 97:
I 40 y
I 40 y
J 20 0
J 20 0
0
0 10      20 129' 0 30 v            so    60      70    80      90 PERCENT OF    ~~7~J  :HERMA!. POWER (\)
* 10      20 129' 0 30 v            so    60      70    80      90 PERCENT OF    ~~7~J  :HERMA!. POWER (\)


     *                    "J!.~tachment    I
     *                    "J!.~tachment    I FIGURE 2 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE LIMITS AS A FUNCTION OF RATED THERMAL POWER 100 I ( *ll. 90) I                I (+ll, 90l I 80 I                  \        IUNACCEPTABLE  I
* FIGURE 2 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE LIMITS AS A FUNCTION OF RATED THERMAL POWER 100 I ( *ll. 90) I                I (+ll, 90l I 80 I                  \        IUNACCEPTABLE  I
           !UNACCEPTABLE' OPERATION I                        \      OPERATION I                                  \
           !UNACCEPTABLE' OPERATION I                        \      OPERATION I                                  \
                                         !ACCEPTABLE OPERATION
                                         !ACCEPTABLE OPERATION I
* I I                                          \
I                                          \
                                                                     \
                                                                     \
I ( *31, 50) l                                                I (+31, SOll
I ( *31, 50) l                                                I (+31, SOll 20 0
* 20 0
   *50        *40  *30        -20
   *50        *40  *30        -20
* 10    0      10    20      30      40    50 l:I..UX  DIFFER::~JCE :\ Delta Il Page 7 of 7}}
* 10    0      10    20      30      40    50 l:I..UX  DIFFER::~JCE :\ Delta Il Page 7 of 7}}

Latest revision as of 04:57, 3 February 2020

Final Version of COLR for Salem Unit Cycle 13
ML18106A386
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/16/1998
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Shared Package
ML18106A385 List:
References
COLR-980316, NUDOCS 9803240176
Download: ML18106A386 (7)


Text

  • Attachment 1 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Salem Unit 1 Cycle 13 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.9.

The Technical Specifications affected by this report are listed below:

3/4.1.1.4 Moderator Temperature Coefficient 3I 4 .1. 3 .5 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3/4.2.1 Axial Flux Difference 3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQ(Z) 3/4.2.3 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - FNt.H


---------~\

- - -990324017 6 98031672 ',

PDR ADOCK 050002 p PDR Page 1 of 7

    • Attachment 1
  • 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1. 0 are presented in the following subsections. These limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.9 .1.9.

2.1 Moderator Temperature Coefficient (Specification 3/4.1.1.4) 2.1.1 The Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) limits are:

The BOL/ARO/HZP-MTC shall be less positive than 0 &/k/°F.

The EOL/ARO/RTP-MTC shall be less negative than -4.4 x 104 &/k/°F.

2.1.2 The MTC Surveillance limit is:

The 300 pprn/ARO/RTP-MTC should be less negative than or equal to -3.7xl0 4 &/k/°F.

where: BOL stands for Beginning of Cycle Life ARO stands for All Rods Out HZP stands for Hot Zero THERMAL POWER EOL stands for End of Cycle Life RTP stands for Rated THERMAL POWER Page 2 of 7

  • Attachment 1 2.2 Contr~l Rod Insertion Limits (Specification 3/4.1.3.5) 2.2.1 The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown in Figure 1.

2.3 Axial Flux Difference (Specification 3/4.2.1)

[Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Methodology]

2.3.1 The Axial Flux Difference (AFD) target band is +6%, -9%.

2.3.2 The AFD Acceptable Operation Limits are provided in Figure 2.

2.4 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQ(Z) (Specification 3/4.2.2)

[Fxy Methodology]

  • K(Z) for P > 0.5 FRTP Q
  • K(Z) for P::; 0.5 0.5 THERMAL POWER where: p RATED THERMAL POWER 2.4.1 FtTP = 2. 40 2.4.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure 3.

Page 3 of 7

  • Attachment 1

2.4.3 where

F~TP =1. 77 for the unrodded core planes 2.13 for the core plane containing Bank D control rods 2.5 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - fNt-H (Specification 3/4.2.3)

F~ = FftP [1.0 + PFlili (1.0 - P)]

Operation with FNt.H values equal to or less than those given by the above equation are acceptable.

THERMAL POWER where: P RATED THERMAL POWER 2.5.1 FftP = 1.65 2.5.2 PFlili = 0.3 Page 4 of 7

  • Attachment I
  • FIGURE 3 K(Z) - NORMALIZED FQ(Z) AS A FUNCTION OF CORE HEIGHT
1. 2

~

1. 0

- N a: 0. 8 0

e..

u *

~ FQ K(:z;) HEIGHT (ft) z H

2.40 2.40

1. 0 0.0
1. 0 6.0 ca0.. 0. 6 2.22 0.925 12.0 Q

Czl N

H

~

0

~

z 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 2 4 8 10 12 CORE HE::HT (Feet)

Page 5 of 7

  • Attachment 1 FIGURE 1 ROD BANK INSERTION LIMITS vs. THERMAL POWER 24 0

/

v

~

)

22 0

~

~

v 1117.5,2281 170.8,2281 20 o I IBANK Bl

I10' 1861 I 18 0 I 1100,1701 I

16 0 I

II IBANK Cl v v

~

/

140

~

v

~

I 120

~

v I v

100 /

80

~

I IBANK Cl ii II 60 I

~

10, 581 /

I 40 y

J 20 0

0 10 20 129' 0 30 v so 60 70 80 90 PERCENT OF ~~7~J :HERMA!. POWER (\)

  • "J!.~tachment I FIGURE 2 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE LIMITS AS A FUNCTION OF RATED THERMAL POWER 100 I ( *ll. 90) I I (+ll, 90l I 80 I \ IUNACCEPTABLE I

!UNACCEPTABLE' OPERATION I \ OPERATION I \

!ACCEPTABLE OPERATION I

I \

\

I ( *31, 50) l I (+31, SOll 20 0

  • 50 *40 *30 -20
  • 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 l:I..UX DIFFER::~JCE :\ Delta Il Page 7 of 7