ML18313A102: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Tobin, Jennifer To: "Helker, David P:(GenCo-Nuc)" Cc: "Gropp Jr, Richard W:(GenCo-Nuc)" | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Tobin, Jennifer To: "Helker, David P:(GenCo-Nuc)" | ||
Cc: "Gropp Jr, Richard W:(GenCo-Nuc)" | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review for Peach Bottom - Relief Request from ASME Section XI Code - 4th ISI interval I4R-63 (EPIDS L-2018-LLR-0133) | Acceptance Review for Peach Bottom - Relief Request from ASME Section XI Code - 4th ISI interval I4R-63 (EPIDS L-2018-LLR-0133) | ||
Date: Thursday, November 08, 2018 2:56:00 PM | Date: Thursday, November 08, 2018 2:56:00 PM | ||
==Dear Mr. Helker,== | ==Dear Mr. Helker,== | ||
By letter dated October 16, 2018 (ADAMS Accession Nos. | |||
ML18289A473 | By letter dated October 16, 2018 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML18289A473), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a relief request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3, that requests relief from certain requirements related the examination of the Standby Liquid Control (SLC) nozzle inside radius section that is included in the ASME Section XI Code, 2001 Edition and 2003 Addenda. | ||
), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a relief request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3, that requests relief from certain requirements related the examination of the Standby Liquid Control (SLC) nozzle inside radius section that is included in the ASME Section XI Code, 2001 Edition and 2003 Addenda. | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | The NRC staff has reviewed your request for relief and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this relief request in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this relief request will take a total of approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::130 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 16, 2019, as you requested. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your request for relief and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this relief request in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment. | |||
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | |||
You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC | |||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this relief request will take a total of approximately 130 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 16, 2019, as you requested. | |||
If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | |||
These estimates are based on the NRC | |||
Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | |||
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS. | Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS. | ||
Thanks,-Jenny}} | : Thanks, | ||
-Jenny}} | |||
Latest revision as of 04:41, 6 March 2020
| ML18313A102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 11/08/2018 |
| From: | Jennifer Tobin Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | David Helker Exelon Nuclear |
| Tobin J | |
| References | |
| EPIDS L-2018-LLR-0133 | |
| Download: ML18313A102 (1) | |
Text
From: Tobin, Jennifer To: "Helker, David P:(GenCo-Nuc)"
Cc: "Gropp Jr, Richard W:(GenCo-Nuc)"
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Peach Bottom - Relief Request from ASME Section XI Code - 4th ISI interval I4R-63 (EPIDS L-2018-LLR-0133)
Date: Thursday, November 08, 2018 2:56:00 PM
Dear Mr. Helker,
By letter dated October 16, 2018 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML18289A473), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a relief request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3, that requests relief from certain requirements related the examination of the Standby Liquid Control (SLC) nozzle inside radius section that is included in the ASME Section XI Code, 2001 Edition and 2003 Addenda.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request for relief and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this relief request in terms of protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this relief request will take a total of approximately 130 hours5.417 days <br />0.774 weeks <br />0.178 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 16, 2019, as you requested. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date (greater than a month) or significant changes in the forecasted hours (greater than 25%), the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
- Thanks,
-Jenny