ML19067A009

Revision 24 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 2, Figures. Redacted

ML19067A009
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	04/06/2019
From:	Justin Poole Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:	Bryan Hanson Exelon Nuclear
Poole J, NRR/DORL/LPLI, 301-415-2048
References
TMI-18-047
Download: ML19067A009 (66)

Text

>-

I i

)

J.,oI w I II CJ) 0::

I I 75° DELAWARE ,r L A N D

./

I Id ijl I Nuclear Update -1 76" TMI Unit-1 7/82 LEGEND POPULATION KEY Su.:e Capita: PHILADELPHIA .. _, n. 5110.CXXI General Area Map Courttv 5eat SCRANTON __ . 50,000 111 500.000 Cities. tow**s. or v1llaaes Uniontown 10,000 ID 50.000 8orperate bounOary Shown for towns Oli*r J C.aQO popu1a1u,n Gettysbur1 5.000 Ill 10.llllO B\Jilt ...;~ .-trea ~ ... uwir Tor towns ove" lL (.;~\... p0~*1.J'~i*Ci~ NIC- . . .IPss lllln S.000 fig. 2.1-1 Pop...c.oo: "'C!Wt.0 b'1oa1n o/ aer*

p. 2.FIG-1 ""Cfl"PILED iN ? i;t~,,

._ _.1, ..

I I

I ~---~~ .i. '

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL Id ijJJ Nuclear

."1*

-,_ Update - 1 l?1 I TMI Unit 1 7/82

/ Site Topography

.,. 5 Mlle Radius Fig. 2.1*2 p.2.FIG-2 ----------------

TRANSMISSION LINES TRANSMISSION LINES MEiZLERS *~

l~D SHELLe.'<

• ~'-ANO

-- ---- SCALE IN FEET y s90 10po

t. --..:.-- ~~-....... ~*

C.OLOS80R0 TMI Unit 1 Update - 16 4/02 Extended Plot Plan - TMINS

p. 2.FIG-3 CAD FILE: 6633R15.DWG Fig. 2.1-3

town Admire DISTANCE TOTAL CUI. TOTAL 0-1 II. 510 1-2 II. 1,790 2,380 2-3 II. 7,304 9,114 3-4 II. 8,931 18, 620 4-5 II. 7,371 25,918 5-10 II. 113, 803 131,511 18 ijJ I Nuclear Update -1

• EXCLUSION RADIUS TMI Unit-1 7/82 Population Distribution 0 to 10 miles - 1970

p. 2.FIG-4 Fig. 2.2-1

N

'0 \11LfS 142n NW ', NE 1980 ,;;. 29727 I~

WNW/ 8593 I

I wj E I

\

\

3809 3876 1

~ 1192 I , 695 ./

WSW /'---...._ ' ~652 i / ' ~' ESE

/ ~ ' "'-,

I ,' \ \

'\

I I

\

\ 2530

\ /

\ \

I /

\ /

SW 3963 3694 SE

\I 8196 SSE s

1980 ~T10N WITHIN 10 ..US OF Tiii - i BY RING AHO SECTOR ML.ES (8ASEO ON 1MO CENSUS DATA)

FROM N NNe NE E. . E EH SE SU s SSW SW WSW w WNW NW NNW RING TOTAL

~'

1*2 2-3 1

a3 31'8 31 137 280 29 137 221 31 137 221 41 120 22a 38 105 190 31 HM 180 n

111 31 37 QI 15 43 331 11 124 353 15 251 313 19 343 353 11 212 337 13 129 113 9

51 1291 371 2111 i.)Jq ate 3-4 5711 Ut 320 320 441 291 Z20 312 70I 4U 4M 4M 4M IOI 271 134 12297 w 1110 411 411 400 529 113 2n 211 411 401 Ml 131 Ml 114 17M 10M 10U0

!HO 1un 9112 4150 2513 12001 3171 2530 3H4 11M Ha 3M7 3IOI 5931 1593 29727 17249 133309

~10 250ll 10305 5274 3137 13351 4M7 3321 4503 1111 5213 5231 5551 7712 10370 32107 zos.w Hl7210 ld w~ JNuclear Update

• 8 TMI Unit 1 7/89 Population Distribution O to 10 miles

• 1980 Fig. 2.2*2 p.2. FIG-5

N 1990 NW ENE E

w 15379 WSW ESE SW SSW SSE s

1990 PCFlLATICJN WITHIN 10 MILES CF TMI-1 BY RING NE SECTCA CPCFl.LATI~ BASED m. 1990 CENSUS DATA)

MILES FR04 TMI-1 N NE t£ DE E ESE SE SSE s SSW SW WSW w WNW NW ,...., RING TOTAL 0-1 5 58 42 84 57 13 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 283 1-2 105 113 59 106 29 46 IOI 131 0 I 51 182 350 39 I I 1315 2-3 3418 137 174 126 74 140 210 214 172 441 244 169 137 62 40 1358 7116 3-4 5515 474 423 581 516 222 135 167 827 276 903 501 1665 302 190 1062 13759 4-5 440 347 306 597 617 313 407 34 1253 414 955 465 1593 474 2319 1186 11720 5-10 10190 17841 2937 2387 15379 3464 3003 2654 9319 5139 3099 2592 5061 17166 24672 15996 140899 Ell Nucl*er Update-12 11/94 TMI Untt I 0-10 19673 18970 3941 3881 16672 4198 3868 3212 11571 6271 5252 3909 8806 18043 27222 19603 175092 Popula1ton Dtet~tbutton 0 to 10 *tl** -1990 CACD fSIB,SKM,00,03'8,001-,0001 f tg. 2.2-3 P.2.FIG-6

N

\\ 16733 I I

NW/ \ NE

\

2 000 / 28838 6--~'--

4026 /

/

ENE WNW r , 2437 I

I I

I I

I wl  ;

E

,, I

\ 3695 639 --1.

'-, 3760

/

~ 157 675 NSW / ESE

'--~

/

/ \

I 2454 3576 \

SW

',,/

I I 3844 I

I I 7950 I

I

\

\

3584

\

\

\

SE s

2000 POPULATION WITHIN 10 Mtl.H OF TMl-1 BY RINO ANO SECTOR MILES (POPULATION PROJECTION BASED ON 1980 CENSUS DATA)

RING FROM N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE s SSW SW WSW w WNW NW NNW TOTAL i

7 j 30 21 3-7 *o 37 :M 25 30 15 11 15 19 ti 13 9 3A CH I I 133 1*2 81 133 133 117 102 102 II 31 *2 121 243 333 2~ 121 57 20M 2*3 JO~ 271 221 221 221 151 15e 111 4'2 321 342 342 :M2 327 177 12IO 8018

~ 5517 32* 310 310 428 2* 213 303 1115 4'2 *a 282 IOI 11-

• -5 175e 399 3ft 3U 510 417 270 211 477 3ft ~ 117 123 13' 1731 1oa 1050I 5-10 13850 IMO *021 2437 119'2 31eo 24~ 358' 7950 .... 3571

• • 5753 1331 2U31 11733 129320 0-10 2*:M5 9997 5117 3529 12951 *838 3229 4370 9120 5058 5071 5392 7550 10051 31147 19930 11221*

~Nuclear Update

• 8 TMI Unit 1 7/89 Population Distribution 0 to 10 miles

• 2000 Fig. 2.2*4 p.2.FIG-7

N

/ 16198 13145 8557

\ NE 27915 3897 2010 \ /

\

-\

\ / \

WNW /

I ENE 8069 2359 I

I w

E I

3577 3640 I NSW

/

ESE

"-..;/

2375

/

\

/

/

3469 SE SSE s

rI 2010 POPULATION WITHIN 10 MILES OF TUI-I BY RING AHO SECTOA IMllES FROM (POPULATION PAOJECTlON BASED ON 1980 CENSUS DATA)

RING ITMl-1 N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE s SSW SW WSW w WNW NW NNW TOTAL 0-1 7 29 27 38 39 38 33 2* 29 15 15 15 11 15 13 9 358 1*2 71 129 12' 129 113 99 99 13 35 41 117 235 322 241 122 55 r 2021 2*3 2958 212 214 214 214 151 151 151 421 311 331 331 331 317 171 1220 7711 3-4 5411 314 300 300 414 277 208 293 113 421 415 415 415 471 254 713 11511

• -5 1700 JM 381 371 494 411 211 2CM 412 377 521 517 I03 114 1171 1021 10170 5-10 13145 1557 Jn7 2351 11211 3MO 2375 3411 7891 3721 34e2 3577 5511 IOll 27115 11111 125182 0-10 23511 9177 4953 3414 12543 4184 3125 4229 9313 4891 4911 5220 7308 9737 30151 19293 157027 i Id ;Jl I Nuclear Update - 8 TMI Unit 1 7/89 Population Distribution O to 10 miles - 2010 Fig. 2.2*5 p.2.FIG-8

DISTANCE TOTAL CUM. TOTAL D-10 1111. 139,599 10-20 1111. 485,609 625,208 20-30 1111. 373,072 998,280 30-40 Jll I. 238,281 I' 236 511 I

40-50 1111. 659,206 1,865,717 l<l ijl I Nuclear Update -1 TMI Unit-1 7/82 Population Distribution 0-50 miles 1970

p. 2.FIG-9 Fig. 2.2-6

NNW --------~ NNE

/,/'

---

~~ 32541 ~.

5940

/// 36847 40 Ml.

NW/

// 50818 -........,

NE

/ 3927 /

21323

' ' 29996 -~ 63989 1980 \, \ ,i /

/

/ *~OML* .*

8772 ', ~ ~/

33828 \ 41971 ( 30749 '"1<.

3994 0

...VNW, I I

ENE 1C260 64139 \

29973

'.5836

,/ 5l175 \

4686 \

w* E

/

24021 52312 2C346 20346 20346 ,.,< 732:0

---~ 22869 , ESE 32851 33911

• , 19685 347 55 47262

/ PA.

29751 31062 161720 48539 L /

MO.

SW ,/SE 84662

'~~- 37257 185934 SSW SSE s

1980 POPULATION WITHIN 50 MILES Of TMI *I BY RING ANO SECTOR MILES (BASED ON 1980 CENSUS DATA)

F"ROfll RINO TMl*f N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE s SSW SN WSW w Wt#W NW NNW TOTAL

().10 25085 10305 5274 3837 13358 4987 3321 4503 8818 5213 5235 5558 7712 10310 32107 20!W4 117210 1G-20 25751 20510 17111 19a 33187 39512 21141 203a 203a 203..s 11244 18422 20543 11271 1- 25118 384411 20-30 4tll71 30741 29173 30842 37385 37385 3219 33111 34155 32151 14427 Ul851 33211 2011112 10290 331121 472(8)

~ llOll11 298118 39940 51175 42799 52312 47292 54031 181720 31082 19915 240:lt ....., 15131 am 21123 70820I 4'0-SG 32&41 38847 63111 84131 7'038I 73250 41531 84112 1851:M 37257 29751 8081 427'51 10110 lm7 18940 118227

().50 18S275 129408 158817 159181 197073 207498 111()131 1117453 412171 121721 18343 75012 141188 78355 757SS 1111151 2529201 l?ik1l Nuclear Update - 8 TMI Unit 1 7/89 Population Distribution O to 50 miles

• 1980 Fig. 2.2-7 p.2.FIG-10

/A..,"-,

~/ I I

',,NE

/ 9897 I ""' 63797 1990 I

39820

""' "\

I WNW I ENE 10139 29883 63946 '

I

/

15788 51022

/

30749 w 42623

\ 1936* , ; ,' * ' , ,~9463 ./

~ ~! 37253 23949 19187 I . 2ao51 / . s2155

-, I 20285 I 20285 \ 20285 "-</ ..

~ ~ ~-

73030 WSW \ 9034 14384 / '. 32770 /

/ . \. /

/ ~

ESE

/ 32752 33809 / ~

20095 I 34848 \ 4i548 ", .

~- 32654 59128 51428 181256 SW / SE

\ /

94906 208*32 SSE s

1990 POPUl.ATIOH WITHIN 50 MILES ~ TMl-I BY RING ANO SECT~

(POfl'UlATIOH PAO.ECTION BASED ON 1980 CENSUS DATA)

MllfS FROM _, RING TMl-1 ~ NNE NE ENE E ESE se sse s SSN SW WSW w WNW NW NNW TOTAL

().10 25020 1~ 5291> 3125 13317 4172 3311 4480 99117 5191 5211l 5542 7751 10331 32011 20482 1158712 10-20 25873 ~ 17757 11301 331117 ~ 29057 20295 20295 20295 11117 19* 20482 19220 1~ 25831 383312 20-30 *11'5 lOl9I 2993 31>7* 37253 37253 32770 3:.. 3..... 327'2 14314 111100 33182 20MO 10229 337'2'8 47tm>

30-40 80l35 2'lllOI -.zo 51022 4a. 52155 *r.Me 51121 1812'8 33M) 20095 ~ 4'7'29 1!5711 87..S 218!57 733231

<I0-50 l2SQ 31731 83717 ~ 70151 73030 !51"29 94IOI 208432 *17'8!5 32154 903.a 42123 10131 -7 189 8!51111 0-50 18!571t 129022 151517 1111852 1~ 208973 183122 907529 ~708 133940 91!537 7479t 1.S7SI 711125 75521 1187'13 2917011

('1 w~ I Nuclear Update

• 8 TMI Unit 1 7/89 Population Distribution O to 50 miles

• 1990 Fig. 2.2*8 p .2. FIG-1_1

N 35744 40 ML NW

• NE

// 9630 58998 29098 ".....,(/

"" 62074'" "'-,

I ,,

/

2000 /' / \ *~ / '*, A

/~

38745 8510

// \ 32816 4

0115 ' 29829 ,X' ' \

~

WNW /

9953 \ . / 29075 " _, , ENE 9866

""' /,< 25768\ 249801 !9896 /'---. /\ \ \ 52220

'5362 ""' / \ / / . .!9644

• "'Z t4603\ , . I 17278

/ 20083 I' ~ >~! \ 29919 \

19168 "'

~\\I 1 / 18788 I

I ~ ~ \;

wI 41472 36247 41516 68264 E I

I

\I

'27299

\ // I 50747 I I I 8790 ></ ...

... I

/ 11059 I WSW '

/

" ,, I ESE

""'" 'I

/

~6476 I 34042 /

" 35614

'\,

SW "*

s 20!>.0 POPULATION WITMN !IO MILES Of TMI* I BY RING ANO SECTOR MILES (POPUlATION PAO.ECTION BASED ON 1980 CENSUS DATA)

FROM RING 1MI _, N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE s SS# SW WSW w WtNt f<lW Nf<l'N TOTAL 0-10 2'345 .., 5117 3521 12191 4131 3221 4370 9820 S05I

!!071 5312 75!!0 100!58 311'7 19921 18221*

10-20 2-

• - 17271 11711 321M 3lm 27291 20230 19737 19737 1. .1 20CI 191* 1'803 25791 358012 20-30 <<>715 21121 29075 21119 31247 312*7 31- 32117 3<<M2 31- 131111 1MM 32291 20083 9953 32111 '51211 3CMO 6SO

~

31. .

am 357..

317.S 8207* l222D ....

41511 507*7 7109I

-.11 53ISS 5l5m 180291 105820 232<<112 ...

33121 190 39114 2331112 43511

• 1472 15312 1510 21217' 18'133 711375 0-!IO lll07'03 124* 152211 11M017 19111'1 201211 112129 221913 479083 1311157 930ill 72791 145233 7'537 ~ 11821* 2517GI

~Nuclear Update

• 8 TMI Unit 1 7/89 Population Distibution O to 50 miles - 2000 Fig. 2.2-9 p.2.FIG-12

N 34601 ""--,

40 Ml. )~

/ '-, NE 2010 /

57110 28167 SCC88~'.

30 Ml. / '\

/ 31766 \ 39413  ! 28874  ! 37505 \.\ /\*.,

WNW I I \

\I /

/ /

/ ""'- '. /'.

/ \

I 9635 \ ~ I 28144 ' * / \ 60229 'ENE

/ ,X 24944\ 241a1i 19250~ \ '\.

/ ' ' *' " -l8056 \

/ i4135 \ f I :6725 '*.

~*~./

18555 ' , *. , I / "'./

~-~./.

- ~\I.//

E 3: 45 \

22556 I

WSW\

SSE i

I I

I 174387 2506'5 s

2010 POP\JlATION wmtlN 50 Mtl£S Of TMH ev RING ANO SECTOR MILES (POP\JlATION ~OJECTION 8ASEO ON 1990 CENSUS OATAI FROM RING TMl-1 N NNe Ne ENe E ESE SE sse s SS# SW WSW w wtNt PM NPM TOTAL

()..10 23511 *77 ..s3 3414 12$13 ... 3125 '221 9313 ... 48111 5220 730I 9737 30151 19293 , 57'027 10-20 2'111 11211 18725 11117 311M 371* 29G 115&1 11108 11'108 18071 112311 19773 115!15 14135 2-..

34il819 20--30 31M13 211 .. 29m 350l7 35Gl7 311115 31 ... 33111 135-tl 15117 312:14 19'MO 9135 31711 304 57110 21117 37'505 *>117 *1zs *131 ~ 174317 32711 1..73 22551 42121 14110 12311 20587 1111219

~ 3()151 ,..,, 80229 lll071 91715 SS. 114127 250MS 50224 37907 97'5 4129 *1s 9511 I~ 914573

()..50 17.-0 120571 147411 1519'7 185080 I . . . . 152137 229772 *7'291 137712 93114 70879 1'1- 72411 71731 112837 25Sll22 Iri w' I Nuclear Update - 8 TMI Unit 1 7/89 Population Distribution O to 50 miles - 2010 Fig. 2.2-10 p.2.FIG-13

\

LUZERNE

{

Lf.i!ION )... ..-...... /

CQ..l.leIA

/ ~ CARBON

\.

SCKJYLKILL ' '°' '

./

\

,,\

w

~

r I

(

) *POPULATION CENTERS ,Afss Io 10 20 I

JO ~

(

SCALE......- MILES \

H:>WARO

"'""' -,,./ MONTGOMERY '-

EDm Nualear Update-12 11/94 TMI Untt I Countl** and Coamunttl**

o 50 *lle radtue p.2.FIG-14 SIA,SKM,00,0349,001-,0001 Ftg.2.2-11

TMI UFSAR Figure 2.2-12 Deleted

_1, ...

.;,:*- ... .,,, I t'

CONTROL INTERVAL 20 FEET

\ DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL Id wJI Nuclear Update - 1 TMI Unit 1 7/82 Site Topography Five Mlle Radius Fig. 2.4-1 p.2. FIG-16

TMI UFSAR Figure 2.4-2 Deleted

WIND ROSE THREE MILE ISLAND TOWER 5/15/67 thru 5/14/69 N

CALMS 3.93 °/o 18 ijl J Nuclear Update -1 TMI Unit-1 7/82 Wind Rose Three Mile Island Tower Fig. 2.5-1

p. 2.FIG-18

-- WIND ROSE CRAWFORD STATION 5/15/67 thru 5/14/68 N

CALMS 1.17%

,- 18 ijJ I Nuclear Update -1 TMI Unit-1 7/82 Wind Rose Crawford Station

p. 2.FIG-19 Fig. 2.5-2

)

/,.

\

I I o, \

I \ D~ {) \

.o:x~1~0-:s7s.-7:.---;t--------:1

\ Db-------Q I I \

\

' ' ..J ______ ,. ,.

~.o

._._ / I I

I I I

- - _ _./ I

.....x rn-s I

II I I

' ._ _J..S x 1ff6 /

I I

I UPDATE - 15 4/00 ANNUAL AVERAGE DIS PERSION ESTIM ATMOSPHERIC 1967-1969) ATE, xto ISOPLETH

(

p. 2.FIG-20 CAD FILE: 6648R15.DWG

TMI UFSAR Figure 2.5-4 through 2.5-6 Deleted

I Id ijJ l Nuclear Update -1 TMI Unit-1 7/82 Annual Average X/Q Isopleth Based on 4/71-3/72 Site delta T Data

p. 2.FIG-24 Fig. 2.5- 7

TMI UFSAR Figure 2.5-8 through 2.5-28 Deleted

N MIL[

"' ' 0 t di Sr*-*-*-*i  ;,1..-.~11:. *~ '"~c:.s

!IALTIMOffE j REFER TO TABLE 2.~-1 FOR IDE'H!rlSATIC~ OF ~ESEQVQIR I I ANO OTHER PERTINENT DATA i i NOTE:

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or expected to be updated for the life of the plant.

AmerGen TMI - UNIT 1 UPDATE - 15 4/00 RESERVOIRS AND LAKES WITHIN A 50 MILE RADIUS

p. 2.FIG-46 CAD FILE: 6674R15.DWG FIG 2.6-1

uJ s

"I =0 REFER TO TABLE 2.6-2 FOR IDENTIFICATIO~ CF WATER SUPPLY NOTE:

AmerGen TMI - UNIT 1 UPDATE - 15 4/00

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or OTHER WATER SUPPLIES WITHIN A 20 MILE expected to be updated for the life of the RADIUS plant.

p. 2.FIG-47 CAD FILE: 6675R15.DWG FIG 2.6-2

1-r-.-.~---~~---~--..._..~~~+rT-~.---,...._.,~_...+.ri-.,..,..,........,.,.....,..,...,._,.~r-+--..,.,........,.....r-h-...,..,..,.._.......g fl)

!t 9

LI..

!t 0

..J en 2

a

?.

ct

~

z ct e... t;

• 7.

• ... I

~

• ct lft "'>-

• .J

.. ~

a:

La.I

~

~

"'uz LI.I c:

a:

~

a:

....0

• s.:1~ ~01.:1 NOTE:

AmerGen TMI - UNIT 1 UPDATE - 15 4/00

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or INSTANTANEOUS LOW FLOW FREQUENCY expected to be updated for the life of the CURVE OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AT plant. HARRISBURG

p. 2.FIG-48 CAD FILE: 6676R15.DWG FIG 2.6-3

- 2'0 170 r-Ht 110 uo 120 r-

..* 11 t' I

• lot u

1111 J

I J

' 0 J J

I r-j 70 j

• 0 J

I0

~

.. ~

II' r

~

II'

• 1111

~

~

.ol

~

c..-

20 c..r

,~ ..

-~

-- ~-~

I I

I

• • 50 '° 70 " 100 ft!IC!NT OP TIMI NOTE:

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or AmerGen TMI - UNIT 1 UPDATE - 15 4/00 expected to be updated for the life of the plant. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AT HARRISBURG, PA, DISCHARGE DURATION CURVE

p. 2.FIG-49 CAD FILE: 6677R15.DWG FIG 2.6-4

10 10 ~ ........

....... I 1

\

60

\

\

1 1 I t*

00 50 ..

1 1

- f- -

0

-- I 1

, l j

J I c

z 0

I

• I I u .... il IU elt WI' I 1 \

~o ~ ...~ 1 1

1

\

1

~

I

.,,, " I '1 l *

'i~::.

I I 1 IU 'ii I ~ ,, ' 1

~

IU

• ""' ~

~ 1 1 ~

.,u " I .....,

'\o.4L- -

~

.. ' J

• l

,, ~

~ l I \

I I I 1

' '1 'cl u 30 I I

' , ', , , l I

J ~ l

'1 ,.I I I I I J

I~,

r. .

'\1 1 1 1

\

1 I

j J j

J J lo I

.. . ,, l \

I 1

' , j r'

J I

• • " -*.. , 1 ' \

20 I J .I JI C .. \ l l \

~- I

,.. 1 '

"' ' ' II I 1 ~ ~ I j

, ~

.~-:- ...... ..__

., ..' ........."' ..""' ~' ""' " \ '

.I 1 J r

-"" ~

l...i I

~

~ \ ~ ~

J '~~

~ 1 *

~

~

I

~

L..1111 ..

G j 10 , l..111111

~

lU I

~ \()~~~

... L...o- ... '-

.._. ... . . ~"

r' l...llllr~ ~

~ ..

.... t. T-

~~ ........

~ ......

~

~

r"'ll ....

1 I

I 1

' I

~

!,ill' "' -.........

. .~~~

~._

..1L:

-~!~

~ -~

~~~ "'

,,. .-~*~~ ~*'

~

.~*

-~ -~

I I I I , ............ ~

--:-1 I I I I i I-. I .... - . - : - . - I I I I I r I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I JAN. f El. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN.

NOTE:

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was AmerGen TMI - UNIT 1 UPDATE - 15 4/00 originally licensed, but is not intended or expected to be updated for the life of the plant. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AT HARRISBURG, PA, MEAN MONTHLY FLOW

SUMMARY

p. 2.FIG-50 CAD FILE: 6678R15.DWG FIG 2.6-5

- ____ ..,.. ---=--

0

- .... -*.;+..-. *

~--- ~-. =-- -:::r=-- -*

0 0 ~

N Q

-~-

~

-- w 1..-. ~ t ~+-

• - u

- .,,z 0 w

L - i . - - - - _,,. ...

-::.

0

-~:- . ..._ . 0 u

• - _..__ , __ z 0

0 ....

CD <

IX Q

0 L. - - , *- .:.. :.! . -*

'°

... --~*-.

... =

0 0

N

.. - * ':::::i:: t:

-'---:;'.:_:~~

0

• CUBIC FEET PER SECOND (1000)

• N 0 0

NOTE:

AmerGen TMI - UNIT 1 UPDATE - 15 4/00

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or "SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AT HARRISBURG, PA, expected to be updated for the life of the MINIMUM DAILY FLOW DURATION

SUMMARY

plant.

p. 2.FIG-51 CAD FILE: 6679R15.DWG FIG 2.6-6

~-----..,__ ________ - ..  !!!

- I I

. .. E .

CD @ @

I

--~~~~-~-----t------------+----=--------t=--~

I I  !

Mtll .......

(~ I

• =-----~'---------~--------------------~~------~~~--------------~---_-_-_-__,--#--lM_ll_

- J ..._._..&_*_*--f------

~-~---=---~~~~~------~~--t-1--~ .

STATION 9

~

~!!!_~1.----~~-r---~-+-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-+~~~-+-~~~~~~1--~~L-~~_;_--:--~~-~~~~~::::=::::===:=::::=='"--:~

z 0

ICAU STATION I STATION 3

© @

I 2 _ _~---+-~~....,:=t-~~-~---~

c ~-=::-:-:-=--;----;-------~-~--~~~-------------~-..:::::00,,,,,c_::i..r-+---+---+---T-------------~-v=:--~-~--;.r'.q:::::;_

,,. Oii

• • ~,~ ..'::'"

.::. ~-----=---1----------~---~-------------...,f-----+---+---4--~t------------+-

STATION 7 STATION 2 STAT ION 13

... II ! ©

~

+

© @ 0 I

~ =--~~~--t-l~-+-~~__,1--~~~-+~~~~~~~~1__1~~~~~~~~~--l.~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

! *~

IMlll Mlll lll&*D STATION 19 STATION II STAT ION 27 NOTE:

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or expected to be updated for the life Qf the plant.

AmerGenTMI-1 UPDATE - 15 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report TMI - UNIT 1 4/00 RIVER RIVER CROSS CROSS SECTIONS SECTIONS USEDUSED IN FLOOD IN LOW FLOW STUDIES STUDIES AND RIPRAP DESIGN

p. 2.FIG-51A Figure 2.6-6A CAD FILE: 6680R15.DWG Rev. 22, 04/14 FIG 2.6-6A

JU ,,,

) )IS @ JIS

~' lOS z

~

..... m 2!?

~

,~

lOO SJ!'

100 JOO, *OO. too' 1c au z ,..

...~<

~

,.. .....__ ___,2111 I

,,.. ~----,-- ~  :~

r"\1 Ii' '

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,1~10 (1) ~  !*0-*--+----\!.1,...--....,,-~,..+------\Y---

1* --- .

'-V I 10 I STAT ION 11 sTAT , o N 6  ! l'1'l

);'u n. 2011

• - ----- D!_l.t_ ~ * ,_ ,

l!E

'2 I -*m_J~ -~-----+------------

~

I I ~~: *~~-+--------4--+--------------- ___ _w

\ ~--1.lllf"'"IJ.l *JL***

J I

... ' <D z

Jte 2 . --+----~::::---t--------------------------! 1!! ~!!Ob' z 0

'!Cl 1 -* ____ "1!0 z

> Q -r_*__ ,,: < ....

~

... 2ff

<- ~ - - - * - ... =2111

- - - - Ullfl **LI 1HA11D -----------+-- 1*11 1"011 .1!_0

~

~ SMILLYS ISlAteO 170 ~ 1111 210 STAT ION 10 STATION 5 STATION IS NOTE:

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or expected to be updated for the life of the plant.

AmerGen TMI - UNIT 1 TMI-1 UPDATE - 15 4/00 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report RIVER CROSS SECTIONS USED IN LOW RIVER CROSS SECTIONS USED IN FLOOD STUDIES AND RIPRAP DESIGN FLOW STUDIES CAD FILE: 6681R15.DWG FIG 2.6-68

p. 2.FIG-51B Figure 2.6-6B Rev. 22, 04/14

)

... ~~~-+-+-+-~~~~~~~~~t-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4---~~~~~~~~~~~~---'

IL

~

~ ~~~~~~_...;~~~~~~~~+-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___;

IU STATION 32 STATION 21 0 JO' xx;*

HALI

.,.,... WAl L z

0 ...

STATION 31 STATION 20 Amer Gen TMI-1 UPDATE - 15 NOTE: TMIUpdated

- UNIT 1 Final Safety Analysis Report 4/00

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or RIVERCROSS RIVER CROSS SECTIONS SECTIONS USED INUSED FLOODIN LOW expected to be updated for the life of the FLOW STUDIES STUDIES AND RIPRAP DESIGN plant.

p. 2.FIG-51C Figure 2.6-6C CAD FILE: 6682R15.DWG FIGRev. 22, 04/14 2.6-6C

- - _>10

)

~----+--

© I

~~---,--

~

z

-0

~

<(

... !_19

~

STATION H STATION 23 O JO IOO' ICALI z

0

~

• --------------HI!

CTATtl"\~ "°' STATION 22 AmerGen TMI-1 UPDATE - 15 TMIUpdated

- UNIT 1 Final Safety Analysis 4/00 Report NOTE:

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was RIVER RIVER CROSS CROSS SECTIONS SECTIONS USED INUSED FLOOD IN LOW originally licensed, but is not intended or expected to be updated for the life of the FLOW STUDIES STUDIES AND RIPRAP DESIGN plant.

p. 2.FIG-51D Figure 2.6-6D CAD FILE: 6683R15.DWG FIG Rev.

2.6-6022, 04/14

no

<D

• JIO

)

w JOO z Jfll 0

v.

STATION 30 STATION 29 po \

I

'111 \ (!)

I

~----t----+--------------~----

I

---

+-"'

.......... ;;01 E -

wm \

I

~

z ro II 0

- I rl'

• 1°

\_

o JD(]

....... .!Ill I SCALI 2711 1711 STATION 36

~~------------------- ------------------------------------------------:-----------r--'A I -'"'~---=----~*~----+----~~~-~--+-----~---------------------------+-------j.__~---~

z 0

)!II IU AmerGen TMI-1 UPDATE - 15 TMI Updated

- UNIT 1 Final Safety Analysis4/00 Report STATIONS 35 & 39 STATION 24 NOTE: RIVER RIVER CROSSCROSS SECTIONSSECTIONS USED IN USED FLOOD IN LOW

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was STUDIES AND RIPRAP FLOW STUDIESDESIGN originally licensed, but is not intended or expected to be updated for the life of the CAD Figure FILE:2.6-6E 6684R15.DWG FIG Rev. 22, 04/14 2.6-6E

p. 2.FIG-51E plant. '-------------------

I He

') :ue I I JIO IU IU

~

- I CD <D I l

I G)

I -

- I r *-

/ . SMOI!

z 0

~

IA.I .....

m

/ I\ ~

/ ""'

STATION 25 - STATION 26 1cx/ JOC' t* I I

CD @

I

' ~ ~~ IAlllOAD I

I I

z 0 - ~ I I

I Wl!SY SHOltf I

- ' I -----

- ~l I 1711

\ --

~-

STATION 37 TMI-1 NOTE:

AmerGen Updated TMI - UNIT 1 UPDATE - 15 Final Safety Analysis Report 4/00

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or RIVER RIVER CROSSCROSS SECTIONS SECTIONS USED USED IN FLOODIN LOW expected to be updated for the life of the STUDIES AND FLOWRIPRAP STUDIES DESIGN plant.

p. 2.FIG-51F Figure CAD 2.6-6F FILE: 6685R15.DWG Rev.2.6-6F FIG 22, 04/14

)

_(=._@

119

... ~APflOll **OOll Of htlll Mill ISlA .. 0

---

~~~~~~~~~~~~~----~~~~~~~~~~~--r-~~~~~ -----~J!IO

... 10, Of * *

• Wl\1 SIOI STATION 211 IC&ll

... ~ CD I i-

~tlAttlOAD I

- I I

I -

\

WI" S"Oll I

~ - I

~

~ ~Of-~

---

 ;)_Ill

,,, Ill!

lft STATION 31 NOTE: TMI-1 UPDATE - 15

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was Amer TMI Updated Gen

- UNIT 1 Final Safety Analysis 4/00Report originally licensed, but is not intended or expected to be updated for the life of the plant. RIVER RIVER CROSS CROSS SECTIONS SECTIONS USED IN USED FLOOD IN LOW FLOWDESIGN STUDIES AND RIPRAP STUDIES

p. 2.FIG-51G Figure 2.6-6G CAD FILE: 6686R15.DWG FIG Rev. 22, 04/14 2.6-6G

RIVER DI Updated Fi ECR 11-00487 R1 Attachment 4A Figure 2.6-7 Markup of UFSAR Section 2.6 (update 20 with posted changes per ECR 10-00545 and 11-00426 already incorporated)

Page 14 of 16 River Discharge Frequency UFSAR Figure 2.6-7 2000000 1800000 1600000

• 41 1400000 E>

ftl z:.

~ 1200000

• Q

~

ff' 1000000 ,/I 2.

~

800000 0

u::

~

ii 600000

• 400000 200000

• 0 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000

p. 2.FIG-52 Recurrence Interval (Years) "Frequency"

SusquehannaRiverStage DischargeCurvesPATurnpikeBridgetoMariettaPA x100000 RiverFlow(CFS)(x100,000) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 330 330 HECRAS HighFlowModel>1,500,000cfs HECRASSplitFlowModel<500,000 CFS HECRAS IntermediateFlowModel500,000cfsthrough1,500,000cfs

(TheHECRASsplitflowmodelwasnot (CalibratedtoTropicalStormAgnes) 320 calibratedtoanyhistoriceventsinthisflow 320 range.ThesameManning'sNValuesasthe

IntermediateFlowModelwereusedto

calculatetheWSEforthismodel.The

310 Manning'sNvalueislikelyhigherthanthatis 310 whencalibratedatlowerflows.)

300 300 290 290 FeetNAVD88 280 280 270 270 DownstreamSideofShocksMillBridge UpstreamSideofShocksMillBridge YorkHavenTailwater 260 260 YorkHavenIntake HeadofTMI TurnpikeBridge TropicalStormAgnes DesignFlow 250 PMF 250 Marietta PA MariettaPA YorkHavenTailwater RiverFLO2D YorkHavenIntake RiverFLO2D HeadofTMIRiverFLO2D 240 240 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 RiverFlow(cfs)(x100,000)

TMI-1 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report STAGE DISCHARGE CURVES PA4-13 TURNPIKE BRIDGE TO MARIETTA p.2.FIG-53 Figure 2.6-8 Rev. 22, 04/14

')

12 ,. ,. * .. 72 ..

HOU*I

. .. IJI U2

('i TMI - 1 Ca:imNuclear Updated Final Safety AnalysisUpdate Report -1

• NOTE: The curve titled "1972 FLOOD AT HARRISBURG" has no known basis. Hydrographs for that flood show a curve similar in shape / duration to the other curves (see Figure 2.6-9a). TMI Unit-1 7/82

) Flood Hydrographs Flood Hydrographs Fig. 2.6-9

p. 2.FJG-54. Figure 2.6-9 Rev. 20, 04/10

ECR # 07-00902 Revision 000 Attachment #3 Page I of 1 RECOMMENDED NEW FSAR FIGURE 2.6-9a 2,000,000 , - - . . , - - - - , - - - - , - - - - . , - - - - . . . . . , . . . - - - . . - - - - .

1,000,000 i - - - + - - - - + - - -

900,000 1-----!----l--~

800,000 1 - - - - - - - -

0 700,000 r-----+----J,.J.

z 0 600,000 1 - - - - + - - - - i

(.)

~ 500,000 1 - - - - - ! - - - - / .

er LIJ 400,000 ,___ _........_ _

a.

l-t::1 300,000 1 - - - - - + - -

IJ..

~

tD

'.

) 200,000 ,___ _.;,._

u z

w

~

a::

<t

c 0

en 100,000 1--~-

o 90,000 i-------

80,000 1 - - - -

70,000 ,___ __,.

sopoor---Tb't:-=:~;....;.._1--,.---+-.::.,__:..~~""'-.;.;..::.-i.._:__:____JL.:L:..._.:._:..J 40,000 21 22 23 24 25 26 . 27 STATION NUMBER 01570500 JUNE 1972 STAGE AND DISCHARGE HYDROGRAPHS FOR SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AT HARRISBURG.

SOURCE DOCUMENT:

BULLETIN No. 9 HYDROLOGIC DATA OF THE JUNE 1972 FLOOD IN PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA TMI - 1 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report 1972 Flood Hydrograph Susquehanna River at Harrisburg

p. 2.FIG-54a Figure 2.6-9a Rev. 20, 04/10

)

SECTION 8-8, EAST CHANNEL

~...... <.._. See Figure 2.6-9C UPSTllAM fL 2*1 10 l.2H.AO See Figure 2.6-9B ........

s ......

-- S.:&.

-~

LEGEND NOTE:

'-u 2H n

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that does not

-e- STATION NQ change with time.

--- THALWEG OF STREAM AmerGen TMI-1 Updated Final Safety Analysis TMI - UNIT 1 Report- 15 UPDATE 4/00 OBSERVED WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS OBSERVED JUNE 1972 (HURRICANE WATER AGNES)

SURFACE ELEVATIONS FLOW = 1,020,000 CFS JUNE 1972 (HURRICANE AGNES)

FLOW = 1,020,000 CFS

p. 2.FIG-54A CAD FILE: 6690R15.DWG FIG 2.6-9A Figure 2.6-9A Rev. 22, 04/14

l':N ITMFAN FNn ~ ~

OF DIKE INTAKE SCREEN AND PUMP HOUSE DESIGN ELEV. 308.2 FT t ~g ELEV. 303.2 FT WITH STOP LOG PROTECTION 310.2 FT

_, .. 15 ~

! JI :c

.. !! ~

320 0 r*~~

(/)

z 0

I YORK HAVEN DAM _

~

~ [

~ 0 WEST CHANNEL n:: ~

c------;----- m 11-rT1-111r--cJ:=r=+=~=t==f===r=1-----N*'ORTHERN ..,"'a.. ~

D END n---- ~ OF DIKE ELEV. 309.2 FT i

,/ I at 300

!ls 7 ft P,VD- 0 8

'~ 'IW I

' * 'D SB f1 /

1' 96.4 t f

~9. 9 f 1 v a-as 300 .5 P J/ ..... _.

-- ~ a c:

0

-t-->

d 280 C'u

/

w (.,,._. Legend

+

260 r DBS. MIDDLE CHANNEL I

J

) wSE MIDDLE CHANNEL GROUND 240 60000 80000 100000 TMI-1Pltljllct No.: 780550000 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Mo_ in Cho_nnel Disto_nce (ft)

WATER SURFACE CALIBRATION HEC RAS MODEL - MIDDLE CHANNEL 3-7 TROPICAL STORM AGNES 1020000 CFS p.2.FIG-54B Figure 2.6-9B Rev. 22, 04/14

OF DIKE ~ ~

ELEV. 303.2 FT TMI UPSTREAMY~ORTHERN END ACCESS BRIDGE OF DIKE t ~g vn*>i, UA'"'" nAl<

ELEV. 309.2 FT _, .. 15:c

! JI

~

EAST CHANNEL .. !! ~

320 0 V

r*~~

(/)

DOWNSTREAM _ z 0

f--------+----+--ACCESS BRIDGE +-+---+-->----+-+----+--+--+----++-----+/____,,_/-+----+--+----+----+--+----< ~

~

~

[

0 n:: ~

/

m I/ D

..,"'a.. ~

i

~

I ta a

9< ,0 ft f 99 Ft A D-88 AV _ 88 I - - 300 .9 P

_. .,_ <AVD- 8 300 II VD 88 ~~ \ ' ' 7 ft

/"3 - '-"'""' \,<i<J,4 f~ V D-88 I NAVD 81 c:

0

-t-->

d 280 C'u w

v Legend

, +

260 DBS. EAST CHANNEL J wSE EAST CHANNEL I

r-...' GROUND 240 60000 80000 100000 TMI-1Pltljllct No.: 780550000 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Mo_ in Cho_nnel Disto_nce (ft) WATER SURFACE CALIBRATION HEC RAS MODEL - EAST CHANNEL 3-8 TROPICAL STORM AGNES 1020000 CFS p.2.FIG-54C Figure 2.6-9C Rev. 22, 04/14

)

s ......... . Figure 2.6-10 Deleted t.1.it

---Ht--- WATll SUlfACI CON TO UIS NO AND MANNINGS STATION IOUGHNI SS .COEFFICIENT 1AmerGen UPDATE 151 TMI _ UNIT 1 4/00 NOTE: RMATION that was

-1 HISTORICAL INF? the plant was

~ t the time

• tended or ed but is not in life of the originally lice~~ u'pdated for the accurate 1964 FLOOD LEVELS expected to plant.

p. 2.FIG-55 I CAD FILE: 6693R15.DWG Rev. 22, 04/14 FIG 2.6-10_J

p. 2 .FIG-55

)

USGS *EL 117.'1 GAi

• llL t ...O

~ ... .. ~"'.

Figure 2.6-11 Deleted

~

• • ~-

• 41::ii!.:.'iliii~;i1~1~,~~~~~;m;~:.'*:.b. ,~c;~:.....,._ _

u*a*. &L . . . . , IAYlll .,

• • 1

• llL IN.I CAVIii llL 1e1.1 lllAIT OP' R.R.t UGEND 0.030 WATER SUIFACE STATION NO. AND MANNINGS ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT CONTOUIS AmerGen TMI - UNIT 1 UPDATE - 15 4/00 NOTE:

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was accurate at the time the plant was 1936 FLOOD LEVELS originally licensed, but is not intended or expected to be updated for the life of the

p. 2.FIG-56 plant. Rev. 22, 04/14

p. 2.FIG-56 CAD FILE: 6694R15.DWG FIG 2.6-11

0 0

0

" * *1 o.*oo

• c ~.

-~*

~

....... ~

LIGIND

-***--- WA Tll SUlfACI CONTOUIS MANNINGS STATION NO .COIUFICllN IOUGHNISS AND t TMI-1 1AmerGen UPDATE Updated Final Safety Analysis Report TMI _ UNIT 1 4/00 NOTE:

These water surface elevations and velocities DESIGN FLOOD LEVELS for a flow for a flow of 1,100,000 NOTE: RMATIONcfsthatwere was the basis

1. HISTORl~A~h~~?me for the design of the site inundation the pita n.t t=~~ed or DESIGN FLOOD LEVELS projection.

accurate The a predicted d butconditions is no in for a. f the flow orig. of inally license 1,100,000 '

cfs upda t o be have tbeen ed for the life o superseded expected byplant.

those in Reference 38. Figure 2.6-12 Rev. 22, 04/14 ICAD FILE: 6695R15.0WG FIG 2.6- 12_J

p. 2.FIG-57

Figure 2.6-14 Deleted UGI ND WATll SUUACI CONTOUIS NO AND MANNINGS STATION IOUOHNIS S . COIFPICll NT 1*AmerGen UPDATE 151 TMI _ UNIT 1 4/00 NOTE: RICAL INFORMA Tl ON lant that was was

~

1. HISTO t the time the p . tended or accurate d but is not m rte of the originally expected l1ce~~e to u'pdated for the I PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD plant.

p. 2.FIG-58

p. 2 .FIG-58 (CAD FILE: 6696R15.DWG Rev. 22, FIG 04/14 2.6- 12._J

WILKES-BARRE I

I s I I

I.

0 6 11 30 36 42 54 HOURS NOTE:

1. HISTORICAL INFORMATION that was TMI-1 accurate at the time the plant was originally licensed, but is not intended or AmerGen Updated TMI - UNIT 1 Final Safety UPDATE - 15 Analysis Report 4/00 expected to be updated for the life of the plant. PRECIPITATIONS FROM HYDROMET NO. 40 RECIPITATIONS FROM HYDROMET NO. 40

p. 2.FIG-59 Figure 2.6-14 CAD FILE: 6697R15.DWG Rev.

FIG 22, 04/14 2.6-14

(b) (5)

(b) (5)

(b) (5)

'° 0

~

o'

~

~

~

0

~-------------'--------------""------------....JL-.-------------'-----.ll..------...Jo II\ ~ M N - O 0 0 0 0 c)

SPECTRAL ACCELERATION (1)

Id ijl I Nuclear Update -1 TMI Unit-1 7/82 Acceleration Response Spectra

p. 2.FIG-63 Fig. 2.7-1

)

• ..*=-.

.uw.t!l. - - ---

11*1

• • t - .... -

/< ~-- -'-...

Tt I

_,_J""~

.\ ~ / ~

~. ,.,

i

?i~c

~*=~

' .. \\.t

. ~*

,1.

i.

\ ~\\ ...

1:1.~.~~) -,~

-., .0;

.. \

( . ).

~(

~ _,._

Update -1 7/82 I

p. 2 .FIG-64

)

g q 300 ~------~~~---~~--~~------a4=-~ --------------~~-------------~a

+~=---------------~-------~~--------+-------------------------------,300 EllSTING GIAOI

=~ *ED.DENSE SANDY SILT -

a 300 r----S-OIE-GR-AY_EL_ _ i:r-:r------~.'.rr*~;:~;r§"----==:::::;;;ffi7F=f:::=:=;:;::;;;:::=~-1--1 JOO L E 6 END 2 400 *~*-~'

F\/m.<;.,;_. .ff_ GRllUllDIATIRLEVEL 280 CLAY 260 L..~'.:.."."."....'...'.~~---------1_1.~oo_o_F_11_sE_c._~-+------------+------------~2eo 28G ffil SILT 4+0DI 2+DOI o+oo 2+DOE 4+DOE  !+DOE 0+00 2+00E 4*DDE  !+DOE ID+OOE 12*0111 LLW 26+DOH - LINE A SO+ODS - LINE E SAND GlllYEL p BC~LDERS 280 IED. HARD TO HAllO 821 POSSIBLE IEATNIRED ROCK INTERBEDDED SHALYSILTSTOllEI L __ _ _ _ _ _ __:.:..c.:::.:...:..:.:...:o:::___-f-----cL_n_sT_DN_E_ _ _ _ _-,r-_-1_1_.s_oo_F_r1_s1_c._ _ _ _ _ _~ 280 TOP OF ROCK FRI* DRILL NOLE DATA llllRI OIFFERINT FROI SEISllC DATA 3B+OON 34+00N 32+00N 30+01111 28+00N 28+00ll 6+001 - LINE F TOP OF ROCK DELINEATED IT APPROX.

SEISllC VELOCITY IN EXCESS OF ID,000 FT/SEC.

PERCENT OF IOCI CORE RECOVER!

300 SEISllC VELOCITIES SNOIN IN DVEIBllRDEN APPLY TD ENTIRE DEPTH.

280 210~-----~

!,500 FT/SEC. 8,600 FT/SEC.

(+001 2+001 O+OO 2+0DE 3&+01111 J4+0DN 34+011H - LINE C 2+001 - LINE G 2+00E - LINE H 4+00E - LINE J

=

~ - - - - - - + - - - - - - - ; f - - - - - t - - - - , 300 NOTES*

f===;~====~~~=3:=~::::=;;;,::::;:::::::7~=~=====--~~~==t~;;=;;,;:=i===[==r.EO.DENSE 300 I. REFER TD ijAI SOIL CLASS If I CATION SHEETS FOR STANDARD PENETRATION VALUES.

FINE Sil TY SAND

2. FOR DENSITY OF GllANUUR SOILS 280 DESl&llATIOll (N)VILUE V.DINSE > 50 BPf DENSE 31-50 8PF IED.OINSE 11-30 BPF LOOSE 5-10 BPF 260 Y. lOOSE 0-4 BPf 6+001 4+001 D+OD 2+DDE 4+00! 6*0DE

3. FOR COllSISTENCT Of COHESIVE SOILS

~Nuclear 38*00N - LI NE D APPRDX.UNCONFIHID OESIGNATICN HARD COIPR.STAENGTH

> 4.0 TSF 2.0-4.D TSF Update -1 I.STIFF STIFF IED.STlff son 1.0-2.0 !SF D.H.OTSf D.25-D.5 m TMI Unit-1 7/82 Y.SOFT < 0.25 !SF Subsurface Profiles

p. 2.FIG-65 Fig. 2.7-3

. - '*** ~> .

• ~

~: ..

.... ~

'!"~.~.

SUSQ UCHi'.NN""-

D C~*Y m

L:&:J D

n i..:.:w

~. -~-**.. r**,.

T~or-

... ...u °"'"... -*&

,~

_.I.NT - ~-.,_TA,

'tOP W MC. .. -~1 ..&AT*a

........... Slla .. oc: '4..-C:ITY IM &WCl9S _, . . . . . n/W&

ca::im Nuclear Update -1 i TMI Unit-1 7/82 Seismic Refr1ction Test Boring Pl1n

p. 2.FIG-66 Fig. 2.7-4