IR 05000483/2019301: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:April 23, 2019 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ by BLarson Acting For/ | /RA/ by BLarson Acting For/ | ||
Gregory E. Werner, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-483 License No. NPF-30 | |||
Gregory E. Werner, Chief Operations Branch | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket No. 50-483 License No. NPF-30 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Examination Report 05000483/2019301 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | Examination Report 05000483/2019301 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | ||
REGION IV== | REGION IV== | ||
Docket: | Docket: | ||
Steedman, MO 65077 Dates: | 50-483 License: | ||
B. Larson, Senior Operations Engineer T. Farina, Operations Engineer Gregory E. Werner, Chief | NPF-30 Report: | ||
05000483/2019301 Enterprise Identifier: L-2019-OLL-0004 Licensee: | |||
Union Electric Company Facility: | |||
Callaway Plant, Unit 1 Location: | |||
8315 County Road 459 Steedman, MO 65077 Dates: | |||
March 4 - 29, 2019 Inspectors: | |||
K. Clayton, Chief Examiner, Senior Operations Engineer C. Osterholtz, Senior Operations Engineer B. Larson, Senior Operations Engineer T. Farina, Operations Engineer Approved By: | |||
Gregory E. Werner, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety | |||
=SUMMARY= | =SUMMARY= | ||
ER 05000483/2019301; March 4 - 29, 2019; Callaway Plant Unit 1; Initial Operator Licensing | ER 05000483/2019301; March 4 - 29, 2019; Callaway Plant Unit 1; Initial Operator Licensing | ||
Examination Report. | Examination Report. | ||
| Line 55: | Line 67: | ||
The NRC examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued. | The NRC examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued. | ||
===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings=== | ===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings=== | ||
None. | None. | ||
=== | ===Licensee-Identified Violations=== | ||
None. | None. | ||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)== | ||
{{a|4OA5}} | {{a|4OA5}} | ||
==4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)== | ==4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)== | ||
===.1 License Applications=== | ===.1 License Applications=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
The NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The NRC examiners also audited three of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes. | The NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The NRC examiners also audited three of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes. | ||
| Line 82: | Line 88: | ||
===.2 Examination Development=== | ===.2 Examination Development=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
The NRC examiners reviewed integrated examination outlines and draft examinations submitted by the licensee against the requirements of NUREG-1021. The NRC examination team conducted an onsite validation of the operating tests. | The NRC examiners reviewed integrated examination outlines and draft examinations submitted by the licensee against the requirements of NUREG-1021. The NRC examination team conducted an onsite validation of the operating tests. | ||
| Line 92: | Line 97: | ||
===.3 Operator Knowledge and Performance=== | ===.3 Operator Knowledge and Performance=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
On March 13, 2019, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 18, 2019. | On March 13, 2019, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 18, 2019. | ||
| Line 107: | Line 111: | ||
The licensee identified six generic weaknesses associated with applicant performance on the written examinations. Two of the weaknesses (item 1 and 5 below) were attributed to the lack of recall of information provided during training by the applicants and the remaining four weaknesses (items 2, 3, 4, and 6) were attributed to initial program class training material deficiencies. | The licensee identified six generic weaknesses associated with applicant performance on the written examinations. Two of the weaknesses (item 1 and 5 below) were attributed to the lack of recall of information provided during training by the applicants and the remaining four weaknesses (items 2, 3, 4, and 6) were attributed to initial program class training material deficiencies. | ||
1. The applicants could not recall the correct combination of containment spray pumps and containment coolers used during emergency coolant recirculation. | ===1. The applicants could not recall the correct combination of containment spray=== | ||
pumps and containment coolers used during emergency coolant recirculation. | |||
2. The applicants were unfamiliar with the requirements for shutdown margin during an anticipated transient without trip. | ===2. The applicants were unfamiliar with the requirements for shutdown margin during=== | ||
an anticipated transient without trip. | |||
3. The applicants were unfamiliar with the actions for a loss of coolant accident during shutdown conditions. | ===3. The applicants were unfamiliar with the actions for a loss of coolant accident=== | ||
during shutdown conditions. | |||
4. The applicants were unfamiliar with the technical specification basis for the completion time to verify permissive P-11 is in the correct state. | ===4. The applicants were unfamiliar with the technical specification basis for the=== | ||
completion time to verify permissive P-11 is in the correct state. | |||
5. The applicants could not recall the local xenon effects of a dropped rod on nuclear instrumentation. | ===5. The applicants could not recall the local xenon effects of a dropped rod on=== | ||
nuclear instrumentation. | |||
6. The applicants had difficulty determining the time limits for starting and stopping a gaseous radwaste release. | ===6. The applicants had difficulty determining the time limits for starting and stopping=== | ||
a gaseous radwaste release. | |||
Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation and determination of appropriate remedial training. The licensee generated training request TRRQ # 201900042 to improve initial license class training material because of these generic weaknesses. | Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation and determination of appropriate remedial training. The licensee generated training request TRRQ # 201900042 to improve initial license class training material because of these generic weaknesses. | ||
| Line 124: | Line 134: | ||
===.4 Simulation Facility Performance=== | ===.4 Simulation Facility Performance=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during examination validation and administration. | The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during examination validation and administration. | ||
| Line 132: | Line 141: | ||
===.5 Examination Security=== | ===.5 Examination Security=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel. | The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel. | ||
| Line 139: | Line 147: | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | {{a|4OA6}} | ||
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ||
===Exit Meeting Summary=== | ===Exit Meeting Summary=== | ||
The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. J. Cortez, Director, Training, and other members of the staff on March 8, 2019. A telephonic exit was conducted on March 29, 2019, with Mr. P. Swan, Operations Exam Lead, who was provided the NRC licensing decisions. | The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. J. Cortez, Director, Training, and other members of the staff on March 8, 2019. A telephonic exit was conducted on March 29, 2019, with Mr. P. Swan, Operations Exam Lead, who was provided the NRC licensing decisions. | ||
| Line 151: | Line 158: | ||
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | ==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | ||
===Licensee Personnel=== | |||
: [[contact::D. Farnsworth]], Operations Director | |||
: [[contact::M. Covey]], Manager, Operations (Support) | |||
: [[contact::J. Cortez]], Director, Operations Training | |||
: [[contact::R. Wink]], Manager, Regulatory Affairs | |||
: [[contact::S. Jones]], Senior Training Supervisor, Simulator | |||
: [[contact::M. Otten]], Operations Training Manager | |||
: [[contact::P. Swan]], Operations Exam Lead | |||
: [[contact::L. Sanders]], Operations Exam Writer | |||
===NRC Personnel=== | ===NRC Personnel=== | ||
: [[contact::D. Bradley]], Senior Resident Inspector | : [[contact::D. Bradley]], Senior Resident Inspector | ||
==ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED== | ==ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED== | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:02, 5 January 2025
| ML19113A293 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 04/23/2019 |
| From: | Greg Werner Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Diya F Ameren Missouri |
| References | |
| EPID L-2019-OLL-0004 50-483/19-301 | |
| Download: ML19113A293 (9) | |
Text
April 23, 2019
SUBJECT:
CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000483/2019301
Dear Mr. Diya:
On March 7, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an initial operator license examination at Callaway Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the examination results and licensing decisions. The preliminary examination results were discussed on March 8, 2019, with Mr. J. Cortez, Director, Training, and other members of your staff. A telephonic exit meeting was conducted on March 29, 2019, with Mr. P. Swan, Operations Exam Lead, who was provided the NRC licensing decisions.
The examination included the evaluation of eight applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses, and one applicant for an upgrade senior reactor operator license. The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued. There were no post examination comments submitted by your staff. The Enclosure contains details of this report.
No findings were identified during this examination.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/ by BLarson Acting For/
Gregory E. Werner, Chief Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-483 License No. NPF-30
Enclosure:
Examination Report 05000483/2019301 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
REGION IV==
Docket:
50-483 License:
NPF-30 Report:
05000483/2019301 Enterprise Identifier: L-2019-OLL-0004 Licensee:
Union Electric Company Facility:
Callaway Plant, Unit 1 Location:
8315 County Road 459 Steedman, MO 65077 Dates:
March 4 - 29, 2019 Inspectors:
K. Clayton, Chief Examiner, Senior Operations Engineer C. Osterholtz, Senior Operations Engineer B. Larson, Senior Operations Engineer T. Farina, Operations Engineer Approved By:
Gregory E. Werner, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY
ER 05000483/2019301; March 4 - 29, 2019; Callaway Plant Unit 1; Initial Operator Licensing
Examination Report.
The NRC examiners evaluated the competency of eight applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses and one applicant for an upgrade senior reactor operator license at Callaway Plant, Unit 1.
The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 11. The written examination was administered by the licensee on March 13, 2019. The NRC examiners administered the operating tests on March 4 - 7, 2019.
The NRC examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.
NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
None.
Licensee-Identified Violations
None.
REPORT DETAILS
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
.1 License Applications
a. Scope
The NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The NRC examiners also audited three of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Examination Development
a. Scope
The NRC examiners reviewed integrated examination outlines and draft examinations submitted by the licensee against the requirements of NUREG-1021. The NRC examination team conducted an onsite validation of the operating tests.
b. Findings
The NRC examiners provided outline, draft examination and post-validation comments to the licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination administration.
The NRC examiners determined the written examinations and operating tests initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
.3 Operator Knowledge and Performance
a. Scope
On March 13, 2019, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 18, 2019.
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to all applicants on March 4 - 7, 2019.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test. The final examinations and post examination analysis may be accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment.
The examination team noted no generic weaknesses associated with applicant performance on the operating test.
The licensee identified six generic weaknesses associated with applicant performance on the written examinations. Two of the weaknesses (item 1 and 5 below) were attributed to the lack of recall of information provided during training by the applicants and the remaining four weaknesses (items 2, 3, 4, and 6) were attributed to initial program class training material deficiencies.
1. The applicants could not recall the correct combination of containment spray
pumps and containment coolers used during emergency coolant recirculation.
2. The applicants were unfamiliar with the requirements for shutdown margin during
an anticipated transient without trip.
3. The applicants were unfamiliar with the actions for a loss of coolant accident
during shutdown conditions.
4. The applicants were unfamiliar with the technical specification basis for the
completion time to verify permissive P-11 is in the correct state.
5. The applicants could not recall the local xenon effects of a dropped rod on
nuclear instrumentation.
6. The applicants had difficulty determining the time limits for starting and stopping
a gaseous radwaste release.
Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation and determination of appropriate remedial training. The licensee generated training request TRRQ # 201900042 to improve initial license class training material because of these generic weaknesses.
Because some procedures would benefit from improvements discovered during examination development, validation, and administration, the licensee wrote Condition Reports 201805793, 201805822, 201901508, 201901509, 201901513, 201901515, 201901516, 201901517, and 201901518 to evaluate these procedures for improvement in future revisions.
.4 Simulation Facility Performance
a. Scope
The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during examination validation and administration.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.5 Examination Security
a. Scope
The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
Exit Meeting Summary
The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. J. Cortez, Director, Training, and other members of the staff on March 8, 2019. A telephonic exit was conducted on March 29, 2019, with Mr. P. Swan, Operations Exam Lead, who was provided the NRC licensing decisions.
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- D. Farnsworth, Operations Director
- M. Covey, Manager, Operations (Support)
- J. Cortez, Director, Operations Training
- R. Wink, Manager, Regulatory Affairs
- S. Jones, Senior Training Supervisor, Simulator
- M. Otten, Operations Training Manager
- L. Sanders, Operations Exam Writer
NRC Personnel
- D. Bradley, Senior Resident Inspector