ML18283B065: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18283B065 | | number = ML18283B065 | ||
| issue date = 10/10/2018 | | issue date = 10/10/2018 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for License Amendment Request to Recapture Low-power Testing Time | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for License Amendment Request to Recapture Low-power Testing Time | ||
| author name = Wiebe J | | author name = Wiebe J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
The request is applicable to Clinton Power Station, Unit 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The request is applicable to Clinton Power Station, Unit 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is September 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::100 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is September 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606. | ||
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1 | Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1 |
Latest revision as of 06:29, 6 March 2020
ML18283B065 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Clinton ![]() |
Issue date: | 10/10/2018 |
From: | Joel Wiebe Plant Licensing Branch III |
To: | Steinman R Exelon Generation Co |
References | |
Download: ML18283B065 (2) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Wiebe, Joel Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 12:45 PM To: Steinman, Rebecca L:(GenCo-Nuc)
Subject:
Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for License Amendment Request to Recapture Low-power Testing Time
- Rebecca, By letter dated September 17, 2018 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML18260A307), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request to revise the expiration date of the operating license to recapture low-power testing time.
The request is applicable to Clinton Power Station, Unit 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours4.167 days <br />0.595 weeks <br />0.137 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is September 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606.
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 614 Mail Envelope Properties (Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov20181010124400)
Subject:
Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for License Amendment Request to Recapture Low-power Testing Time Sent Date: 10/10/2018 12:44:50 PM Received Date: 10/10/2018 12:44:00 PM From: Wiebe, Joel Created By: Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Steinman, Rebecca L:(GenCo-Nuc)" <Rebecca.Steinman@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2459 10/10/2018 12:44:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: