ML061160369: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:s -1.2 -zo NOP-LP-2001-01 Bea3ver Valley Aq CONDITION REPORT CR Nimber TITLE: OFFICER INATTENTIVE TO DUTY | {{#Wiki_filter:el-,4.Rl s -1.2 -zo NOP-LP-2001-01 Bea3ver Valley Aq CONDITION REPORT CR Nimber TITLE: OFFICER INATTENTIVE TO DUTY DISCOVERY DATE TIME EVENT DATE TIME SYSTEM / ASSET# | ||
Identify what, when, where, why, how.Officer while on duty was observed being inattentive to duty.0 R I G l N A T | 3/11/2003 0555 03/11/03 0555 N/A N/A E QUIPMENT DESCRIPTION N/A DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION and PROBABLE CAUSE (if known) Summarize any attachments. Identify what, when, where, why, how. | ||
I ASSOCIATED LCO ACTION STATEMENT(S) | Officer while on duty was observed being inattentive to duty. | ||
NIAA EgN/A' :: #1 N/A -__# 2 _ _ _ _ | 0 R | ||
One Hour N/A APPLICABLIE UNIT(S)(Date I Time) Four Hour N/A N/A n Eval Eight Hour N/A | I G | ||
CF 0070 4/26/2003 E | l N | ||
[ | A T IMMEDIATE ACTIONS TAKEN I SUPV COMMENTS (Discuss CORRECTIVE ACTIONS completed, basis for closure.) | ||
l 'rhe Officer was relieved of duty and replaced with another Officer. | |||
0 N QUALITY ORGANIZATION USE ONLY IDENTIFIED BY (Check one) El Self-Revealed ATTACHMENTS Quality Org. Initiated El Yes El Individual/Work Group El Intemal Oversight I Quality Org. Follow-up El Yes_, El No EJ Supervision/Management | |||
_ l Extemal Oversight | |||
_ , AE El Ye,. No__ 8N | |||
) ORIGINATOR ORGANIZATION DATE ,3SUPERVISOR DATE PHONE EXT. | |||
YOUNG, R. 3 l 0070 3112/2003 MIKLAVIC, L | |||
* 1 3/12/2003 4- 7811 SRO EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY ORG. 4MMEDIATE ORG. WM =D CHANG17 REVIEW OPERABLE ASSESSMENT NOTIFIED INVESTIGATION NOTIFIED RESTRAINT P REQUIRED REQUIRED L D Yes ij No 0 Yes 0 No il N/ Rl Yes iR No N/A Yes R]No N/A n Yes TV No A MODE I ASSOCIATED TECH SPEC NUMBER(S) I ASSOCIATED LCO ACTION STATEMENT(S) | |||
N NIAA EgN/A' :: #1 N/A -__ | |||
T #2 _ _ _ _ _ | |||
_ . #3 -_ __._._'_., _.''' | |||
0 DECLARED INOPERABLE REPORTABLE? One Hour N/A APPLICABLIE UNIT(S) | |||
P (Date I Time) Four Hour N/A E N/A n Eval Eight Hour N/A 0 lU U. L-i Both R lLiEval Required Other N/A A | |||
T COMMENTS NIA 0 | |||
N Current Mode - Unit 1' Power Level - Unit 1 Current Mode - Unit 2 Power Level - Unit 2 S NN/AN/ N/A N/A SRO - UNIT I SRO - UNIT 2 DATE Approved By Supv Approved By Supv 3/12/2003 CATEGORY I EVAL ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION DUE DATE R REPORTABLE? | |||
CF 0070 4/26/2003 G | |||
E ElYes R No ElLER No. | |||
CRPA TREND CODES Comp Type I ID Cause uL REPORTABILITY REVIEWER Process I Activity /Cause Code(s) (If Cause T or W) Org A Fedin, R SUPV LP1 0100 H04 0070 T_ | |||
01 DATE MRB Y. 03/12/03 INVESTIGATION OPTIONS I CLOSED BY DATE | |||
[]Maint.Rule [JOEEvaluation l 3/31/2003 | |||
-I-Page 1 of I | |||
1, INVESTIGATION | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
CR Number: 03-(12794 NOP-LP-2001 | CR Number: | ||
-06 Category I Eval: CF Assigned Organization: | 03-(12794 NOP-LP-2001 -06 Category I Eval: CF Assigned Organization: 0070 Quality Followup Req'd: C] Yes [-/j No For Fix Investigations Only: | ||
0070 Quality Followup Req'd: C] Yes [-/j No For Fix Investigations Only: ,1 Hardware / Degraded Condition Resolution Required? | ,1 Hardware / Degraded Condition Resolution Required? L1 Yes i; No If Yes: LI Repair Scicap D Rework F1 Use-As-Is | ||
L1 Yes i; No If Yes: LI Repair Scicap D Rework F1 Use-As-Is.J Acceptance of the CR Investigation signifies acceptance of the following items, as applicable: | .J Acceptance of the CR Investigation signifies acceptance of the following items, as applicable: | ||
Originator Identification Date Corrective Actions ( listed below) (listed below, if any) (listed below, if any)Cause Analysis Generic Implications I0 CFR 21 Decision Checklist Acceptance of Investigation: | Originator Identification Date Corrective Actions ( listed below) (listed below, if any) (listed below, if any) | ||
Date: Quality Approval: | Cause Analysis Generic Implications I0 CFR 21 Decision Checklist Acceptance of Investigation: Date: Quality Approval: Date: | ||
Date: Halliday, K 3/28/2003 Site-VP Acceptance: | Halliday, K 3/28/2003 Site-VP Acceptance: Date: | ||
Date: Closuro Comments: An investigation was conducted in accordance with the security contractor's company policy. During the investigation, the employee admitted to willful misconduct and his employment relationship with thE security contractor was terminated. | Closuro Comments: | ||
Quality Comments: CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Resp CA Sched CA Cause Org. Accept Due Completed Number: Type: Type: Code: Codes: CA Acceptance: | An investigation was conducted in accordance with the security contractor's company policy. During the investigation, the employee admitted to willful misconduct and his employment relationship with thE security contractor was terminated. | ||
Date: Date: Date: Page 1 of 1}} | Quality Comments: | ||
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Resp CA Sched CA Cause Org. Accept Due Completed Number: Type: Type: Code: Codes: CA Acceptance: Date: Date: Date: | |||
Page 1 of 1}} |
Latest revision as of 06:43, 23 March 2020
ML061160369 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Beaver Valley |
Issue date: | 03/12/2003 |
From: | Young R - No Known Affiliation |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
CR-03-02794, FOIA/PA-2005-0235 NOP-LP-2001-01 | |
Download: ML061160369 (2) | |
Text
el-,4.Rl s -1.2 -zo NOP-LP-2001-01 Bea3ver Valley Aq CONDITION REPORT CR Nimber TITLE: OFFICER INATTENTIVE TO DUTY DISCOVERY DATE TIME EVENT DATE TIME SYSTEM / ASSET#
3/11/2003 0555 03/11/03 0555 N/A N/A E QUIPMENT DESCRIPTION N/A DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION and PROBABLE CAUSE (if known) Summarize any attachments. Identify what, when, where, why, how.
Officer while on duty was observed being inattentive to duty.
0 R
I G
l N
A T IMMEDIATE ACTIONS TAKEN I SUPV COMMENTS (Discuss CORRECTIVE ACTIONS completed, basis for closure.)
l 'rhe Officer was relieved of duty and replaced with another Officer.
0 N QUALITY ORGANIZATION USE ONLY IDENTIFIED BY (Check one) El Self-Revealed ATTACHMENTS Quality Org. Initiated El Yes El Individual/Work Group El Intemal Oversight I Quality Org. Follow-up El Yes_, El No EJ Supervision/Management
_ l Extemal Oversight
_ , AE El Ye,. No__ 8N
) ORIGINATOR ORGANIZATION DATE ,3SUPERVISOR DATE PHONE EXT.
YOUNG, R. 3 l 0070 3112/2003 MIKLAVIC, L
- 1 3/12/2003 4- 7811 SRO EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY ORG. 4MMEDIATE ORG. WM =D CHANG17 REVIEW OPERABLE ASSESSMENT NOTIFIED INVESTIGATION NOTIFIED RESTRAINT P REQUIRED REQUIRED L D Yes ij No 0 Yes 0 No il N/ Rl Yes iR No N/A Yes R]No N/A n Yes TV No A MODE I ASSOCIATED TECH SPEC NUMBER(S) I ASSOCIATED LCO ACTION STATEMENT(S)
N NIAA EgN/A' :: #1 N/A -__
T #2 _ _ _ _ _
_ . #3 -_ __._._'_., _.
0 DECLARED INOPERABLE REPORTABLE? One Hour N/A APPLICABLIE UNIT(S)
P (Date I Time) Four Hour N/A E N/A n Eval Eight Hour N/A 0 lU U. L-i Both R lLiEval Required Other N/A A
T COMMENTS NIA 0
N Current Mode - Unit 1' Power Level - Unit 1 Current Mode - Unit 2 Power Level - Unit 2 S NN/AN/ N/A N/A SRO - UNIT I SRO - UNIT 2 DATE Approved By Supv Approved By Supv 3/12/2003 CATEGORY I EVAL ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION DUE DATE R REPORTABLE?
CF 0070 4/26/2003 G
E ElYes R No ElLER No.
CRPA TREND CODES Comp Type I ID Cause uL REPORTABILITY REVIEWER Process I Activity /Cause Code(s) (If Cause T or W) Org A Fedin, R SUPV LP1 0100 H04 0070 T_
01 DATE MRB Y. 03/12/03 INVESTIGATION OPTIONS I CLOSED BY DATE
[]Maint.Rule [JOEEvaluation l 3/31/2003
-I-Page 1 of I
1, INVESTIGATION
SUMMARY
CR Number:
03-(12794 NOP-LP-2001 -06 Category I Eval: CF Assigned Organization: 0070 Quality Followup Req'd: C] Yes [-/j No For Fix Investigations Only:
,1 Hardware / Degraded Condition Resolution Required? L1 Yes i; No If Yes: LI Repair Scicap D Rework F1 Use-As-Is
.J Acceptance of the CR Investigation signifies acceptance of the following items, as applicable:
Originator Identification Date Corrective Actions ( listed below) (listed below, if any) (listed below, if any)
Cause Analysis Generic Implications I0 CFR 21 Decision Checklist Acceptance of Investigation: Date: Quality Approval: Date:
Halliday, K 3/28/2003 Site-VP Acceptance: Date:
Closuro Comments:
An investigation was conducted in accordance with the security contractor's company policy. During the investigation, the employee admitted to willful misconduct and his employment relationship with thE security contractor was terminated.
Quality Comments:
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Resp CA Sched CA Cause Org. Accept Due Completed Number: Type: Type: Code: Codes: CA Acceptance: Date: Date: Date:
Page 1 of 1