ML14090A440

North Carolina State University - Annual Report for 2013

ML14090A440
Person / Time
Site:	North Carolina State University
Issue date:	03/25/2014
From:	Hawari A I North Carolina State University
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML14090A440 (26)

Text

NC STATE UNIVERSIfY-l Attn: Documen US 11555 Ro Rockville, Re: Annual Ri License N Docket N In accordance wi attached.If you have any q contact Gerald V I declare under p Executed on 25 Ik Ayman I. Hawari, Director, Nuclear North Carolina St

Enclosures:

Annual Operatinj Attachment A: P.North Carolina State University is a land- Nuclear Reactor Program Grant university and a constituent institution Of The University of North Carolina An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Nuclear Reactor Program Campus Box 7909 Raleigh, North Carolina 27695 http://www.ne.ncsu.edu/nrp/index.html Director 919.515.4598 Office 919.515.7294 (Fax) 919.513.1276 Shipping Address: NC State University 2500 Stinson Dr.Raleigh, NC 27695 25 March 2014 it Control Desk ar Regulatory Commission)ckville Pike MD 20852 eport for 2013 o. R-120 o. 50-297 th Technical Specification 6.7.4, the annual operating report for our facility is luestions regarding this correspondence or require additional information, please dicks at 919-515-4601 or wicks@ ncsu.edu.enalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct.March 2014.Ph. D., r Reactor Program tate University g Report for 2013 ULSTAR Reactor Environmental Radiation Surveillance Report Aoa NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING PULSTAR REACTOR ANNUAL REPORT DOCKET NUMBER 50-297 For the Period: 01 January 2013 -31 December 2013 The following annual report for 2013 is submitted in accordance with Section 6.7.4 of the North Carolina State University PULSTAR Reactor Technical Specifications:

6.7.4.a Brief Summary: Reactor operations have been routine during this reporting period. The primary and secondary cooling systems were modified with new equipment.

The changes made were reviewed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 and made using an approved design change. The reactor was shutdown for the cooling system modifications.

Commissioning procedures and power ascension testing were used to confirm operation of the primary and secondary cooling systems and to assess changes made to radiation shielding prior to resuming normal operations.

Details are provided in Section 6.7.4.e.Operating experience including a summary of experiments performed.

Reactor operations have been routine during this reporting period. The following is a brief summary of the types of experiments performed:

Teaching Laboratories, Short Courses, and Research* Core thermal power measurements

• Dynamic reactivity measurements

• Axial power and peaking factor measurements (flux mapping)* Reactor power determination using photodiode arrays* Neutron fluence and spectral measurements

• In-core detector certification

• Accelerated lifetime testing for nuclear detectors* Neutron radiography

• Positron production facility* Neutron Diffraction

• Isotope Production Neutron Activation Analysis* Crude oil* Food samples* Fish tissues* Laboratory animal tissue* Human hair, nails, and urine 1

• Polymers and plastics* Sediment/soil/rocks

• Silicon crystals* Textiles* Water Reactor Utilization

-2013 Education 4%Service 42%Research 52%Figure 1 -Reactor Utilization by Protocol Utilization Education Research Service Surveillance Hours 106 1227 46 980 Percent 5%52%2%42%100%TOTAL 2359 NOTE: Utilization hours (2359 h) exceed critical hours (1007 h) since there was typically more than one user of the reactor facility at a given time.2 ii Changes in Performance Characteristics Related to Reactor Safety: None iii Results of Surveillance, Tests, and Inspections:

The reactor surveillance program has revealed no significant or unexpected trends in reactor systems performance during this reporting period. The Reactor Safety and Audit Committee (RSAC) performed its annual audit for the facility and determined that all phases of operation and supporting documents were in compliance.

6.7.4.b Energy Output and Critical Hours: Total Energy Output in 2013: 40.517 Megawatt.days Critical hours in 2013: 1007.15 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br /> Cumulative Total Energy Output Since Initial Criticality:

1545.07 Megawatt-days 6.7.4.c Number of Emergency and Unscheduled Shutdowns:

Emergency Shutdowns

-NONE Unscheduled Shutdowns

-Ten 22-FEB-2013 09-AUG-2013 Reactor SCRAM -Linear Level Monitor Over-Power SCRAM -The SCRAM was caused by static electrical discharge when reactor operator touched the instrumentation drawer.No over power condition existed. The reactor was cleared for restart.Reactor SCRAM -Low Flow SCRAM -Between 09-AUG-2013 and 04-OCT-2013 following the installation of the new nitrogen-16 delay tanks and annubar flow measuring system nine Low Flow SCRAMs occurred.

This was due to entrained air in the primary piping system. As the entrained air entered the flow measuring system it would cause spikes in the measurement and trigger a false low flow reading. At no time was there a low flow condition.

After each occurrence the system was vented, calibrated and the reactor was cleared for restart.6.7.4.d Corrective and Preventative Maintenance:

Preventative maintenance, tests and calibrations are scheduled, performed and tracked utilizing the PULSTAR Surveillance File System. Each major component of the Reactor Safety System defined in Section 3.3, and all surveillance required by Section 4 of the Technical Specifications are monitored by this file system to ensure that maintenance and calibrations are performed in a timely manner. All historical data relating to those components, in addition to many other sub-systems, are maintained in these files.785 Auxiliary Generator

-The PRE-HI ENG TEMP light came on during the monthly generator check.It was determined that this was due to low coolant level. Coolant was added and the condition cleared.786 Log N and Linear Level Monitor -The NON-OP light came on during the startup checklist.

It was determined that the high voltage power supply was faulty and was replaced.

The monitor was calibrated and placed back into service.3 787 Auxiliary Generator

-The battery for the auxiliary generator was replaced.

This was a preventative maintenance activity.788 Installation of Rosemount Annubar -The Rosemount Annubar was installed as per DC741. The primary piping was partial drained and subsequently refilled for this installation.

789 Primary Demineralizer Pump -The mechanical shaft seal was leaking and was replaced.790 Primary and Secondary System Replacement

-The primary and secondary piping was replaced as per DC744 and DC745.791 Source Range Monitor/Fission Chamber -The source range monitor failed high, CPS _ 10'. It was determined that the failure was due to a faulty fission chamber. A new fission chamber, cables and connectors were installed.

The monitor was calibrated and placed back into service.792 RTD2 and Transmitter

-RTD2 (pool temperature) and transmitter was replaced.

The channel was calibrated and returned to service. This was a preventative maintenance activity.793 Flow Channel -A Low Primary Flow SCRAM occurred during operation.

It was determined that entrained was causing fluctuations in the measurement.

The system was vented, calibrated and placed back into service. There was never a low flow condition.

794 Flow Channel -A Low Primary Flow SCRAM occurred during operation.

It was determined that entrained was causing fluctuations in the measurement.

The system was vented, calibrated and placed back into service. There was never a low flow condition.

6.7.4.e Changes in Facility, Procedures, Tests, and Experiments:

Facility Changes Design changes to the reactor facility were reviewed to determine whether or not a 10CFR5O.59 evaluation was required.

Based on the reviews, DC741 and DC745 required a 10CFR50.59 evaluation.

The following design changes were made: 741 Installation of Rosemount 485 Annubar pak-lok Assembly -This design change allowed for the installation of the Rosemount 485 Annubar with pak-lok assembly.

This change for the characterization of the annubar system and comparison to the Flow Orifice Measuring System. It does not allow for the use of the device for reactor operation.

744 Removal and Installation of Primary and Secondary Coolant Systems -This design change detailed the process of removing the primary and secondary components that were being replaced in Design Change 745.745 Primary and Secondary Cooling System Modifications

-This design change details the replacement of the primary and secondary components in preparation for the reactor power upgrade to 2 MW.757 Control Console Annunciator Modification

-This design change allows for the installation of separate annunciators that alert the reactor operator of personnel entry into various high radiation areas located in the reactor building.759 Waste Water Processing System -This design change allows for the installation of waste water filtration system to reduce liquid discharge volume and activity and to recycle water for re-use in the reactor pool.761 Process Air Flow Monitoring

-This design change allows for the installation air flow monitoring 4

devices in the effluent systems.Document Changes Procedure changes were reviewed to determine whether or not a 10CFR50.59 evaluation was required.Based on the reviews, none required a 10CFR50.59 evaluation.

740 Emergency Procedure 2 -Off-site Notification

-Updated Attachment 2 -The State of North Carolina Authentication Code List. This was classified as a minor change.746 Commissioning Procedure (CP) 1.0 -Cooling System Task List -This new procedure detailed the task required to commence reactor operations following the completion of Design Change 745.747 Commissioning Procedure (CP) 2.0- Primary System -This new procedure detailed the steps required to refill and test the primary system following the completion of Design Change 745.748 Commissioning Procedure (CP) 3.0- Secondary System -This new procedure detailed the steps required to refill and test the secondary system following the completion of Design Change 745.749 Temperature Channel Calibration

-PS-1-10:S1

-Revised the procedure to incorporate changes to the temperature measuring channel following the completion of Design Change 745.750 Flow Channel Calibration

-PS-2-03:S1

-Revised the procedure to incorporate changes to the flow measuring channel following the completion of Design Change 745.751 Flow Monitoring Channel Check Calibration

-PS-4-06-1:Sl

-Revised the procedure to incorporate changes to the primary system that affected how the channel check was performed following the completion of Design Change 745.752 NRP-OP-101

-Reactor Startup and Shutdown -Revised the procedure to incorporate changes following the completion of Design Change 745.753 NRP-OP-103

-Reactor Operation

-Revised the procedure to incorporate changes following the completion of Design Change 745.754 NRP-OP-105

-Response to SCRAMS, Alarms and Abnormal Conditions

-Revised the procedure to incorporate changes following the completion of Design Change 745.755 NRP-OP-201

-Primary Demineralizer

-Revised the procedure to incorporate changes following the completion of Design Change 745.756 Commissioning Procedure (CP) 4.0 -Reactor Cooling Control System Test -This new procedure detailed the steps required to test the performance of the primary and secondary system following the completion of Design Change 745.758 NRP-OP-105

-Response to SCRAMS, Alarms and Abnormal Conditions

-Revised the procedure to include operator instructions for high radiation area entry alarms following the completion of Design Change 757.760 PS 6-16-2:W/M/A

-Processing, Sampling, Analyses, and Assessment of Liquid Effluent -Added waste water processing and clarified water assessment for TSS and TDS and solubility.

762 PS 6-20-1:A1

-Dwyer Air Velocity Transmitter Calibration, Operation, and Maintenance

-New procedure for the calibration operation and maintenance of the Dwyer 641 Air Velocity Transmitter.

763 HP5 -Access Control and Training -New procedure to establish requirements for personnel access to the facility.764 HP1 -Radiation Protection Program -Revised the procedure to remove information that was included in HP5.5 Test and Experiments There were no new experiments or changes to existing experiments.

Other Changes There were no other changes.6.7.4.f Radioactive Effluent: Liquid Waste (summarized by quarters)i. Radioactivity Released During the Reporting Period: Releases to the sanitary sewer are given below: (1) (2) (3) (4)1 (5)Period Number of Total Total Diluent Tritium Batches vici Volume Liters pci Liters 01 JAN -31 MAR 13 2 114 6.84E3 8.17E4 105 01 APR -30 JUN 13 3 377 1.02 E4 6.09E4 370 01 JUL -30 SEP 13 3 217 1.02E4 8.46E2 216 01 OCT -31 DEC 13 2 130 6.703E3 3.43E4 126 2013 817 jtCi of tritium was released during this year.2013 838 RCi of total activity was released during this year.1Based on gross beta activity only. Tritium did not require further dilution.ii. Identification of Fission and Activation Products: The gross beta-gamma activity of the batches in (i) above were less than 2x10s 5 pCi/ml. Isotopic analyses of these batches indicated low levels of typical corrosion and activation products.

No fission products were detected.iii. Disposition of Liquid Effluent not Releasable to Sanitary Sewer System: All liquid effluent met the requirements of 10CFR20 for release to the sanitary sewer.Gaseous Waste (summarized monthly)i. Radioactivity Discharged During the Reporting Period (in Curies) for: (1) Gases: Total Time Year Month Curies Hours 2013 JANUARY 744 1.713 FEBRUARY 672 1.384 MARCH 744 1.764 APRIL 720 0 6 MAY 744 0 JUNE 720 0 JULY 744 0 AUGUST 744 1.736 SEPTEMBER 720 2.271 OCTOBER 744 1.669 NOVEMBER 720 1.032 DECEMBER 744 1.150 TOTAL 8784 12.717 (2) Particulates with a half-life of greater than eight days: Particulate filters from the Stack Particulate Monitoring Channel were analyzed upon removal. There was no particulate activity with a half-life greater than 8 days indicated on any filter during this reporting period.ii. Gases and Particulates Discharged During the Reporting Period: (1) Gases: Total activity of Argon-41 released was 16.699 curies in 2013.The yearly average concentration of Argon-41 released from the PULSTAR reactor facility exhaust stack in 2013 was 8.7x10 8 pCi/ml. Dose calculations for the year were performed using methods given in the Final Safety Analysis Report. Dose calculations gave results less than the 10 CFR 20 constraint level of 10 mrem.These results are consistent with environmental monitoring data given in Attachment A.(2) Particulates:

Refer to gaseous waste i.(2) above. Low levels of naturally occurring radioactivity were detected.Solid Waste from Reactor i. Total Volume of Solid Waste Packaged Total volume of solid waste was 78 ft3.57 ft 3 of dry uncompacted waste 21 ft 3 of ion exchange resins ii. Total Activity Involved Total activity for solid waste was 3.9 mCi.1.5 mCi of dry uncompacted waste 2.4 mCi of ion exchange resins iii. Dates of shipments and disposal A total of three transfers to the university broad scope radioactive materials license were made in 2013.The University Environmental Health and Safety Center arranges disposal of hazardous wastes.7 6.7.4.g Personnel Radiation Exposure Report: Twenty-six individuals were monitored for external radiation dose during the reporting period. Internal dose monitoring was not required for any individual.

Collective deep dose-equivalent for 1 Jan 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 was 2.207 person-rem.

Individual deep dose-equivalent ranged from 0.001 rem to 0.286 rem with a median of 0.067 rem and average of 0.085 rem.6.7.4.h Summary of Radiation and Contamination Surveys Within the Facility: Radiation and contamination surveys performed within the facility indicated that:* Radiation in the majority of areas was 5 mrem/h or less.* Radiation in the remaining areas was higher due to reactor operations.

• Contamination in most areas was not detectable.

When contamination was detected, the area or item was confined or decontaminated.

6.7.4.i Description of Environmental Surveys Outside of the Facility: Refer to Attachment A for results of environmental sampling and analysis.Radiation surveys performed in unrestricted areas near the reactor facility indicated that: Radiation was at background levels for most areas (average background is approximately 10 grem/h).Contamination was not detectable.

Net radiation readings ranged from 0 to 50 prem/h while the reactor was operating at power.However, radiation was at background levels in all routinely occupied spaces.Water samples from Rocky Branch Creek were analyzed in 2013 for tritium, gross beta activity, gross alpha activity, and gamma radiation.

All sample results were consistent with background radioactivity.

Environmental monitoring of Rocky Branch Creek is routinely performed in accordance with facility procedures.

8 ATTACHMENT A PULSTAR REACTOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION SURVEILLANCE REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2013[JANUARY 1, 2013 -DECEMBER 31, 2013]NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY CENTER RADIATION SAFETY DIVISION by Ralton J. Harris Environmental Health Physicist 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Table 1 Environmental Monitoring Programs for the PULSTAR Reactor 2. AIR MONITORING Table 2.1 Location of Air Monitoring Stations Table 2.2 Airborne Gross Beta Activities Table 2.3 Airborne Gamma Activities (LLD Values)Table 2.4 Regulatory Limits, Alert Levels and Background Levels for Airborne Radioactivity

3. MILK Table 3.1 1-131 in Cow's Milk 4. SURFACE WATER Table 4.1 Gross Alpha and Beta Activity in Surface Water Table 4.2 LLD Values for Gamma Emitters in Surface Water 5. VEGETATION Table 5.1 Gross Beta Activity in Campus Vegetation Table 5.2 LLD Values for Gamma Emitters in Vegetation

6. OPTICALLY STIMULTATED DOSIMETERS Table 6.1 Environmental Dosimeter Doses 7. QUALITY CONTROL INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Tables 7.1a -7.1e 8. CONCLUSIONS PAGE NO.11 12 13 13 13 14 14 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 21-24 25 10 INTRODUCTION The Environmental Radiation Surveillance Program exists to provide routine measurements of the university environment surrounding the PULSTAR Reactor. The specific objectives of this program include: " Providing information that assesses the adequacy of the protection of the university community and the public-at-large;" Meeting requirements of regulatory agencies;* Verifying radionuclide containment in the reactor facility;* Meeting legal liability obligations;" Providing public assurance and acceptance.

11 TABLE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE PULSTAR REACTOR AT NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY SAMPLE STACK GASES STACK PARTICLES WATER FROM REACTOR FACILITY AIR PARTICLES AT 5 CAMPUS STATIONS 1 AIR DOSE AT 8 CAMPUS STATIONS 2 SURFACE WATER ROCKY BRANCH CREEK ACTIVITY MEASURED GROSS GAMMA GROSS BETA GAMMA EMITTERS GROSS BETA GROSS GAMMA TRITIUM GROSS BETA GAMMA EMITTERS TLD DOSIMETER GROSS BETA GAMMA EMITTERS CONDUCTED BY N.E.N.E.N.E.N.E.N.E.N.E.RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD PREVIOUS FREQUENCY CONTINUOUS MONTHLY PRIOR TO DISCHARGE (~ MONTHLY)WEEKLY WEEKLY QUARTERLY QUARTERLY QUARTERLY CURRENT FREQUENCY CONTINUOUS MONTHLY PRIOR TO DISCHARGE (- MONTHLY)QUARTERLY QUARTERLY QUARTERLY QUARTERLY QUARTERLY BASIS FOR MEASUREMENT 10 CFR 20 T.S. 6.7.4 10 CFR 20 T.S. 6.7.4 10 CFR 20 T.S. 6.7.4 CITY OF RALEIGH ORDINANCE 10 CFR 20 10 CFR 20 10 CFR 20 NCSU NCSU TRITIUM N.E.QUARTERLY 10 CFR 20 VEGETATION GROSS BETA RSD SEMI- EVERY OTHER NCSU NCSU GAMMA RSD ANNUALLY YEAR NCSU CAMPUS MILK 1-131 RSD MONTHLY EVERY OTHER NCSU LOCAL DAIRY YEAR ABBREVIATIONS USED IN TABLE: N.E. = NUCLEAR ENGINEERING/REACTOR FACILITY; RSD/EHSC = RADIATION SAFETY DIVISION.'THESE 5 STATIONS INCLUDE: WITHERS, DANIELS, BROUGHTON, D.H. HILL LIBRARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY CENTER.2THESE 8 STATIONS INCLUDE: PULSTAR REACTOR, A CONTROL STATION (EH&S) AND THE 5 AIR SAMPLING STATIONS, AND NORTH HALL.12

2. AIR MONITORING (TABLES 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4)Air monitoring is performed continually for one week during each of four (4) quarters during the year. The data in Table 2.2 are for gross beta activity levels measured during the year. Figures 2a through 2e show bar graphs of gross beta activity (fCi/cubic meter vs. sampling quarters per year). The highest gross beta activity observed was 19.0 fCi/cubic meter at the Withers Hall station during the week of 07/08/13 to 07/15/13.

The annual campus average was 12.6 fCi/cubic meter.Table 2.3 lists LLD values for several gamma emitters which would be indicative of fission product activity.

No gamma activity due to any of these radionuclides was detected.Table 2.4 lists regulatory limits, alert levels, and average background levels for airborne radioactivity.

TABLE 2.1 LOCATION OF AIR MONITORING STATIONS SITE BROUGHTON DIRECTION 1 SOUTHWEST NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST NORTHEAST DISTANCE 2 METERS ELEVATION 3 METERS 125 192-17+11 DH HILL DANIELS WITHERS 90 82-8-6-3-4 EH & S CENTER NORTH HALL WEST 1230 NORTHEAST 402 1 DIRECTION

-DIRECTION FROM REACTOR STACK 2 DISTANCE -DISTANCE FROM REACTOR STACK 3 ELEVATION

-ELEVATION RELATIVE TO THE TOP OF THE REACTOR STACK TABLE 2.2 AIRBORNE GROSS BETA ACTIVITY (fCi.m" 3 meter +/- 20)PERIOD BROUGHTON DH HILL DANIELS WITHERS EH&S 03/04 -03/11 10.5 +/- 1.0 16.6 +/- 1.2 12.0 +/- 1.1 8.7 +/- 1.0 15.5 +/- 1.1 05/28 -06/04 8.2 +/- 0.9 12.5 +/-1.0 7.9 +/- 0.9 11.8 +/- 1.0 10.9 +/- 0.8 07/08 -07/15 12.1 _ 1.0 16.3 +/- 1.1 16.3 + 1.1 19.0 +/- 1.2 9.0 +/- 0.8 11/11 -11/18 9.6 + 1.0 15.9 +/- 1.1 15.1 + 1.1 15.0 +/- 1.1 9.8 +/- 0.9 13 TABLE 2.3 AIRBORNE GAMMA ACTIVITY LLD VALUES (fCi.m" 3)PERIOD CO-57 CO-60 NB-95 ZR-95 RU-103 RU-106 CS-137 CE-141 CE-144 2013 03/04- 03/11 0.21 0.35 0.29 0.47 0.27 2.37 0.26 0.38 1.22 05/28 -06/04 0.20 0.37 0.28 0.48 0.28 2.48 0.29 0.34 1.28 07/08 -07/15 0.18 0.35 0.31 0.54 0.33 2.51 0.29 0.43 1.40 11/11 -11/18 0.17 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.32 2.41 0.29 0.39 1.41 NOTE: NO GAMMA ACTIVITY DUE TO ANY OF THESE RADIONUCLIDES WAS DETECTED.TABLE 2.4 REGULATORY LIMITS, ALERT LEVELS, AND BACKGROUND LEVELS FOR AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY (fCi.m 3)NUCLIDE REGULATORY LIMIT INVESTIGATION LEVEL AVERAGE N.C.BACKGROUND LEVEL GROSS BETA CS-137 CE-134 NB-95 ZR-95 1000 2 X 10 5 2 X 10 5 2 X 106 500 100 100 100 100 20 2 0 0 0 400 THIS DATA REPRESENTS AN AVERAGE VALUE MEASURED IN NORTH CAROLINA AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS.

EXCERPTED FROM 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE REPORT PRODUCED BY THE NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT

& NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RADIATION PROTECTION SECTION.14

3. MILK (TABLE 3.1)Milk samples are collected every other year from the Campus Creamery and the Lake Wheeler Road Dairy as processed milk and raw milk and analyzed for 1-131. Data given for 2013 show that no 1-131 activity was detected.TABLE 3.1 1-131 IN COW'S MILK (pCi.Liter

+/- 2c) LLD -3 pCi.Liter 1 PCI LITER" 1 DATE CAMPUS CREAMERY LAKE WHEELER NOVEMBER 2013 < 3 < 3 15

4. SURFACE WATER (TABLES 4.1 AND 4.2)Table 4.1 gives the gross alpha and beta activities for water from Rocky Branch at points where it enters (ON)and exits (OFF) the campus. The LLD value for gross alpha and beta activities is -0.4 pCi Liter 1.For gross alpha activity the Investigation Level is 5 pCi Liter" and the Regulatory Limit is 15 pCi Liter'. For gross beta activity the Investigation Level is 12.5 pCi Liter' and the Regulatory Limit is 50 pCi Liter'. Gamma analysis of all samples was also performed.

All the results are consistent with the presence of naturally-occurring radionuclides and none of the gamma emitters listed in Table 4.2 were detected.TABLE 4.1 GROSS ALPHA AND BETA ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER (pCi.Liter

+/- 20)LLD, -0.4 pCi.Liter"'

LLDp -0.4 pCi.Liter

-1 pCi Liter -1 DATE LOCATION GROSS ALPHA FIRST QUARTER 2013 ON OFF GYM SECOND QUARTER 2013 THIRD QUARTER 2013 ON OFF GYM 1.5+/-0.5 0.1+/-0.3 0.1+/-0.3-0.1+/-0.2-0._1+/-0.2 0.0+/-0.2 0.4+/-0.3 0.4+/-0.3 0.1+/-0.2 3.8+/-0.7 2.6+/-0.6 3.1+/-0.7 2.7+0.6 3.5+0.7 3.5+0.7 GROSS BETA 6.3+/-0.8 1.0+/-0.6 1.0+/-0.6 ON OFF GYM'FOURTH QUARTER 2013 ON 0.675+/-0.958 0.741+/-1.06 0.246+/-0.758 1.46+0.693 1.72+0.666 2.02+0.704 OFF GYM'Fourth Quarter gross alpha and gross beta water results were provided by a contracted analytical lab due to lab instrumentation problems.16 TABLE 4.2 LLD VALUES FOR GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER NUCLIDE LLD (pCi.Litera)

Co-60 0.4 Zn-65 0.7 Cs-137 0.3 Cs-134 0.4 Sr-85 0.4 Ru-103 0.3 Ru-106 3.0 Nb-95 0.4 Zr-95 0.5 17

5. VEGETATION (TABLE 5.1 & 5.2)Tables 5.1 gives gross beta activities for grass samples collected on the NCSU Campus. Table 5.2 lists LLD values for several gamma emitters.

The vegetation sampling is performed every other year. All the results are consistent with the presence of naturally-occurring radionuclides and none of the gamma emitters listed in Table 5.2 were detected.TABLE 5.1 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN CAMPUS VEGETATION

• LLD -0.5 pCi'g" 1 DATE SAMPLE LOCATION (pCi.g" 1 +/- 2a)08/02/2013 NORTH CAMPUS 11.5+/-0.8 08/02/2013 SOUTH CAMPUS 12.9+/-0.8 08/02/2013 EAST CAMPUS 13.7+/-0.9 08/02/2013 WEST CAMPUS 12.9+/-0.8 TABLE 5.2 LLD VALUES FOR GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION NUCLIDE LLD (pCi.gramz)

Co-60 0.01 Zn-65 0.02 Cs-137 0.01 Cs-134 0.01 Sr-85 0.01 Ru-103 0.01 Nb-95 0.01 Zr-95 0.02 18

6. OPTICALLY STIMULATED DOSIMETERS (TABLE 6.1)Dosimeter analysis is contracted to Landauer, Inc. for determination of ambient gamma exposures.

Exposures are integrated over a three-month period at each of the six air monitor stations listed in Table 2.1 and at the PULSTAR Reactor facility.

A control dosimeter is located in the Environmental Health & Safety Center. Table 6.1 gives the dose equivalent data for these eight (8) locations.

The dose equivalents are reported as millirem per quarter year. Readings which fall below the dosimeters' minimum measurable quantities (i.e., 1 millirem for gamma radiations and 10 millirem for beta radiation) are reported by the contract vendor with the designation "M". The observed readings are typically within the expected range for natural background radiation levels.Historically, dosimeter readings for D.H. Hill Library monitoring station have often been higher than those for the other campus stations due to its location inside a concrete penthouse.

Pursuant to a recommendation made in the NCSU PULSTAR 2001 Annual Self-Assessment, two additional TLDs were included at the D.H. Hill Library station to supplement the existing dosimeter.

These higher readings have been due to natural radioactivity as confirmed by both gross beta and gamma isotopic analyses of air particulates.

This dosimeter station will be moved to another outside location beginning with the 2 nd Quarter of 2014. Only one (1)dosimeter will be deployed at the new location.19 TABLE 6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETER DOSES DATE WITHERS DANIELS BROUGHTON DH HILL EH&S PULSTAR NORTH CONTROL 2013 01/01 -M M M 52,42,47 M 30 M 43 03/31 05/10- 1 1 1 3 M 141 1 25 06/302 07/01- 1 7 7 21,24,20 2 233 8 30 09/30 10/01- M M M 27,19,27 M 25 1 35 12/31'CONTROL DOSE WAS 30 mrem FOR PULSTAR DOSIMETER.

22ND QUARTER DOSIMETERS WERE NOT PROVIDED BY THE VENDOR COMPANY UNTIL MAY 10, 2013.3CONTROL DOSE WAS 42 mrem FOR PULSTAR DOSIMETER.

ENTRIES FOR DH HILL ARE FOR THREE INDEPENDENT DOSIMETER READINGS FOR THAT STATION FOR 1 sT 3 RD AND 4 QUARTERS.CONTROL ENTRIES ARE FOR BACKGROUND DOSIMETER READINGS (SEE NOTES 1 AND 3 FOR EXCEPTIONS TO CONTROL DOSE USED).THE DESIGNATION "M" IS USED BY THE CONTRACT VENDOR FOR REPORTING DOSE EQUIVALENTS BELOW THE MINIMUM MEASURABLE QUANTITY WHICH IS 1 MILLIREM FOR GAMMA RADIATION AND 10 MILLIREM FOR BETA RADIATION.

ALL REPORTED VALUES AR DEEP DDE.20

7. QUALITY CONTROL INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM The Environmental Radiation Surveillance Laboratory (ERSL) in the Radiation Safety Division has analyzed samples provided by the U.S. DOE Mixed-Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP Test Session 28)Radiological and Environmental Sciences Laboratory (RESL) during this reporting period. The objective of this program is to provide laboratories performing environmental radiation measurements with unknowns to test their analytical techniques.

The MAPEP value listed in the Tables 7.1 (a-e) to which the ERSL results are compared is the mean of replicate determinations for each nuclide. The MAPEP uncertainty is the standard error of the mean.For each reported radiological analyte, the laboratory result and the reference value may be used to calculate a relative bias:%Bias = (1 00)(Laboratory Re suit -RESL Re ferenceValue)

RESL Re ferenceValue The relative bias will place the laboratory result in one of three categories:

Acceptable Bias < 20%Acceptable with Warning 20% < Bias < 30%Not Acceptable Bias > 30%TABLE 7.1a GROSS ALPHA & BETA ACTIVITY AIR FILTER -INTERCOMPARISON STUDY 01 February 2013 NCSU -ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS RADIONUCLIDE REPORTED REPORTED MAPEP ACCEPTANCE VALUE ERROR VALUE RANGE GROSS ALPHA 1.43 0.11 1.20 0.36 -2.04 GROSS BETA 0.98 0.04 0.85 0.43 -1.28 THE SAMPLE CONSISTS OF ONE 50 MM DIAMETER SIMULATED FILTER SPIKED WITH A MATRIX-FREE SOLUTION CONTAINING A SINGLE ALPHA AND A SINGLE BETA EMITTING NUCLIDE. THE REPORTED VALUES AND THE KNOWN VALUES ARE GIVEN IN BO/FILTER.

21 TABLE 7.1b MULTINUCLIDE AIR FILTER -INTERCOMPARISON STUDY 01 February 2013 NCSU -ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS RADIONUCLIDE 1 REPORTED 'REPORTED MAPEP ACCEPTANCE VALUE ERROR VALUE RANGE Co60 0.06 0.12 False + Test Cs137 2.40 0.16 2.60 1.82-2.38 Cs134 0.121 0.05 1.78 1.25 -2.31 Co57 2.11 0.12 2.36 1.65-3.07 Mn54 4.31 0.24 4.26 2.98-5.54 Zn65 3.51 0.22 3.13 2.19-4.07 THE SAMPLE CONSISTS OF ONE 50 MM DIAMETER GLASS FIBER FILTER WHICH HAS BEEN SPIKED WITH 0.10 GRAM OF SOLUTION AND DRIED. THE REPORTED VALUES AND THE KNOWN VALUES ARE GIVEN IN BO./FILTER.

NOTE: THE ENTRY "-------" INDICATES NO ANALYTE WAS PRESENT FOR PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING A FALSE POSITIVE (+) TEST.'THE LISTED VALUE (0.12) WAS A DATA ENTRY ERROR MADE DURING DATA SUBMISSION TO THE MAPEP PROGRAM. THE CORRECT VALUE SHOULD HAVE BEEN 1.20.22 TABLE 7.1c MULTINUCLIDE WATER SAMPLE -INTERCOMPARISON STUDY 01 February 2013 NCSU -ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS RADIONUCLIDE REPORTED REPORTED MAPEP ACCEPTANCE VALUE ERROR VALUE RANGE Co60 20.0 1.0 19.56 13.69 -25.43 Cs137 -0.05 2.0 False + Test Cs134 21.0 1.0 24.4 17.1- 31.7 Co57 28.2 2.2 30.9 21.6-40.2 Mn54 27.8 1.8 27.4 19.2 -35.6 Zn65 33.3 2.6 30.4 21.3 -39.5 THE SAMPLE CONSISTS OF A SPIKED ALIQUOT OF ACIDIFIED WATER (-5 % HNO 3). THE REPORTED VALUES AND THE KNOWN VALUES ARE GIVEN IN BQ/LITER.NOTE: THE ENTRY "-".......

INDICATES NO ANALYTE WAS PRESENT FOR PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING A FALSE POSITIVE (+) TEST.TABLE 7.1d GROSS ALPHA AND BETA WATER SAMPLE -INTERCOMPARISON STUDY 01 February 2013 NCSU -ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS RADIONUCLIDE REPORTED REPORTED MAPEP ACCEPTANCE VALUE ERROR VALUE RANGE Gross Alpha 2.22 0.46 2.31 0.69 -3.93 Gross Beta 13.03 0.30 13.0 6.5 -19.5 THE SAMPLE CONSISTS OF A 5% HNO 3 MATRIX FREE SOLUTION.

THE REPORTED VALUES AND THE KNOWN VALUES ARE GIVEN IN BQ/LITER.23 TABLE 7.1e MULTINUCLIDE VEGETATION SAMPLE -INTERCOMPARISON STUDY 01 February 2013 NCSU -ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS RADIONUCLIDE REPORTED REPORTED MAPEP ACCEPTANCE VALUE ERROR VALUE RANGE Co60 5.18 0.31 5.85 4.10-7.61 Cs137 6.71 0.52 6.87 4.81-8.93 Cs134 0.21 0.28 False + Test Co57 8.72 0.68 8.68 6.08 -11.28 Mn54 0.20 0.25 False + Test Zn65 6.13 0.76 6.25 4.38-8.13 THE SAMPLE CONSISTS OF A SPIKED SAMPLE OF VEGETATION.

THE REPORTED VALUES AND THE KNOWN VALUES ARE GIVEN IN BQ/SAMPLE.

NOTE: THE ENTRY "-"......" INDICATES NO ANALYTE WAS PRESENT FOR PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING A FALSE POSITIVE (+) TEST.24

8. CONCLUSIONS The data obtained during this period do not show any fission product activities.

The observed environmental radioactivity is due primarily to radon progeny, primordial radionuclides (e.g. K-40) and those radionuclides which originate in the upper atmosphere as the result of cosmic ray interactions.

These facts justify the conclusion that the PULSTAR Reactor facility continues to operate safely and does not release fission product materials.

25