ML060690070: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:a I Scott Barber -HC EIJG SSDI Issue Pmage 1 1 From: Stephen Pindale To: Mel Gray Date: 5/14/04 1:54PM  
{{#Wiki_filter:a I Scott Barber - HC EIJG SSDI Issue                                                                                       Pmage 11 From:             Stephen Pindale To:               Mel Gray Date:             5/14/04 1:54PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
HC EDG SSDI Issue Mel, Since O finished their review of the HC EDG testing issue (lockout relays, identified during the SSDI in December 2002), 1 am drafting the closeout of the associated open item (AV 50-354/2003-002-01).
HC EDG SSDI Issue Mel, Since O finished their review of the HC EDG testing issue (lockout relays, identified during the SSDI in December 2002), 1 am drafting the closeout of the associated open item (AV 50-354/2003-002-01). It will consist of a writeup similar to that in the original report (2003-002), and will be a Green NCV.
It will consist of a writeup similar to that in the original report (2003-002), and will be a Green NCV.Here's the question.
Here's the question. Since there was no associated onsite re-inspection and meeting/debrief with the licensee, the licensee needs to be informed of the conclusion. I will call them, but I need a contact for the appropriate individual. Please let me know who I should call (probably sometime next week). Or, if you prefer, you can inform them during your periodic debrief - just let me know if that is your preference.
Since there was no associated onsite re-inspection and meeting/debrief with the licensee, the licensee needs to be informed of the conclusion.
Thanks, Steve CC:               Marc Ferdas; Raymond Lorsonr; Scott Barber}}
I will call them, but I need a contact for the appropriate individual.
Please let me know who I should call (probably sometime next week). Or, if you prefer, you can inform them during your periodic debrief -just let me know if that is your preference.
Thanks, Steve CC: Marc Ferdas; Raymond Lorsonr; Scott Barber}}

Latest revision as of 21:15, 23 November 2019

E-mail from S. Pindale of USNRC to M. Gray of USNRC, Regarding Hc EDG Ssdi Issue
ML060690070
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 05/14/2004
From: Stephen Pindale
NRC Region 1
To: Mel Gray
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194, IR-03-002
Download: ML060690070 (1)


Text

a I Scott Barber - HC EIJG SSDI Issue Pmage 11 From: Stephen Pindale To: Mel Gray Date: 5/14/04 1:54PM

Subject:

HC EDG SSDI Issue Mel, Since O finished their review of the HC EDG testing issue (lockout relays, identified during the SSDI in December 2002), 1 am drafting the closeout of the associated open item (AV 50-354/2003-002-01). It will consist of a writeup similar to that in the original report (2003-002), and will be a Green NCV.

Here's the question. Since there was no associated onsite re-inspection and meeting/debrief with the licensee, the licensee needs to be informed of the conclusion. I will call them, but I need a contact for the appropriate individual. Please let me know who I should call (probably sometime next week). Or, if you prefer, you can inform them during your periodic debrief - just let me know if that is your preference.

Thanks, Steve CC: Marc Ferdas; Raymond Lorsonr; Scott Barber