ML093170166: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:2R19 WELD OVERLAY (WOL) EXAMINATION REPORT Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC) hereby provides the Examination Report for Ultrasonic Testing (UT) examinations of structural WOLs performed during refueling outage 2R19. Final examinations were completed on November 1, 2009.  
{{#Wiki_filter:2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 1 of 299 2R19 WELD OVERLAY (WOL)
 
EXAMINATION REPORT Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC) hereby provides the Examination Report for Ultrasonic Testing (UT) examinations of structural WOLs performed during refueling outage 2R19. Final examinations were completed on November 1, 2009.
A final stress analysis that documents weld overlay qualification including residual stresses, transient stresses, and flaw growth evaluation has been previously submitted to the NRC as attachment 3 to DNC letter dated July 23, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092090215).
A final stress analysis that documents weld overlay qualification including residual stresses, transient stresses, and flaw growth evaluation has been previously submitted to the NRC as attachment 3 to DNC letter dated July 23, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092090215).
Additionally, DNC has measured shrinkage of the piping as a result of the overlay application.
Additionally, DNC has measured shrinkage of the piping as a result of the overlay application.
The preliminary evaluation of shrinkage stresses arising from the weld overlays shows that the resulting stresses are within acceptable ASME code limits and have no significant impact on the associated piping or supports. Completion of these evaluations is tracked by the corrective action program (CA150207 and CA150954). Affected supports and restraints have been checked and remain satisfactory after overlay application. Analyses for the reactor coolant  
The preliminary evaluation of shrinkage stresses arising from the weld overlays shows that the resulting stresses are within acceptable ASME code limits and have no significant impact on the associated piping or supports. Completion of these evaluations is tracked by the corrective action program (CA150207 and CA150954). Affected supports and restraints have been checked and remain satisfactory after overlay application. Analyses for the reactor coolant system (RCS) branch piping that evaluate the impacts of weld shrinkage and stiffness are contained in separate changes to individual piping stress calculations. The impacts from shrinkage and stiffness are acceptable and the individual piping stress calculations will remain available on site for review.
Information included in the balance of this report is provided as follows.
: a. WOL examination results that includes a listing of indications detected and coverage limitations.
: b. The disposition of indications using the standards of ASME Section XI, IWB-3514-2 and/or IWB-3514-3 criteria.
c  A discussion of any needed repairs to the WOL material and/or base metal and the reasons for the repairs.
For items a and b, there were no 2R19 structural WOL indications noted in the submitted inspection reports. Any limitations to the inspections are noted in the following individual inspection reports.
Dissimilar Metal    Adjacent Welds (DMWs)        SS Weld        Location                                                  Page BSI-C-1001          BSI-C-1003      12-inch Cold Leg Safety Injection (SI) Loop 1A            3 BSI-C-3000          BSI-C-3002      12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 1B                              42 BSI-C-4000          BSI-C-4002      12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 2B                              81 BCH-C-2001          BCH-C-2003      2-inch Cold Leg Charging Loop 2A                        120 BPY-C-1001          BPY-C-1003      3-inch Cold Leg Spray Line Loop 1A                      150 BPY-C-3000          BPY-C-3002      3-inch Cold Leg Spray Line Loop 1B                      180 BPD-C-1017          BPD-C-1019      2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 1A                      210 BPD-C-2001          BPD-C-2003      2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 2A                      240 BPD-C-3000          BPD-C-3002      2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 1B                      270


system (RCS) branch piping that evaluate the impacts of weld shrinkage and stiffness are contained in separate changes to individual piping stress calculations. The impacts from shrinkage and stiffness are acceptable and the individual piping stress calculations will remain available on site for review.  
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 2 of 299 For item c, the following 2R19 structural WOL repairs were performed.
: a. BSI-C-4000 (Loop 2B Safety Injection Nozzle) - Liquid penetrant testing (LPT) of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.
: b. BCH-C-2001 (Loop 2A Charging Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.
: c. BPY-C-1001 (Loop 1A Spray Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT re-performed with acceptable results.
: d. BPD-C-1017 (Loop 1A Drain Nozzle) - While welding the 4th bead of the 309L sacrificial layer the welder observed an expulsion of molten metal from the puddle and stopped the welding process. The area was LP examined and excavated, 3/4 long x 3/8 wide x 1/16 deep until the indication was reduced to an acceptable size meeting the base material acceptance criteria of ASME III.
The areas adjacent to the excavation were measured by UT to determine the actual wall thickness immediately above and below the indication. A contour gauge was used to show the profile indicating that the remaining wall thickness at the indication was 0.326.
This is 0.025 above the 0.301 min. pipe wall thickness.
The excavation was then welded and blended flush with the adjacent base material, and was LPT examined to the Pre-overlay standards with acceptable results.
: e. BPD-C-1017 (Loop 1A Drain Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.
: f. BPD-C-3000 (Loop 1B Drain Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.


Information included in the balance of this report is provided as follows.
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 3 of 299 BSI-C-1001 / BSI-C-1003 12-inch Cold Leg Safety Injection (SI) Loop 1A
: a. WOL examination results that includes a listing of indications detected and coverage limitations.
 
: b. The disposition of indications using the standards of ASME Section XI, IWB-3514-2 and/or IWB-3514-3 criteria. 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 4 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 5 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 6 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 7 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 8 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 9 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 10 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 11 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 12 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 13 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 14 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 15 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 16 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 17 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 18 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 19 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 20 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 21 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 22 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 23 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 24 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 25 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 26 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 27 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 28 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 29 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 30 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 31 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 32 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 33 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 34 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 35 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 36 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 37 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 38 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 39 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 40 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 41 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 42 of 299 BSI-C-3000 / BSI-C-3002 12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 1B
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 43 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 44 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 45 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 46 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 47 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 48 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 49 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 50 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 51 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 52 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 53 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 54 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 55 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 56 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 57 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 58 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 59 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 60 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 61 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 62 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 63 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 64 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 65 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 66 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 67 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 68 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 69 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 70 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 71 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 72 of 299
 
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 73 of 299


c A discussion of any needed repairs to the WOL material and/or base metal and the reasons for the repairs.
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 74 of 299


For items a and b, there were no 2R19 structural WOL indications noted in the submitted inspection reports. Any limitations to the inspections are noted in the following individual inspection reports.   
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 75 of 299


Dissimilar Metal Adjacent Welds (DMWs) SS Weld Location Page BSI-C-1001 BSI-C-1003 12-inch Cold Leg Safety Injection (SI) Loop 1A 3 BSI-C-3000 BSI-C-3002 12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 1B 42 BSI-C-4000 BSI-C-4002 12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 2B 81 BCH-C-2001 BCH-C-2003 2-inch Cold Leg Charging Loop 2A 120 BPY-C-1001 BPY-C-1003 3-inch Cold Leg Spray Line Loop 1A 150 BPY-C-3000 BPY-C-3002 3-inch Cold Leg Spray Line Loop 1B 180 BPD-C-1017 BPD-C-1019 2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 1A 210 BPD-C-2001 BPD-C-2003 2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 2A 240 BPD-C-3000 BPD-C-3002 2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 1B 270
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 76 of 299


For item c, the following 2R19 structural WOL repairs were performed.
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 77 of 299
: a. BSI-C-4000 (Loop 2B Safety Injection Nozzle) - Liquid penetrant testing (LPT) of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.
: b. BCH-C-2001 (Loop 2A Charging Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.
: c. BPY-C-1001 (Loop 1A Spray Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT re-performed with acceptable results. d. BPD-C-1017 (Loop 1A Drain Nozzle) -  While welding the 4 th bead of the 309L sacrificial layer the welder observed an expulsion of molten metal from the puddle and stopped the welding process. The area was LP examined and excavated, 3/4" long x 3/8" wide x 1/16" deep until the indication was reduced to an acceptable size meeting the base material acceptance criteria of ASME III.
The areas adjacent to the excavation were measured by UT to determine the actual wall thickness immediately above and below the indication. A contour gauge was used to show the profile indicating that the remaining wall thickness at the indication was 0.326".
This is 0.025" above the 0.301" min. pipe wall thickness. 


The excavation was then welded and blended flush with the adjacent base material, and was LPT examined to the Pre-overlay standards with acceptable results.
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 78 of 299
: e. BPD-C-1017 (Loop 1A Drain Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results. f. BPD-C-3000 (Loop 1B Drain Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.   


BSI-C-1001 / BSI-C-1003 12-inch Cold Leg Safety Injection (SI) Loop 1A
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 79 of 299


BSI-C-3000 / BSI-C-3002 12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 1B}}
2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 80 of 299}}

Latest revision as of 01:32, 14 November 2019

Part 1 of 4--Weld Overlay Examination Report 2R19
ML093170166
Person / Time
Site: Millstone  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 11/12/2009
From:
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Sandeers, Carleen, NRR/DORL, 415-1603
Shared Package
ml093170104 List:
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0115
Download: ML093170166 (80)
v • d • e


Text

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 1 of 299 2R19 WELD OVERLAY (WOL)

EXAMINATION REPORT Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC) hereby provides the Examination Report for Ultrasonic Testing (UT) examinations of structural WOLs performed during refueling outage 2R19. Final examinations were completed on November 1, 2009.

A final stress analysis that documents weld overlay qualification including residual stresses, transient stresses, and flaw growth evaluation has been previously submitted to the NRC as attachment 3 to DNC letter dated July 23, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092090215).

Additionally, DNC has measured shrinkage of the piping as a result of the overlay application.

The preliminary evaluation of shrinkage stresses arising from the weld overlays shows that the resulting stresses are within acceptable ASME code limits and have no significant impact on the associated piping or supports. Completion of these evaluations is tracked by the corrective action program (CA150207 and CA150954). Affected supports and restraints have been checked and remain satisfactory after overlay application. Analyses for the reactor coolant system (RCS) branch piping that evaluate the impacts of weld shrinkage and stiffness are contained in separate changes to individual piping stress calculations. The impacts from shrinkage and stiffness are acceptable and the individual piping stress calculations will remain available on site for review.

Information included in the balance of this report is provided as follows.

a. WOL examination results that includes a listing of indications detected and coverage limitations.
b. The disposition of indications using the standards of ASME Section XI, IWB-3514-2 and/or IWB-3514-3 criteria.

c A discussion of any needed repairs to the WOL material and/or base metal and the reasons for the repairs.

For items a and b, there were no 2R19 structural WOL indications noted in the submitted inspection reports. Any limitations to the inspections are noted in the following individual inspection reports.

Dissimilar Metal Adjacent Welds (DMWs) SS Weld Location Page BSI-C-1001 BSI-C-1003 12-inch Cold Leg Safety Injection (SI) Loop 1A 3 BSI-C-3000 BSI-C-3002 12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 1B 42 BSI-C-4000 BSI-C-4002 12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 2B 81 BCH-C-2001 BCH-C-2003 2-inch Cold Leg Charging Loop 2A 120 BPY-C-1001 BPY-C-1003 3-inch Cold Leg Spray Line Loop 1A 150 BPY-C-3000 BPY-C-3002 3-inch Cold Leg Spray Line Loop 1B 180 BPD-C-1017 BPD-C-1019 2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 1A 210 BPD-C-2001 BPD-C-2003 2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 2A 240 BPD-C-3000 BPD-C-3002 2-inch Cold Leg Drain Line Loop 1B 270

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 2 of 299 For item c, the following 2R19 structural WOL repairs were performed.

a. BSI-C-4000 (Loop 2B Safety Injection Nozzle) - Liquid penetrant testing (LPT) of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.
b. BCH-C-2001 (Loop 2A Charging Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.
c. BPY-C-1001 (Loop 1A Spray Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT re-performed with acceptable results.
d. BPD-C-1017 (Loop 1A Drain Nozzle) - While welding the 4th bead of the 309L sacrificial layer the welder observed an expulsion of molten metal from the puddle and stopped the welding process. The area was LP examined and excavated, 3/4 long x 3/8 wide x 1/16 deep until the indication was reduced to an acceptable size meeting the base material acceptance criteria of ASME III.

The areas adjacent to the excavation were measured by UT to determine the actual wall thickness immediately above and below the indication. A contour gauge was used to show the profile indicating that the remaining wall thickness at the indication was 0.326.

This is 0.025 above the 0.301 min. pipe wall thickness.

The excavation was then welded and blended flush with the adjacent base material, and was LPT examined to the Pre-overlay standards with acceptable results.

e. BPD-C-1017 (Loop 1A Drain Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.
f. BPD-C-3000 (Loop 1B Drain Nozzle) - LPT of the sacrificial layer was unacceptable due to hot cracking. The area was repaired and LPT was re-performed with acceptable results.

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 3 of 299 BSI-C-1001 / BSI-C-1003 12-inch Cold Leg Safety Injection (SI) Loop 1A

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 4 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 5 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 6 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 7 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 8 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 9 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 10 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 11 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 12 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 13 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 14 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 15 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 16 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 17 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 18 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 19 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 20 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 21 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 22 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 23 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 24 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 25 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 26 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 27 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 28 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 29 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 30 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 31 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 32 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 33 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 34 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 35 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 36 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 37 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 38 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 39 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 40 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 41 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 42 of 299 BSI-C-3000 / BSI-C-3002 12-inch Cold Leg SI Loop 1B

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 43 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 44 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 45 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 46 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 47 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 48 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 49 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 50 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 51 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 52 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 53 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 54 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 55 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 56 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 57 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 58 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 59 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 60 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 61 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 62 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 63 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 64 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 65 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 66 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 67 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 68 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 69 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 70 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 71 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 72 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 73 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 74 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 75 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 76 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 77 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 78 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 79 of 299

2R19 WOL Examination Report Page 80 of 299

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML093170166&oldid=2139805"